![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Dominance is a key feature on which romantic partners are evaluated, yet there is no clear consensus on its definition. In Study 1 (N = 305), the authors developed scales to measure three putatively distinct dimensions of dominance: social, financial, and physical. In Study 2 (N = 308), the authors used their scales in a mate-selection paradigm and found that women perceived physical dominance to be related to both attractiveness and social dominance. For both sexes, attractiveness predicted desirability for a one-night stand, whereas attractiveness and agreeableness were predictors of desirability for a serious relationship. In Study 3 (N = 124), the authors surveyed romantic partners in monogamous relationships and found that although aspects of a partner’s dominance—financial for women and social for men—played a bivariate role in relationship satisfaction, agreeableness was the strongest predictor of current and future relationship satisfaction and the only significant predictor of relationship dissolution.
| Ackerman, R.A. , Donnellan, M.B. , & Kashy, D.A. ( 2011). Working with dyadic data in studies of emerging adulthood: Specific recommendations, general advice, and practical tips. In F. Fincham & M. Cui (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood (pp. 67-98). New York Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Baker, R.R. , & Bellis, M.A. ( 1995). Human sperm competition. London, UK: Chapman and Hall. Google Scholar | |
| Bentler, P.M. ( 1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software. Google Scholar | |
| Betzig, L.L. ( 1986). Despotism and differential reproduction: A Darwinian view of history. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine. Google Scholar | |
| Botwin, M. , Buss, D.M. , & Shackelford, T.K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65, 107-136. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Braun, M. , & Bryan, A. ( 2006). Female waist-to-hip and male waist-to-shoulder ratios as determinants of romantic partner desirability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 805-819. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Buss, D.M. ( 1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses testing in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 12, 1-49. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Buss, D.M. ( 1991). Conflict in married couples: Personality predictors of anger and upset. Journal of Personality, 59, 663-688. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Buss, D.M. , Abbott, M. , Angleitner, A. , Biaggio, A. , Blanco-Villasenor, A. , Bruchon-Schweitzer, M. , . . . Yang, K.-S. ( 1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5-47. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Buss, D.M. , & Barnes, M. ( 1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Buss, D.M. , & Schmitt, D. ( 1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Dijkstra, P. , & Buunk, B.P. ( 2001). Sex differences in the jealousy-evoking nature of a rival’s body build. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 335-341. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Eastwick, P.W. , & Finkel, E.J. ( 2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245-264. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Ellis, B. ( 1992). The evolution of sexual attraction: Evaluative mechanisms in women. In J. Barkow , L. Cosmides , & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 267-288). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Ellis, L. ( 1995). Dominance and reproductive success among non-human animals: A cross-species comparison. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 257-333. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Fletcher, G.J.O. , & Simpson, J.A. ( 2000). Ideal standards in close relationships: Their structure and functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 9, 102-105. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Fletcher, G. , Simpson, J. , & Thomas, G. ( 2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340-354. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Fletcher, G.J.O. , Tither, J.M. , O’Loughlin, C. , Friesen, M. , & Overall, N. ( 2004). Warm and homely or cold and beautiful? Sex differences in trading off traits in mate selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 659-672. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Franzoi, S.L. , & Hertzog, M.E. ( 1987). Judging physical attractiveness: What body aspects do we use? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 19-33. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Frisch, R.E. , & McArthur, J.W. (1974). Menstrual cycles: Fatness as determinant of minimum weight necessary for their maintenance and onset . Science, 185, 554-556. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Galton, F. ( 1879). Composite portraits, made by combining those of many different persons in a single resultant figure. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 8, 132-144. Google Scholar | |
| Gangestad, S.W. , & Simpson, J.A. ( 2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573-587. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Gangestad, S.W. , & Thornhill, R. ( 1999). Individual differences in developmental precision and fluctuating asymmetry: A model and its implications. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 402-416. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Gangestad, S.W. , Thornhill, R. , & Garver-Apgar, C. (2005). Adaptations to ovulation . In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 344-371). Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley. Google Scholar | |
| Gangestad, S.W. , Thornhill, R. , & Yeo, R.A. ( 1994). Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 73-85. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Garver-Apgar, C. , Gangestad, S. , Thornhill, R. , Miller, R. , & Olp, J. ( 2006). Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science , 17, 830-835. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Gillis, J.S. , & Avis, W.E. ( 1980). The male-taller norm in mate selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 396-401. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Grammer, K. , Fink, B. , Juette, A. , Ronzal, G. , & Thornhill, R. ( 2002). Female faces and bodies: N-dimensional feature space and attractiveness. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 91-125). Westport, CT: Greenwood. Google Scholar | |
| Gray, P.B. , Kahlenber, S.M. , Barrett, E.S. , Lipson, S.F. , & Ellison, P.T. ( 2002). Marriage and fatherhood are associated with lower testosterone in males. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 193-201. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Graziano, W.G. , Jensen-Campbell, L.A. , Todd, M. , & Finch, J.F. ( 1997). Interpersonal attraction from an evolutionary psychology perspective: Women’s reactions to dominant and prosocial men. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 141-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
| Greiling, H. , & Buss, D.M. ( 2000). Women’s sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences , 28, 929-963. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Henrich, J. , & Gil-White, F.J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165-196. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Hillson, S. ( 1996). Dental anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Hinsz, V.B. , Matz, D.C. , & Patience, R.A. (2001). Does women’s hair signal reproductive potential? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 166-172. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Horvarth, T. ( 1979). Correlates of physical beauty in men and women. Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 145-151. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Hughes, S.M. , & Gallup, G.G. ( 2002). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 173-178. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Jensen-Campbell, L.A. , Graziano, W.G. , & West, S.G. ( 1995). Dominance, prosocial orientation, and female preferences: Do nice guys really finish last? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 427-440. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Judd, C.M. , McClelland, G.H. , & Ryan, C.S. ( 2009). Data analysis: A model comparison approach. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Judge, T.A. , & Cable, D.M. ( 2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 428-441. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Kashy, D.A. , & Donnellan, M.B. (in press). Conceptual and methodological issues in the analysis of data from dyads and groups. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Kenny, D.A. , Kashy, D.A. , & Cook, W.L. ( 2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY : Guilford. Google Scholar | |
| Kenrick, D.T. , Neuberg, S.L. , Zierk, K.L. , & Krones, J.M. ( 1994). Evolution and social cognition: Contrast effects as a function of sex, dominance, and physical attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 210-217. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Kinsey, A.C. , Pomeroy, W.B. , Martin, C.E. ( 1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders. Google Scholar | |
| Kline, R.B. ( 2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford. Google Scholar | |
| Langlois, J.H. , & Roggman, L.A. ( 1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115-121. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Li, N.P. , Bailey, M.J. , Kenrick, D.T. , & Linsenmeier, J.A.W. (2002). The necessities and luxury of mate preferences: Testing the trade offs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947-955. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Li, N.P. , & Kenrick, D.T. ( 2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468-489. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Locke, K.D. ( 2000). Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders . Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 249-267. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Manning, J.T. , Scutt, D. , Whitehouse, G.H. , & Leinster, S.J. (1997). Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 223-236. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| McCann, S.J. ( 2001). Height, societal threat, and the victory margin in presidential elections (1824-1992). Psychological Reports, 88, 741-742. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Møller, A.P. , Soler, M. , & Thornhill, R. ( 1995). Breast asymmetry, sexual selection and human reproductive success. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 207-219. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Montepare, J.M. , Zebrowitz, M. , & McArthur, L. ( 1988). Impressions of people created by age-related qualities and their gates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 55, 547-556. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Penton-Voak, I.S. , Little, A.C. , Jones, B.C. , Burt, D.M. , Tiddeman, B.P. , & Perrett, D. ( 2003). Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 264-271. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Perilloux, H.K. , Webster, G.D. , & Gaulin, S.J.C. (2010). Signals of genetic quality and maternal investment capacity: The dynamic effects of fluctuating asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio on men’s ratings of women’s attractiveness . Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 34-42. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Perusse, D. ( 1993). Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: Testing the relationship at proximate and ultimate levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 267-322. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Regan, P.C. ( 1998). What if you can’t get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1294-1303. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Rubenstein, A.J. , Langlois, J.H. , & Kalakanis, L.E. (1999). Infant preferences for attractive faces: A cognitive explanation. Developmental Psychology , 35, 848-855. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Sadalla, E.K. , Kenrick, D.T. , & Vershure, B. ( 1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 730-738. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Singh, D. ( 1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293-307. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Singh, D. ( 1995). Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationships: Role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 465-481. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Stevenage, S.V. , Nixon, M.S. , & Vince, K. ( 1999). Visual analysis of gait as a cue to identity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 513-526. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Symons, D. ( 1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Symons, D. ( 1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerson (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80-118). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
| Thornhill, R. , & Gangestad, S.W. (1993). Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature, 4, 237-269. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Tovée, M.J. , & Cornelissen, P.L. (1999). The mystery of female beauty . Nature, 399, 215-216. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Tovée, M.J. , Reinhardt, S. , Emery, J.L. , & Cornelissen, P.L. (1998). Optimal BMI and maximum sexual attractiveness. Lancet, 352, 548. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Townsend, J.M. ( 1993). Sexuality and partner selection: Sex differences among college students. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 305-329. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Townsend, J.M. , & Wasserman, T. ( 1998). Sexual attractiveness: Sex differences in assessment and criteria. Evolution of Human Behavior, 19, 171-191. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Watson, P.J. , & Thornhill, R. ( 1994). Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 21-25. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI |
