Patterns of intermarriage between persons who have varying levels of educational attainment are indicators of socioeconomic closure and affect the family backgrounds of children. This article documents trends in educational assortative mating throughout the twentieth century in the United States, using socioeconomic data on adults observed in several large cross section surveys collected between 1972 and 2010 and on their parents who married a generation earlier. Spousal resemblance on educational attainment was very high in the early twentieth century, declined to an all-time low for young couples in the early 1950s, and has increased steadily since then. These trends broadly parallel the compression and expansion of socioeconomic inequality in the United States over the twentieth century. Additionally, educationally similar parents are more likely to have offspring who themselves marry within their own educational level. If homogamy in the parent generation leads to homogamy in the offspring generation, this may reinforce the secular trend toward increased homogamy.

Agresti, Alan. 2002. Categorical data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Google Scholar, Crossref
Atkinson, Anthony B., Piketty, Thomas, Saez, Emmanuel. 2011. Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature 49 (1): 371. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, Timm, Andreas, eds. 2003. Who marries whom? Educational systems as marriage markets in modern societies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar, Crossref
Bruch, Elizabeth E., Mare, Robert D. 2009. Segregation processes. In Oxford handbook of analytical sociology, eds. Bearman, Peter, Hedström, Peter, 26993. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi L., Feldman, Marcus W. 1981. Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Monographs in Population and Biology 16. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Epstein, E., Guttman, R. 1984. Mate selection in man: Evidence, theory, and outcome. Social Biology 31 (3–4): 24378. Google Scholar, Medline
Featherman, David L., Hauser, Robert M. 1975. Design for a replicate study of social mobility in the United States. In Social indicator models, eds. Land, Kenneth C., Spilerman, Seymour, 21951. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar
Fernández, R., Guner, N., Knowles, J. 2005. Love and money: A theoretical and empirical analysis of household sorting and inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (1): 273344. Google Scholar
Fernández, Raquel, Rogerson, Richard. 2001. Sorting and long-run inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (4): 130541. Google Scholar, Crossref
Goldin, Claudia, Katz, Lawrence F. 2000a. Decreasing (and then increasing) inequality in America: A tale of two half-centuries. In The causes and consequences of increasing inequality, ed. Welch, Finis, 3782. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia, Katz, Lawrence F. 2000b. Education and income in the early twentieth century: Evidence from the prairies. Journal of Economic History 60 (3): 782818. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Goldin, Claudia, Katz, Lawrence F. 2008. The race between education and technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Johnson, Robert A. 1980. Religious assortative mating in the United States. New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Kalmijn, Matthijs. 1991a. Shifting boundaries: Trends in religious and educational homogamy. American Sociological Review 56 (6): 786800. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Kalmijn, Matthijs. 1991b. Status homogamy in the United States. American Journal of Sociology 97 (2): 496523. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Katz, Lawrence F., Murphy, Kevin M. 1992. Changes in relative wages, 1963-1987: Supply and demand factors. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (1): 3578. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Kremer, Michael. 1997. How much does sorting increase inequality? Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (1): 11539. Google Scholar, Crossref
Logan, John Allen, Hoff, Peter D., Newton, Michael A. 2008. Two-sided estimation of mate preferences for similarities in age, education, and religion. Journal of American Statistical Association 103 (482): 55969. Google Scholar, Crossref
Mare, Robert D. 1991. Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review 56 (1): 1532. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Mare, Robert D. 1995. Changes in educational attainment and school enrollment. In State of the union: America in the 1990s. Vol. I, Economic trends, ed. Farley, Reynolds, 155213. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar
Mare, Robert D. 2000. Assortative mating, intergenerational mobility, and educational inequality. California Center for Population Research Working Paper CCPR-004-00, Los Angeles, CA. Google Scholar
Mare, Robert D. 2011. A multigenerational view of inequality. Demography 48 (1): 123. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Mare, Robert D., Chang, Huey-Chi. 2006. Family attainment norms and educational stratification in the United States and Taiwan: The effects of parents’ school transitions. In Mobility and inequality: Frontiers of research in economics and sociology, eds. Morgan, Stephen. L., Grusky, David B., Fields, Gary, 195231. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
Mare, Robert D., Schwartz, Christine R. 2006a. Educational assortative mating and the family background of the next generation: A formal analysis. Riron to Hoho (Sociological Theory and Methods) 21 (2): 25378. Google Scholar
Mare, Robert D., Schwartz, Christine R. 2006b. Income inequality and educational assortative mating: Accounting for trends from 1940 to 2003. Paper presented to the International Sociological Association World Congress of Sociology, Durban, South Africa. Google Scholar
Pencavel, John. 1998. Assortative mating by schooling and the work behavior of wives and husbands. American Economic Review 88 (2): 32629. Google Scholar, ISI
Piketty, Thomas, Saez, Emmanuel. 2003. Income inequality in the United States, 1913-1998. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 139. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Preston, Samuel H. 1976. Family sizes of children and family sizes of women. Demography 13 (1): 10514. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Qian, Zhenchao. 1998. Changes in assortative mating: The impact of age and education, 1970-1990. Demography 35 (3): 27992. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Qian, Zhenchao, Preston, Samuel H. 1993. Changes in American marriage, 1972 to 1987: Availability and forces of attraction by age and education. American Sociological Review 58 (4): 48295. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Raymo, James M., Xie, Yu. 2000. Temporal and regional variation in the strength of educational homogamy. American Sociological Review 65 (5): 77381. Google Scholar, Crossref
Schwartz, Christine R. 2010. Earnings inequality and the changing association between spouses’ earnings. American Journal of Sociology 115 (5): 152457. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Schwartz, Christine R. 2013. Trends and variation in assortative mating: Causes and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology 39 (1): 45170. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Schwartz, Christine R., Mare, Robert D. 2005. Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography 42 (4): 62146. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Smits, Jeroen, Ultee, Wout, Lammers, Jan. 1998. Educational homogamy in 65 countries: An explanation of differences in openness using country-level explanatory variables. American Sociological Review 63 (2): 26485. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Smits, Jeroen, Ultee, Wout, Lammers, Jan. 2000. More or less educational homogamy? A test of different versions of modernization theory using cross-temporal evidence for 60 countries. American Sociological Review 65 (5): 78188. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Sweeney, Megan M., Cancian, Maria. 2004. The changing importance of white women’s economic prospects for assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family 66 (4): 101528. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Ultee, W. C., Luijkx, R. 1990. Educational heterogamy and father-to-son occupational mobility in 23 industrial nations. European Sociological Review 6 (2): 12549. Google Scholar, Crossref
U.S. Census Bureau. 2007. Estimated mean age at first marriage by sex: 1890 to the present. Available from http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hh-fam/ms2.xls. Google Scholar
Warren, John Robert, Hauser, Robert M. 1997. Social stratification across three generations: New evidence from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study. American Sociological Review 62 (4): 56172. Google Scholar, Crossref

Correction

View access options

My Account

You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Article

Article available in: