Growing concern about economic inequality has generated a polarized narrative regarding the causes and consequences of extreme wealth. We contend that divided ideological positions obscure a more mundane reality about the typical wealthiest 1% households. Using data from the triennial survey of consumer finance, we demonstrate that there is substantial heterogeneity within the 1%. Contrary to public discourse, the typical 1% household does not have wealth reflective of popular rich lists, but derives a significant share of its wealth from ownership and active management of small- to medium-sized private enterprise. We use these findings to shed new insights on business families’ relationship to economic inequality and open promising new areas of inquiry regarding the role of the family business in society.

Anderson R. C., Reeb D. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 209-237. Google Scholar Abstract
Astrachan J. H., Shanker M. C. (2003). Family businesses’ contribution to the U.S. economy: A closer look. Family Business Review, 16, 211-219. Google Scholar Link
Atkinson A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar CrossRef
Bapuji H. (2015). Individuals, interactions and institutions: How economic inequality affects organizations. Human Relations, 68, 1059-1083. Google Scholar Link
Bapuji H., Neville L. (2015). Income inequality ignored? An agenda for business and strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 13(3), 233-246. Google Scholar Abstract
Bebchuk L. A. (2009). Pay without performance: The unfulfilled promise of executive compensation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Becker G. S., Tomes N. (1986). Human capital and the rise and fall of families. Journal of Labor Economics, 4(3, Pt. 2), S1-S39. Google Scholar
Becker G. S., Tomes N. (1994). Human capital and the rise and fall of families. In Becker G. S. (Ed.), Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed., pp. 257-298). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Beckert J. (2004). Inherited wealth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Berger P. L. (1987). The capitalist revolution. Aldershot, UK: Gower. Google Scholar
Berghoff H. (2006). The end of family business? The Mittelstand and German capitalism in transition, 1949-2000. Business History Review, 80, 263-295. Google Scholar CrossRef
Berle A., Means G. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Google Scholar
Berrone P., Cruz C., Gomez-Mejia L. R., Kintana M. (2010). Ownership structure and corporate response to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), 82-113. Google Scholar Abstract
Berstein A., Raman A. (2015, June). The great decoupling: An interview with Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/06/the-great-decoupling Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson E., McAfee A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York, NY: W.W. Norton. Google Scholar
Bulmer M. G. (2012). Principles of statistics. Mineola, NY: Courier Corporation. Google Scholar
Cagetti M., De Nardi M. (2008). Wealth inequality: Data and models. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 12(S2), 285-313. Google Scholar
Carney M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249-265. Google Scholar CrossRef
Carney M., Van Essen M., Gedajlovic E., Huegens P. (2015). What do we know about the private family firm? A meta-analytic review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 513-544. Google Scholar
Chandler A. D. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Google Scholar
Chrisman J. J., Patel P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 976-997. Google Scholar CrossRef
Cobb J. A. (2016). How firms shape income inequality: Stakeholder power, executive decision-making, and the structuring of employment relationships. Academy of Management Review, 41, 324-348. Google Scholar
The complete list of the Forbes 400 members. (2013, September 16). Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/edwindurgy/2013/09/16/the-complete-list-of-the-forbes-400-members/13/ Google Scholar
Cruz C., Larraza-Kintana M., Garcés-Galdeano L., Berrone P. (2014). Are family firms really more socially responsible? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 1295-1316. Google Scholar
Davis G. F. (2009). Managed by the markets: How finance re-shaped America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
De Nardi M. (2015). Quantitative models of wealth inequality: A survey (Working Paper No. 21106). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar
DeTienne D. R., Chirico F. (2013). Exit strategies in family firms: How socioemotional wealth drives the threshold of performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1297-1318. Google Scholar
Dyer J., Whetten D. A. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 785-802. Google Scholar CrossRef
Fligstein N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Fogel K. (2006). Oligarchic family control, social economic outcomes, and the quality of government. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 603-622. Google Scholar
Franks J., Mayer C., Volpin P., Wagner H. F. (2012). The life cycle of family ownership: International evidence. Review of Financial Studies, 25, 1675-1712. Google Scholar
Friedman M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, pp. 122-124. Google Scholar
Galbraith J. K. (1952). American capitalism: The concept of countervailing power (Vol. 619). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers. (Original work published 1968) Google Scholar
Gale W. G., Scholz J. K. (1994). Intergenerational transfers and the accumulation of wealth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 145-160. Google Scholar
Gedajlovic E., Carney M., Chrisman J. J., Kellermanns F. W. (2012). The adolescence of family firm research. Journal of Management, 38, 1010-1037. Google Scholar Abstract
Gilding M. (2005). Families and fortunes: Accumulation, management succession and inheritance in wealthy families. Journal of Sociology, 41, 29-45. Google Scholar Abstract
Goldstein A. (2012). Revenge of the managers: Labor cost-cutting and the paradoxical resurgence of managerialism in the shareholder value era, 1984 to 2001. American Sociological Review, 77, 268-294. Google Scholar Abstract
Gomez-Mejia L. R., Cruz C., Berrone P., De Castro J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 653-707. Google Scholar CrossRef
Gomez-Mejia L. R., Makri M., Kintana M. L. (2010). Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 223-252. Google Scholar CrossRef
Gomez-Mejia L. R., Takacs Haynes K., Nunez-Nickel M., Jacobson K. J. L., Moyano-Fuentes J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137. Google Scholar Link
Hall P., Soskice D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar CrossRef
Handler W. C. (1994). Succession in family business: A review of the research. Family Business Review, 7, 133-157. Google Scholar Link
Hansen M. N. (2014). Self-made wealth or family wealth? Changes in intergenerational wealth mobility. Social Forces, 93, 457-481. Google Scholar
Herrigel G. (2000). Industrial constructions: The sources of German industrial power (Vol. 9). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. Google Scholar
Jiang Y., Peng M. W. (2011). Are family ownership and control in large firms good, bad, or irrelevant? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28, 15-39. Google Scholar CrossRef
Johnson B., Moore K. (2005). Consider the source: Differences in estimates of income and wealth from survey and tax data. Federal Reserve Board Working Paper. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/scf_workingpapers.htm Google Scholar
Judge W. Q., Fainshmidt S., Brown J. L.III. (2014). Which model of capitalism best delivers both wealth and equality? Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 363-386. Google Scholar CrossRef
Kaplan S. N., Rauh J. D. (2013). Family, education, and sources of wealth among the richest Americans, 1982-2012. American Economic Review, 103, 158-162. Google Scholar
Keister L. A. (2005). Getting rich: America’s new rich and how they got that way. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar CrossRef
Keister L. A. (2014). The one percent. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 347-367. Google Scholar CrossRef
Keister L. A., Lee H. Y. (2014). The one percent top incomes and wealth in sociological research. Social Currents, 1, 13-24. Google Scholar Abstract
Keister L. A., Moller S. (2000). Wealth inequality in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 63-81. Google Scholar CrossRef
Kennickell A. B. (2008). The role of over-sampling of the wealthy in the Survey of Consumer Finances. Irving Fisher Committee Bulletin, 28, 403-408. Google Scholar
Kennickell A. B. (2011). Look again: Editing and imputation of SCF panel data Federal Reserve Board Working Paper. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/scf_workingpapers.htm Google Scholar
La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R. (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance, 57, 1147-1170. Google Scholar
Le Breton-Miller I., Miller D. (2006). Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 731-746. Google Scholar
Lubatkin M., Ling Y., Schulze W. (2007). An organizational justice-based view of self-control and agency costs in family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 956-971. Google Scholar
Mazumder B. (2005). Fortunate sons: New estimates of intergenerational mobility in the United States using social security earnings data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 235-255. Google Scholar
Memili E., Chrisman J. J., Chua J. H. (2011). Transaction costs and outsourcing decisions in small-and medium-sized family firms. Family Business Review, 24, 47-61. Google Scholar Abstract
Miller D., Le Breton-Miller I., Scholnick B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 51-78. Google Scholar
Modigliani F. (1986). Life cycle, individual thrift, and the wealth of nations. American Economic Review, 76, 297-313. Google Scholar
Morck R. K., Strangeland D. A., Yeung B. (2000). Inherited wealth, corporate control and economic growth: The Canadian disease. In Morck R. (Ed.), Concentrated corporate ownership (pp. 319-369). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Morck R. K., Wolfenzon D., Yeung B. (2005). Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 655-720. Google Scholar CrossRef
Moriarty S. (Ed.). (2012). Born on third base: What the Forbes 400 really says about economic equality and opportunity in America. Retrieved from http://www.FairEconomy.org/BornOnThirdBase2012 Google Scholar
Oxfam. (2015). Wealth: Having it all and wanting more. Oxford, UK: Author. Google Scholar
Palmer D., Barber B. M. (2001). Challengers, elites, and owning families: A social class theory of corporate acquisitions in the 1980s. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 87-120. Google Scholar Abstract
Piketty T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar CrossRef
Piketty T., Saez E. (2001). Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998 (series updated to 2000 available) (Working Paper No. w8467). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar
Quadrini V. (1999). The importance of entrepreneurship for wealth concentration and mobility. Review of Income and Wealth, 45, 1-19. Google Scholar CrossRef
Rawls J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Riaz S. (2015). Bringing inequality back in: The economic inequality footprint of management and organizational practices. Human Relations, 68, 1085-1097. Google Scholar Link
Saez E. (2009). Striking it richer: The evolution of top incomes in the United States (update with 2007 estimates). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar
Saez E., Zucman G. (2014). Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar
Schneider B. R. (2009). Hierarchical market economies and varieties of capitalism in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, 41, 553-575. Google Scholar
Selznick P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Google Scholar
Sieger P., Zellweger T., Nason R. S., Clinton E. (2011). Portfolio entrepreneurship in family firms: A resource-based perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5, 327-351. Google Scholar
Sraer D., Thesmar D. (2007). Performance and behavior of family firms: Evidence from the French stock market. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5, 709-751. Google Scholar CrossRef
Useem M. (1993). Executive defense: Shareholder power and corporate reorganization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Van Essen M., Carney M., Gedajlovic E., Huegens P. (2015). How does family control influence firm strategy and performance? A meta-analysis of U.S. publicly-listed firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23, 3-24. Google Scholar
Van Essen M., Strike V. M., Carney M., Sapp S. (2015). The resilient family firm: Stakeholder outcomes and institutional effects. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23, 167-183. Google Scholar
Villalonga B., Amit R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385-417. Google Scholar CrossRef
Ward J. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
Williamson O. E. (1963). Managerial discretion and business behavior. American Economic Review, 53, 1032-1057. Google Scholar
Wolff E. N. (2012). The asset price meltdown and the wealth of the middle class. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar CrossRef
Xavier-Oliveira E., Laplume A. O., Pathak S. (2015). What motivates entrepreneurial entry under economic inequality? The role of human and financial capital. Human Relations, 68, 1183-1207. Google Scholar Link
Zeitlin M. (1974). Corporate ownership and control: The large corporation and the capitalist class. American Journal of Sociology, 79, 1073-1119. Google Scholar
Zellweger T. M., Nason R. S., Nordqvist M. (2012). From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: Introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review, 25, 136-155. Google Scholar Link

Recommended Citation


Family Business and the 1%

Michael Carney1, Robert S. Nason1Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada


Business & Society

First published date: July-28-2016


If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click on download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format

Download article citation data for:
Michael Carney, Robert S. Nason
Business & Society 0 0:0

Request Permissions

View permissions information for this article

Share

Email