Abstract
Have the core discussion networks of Americans changed in the past two decades? In 1985, the General Social Survey (GSS) collected the first nationally representative data on the confidants with whom Americans discuss important matters. In the 2004 GSS the authors replicated those questions to assess social change in core network structures. Discussion networks are smaller in 2004 than in 1985. The number of people saying there is no one with whom they discuss important matters nearly tripled. The mean network size decreases by about a third (one confidant), from 2.94 in 1985 to 2.08 in 2004. The modal respondent now reports having no confidant; the modal respondent in 1985 had three confidants. Both kin and non-kin confidants were lost in the past two decades, but the greater decrease of non-kin ties leads to more confidant networks centered on spouses and parents, with fewer contacts through voluntary associations and neighborhoods. Most people have densely interconnected confidants similar to them. Some changes reflect the changing demographics of the U.S. population. Educational heterogeneity of social ties has decreased, racial heterogeneity has increased. The data may overestimate the number of social isolates, but these shrinking networks reflect an important social change in America
| Bailey, S., Marsden, Peter V..1999. “Interpretation and Interview Context: Examining the General Social Survey Name Generator Using Cognitive Methods.” Social Networks 21: 287–309. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Bearman, Peter S., Moody, James.2004. “Adolescent Suicidality.” American Journal of Public Health 94: 89–95. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Bearman, Peter, Parigi, Paolo.2004. “Cloning Headless Frogs and Other Important Matters: Conversation Topic and Network Structure.” Social Forces 83: 535–57. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D., Sailer, L..1982. “Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data: An Experimental Attempt to Predict Actual Communication from Recall Data.” Social Science Research 11: 30–66. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Boase, Jeffery, Horrigan, John, Wellman, Barry, Rainie, Lee.2006. “The Strength of Internet Ties.” Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project, January. Google Scholar | |
| Bonikowski, Bart, McPherson, Miller.2006. “Voluntary Associations.” In Handbook of 21st Century Sociology, edited by Peck, Dennis L., Bryant, Clifton. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
| Brewer, D. D.1995. “The Social Structural Basis of the Organization of Persons in Memory.” Human Nature 6: 379–403. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Burt, Ronald S.1984. “Network Items and the General Social Survey.” Social Networks 6: 293–339. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Burt, Ronald S.1986. “A Note on Socio-metric Order in the General Social Survey Data.” Social Networks 8: 149–74. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Burt, Ronald S.1997. “A Note on Social Capital and Network Content.” Social Networks 19: 355–73. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Fischer, Claude S. 1982. To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
| Burt, Ronald S.2005. “Bowling Alone: What's the score?” Social Networks 27: 155–67. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Freeman, L. C., Romney, A. K., Freeman, S. C..1987. “Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy.” American Anthropologist 89: 311–25. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Gershuny, Jonathan.2003. “Web Use and Net Nerds: A Neofunctionalist Analysis of the Impact of Information Technology in the Home.” Social Forces 82: 141–68. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Granovetter, Mark.1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–80. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Hill, R. A., Dunbar, R. I. M..2003. “Social Network Size in Humans.” Human Nature 14: 53–72. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Hochschild, Arlie.1997. The Time Bind New York: Metropolitan Books. Google Scholar | |
| Hout, Michael, Hanley, Caroline.2002. “The Overworked American Family: Trends and Nontrends in Working Hours, 1968-2001.” Working Paper, Survey Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA. Google Scholar | |
| Hurlbert, Jeanne S., Haines, Valerie A., Beggs, John J..2000. “Core Networks and Tie Activation: What Kinds of Routine Networks Allocate Resources in Nonroutine Situations?” American Sociological Review 65: 598–618. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Jacobs, Jerry A., Gerson, Kathleen.2001. “Overworked Individuals or Overworked Families.” Work and Occupations 28: 40–63. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Kogovsŝek, Tina, Ferligoj, Anuska.2004. “The Quality of Measurement of Personal Support Subnetworks.” Quality and Quantity 38: 517–32. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Lin, Nan.2001. Social Capitol: A Theory of Social Structure and Action New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Marin, A.2004. “Are Respondents More Likely to List Alters with Certain Characteristics? Implications for Name Generator Data.” Social Networks 26: 289–307. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Marsden, Peter V.1987. “Core Discussion Networks of Americans.” American Sociological Review 52: 122–31. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Marsden, Peter V.2005. “Recent Developments in Network Measurement.” Pp. 8–30 in Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, edited by Carrington, Peter J., Scott, John, Wasserman, Stanley. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| McPherson, Miller.1983. “An Ecology of Aff iliation.” American Sociological Review 48: 519–32. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Marsden, Peter V.2004. “A Blau Space Primer: Prolegomenon to an Ecology of Affiliation.” Industrial and Corporate Change 13: 263–80. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| McPherson, Miller, Popielarz, Pamela A., Drobnic, Sonja.1992. “Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics.” American Sociological Review 57: 153–70. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| McPherson, Miller, James, Ranger-Moore.1991. “Evolution on a Dancing Landscape: Organizations and Networks in Dynamic Blau Space.” Social Forces 70: 19–42. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| McPherson, Miller, Lynn, Smith-Lovin.1981. “Women and Weak Ties: Sex Differences in the Size of Voluntary Associations.” American Journal of Sociology 87: 883–904. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| McPherson, Miller, Lynn, Smith-Lovin, Cook, James M..2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–44. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Moore, Gwen.1990. “Structural Determinants of Men's and Women's Personal Networks.” American Sociological Review 55: 726–35. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Nie, Norman H., Erbring, Lutz.2000. “Our Shrinking Social Universe.” Public Perspective 11: 44–45. Google Scholar | |
| Nie, Norman H., Sunshine Hillygus, D., Erbring, Lutz.2002. “Internet Use, Interpersonal Relations and Sociability: A Time Diary Study.” Pp. 215–43 in The Internet in Everyday Life, edited by Wellman, Barry, Haythornthwaite, Carolyn. Oxford, England: Blackwell. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Paxton, Pamela.1999. “Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment.” American Journal of Sociology 105: 88–127. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Putnam, Robert D.1995. “Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy 6: 65–78. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Putnam, Robert D.2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Rotolo, Thomas.1999. “Trends in Voluntary Association Participation.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28: 199–212. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Rotolo, Thomas, Wilson, John.2004. “What Happened to the ‘Long Civic Generation’? Explaining Cohort Differences in Volunteerism.” Social Forces 82: 1091–121. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Ruan, Danching.1998. “The Content of the General Social Survey Discussion Networks: An Exploration of the General Social Survey Discussion Name Generator in a Chinese Context.” Social Networks 20: 247–64. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Sampson, Robert J.2004. “Neighborhood and Community: Collective Efficacy and Community Safety.” New Economy 11: 106–13. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Sampson, Robert J., Laub, John H..1990. “Crime and Deviance over the Life Course: The Salience of Adult Social Bonds.” American Sociological Review 55: 609–27. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Sampson, Robert J., McAdam, Doug, MacIndoe, Heather, Simon, Weffer-Elizondo.2005. “Civil Society Reconsidered: The Durable Nature and Community Structure of Collective Civic Action.” American Journal of Sociology. 111: 673–714. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Smith, Tom W.1989. “Thoughts on the Nature of Context Effects.” Methodological Report No. 66, National Opinion Research Center, September, Chicago, IL. Google Scholar | |
| Smith-Lovin, Lynn, McPherson, Miller.1993. “You Are Who You Know: A Network Perspective on Gender.” Pp. 223–51 in Theory on Gender/Feminism on Theory, edited by England, Paula. New York: Aldine. Google Scholar | |
| Straits, Bruce C.2000. “Ego's Important Discussants or Significant People: An Experiment in Varying the Wording of Personal Network Name Generators.” Social Networks 22: 123–40. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Verbrugge, L. M.1977. “The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices.” Social Forces 56: 576–97. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Wellman, Barry.1979. “The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers.” American Journal of Sociology 84: 1201–31. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Wellman, Barry, Hogan, Bernie, Berg, Kristen, Boase, Jeffery, Carrasco, Juan-Antonio, Cote, Rochelle, Kayahara, Jennifer, Kennedy, Tracy L.M., Tran, Phuoc.2006. “Connected Lives: The Project.” In Networked Neighborhoods, edited by Purcell, Patrick. London: Springer. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Wellman, Barry, Wortley, Scot.1990. “Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support.” American Journal of Sociology 96: 558–88. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI |

