![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
The conservative “echo chamber” is a crucial element of the climate change denial machine. Although social scientists have begun to examine the role of conservative media in the denial campaign, this article reports the first examination of conservative newspaper columnists. Syndicated columnists are very influential because they reach a large audience. We analyze 203 opinion editorials (“op-eds”) written by 80 different columnists published from 2007 to 2010, a period that saw a number of crucial events and policy proposals regarding climate change. We focus on the key topics the columnists address and the skeptical arguments they employ. The overall results reveal a highly dismissive view of climate change and critical stance toward climate science among these influential conservative pundits. They play a crucial role in amplifying the denial machine’s messages to a broad segment of the American public.
References
Section:
| Akerlof, K., Rowan, K. E., Fitzgerald, D., Cedeno, A. Y. (2012). Communication of climate projections in US media amid politicization of model science. Nature Climate Change, 2, 648-654. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Antilla, L. (2005). Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15, 338-352. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Beder, S. (1999, March–April). Corporate hijacking of the greenhouse debate. Ecologist, 29, 119-122. Google Scholar | |
| Begley, S. (2007, August 13). The truth about denial. Newsweek, 150, 20-29. Google Scholar, Medline | |
| Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Boykoff, M. T., Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125-136. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Brock, D. (2004). The Republican noise machine: Right-wing media and how it corrupts democracy. New York, NY: Crown. Google Scholar | |
| Ceccarelli, L. (2011). Manufactured scientific controversy: Science, rhetoric, and public debate. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 14, 195-228. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Davenport, C. (2011). Heads in the sand. National Journal. Retrieved from http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/heads-in-the-sand-20111201?mrefid=site_search&page=1 Google Scholar | |
| Dunlap, R. E., McCright, A. M. (2010). Climate change denial: Sources, actors, and strategies. In Lever-Tracy, C. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of climate change and society (pp. 240-259). London, UK: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Dunlap, R. E., McCright, A. M. (2011). Organized climate change denial. In Dryzek, J. S., Norgaard, R. B., Schlosberg, D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change (pp. 144-160). London, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Feldman, L., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Leiserowitz, A. (2012). Climate on cable: The nature and impact of warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. International Journal of Press/Politics, 17, 3-31. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Gelbspan, R. (1997). The heat is on. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar | |
| Gelbspan, R. (2004). Boiling point. New York, NY: Basic Books. Google Scholar | |
| Grandia, K. (2009). Research on the “sponsors” behind the Heartland’s New York Climate Change Conference. Retrieved from http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Heartland%2009%20climate%20conference%20sponsors%20the%20RESEARCH%20REPORT.pdf Google Scholar | |
| Greenpeace . (2010a). Dealing in doubt: The climate denial industry and climate science. Retrieved from http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/publications/reports/dealing-in-doubt/ Google Scholar | |
| Greenpeace . (2010b). Koch Industries secretly funding the climate denial machine. Retrieved from http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/Global/usa/report/2010/3/executive-summary-koch-indus.pdf Google Scholar | |
| Hamilton, C. (2010). Requiem for a species. London, UK: Earthscan. Google Scholar | |
| Hoffman, A. J. (2011). Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organization & Environment, 24, 3-33. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Hoggan, J., Littlemore, R. (2009). Climate cover-up: The crusade to deny global warming. Vancouver, Canada: Greystone Books. Google Scholar | |
| Holliman, R. (2011). Advocacy in the tail: Exploring the implications of “Climategate” for science journalism and public debate in the digital age. Journalism, 12, 832-846. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Jamieson, K. H., Cappella, J. N. (2008). Echo chamber. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Knight, G., Greenberg, J. (2011). Talk of the enemy: Adversarial framing and climate change discourse. Social Movement Studies, 10, 323-340. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Lahsen, M. (2008). Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: A cultural analysis of a physicist “trio” supporting the backlash against global warming. Global Environmental Change, 18, 204-219. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Leiserowitz, A. A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Smith, N., Dawson, E. (2013). Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. American Behavioral Scientist. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Mashey, J. R. (2010). Crescendo to climate cacophony. Retrieved from http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/crescendo%20climategate%20cacophony%20v1%200.pdf Google Scholar | |
| McCright, A. M. (2007). Dealing with climate change contrarians. In Moser, S. C., Dilling, L. (Eds.), Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change (pp. 200-212). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems, 47, 499-522. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E. (2003). Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement’s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Social Problems, 50, 348-373. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E. (2010). Anti-reflexivity: The American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate change science and policy. Theory, Culture, and Society, 27, 100-103. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change: Political polarization in the American public’s views of global warming. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155-194. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| McKewon, E. (2012). Talking Points Ammo: The use of neoliberal think tank fantasy themes to delegitimise scientific knowledge of climate change in Australian newspapers, Journalism Studies 13(2), 277-297. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| McKnight, D. (2010). A change in the climate? The journalism of opinion at News Corporation. Journalism, 11, 693-706. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals | |
| Media Matters in America . (2007). Black and white and re(a)d all over: The conservative advantage in syndicated op-ed columns. Retrieved from http://mediamatters.org/reports/oped Google Scholar | |
| Mooney, C. (2005, May–June). Some like it hot. Mother Jones, 30, 36-49. Google Scholar | |
| Norgaard, K. M. (2011). Living in denial: Climate change, emotions, and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Oreskes, N., Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar | |
| Painter, J. (2011). Poles apart: The international reporting of climate scepticism. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford. Google Scholar | |
| Pearce, F. (2010). The climate files. London, UK: Guardian Books. Google Scholar | |
| Pooley, E. (2010). The climate war: True believers, power brokers, and the fight to save the earth. New York, NY: Hyperion. Google Scholar | |
| Powell, J. L. (2011). The inquisition of climate science. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Rahmstorf, S. (2004). The climate skeptics. In Re, Munich (Ed.), Weather catastrophes and climate change (pp. 76-83). Munich, Germany: Munich Re. Google Scholar | |
| Roberts, J. T., Parks, B. C. (2007). A climate of injustice: Global inequality, north-south politics, and climate policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
| Union of Concerned Scientists . (2007). Smoke, mirrors, and hot air. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists. Google Scholar | |
| Washington, H., Cook, J. (2011). Climate change denial: Heads in the sand. London, UK: Earthscan. Google Scholar | |
| Wolcott, J. (2007, May). Rush to judgment. Vanity Fair, 561, 100-106. Google Scholar | |
| Young, N. (2011). Working the fringes: The role of letters to the editor in advancing non-standard media narratives about climate change. Public Understanding of Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0963662511414983 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals |
