Abstract
Sternberg, Grigorenko, and Zhang (2008) have presented a creative model for the application of research on intelligence and personality to education. There are many positive aspects of their effort. These include the coordination of individual differences in cognition and personality and their extension of the concept of intelligence beyond skills that can be tested in the normal testing paradigm. Although various parts of their approach have appeared elsewhere, the development of a single package containing all these ideas is a worthwhile improvement in thinking about education. They cite numerous studies in support of their efforts. However, a close examination of some of the major studies shows that this evidence, though not inconsistent with their claims, is not as strong as their review indicates. If one applies conventional psychometric criteria, simpler explanations than those they propose could be found. Their model of thinking styles is probably too complex for many practical applications. However, a good case can be made that the appropriate criterion is “How useful will this approach be in education?” By this criterion, the total package is impressive and should be seriously considered by educators.
References
| Ackerman P.L., Beier M.D. (2001). Trait complexes, cognitive investment, and domain knowledge. In Sternberg R.J., Grigorenko E.L. (Eds.), The psychology of abilities, competences, and expertise (pp. 1–30). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Boring E.G. (1923, June 6). Intelligence as the tests test it. New Republic, 35, 35–37. Google Scholar | |
| Bransford J.D., Brown A.L., Cocking R.R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Google Scholar | |
| Brody N. (2003). Construct validation of the Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test: Comment and reanalysis. Intelligence, 31, 319–330. Google Scholar | |
| Carroll J.B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Cattell R.B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar | |
| Das J.P., Naglieri J.A., Kirby J.R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: The PASS theory of intelligence. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Google Scholar | |
| diSessa A.A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105–225. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Duckworth A.L., Seligman M.E.P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944. Google Scholar Link | |
| Gottfredson L.S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79–132. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Gottfredson L.S. (2003). Dissecting practical intelligence: Its claims and evidence. Intelligence, 31, 343–398. Google Scholar | |
| Huarte de San Juan J. (1991). Examen de ingenios para las ciencias [Examination of talents for sciences] (Felisa Fresco Otero, Ed.). Madrid, Spain: Espasa-Calpa S.A. (Original work published 1575) Google Scholar | |
| Hunt E. (1995). Will we be smart enough? A cognitive analysis of the coming workforce. New York: Russell Sage. Google Scholar | |
| Hunt E., Carlson J. (2007a). Considerations relating to the study of group differences in intelligence. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 2, 194–213. Google Scholar Abstract | |
| Hunt E., Carlson J. (2007b). The standards for conducting research on topics of immediate social relevance. Intelligence, 35, 393–399. Google Scholar | |
| Johnson W., Bouchard T.J.Jr. (2005). The structure of intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized. Intelligence, 33, 393–416. Google Scholar | |
| Minstrell J. (2001). The role of the teacher in making sense of classroom experience and effecting better learning. In Carver S.M., Klahr D. (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: 25 years of progress (pp. 121–150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
| Plucker J.A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance's (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114. Google Scholar | |
| Posner M.I., Rothbart M.K. (2007). Educating the human brain. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Schmidt F.L., Hunter J.E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
| Sternberg R.J. (2003). Issues in the theory and measurement of successful intelligence: A reply to Brody. Intelligence, 31, 331–338. Google Scholar | |
| Sternberg R.J., Grigorenko E.L., Zhang L.-F. (2008). Styles of learning and thinking matter in instruction and assessment. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 3, 486–506. Google Scholar Abstract | |
| Sternberg R.J. , & The Rainbow Project Collaborators. (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical and creative skills. Intelligence, 34, 321–350. Google Scholar | |
| Visser B.A., Ashton M.C., Vernon P.A. (2006). Putting multiple intelligences theory to the test. Intelligence, 34, 487–502. Google Scholar |
