Abstract
The clash between positivist and constructivist research methodologies in organization studies has sent many researchers to look for a ‘third way’ in critical realism and more recently in pragmatism. Building on John Dewey’s work, this article develops a position where the fallible nature of all knowledge is acknowledged and the value of science is anchored to its ability to resolve genuine human problems. It is argued that this kind of ontological experientialism and epistemological fallibilistic instrumentalism offers the most original and defensible version of pragmatism as a philosophy of science. In it, science is seen as an outgrowth of ordinary inquiry, and thus it starts and ends in experiencing, is always constrained by fallibilism, proceeds utilizing abduction, and instead of ‘knowledge’ it produces warranted assertions. However, as pragmatist inquiry is always done with ends-in-view, pragmatism retains the possibility to evaluate the value of different theories and propositions, and thus sees scientific research as an inherently ethical activity. The position is contrasted to positivism, constructivism, critical realism and more realist interpretations of pragmatism to show its uniqueness, and its basic implications for research practice are explained.
References
Section:
| Abbott A. (2004). Methods of discovery: Heuristics for the social sciences. New York: W. W. Norton & Co. Google Scholar | |
| Al-Amoudi I., Willmott H. (2011). Where constructionism and critical realism converge: Interrogating the domain of epistemological relativism. Organization Studies, 32, 27–46. Google Scholar Link | |
| Alexander T. M. (1987). John Dewey’s theory of art, experience, and nature: The horizons of feeling. Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar | |
| Alexander T. M. (1993). John Dewey and the moral imagination: Beyond Putnam and Rorty toward a postmodern ethics. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 29, 369–400. Google Scholar | |
| Alvesson M., Kärreman D. (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1265–1281. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Alvesson M., Sköldberg K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research: 2nd Edition. London: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar | |
| Argyris C. (1977). Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review, 55, 115–125. Google Scholar | |
| Astley W. G. (1985). Administrative science as socially constructed truth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 497–513. Google Scholar | |
| Baert P. (2003). Pragmatism, realism and hermeneutics. Foundations of Science, 8, 89–106. Google Scholar | |
| Barad K. (1998). Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences, 10, 87–126. Google Scholar | |
| Bhaskar R. (1998a). General introduction. In Archer M., Bhaskar R., Collier A., Lawson T., Norrie A. (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings (pp. ix–xxiv). Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Bhaskar R. (1998b). Philosophy and scientific realism. In Archer M., Bhaskar R., Collier A., Lawson T., Norrie A. (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings (pp. 16–47). Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Bhaskar R., Lawson T. (1998). Introduction: Basic texts and developments. In Archer M., Bhaskar R., Collier A., Lawson T., Norrie A. (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings (pp. 3–15). Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Boisvert D. (1998). Dewey’s metaphysics: Ground-map of the prototypically real. In Hickman L. A. (Ed.), Reading Dewey: Interpretations for a postmodern generation (pp. 149–166). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Bradbury H., Reason P. (2003). Action research: An opportunity for revitalizing research purpose and practices. Qualitative Social Work, 2, 155–175. Google Scholar Abstract | |
| Brown M. J. (2012). John Dewey’s Logic of Science. Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 2, 258–306. Google Scholar | |
| Burke T. (1994). Dewey’s New Logic: A reply to Russell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
| Calori R. (2000). Ordinary theorists in mixed industries. Organization Studies, 21, 1031–1057. Google Scholar Abstract | |
| Carlsen A. (2006). Organizational becoming as dialogic imagination of practice: The case of the Indomitable Gauls. Organization Science, 17, 132–149. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Chia R. (1995). From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 16, 579–604. Google Scholar Link | |
| Chia R. (2000). Discourse analysis as organizational analysis. Organization, 7, 513–518. Google Scholar Abstract | |
| Cohen M. D. (2007). Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organization Studies, 28, 773–786. Google Scholar Link | |
| Contu A., Willmott H. (2005). You spin me round: The realist turn in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1645–1662. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Cook S. D. N., Brown J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10, 381–400. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Danermark B., Ekstrom M., Jakobsen L. (2002). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Delanty G., Strydom P. (Eds.) (2003). Philosophies of social science: The classic and contemporary readings. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Dewey J. (1906). Experience and objective idealism. Philosophical Review, 15, 465–481. Google Scholar | |
| Dewey J. (1908). What does pragmatism mean by practical? Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 5, 85–99. Google Scholar | |
| Dewey J. (1917 [1998]). The need for a recovery in philosophy. In Hickman L. A., Alexander T. M. (Eds.), The Essential Dewey Volume 1: Pragmatism, education, democracy (pp. 46–70). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Dewey J. (1928 [1998]). The inclusive philosophical idea. In Hickman L. A., Alexander T. M. (Eds.), The Essential Dewey Volume 1: Pragmatism, education, democracy (pp. 308–315). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Dewey J. (1929a). Experience and nature, 2nd Edition. La Salle, IL: Open Court. Google Scholar | |
| Dewey J. (1929b). The quest for certainty. New York: Minton, Balch & Co. Google Scholar | |
| Dewey J. (1930). Human nature and conduct. New York: Modern Library. Google Scholar | |
| Dewey J. (1933). How we think. Lexington, MA: Heath. Google Scholar | |
| Dewey J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt & Company. Google Scholar | |
| Dewey J. (1939 [1998]). Creative democracy: The task before us. In Hickman L. A., Alexander T. M. (Eds.), The essential Dewey Volume 1: Pragmatism, education, democracy (pp. 340–343). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Donaldson L. (2003). Organization theory as a positive science. In Tsoukas H., Knudsen C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory (pp. 39–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Dubois A., Gadde L. E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55, 553–560. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Elkjaer B. (2004). Organizational learning. Management Learning, 35, 419–434. Google Scholar Abstract | |
| Fairclough N. (2005). Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism. Organization Studies, 26, 915–939. Google Scholar Link | |
| Gadamer H. G. (1960 [2004]). Truth and method. (Weinsheimer J., Marshall D. Trans.) New York: Continuum. Google Scholar | |
| Gadamer H. G. (1988). On the circle of understanding. In Connolly J. M., Keutner T. (Eds.), Connolly J. M., Keutner T. (Trans.), Hermeneutics versus science? Three German views. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Google Scholar | |
| Greenwood D., Levin M. (2007). Pragmatic action research. In Greenwood D., Levin M. (Eds.), Introduction to action research (pp. 133–151). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar | |
| Hambrick D. C. (1994). What if the Academy actually mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 11–16. Google Scholar | |
| Hatch M. J., Cunliffe A. L. (2006). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives (second edition.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Hickman L. A. (1998). Dewey’s Theory of Inquiry. In Hickman L. A. (Ed.), Reading Dewey: Interpretations for a postmodern generation (pp. 166–186). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Hildebrand D. L. (1996). Genuine doubt and the community in Peirce’s Theory of Inquiry. Southwest Philosophy Review, 12, 33–43. Google Scholar | |
| Hildebrand D. L. (2003). Beyond realism and antirealism: John Dewey and the neopragmatists. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Hildebrand D. L. (2005). Pragmatism, neopragmatism, and public administration. Administration & Society, 37, 345–359. Google Scholar Abstract | |
| Hogan B. (2009). Towards a truly pragmatic philosophy of social science. Human Studies, 32, 383–389. Google Scholar | |
| Iedema R. (2007). On the multi-modality, materially and contingency of organization discourse. Organization Studies, 28, 931–946. Google Scholar Abstract | |
| James W. (1896). The will to believe: And other essays in popular philosophy. New York: Longmans, Green & Co. Google Scholar | |
| James W. (1907a [1991]). Pragmatism. New York: Prometheus Books. Google Scholar | |
| James W. (1907b). Pragmatism’s conception of truth. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 4, 141–155. Google Scholar | |
| James W. (1908). The meaning of the word ‘truth’. Mind, XVII, 455–456. Google Scholar | |
| James W. (1909). A pluralistic universe. New York: Longmans, Green, & Co. Google Scholar | |
| Joas H. (1993). Pragmatism and social theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
| Joas H. (1999). Action is the way in which human beings exist in the world [Interview by Claus Otto Scharmer, Frele Universität Berlin, Sept. 21, 1999]. Dialog on leadership. https://www.presencing.com/dol_content/docs/Joas-1999.pdf Google Scholar | |
| Josephson J. R., Josephson S. G. (1994). Abductive inference: Computation, philosophy, technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Ketokivi M., Mantere S. (2010). Two strategies for inductive reasoning in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 35, 315–333. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Kitcher P. (2011). Philosophy inside out. Metaphilosophy, 42, 248–260. Google Scholar | |
| Klag M., Langley A. (2013). Approaching the conceptual leap in qualitative research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 149–166. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Küpers W., Weibler J. (2008). Inter-leadership: Why and how should we think of leadership and followership integrally? Leadership, 4, 443–475. Google Scholar Link | |
| Kwan K.-M., Tsang E. W. (2001). Realism and constructivism in strategy research: A critical realist response to Mir and Watson. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 1163–1168. Google Scholar | |
| Lincoln Y. S., Guba E. G. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In Denzin N. K., Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 191–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar | |
| Locke K., Golden-Biddle K., Feldman M. S. (2008). Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science, 19, 907–918. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Määttänen P. (2006). Space, time, and interpretation. Koht Ja Paik/Place and Location, V, 11–20. Google Scholar | |
| Mantere S. (2008). Role expectations and middle manager strategic agency. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 294–316. Google Scholar | |
| Mantere S., Ketokivi M. (2013). Reasoning in organization science. Academy of Management Review, 38, 70–89. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Marcio J. J. (2001). Abductive inference, design science, and Dewey’s theory of inquiry. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 37, 97–121. Google Scholar | |
| McGilvary E. B. (1939). Professor Dewey: logician-ontologician. Journal of Philosophy, 36, 561–565. Google Scholar | |
| Miles M. B., Huberman A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar | |
| Mills C. W. (1940). Methodological consequences of the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 46, 316–330. Google Scholar | |
| Mills C. W. (1967). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Mir R., Watson A. (2001). Critical realism and constructivism in strategy research: Toward a synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 1169–1173. Google Scholar | |
| Orange D. M. (1995). Emotional understanding: Studies in psychoanalytic epistemology. New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar | |
| Paavola S. (2004). Abduction as a logic and methodology of discovery: The importance of strategies. Foundations of Science, 9, 267–283. Google Scholar | |
| Paavola S., Järvilehto L. (2011). Action man or dreamy detective. In Steiff J. (Ed.), Sherlock Holmes and philosophy: The footprints of a gigantic mind (pp. 45–54). Chicago: Open Court. Google Scholar | |
| Pearce J. L. (2004). What do we know and how do we really know it. Academy of Management Review, 29, 175–179. Google Scholar | |
| Peirce C. S. (1877). The fixation of belief. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 1–15. Google Scholar | |
| Peirce C. S. (1878). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 286–302. Google Scholar | |
| Peirce C. S. (1903a [1998]). Pragmatism as the logic of abduction. In the Peirce Edition Project (Ed.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, volume II, 1893–1913 (pp. 226–241). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Peirce C. S. (1903b [1998]). The nature of meaning. In the Peirce Edition Project (Ed.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, volume II, 1893–1913 (pp. 208–225). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Peirce C. S. (1931). Collected Papers, Vols. 1–6. (Hartshorne C., Weiss P., Eds.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Pihlström S. (1996). Structuring the world: The issue of realism and the nature of ontological problems in classical and contemporary pragmatism. Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica. Google Scholar | |
| Powell T. C. (2001). Competitive advantage: Logical and philosophical considerations. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 875–888. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Powell T. C. (2002). The philosophy of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 873–880. Google Scholar | |
| Prawat R. S. (1999). Dewey, Peirce, and the learning paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 47–76. Google Scholar Abstract | |
| Putnam H. (1990). Realism with a human face (Conant J., Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Putnam H. (1994). Words and life (Conant J., Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Reed M. (2005a). Doing the loco-motion: Response to Contu and Willmott’s Commentary on ‘The Realist Turn in Organization and Management Studies.’ Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1663–1673. Google Scholar | |
| Reed M. (2005b). Reflections on the ‘realist turn’ in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1621–1644. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Rescher N. (2003). Nature and understanding: The metaphysics and method of science. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Rhodes C. (2009). After reflexivity: Ethics, freedom and the writing of organization studies. Organization Studies, 30, 653–672. Google Scholar Abstract | |
| Scherer A. G. (2003). Modes of explanation in organization theory. In Tsoukas H., Knudsen C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory (pp. 310–344). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Schiller F. C. S. (1912). Humanism: Philosophical essays (2nd edition). London: Macmillan & Co. Google Scholar | |
| Shields P. M. (2003). The community of inquiry: Classical pragmatism and public administration. Administration & Society, 35, 510–538. Google Scholar Link | |
| Simpson B. (2009). Pragmatism, Mead and the practice turn. Organization Studies, 30, 1329 –1347. Google Scholar Link | |
| Simpson B., Marshall N. (2010). The mutuality of emotions and learning in organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 351–365. Google Scholar Abstract | |
| Tsang E. W., Kwan K.-M. (1999). Replication and theory development in organizational science: A critical realist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 759–780. Google Scholar | |
| Tschaepe M. D. (2011). John Dewey’s conception of scientific explanation: Moving philosophers of science past the realism-antirealism debate. Contemporary Pragmatism, 8, 187–203. Google Scholar | |
| Tsoukas H. (1993). Analogical reasoning and knowledge generation in organization theory. Organization Studies, 14, 323–346. Google Scholar Link | |
| Tsoukas H., Knudsen C. (2003). Introduction: The need for meta-theoretical reflection in organization theory. In Tsoukas H., Knudsen C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory (pp. 1–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Van de, Ven A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Watson T. J. (2009). Work and the sociological imagination: The need for continuity and change in the study of continuity and change. Sociology, 43, 861–877. Google Scholar Abstract | |
| Watson T. J. (2010). Critical social science, pragmatism and the realities of HRM. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 915–931. Google Scholar | |
| Watson T. J. (2011). Ethnography, reality, and truth: The vital need for studies of ‘how things work’ in organizations and management. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 202–217. Google Scholar | |
| Watson T. J. (2012). Sociology, work and organisation. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Weick K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14, 516–531. Google Scholar | |
| Weick K. E. (2005). Organizing and failures of imagination. International Public Management Journal, 8, 425–438. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Wicks A. C., Freeman R. E. (1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9, 123–140. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Willmott H. (2008). For informed pluralism, broad relevance and critical reflexivity. In Barry D., Hansen H. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 82–83). London: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar | |
| Wodak R. (2004). Critical discourse analysis. In Seale C., Gobo G., Gubrium J. F., Silverman D. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 197–213). London: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar CrossRef |
