Have the core discussion networks of Americans changed in the past two decades? In 1985, the General Social Survey (GSS) collected the first nationally representative data on the confidants with whom Americans discuss important matters. In the 2004 GSS the authors replicated those questions to assess social change in core network structures. Discussion networks are smaller in 2004 than in 1985. The number of people saying there is no one with whom they discuss important matters nearly tripled. The mean network size decreases by about a third (one confidant), from 2.94 in 1985 to 2.08 in 2004. The modal respondent now reports having no confidant; the modal respondent in 1985 had three confidants. Both kin and non-kin confidants were lost in the past two decades, but the greater decrease of non-kin ties leads to more confidant networks centered on spouses and parents, with fewer contacts through voluntary associations and neighborhoods. Most people have densely interconnected confidants similar to them. Some changes reflect the changing demographics of the U.S. population. Educational heterogeneity of social ties has decreased, racial heterogeneity has increased. The data may overestimate the number of social isolates, but these shrinking networks reflect an important social change in America

Bailey, S., Marsden, Peter V..1999. “Interpretation and Interview Context: Examining the General Social Survey Name Generator Using Cognitive Methods.” Social Networks 21: 287309. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Bearman, Peter S., Moody, James.2004. “Adolescent Suicidality.” American Journal of Public Health 94: 8995. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Bearman, Peter, Parigi, Paolo.2004. “Cloning Headless Frogs and Other Important Matters: Conversation Topic and Network Structure.” Social Forces 83: 53557. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D., Sailer, L..1982. “Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data: An Experimental Attempt to Predict Actual Communication from Recall Data.” Social Science Research 11: 3066. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Boase, Jeffery, Horrigan, John, Wellman, Barry, Rainie, Lee.2006. “The Strength of Internet Ties.” Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project, January. Google Scholar
Bonikowski, Bart, McPherson, Miller.2006. “Voluntary Associations.” In Handbook of 21st Century Sociology, edited by Peck, Dennis L., Bryant, Clifton. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Brewer, D. D.1995. “The Social Structural Basis of the Organization of Persons in Memory.” Human Nature 6: 379403. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Burt, Ronald S.1984. “Network Items and the General Social Survey.” Social Networks 6: 293339. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Burt, Ronald S.1986. “A Note on Socio-metric Order in the General Social Survey Data.” Social Networks 8: 14974. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Burt, Ronald S.1997. “A Note on Social Capital and Network Content.” Social Networks 19: 35573. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Fischer, Claude S. 1982. To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald S.2005. “Bowling Alone: What's the score?” Social Networks 27: 15567. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Freeman, L. C., Romney, A. K., Freeman, S. C..1987. “Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy.” American Anthropologist 89: 31125. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Gershuny, Jonathan.2003. “Web Use and Net Nerds: A Neofunctionalist Analysis of the Impact of Information Technology in the Home.” Social Forces 82: 14168. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Granovetter, Mark.1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78: 136080. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Hill, R. A., Dunbar, R. I. M..2003. “Social Network Size in Humans.” Human Nature 14: 5372. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Hochschild, Arlie.1997. The Time Bind New York: Metropolitan Books. Google Scholar
Hout, Michael, Hanley, Caroline.2002. “The Overworked American Family: Trends and Nontrends in Working Hours, 1968-2001.” Working Paper, Survey Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA. Google Scholar
Hurlbert, Jeanne S., Haines, Valerie A., Beggs, John J..2000. “Core Networks and Tie Activation: What Kinds of Routine Networks Allocate Resources in Nonroutine Situations?” American Sociological Review 65: 598618. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Jacobs, Jerry A., Gerson, Kathleen.2001. “Overworked Individuals or Overworked Families.” Work and Occupations 28: 4063. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Kogovsŝek, Tina, Ferligoj, Anuska.2004. “The Quality of Measurement of Personal Support Subnetworks.” Quality and Quantity 38: 51732. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Lin, Nan.2001. Social Capitol: A Theory of Social Structure and Action New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Marin, A.2004. “Are Respondents More Likely to List Alters with Certain Characteristics? Implications for Name Generator Data.” Social Networks 26: 289307. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Marsden, Peter V.1987. “Core Discussion Networks of Americans.” American Sociological Review 52: 12231. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Marsden, Peter V.2005. “Recent Developments in Network Measurement.” Pp. 830 in Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, edited by Carrington, Peter J., Scott, John, Wasserman, Stanley. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
McPherson, Miller.1983. “An Ecology of Aff iliation.” American Sociological Review 48: 51932. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Marsden, Peter V.2004. “A Blau Space Primer: Prolegomenon to an Ecology of Affiliation.” Industrial and Corporate Change 13: 26380. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
McPherson, Miller, Popielarz, Pamela A., Drobnic, Sonja.1992. “Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics.” American Sociological Review 57: 15370. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
McPherson, Miller, James, Ranger-Moore.1991. “Evolution on a Dancing Landscape: Organizations and Networks in Dynamic Blau Space.” Social Forces 70: 1942. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
McPherson, Miller, Lynn, Smith-Lovin.1981. “Women and Weak Ties: Sex Differences in the Size of Voluntary Associations.” American Journal of Sociology 87: 883904. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
McPherson, Miller, Lynn, Smith-Lovin, Cook, James M..2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 41544. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Moore, Gwen.1990. “Structural Determinants of Men's and Women's Personal Networks.” American Sociological Review 55: 72635. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Nie, Norman H., Erbring, Lutz.2000. “Our Shrinking Social Universe.” Public Perspective 11: 4445. Google Scholar
Nie, Norman H., Sunshine Hillygus, D., Erbring, Lutz.2002. “Internet Use, Interpersonal Relations and Sociability: A Time Diary Study.” Pp. 21543 in The Internet in Everyday Life, edited by Wellman, Barry, Haythornthwaite, Carolyn. Oxford, England: Blackwell. Google Scholar, Crossref
Paxton, Pamela.1999. “Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment.” American Journal of Sociology 105: 88127. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Putnam, Robert D.1995. “Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy 6: 6578. Google Scholar, Crossref
Putnam, Robert D.2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster. Google Scholar, Crossref
Rotolo, Thomas.1999. “Trends in Voluntary Association Participation.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28: 199212. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Rotolo, Thomas, Wilson, John.2004. “What Happened to the ‘Long Civic Generation’? Explaining Cohort Differences in Volunteerism.” Social Forces 82: 1091121. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Ruan, Danching.1998. “The Content of the General Social Survey Discussion Networks: An Exploration of the General Social Survey Discussion Name Generator in a Chinese Context.” Social Networks 20: 24764. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Sampson, Robert J.2004. “Neighborhood and Community: Collective Efficacy and Community Safety.” New Economy 11: 10613. Google Scholar, Crossref
Sampson, Robert J., Laub, John H..1990. “Crime and Deviance over the Life Course: The Salience of Adult Social Bonds.” American Sociological Review 55: 60927. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Sampson, Robert J., McAdam, Doug, MacIndoe, Heather, Simon, Weffer-Elizondo.2005. “Civil Society Reconsidered: The Durable Nature and Community Structure of Collective Civic Action.” American Journal of Sociology. 111: 673714. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Smith, Tom W.1989. “Thoughts on the Nature of Context Effects.” Methodological Report No. 66, National Opinion Research Center, September, Chicago, IL. Google Scholar
Smith-Lovin, Lynn, McPherson, Miller.1993. “You Are Who You Know: A Network Perspective on Gender.” Pp. 22351 in Theory on Gender/Feminism on Theory, edited by England, Paula. New York: Aldine. Google Scholar
Straits, Bruce C.2000. “Ego's Important Discussants or Significant People: An Experiment in Varying the Wording of Personal Network Name Generators.” Social Networks 22: 12340. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Verbrugge, L. M.1977. “The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices.” Social Forces 56: 57697. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Wellman, Barry.1979. “The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers.” American Journal of Sociology 84: 120131. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Wellman, Barry, Hogan, Bernie, Berg, Kristen, Boase, Jeffery, Carrasco, Juan-Antonio, Cote, Rochelle, Kayahara, Jennifer, Kennedy, Tracy L.M., Tran, Phuoc.2006. “Connected Lives: The Project.” In Networked Neighborhoods, edited by Purcell, Patrick. London: Springer. Google Scholar, Crossref
Wellman, Barry, Wortley, Scot.1990. “Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support.” American Journal of Sociology 96: 55888. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
View access options

My Account

You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Article

Your Access Options

Have the core discussion networks of Americans changed in the past two decades? In 1985, the General Social Survey (GSS) collected the first nationally representative data on the confidants with whom Americans discuss important matters. In the 2004 GSS the authors replicated those questions to assess social change in core network structures. Discussion networks are smaller in 2004 than in 1985. The number of people saying there is no one with whom they discuss important matters nearly tripled. The mean network size decreases by about a third (one confidant), from 2.94 in 1985 to 2.08 in 2004. The modal respondent now reports having no confidant; the modal respondent in 1985 had three confidants. Both kin and non-kin confidants were lost in the past two decades, but the greater decrease of non-kin ties leads to more confidant networks centered on spouses and parents, with fewer contacts through voluntary associations and neighborhoods. Most people have densely interconnected confidants similar to them. Some changes reflect the changing demographics of the U.S. population. Educational heterogeneity of social ties has decreased, racial heterogeneity has increased. The data may overestimate the number of social isolates, but these shrinking networks reflect an important social change in America

Bailey, S., Marsden, Peter V..1999. “Interpretation and Interview Context: Examining the General Social Survey Name Generator Using Cognitive Methods.” Social Networks 21: 287309. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Bearman, Peter S., Moody, James.2004. “Adolescent Suicidality.” American Journal of Public Health 94: 8995. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Bearman, Peter, Parigi, Paolo.2004. “Cloning Headless Frogs and Other Important Matters: Conversation Topic and Network Structure.” Social Forces 83: 53557. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D., Sailer, L..1982. “Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data: An Experimental Attempt to Predict Actual Communication from Recall Data.” Social Science Research 11: 3066. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Boase, Jeffery, Horrigan, John, Wellman, Barry, Rainie, Lee.2006. “The Strength of Internet Ties.” Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project, January. Google Scholar
Bonikowski, Bart, McPherson, Miller.2006. “Voluntary Associations.” In Handbook of 21st Century Sociology, edited by Peck, Dennis L., Bryant, Clifton. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Brewer, D. D.1995. “The Social Structural Basis of the Organization of Persons in Memory.” Human Nature 6: 379403. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Burt, Ronald S.1984. “Network Items and the General Social Survey.” Social Networks 6: 293339. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Burt, Ronald S.1986. “A Note on Socio-metric Order in the General Social Survey Data.” Social Networks 8: 14974. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Burt, Ronald S.1997. “A Note on Social Capital and Network Content.” Social Networks 19: 35573. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Fischer, Claude S. 1982. To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald S.2005. “Bowling Alone: What's the score?” Social Networks 27: 15567. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Freeman, L. C., Romney, A. K., Freeman, S. C..1987. “Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy.” American Anthropologist 89: 31125. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Gershuny, Jonathan.2003. “Web Use and Net Nerds: A Neofunctionalist Analysis of the Impact of Information Technology in the Home.” Social Forces 82: 14168. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Granovetter, Mark.1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78: 136080. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Hill, R. A., Dunbar, R. I. M..2003. “Social Network Size in Humans.” Human Nature 14: 5372. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Hochschild, Arlie.1997. The Time Bind New York: Metropolitan Books. Google Scholar
Hout, Michael, Hanley, Caroline.2002. “The Overworked American Family: Trends and Nontrends in Working Hours, 1968-2001.” Working Paper, Survey Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA. Google Scholar
Hurlbert, Jeanne S., Haines, Valerie A., Beggs, John J..2000. “Core Networks and Tie Activation: What Kinds of Routine Networks Allocate Resources in Nonroutine Situations?” American Sociological Review 65: 598618. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Jacobs, Jerry A., Gerson, Kathleen.2001. “Overworked Individuals or Overworked Families.” Work and Occupations 28: 4063. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Kogovsŝek, Tina, Ferligoj, Anuska.2004. “The Quality of Measurement of Personal Support Subnetworks.” Quality and Quantity 38: 51732. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Lin, Nan.2001. Social Capitol: A Theory of Social Structure and Action New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Marin, A.2004. “Are Respondents More Likely to List Alters with Certain Characteristics? Implications for Name Generator Data.” Social Networks 26: 289307. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Marsden, Peter V.1987. “Core Discussion Networks of Americans.” American Sociological Review 52: 12231. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Marsden, Peter V.2005. “Recent Developments in Network Measurement.” Pp. 830 in Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, edited by Carrington, Peter J., Scott, John, Wasserman, Stanley. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
McPherson, Miller.1983. “An Ecology of Aff iliation.” American Sociological Review 48: 51932. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Marsden, Peter V.2004. “A Blau Space Primer: Prolegomenon to an Ecology of Affiliation.” Industrial and Corporate Change 13: 26380. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
McPherson, Miller, Popielarz, Pamela A., Drobnic, Sonja.1992. “Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics.” American Sociological Review 57: 15370. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
McPherson, Miller, James, Ranger-Moore.1991. “Evolution on a Dancing Landscape: Organizations and Networks in Dynamic Blau Space.” Social Forces 70: 1942. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
McPherson, Miller, Lynn, Smith-Lovin.1981. “Women and Weak Ties: Sex Differences in the Size of Voluntary Associations.” American Journal of Sociology 87: 883904. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
McPherson, Miller, Lynn, Smith-Lovin, Cook, James M..2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 41544. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Moore, Gwen.1990. “Structural Determinants of Men's and Women's Personal Networks.” American Sociological Review 55: 72635. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Nie, Norman H., Erbring, Lutz.2000. “Our Shrinking Social Universe.” Public Perspective 11: 4445. Google Scholar
Nie, Norman H., Sunshine Hillygus, D., Erbring, Lutz.2002. “Internet Use, Interpersonal Relations and Sociability: A Time Diary Study.” Pp. 21543 in The Internet in Everyday Life, edited by Wellman, Barry, Haythornthwaite, Carolyn. Oxford, England: Blackwell. Google Scholar, Crossref
Paxton, Pamela.1999. “Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment.” American Journal of Sociology 105: 88127. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Putnam, Robert D.1995. “Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy 6: 6578. Google Scholar, Crossref
Putnam, Robert D.2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster. Google Scholar, Crossref
Rotolo, Thomas.1999. “Trends in Voluntary Association Participation.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28: 199212. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Rotolo, Thomas, Wilson, John.2004. “What Happened to the ‘Long Civic Generation’? Explaining Cohort Differences in Volunteerism.” Social Forces 82: 1091121. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Ruan, Danching.1998. “The Content of the General Social Survey Discussion Networks: An Exploration of the General Social Survey Discussion Name Generator in a Chinese Context.” Social Networks 20: 24764. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Sampson, Robert J.2004. “Neighborhood and Community: Collective Efficacy and Community Safety.” New Economy 11: 10613. Google Scholar, Crossref
Sampson, Robert J., Laub, John H..1990. “Crime and Deviance over the Life Course: The Salience of Adult Social Bonds.” American Sociological Review 55: 60927. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Sampson, Robert J., McAdam, Doug, MacIndoe, Heather, Simon, Weffer-Elizondo.2005. “Civil Society Reconsidered: The Durable Nature and Community Structure of Collective Civic Action.” American Journal of Sociology. 111: 673714. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Smith, Tom W.1989. “Thoughts on the Nature of Context Effects.” Methodological Report No. 66, National Opinion Research Center, September, Chicago, IL. Google Scholar
Smith-Lovin, Lynn, McPherson, Miller.1993. “You Are Who You Know: A Network Perspective on Gender.” Pp. 22351 in Theory on Gender/Feminism on Theory, edited by England, Paula. New York: Aldine. Google Scholar
Straits, Bruce C.2000. “Ego's Important Discussants or Significant People: An Experiment in Varying the Wording of Personal Network Name Generators.” Social Networks 22: 12340. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Verbrugge, L. M.1977. “The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices.” Social Forces 56: 57697. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Wellman, Barry.1979. “The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers.” American Journal of Sociology 84: 120131. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Wellman, Barry, Hogan, Bernie, Berg, Kristen, Boase, Jeffery, Carrasco, Juan-Antonio, Cote, Rochelle, Kayahara, Jennifer, Kennedy, Tracy L.M., Tran, Phuoc.2006. “Connected Lives: The Project.” In Networked Neighborhoods, edited by Purcell, Patrick. London: Springer. Google Scholar, Crossref
Wellman, Barry, Wortley, Scot.1990. “Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support.” American Journal of Sociology 96: 55888. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI