The desire for justice can escalate or facilitate resolution of intergroup conflicts. Two studies investigated retributive and restorative notions of justice as the mediating factor of the effect of perceived outgroup sentience—an aspect of (mechanistic) dehumanization referring to the emotional depth attributed to others—on intergroup conflict resolution. Study 1 showed that for Palestinians, who see themselves as victims, perceived sentience of Israelis decreased retributive but increased restorative notions of justice, which, ultimately, increased support for conflict resolution by negotiation rather than political violence. Study 2 partially replicated Study 1’s findings with Jewish Israelis. The role of perceived sentience and its relationship to retributive and restorative notions of justice in protracted and nonprotracted conflicts and their resolution is discussed.

Atran, S., Ginges, J. (2009, January 25). How words could win a war. The New York Times, p. WK12. Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J., Strang, H. (2001). Introduction: Restorative justice and civil society. In Braithwaite, J., Strang, H. (Eds.), Restorative justice and civil society (pp. 1-13). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V. (2010). Do fish feel pain? New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Castano, E. (2012). Antisocial behavior in individuals and groups: An empathy-focused approach. In Deaux, K., Snyder, M. (Eds.), Handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 419-445). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Castano, E., Giner-Sorolla, R. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 805-818. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Castano, E., Kofta, M. (2008). Dehumanization: Humanity and its denial. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 695-697. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Cehajic, S., Brown, R., Castano, E. (2008). Forgive and forget? Antecedents and consequences of intergroup forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Political Psychology, 29, 351-367. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Darley, J., Pittman, T. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324-336. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Demoulin, S., Leyens, J., Paladino, M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Rodriguez-Perez, A., Dovidio, J. F. (2004). Dimensions of “uniquely” and “non-uniquely” human emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 18, 71-96. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Fisher, R., Ury, W., Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Penguin. Google Scholar
Fiske, S. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., Gardner, L. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 357-411). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Giner-Sorolla, R., Castano, E., Espinosa, P., Brown, R. (2008). Shame expressions reduce the recipient’s insult from outgroup reparations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 519-526. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Ginges, J., Atran, S. (2008). Humiliation and the inertia effect: Implications for understanding violence and compromise in intractable intergroup conflicts. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 281-294. Google Scholar, Crossref
Ginges, J., Atran, S., Medin, D., Shikaki, K. (2007). Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 7357-7360. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Ginges, J., Hansen, I., Norenzayan, A. (2009). Religion and support for suicide attacks. Psychological Science, 20, 224-230. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Gromet, D., Darley, J. (2006). Restoration and retribution: How including retributive components affects the acceptability of restorative justice procedures. Social Justice Research, 19, 395-432. Google Scholar, Crossref
Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252-264. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Kelman, H. C. (1973). Violence without moral restraint: Reflections on the dehumanization of victims and victimizers. Journal of Social Issues, 29(4), 25-61. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Leidner, B., Castano, E., Zaiser, E., Giner-Sorolla, R. (2010). Ingroup glorification, moral disengagement, and justice in the context of collective violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1115-1129. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Leyens, J.-P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186-197. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Unchino, B. N., Fabrigar, L. R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185-199. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Maoz, I., McCauley, C. (2008). Threat, dehumanization, and support for retaliatory aggressive policies in asymmetric conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 93-116. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Marcu, A., Lyons, E., Hegarty, P. (2007). Dilemmatic human-animal boundaries in Britain and Romania: Post-materialist and materialist dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 875-893. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Marsh, H., Balla, J., McDonald, R. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Mikula, G., Wenzel, M. (2000). Justice and social conflict. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 126-135. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Mummendey, A., Otten, S. (1989). Perspective-specific differences in the segmentation and evaluation of aggressive interaction sequences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 23-40. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Nadler, A., Liviatan, I. (2006). Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary’s expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients’ trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 459-470. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Nadler, A., Malloy, T., Fisher, J. (2008). Intergroup reconciliation: Dimensions and themes. In Nadler, A., Malloy, T., Fisher, J. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 3-12). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Nadler, A., Saguy, T. (2004). Reconciliation between nations: Overcoming emotional deterrents to ending conflicts between groups. In Langholtz, H., Stout, C. (Eds.), The psychology of diplomacy: Psychological dimensions to war and peace (pp. 29-46). Westport, CT: Praeger. Google Scholar
Noor, M., Brown, R., Gonzalez, R., Manzi, J., Lewis, C. (2008). On positive psychological outcomes: What helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 819-832. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Noor, M., Brown, R., Prentice, G. (2008). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 481-495. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Okimoto, T. G., Wenzel, M. (2009). Punishment as restoration of group and offender values following a transgression: Value consensus through symbolic labelling and offender reform. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 346-367. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Okimoto, T. G., Wenzel, M., Feather, N. T. (2009). Beyond retribution: Conceptualizing restorative justice and exploring its determinants. Social Justice Research, 22, 156-180. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Otten, S., Mummendey, A., Wenzel, M. (1995). Evaluation of aggressive interactions in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Aggressive Behavior, 21, 205-224. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Pruitt, D., Carnevale, P. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Buckingham, England: Open University Press. Google Scholar
Roche, D. (2003). Accountability in restorative justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Shnabel, N., Nadler, A. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116-132. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Shnabel, N., Nadler, A. (2010). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Perpetrators need acceptance and victims need empowerment to reconcile. In Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 409-429). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar, Crossref
Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J., Dovidio, J., Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021-1030. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Skitka, L. (2003). Of different minds: An accessible identity model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 286-297. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Slater, J. (2001). What went wrong? The collapse of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. Political Science Quarterly, 116, 171-199. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Steinbock, B. (1992). Life before birth: The moral and legal status of embryos and fetuses. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Strang, H. (2002). Repair or revenge: Victims and restorative justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 376-400. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Wenzel, M. (2009). Social identity and justice: Implications for intergroup relations. In Otten, S., Sassenberg, K., Kessler, T. (Eds.), Intergroup relations: The role of motivation and emotion (pp. 61-79). New York, NY: Psychology Press. Google Scholar
Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G. (2010). How acts of forgiveness restore a sense of justice: Addressing status/power and value concerns raised by transgressions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 401-417. Google Scholar, ISI
Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., Platow, M. J. (2008). Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 375-389. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Wenzel, M., Thielmann, I. (2006). Why we punish in the name of justice: Just desert versus value restoration and the role of social identity. Social Justice Research, 19, 450-470. Google Scholar, Crossref
View access options

My Account

You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Article

Your Access Options

The desire for justice can escalate or facilitate resolution of intergroup conflicts. Two studies investigated retributive and restorative notions of justice as the mediating factor of the effect of perceived outgroup sentience—an aspect of (mechanistic) dehumanization referring to the emotional depth attributed to others—on intergroup conflict resolution. Study 1 showed that for Palestinians, who see themselves as victims, perceived sentience of Israelis decreased retributive but increased restorative notions of justice, which, ultimately, increased support for conflict resolution by negotiation rather than political violence. Study 2 partially replicated Study 1’s findings with Jewish Israelis. The role of perceived sentience and its relationship to retributive and restorative notions of justice in protracted and nonprotracted conflicts and their resolution is discussed.

Atran, S., Ginges, J. (2009, January 25). How words could win a war. The New York Times, p. WK12. Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J., Strang, H. (2001). Introduction: Restorative justice and civil society. In Braithwaite, J., Strang, H. (Eds.), Restorative justice and civil society (pp. 1-13). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V. (2010). Do fish feel pain? New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Castano, E. (2012). Antisocial behavior in individuals and groups: An empathy-focused approach. In Deaux, K., Snyder, M. (Eds.), Handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 419-445). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Castano, E., Giner-Sorolla, R. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 805-818. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Castano, E., Kofta, M. (2008). Dehumanization: Humanity and its denial. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 695-697. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Cehajic, S., Brown, R., Castano, E. (2008). Forgive and forget? Antecedents and consequences of intergroup forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Political Psychology, 29, 351-367. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Darley, J., Pittman, T. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324-336. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Demoulin, S., Leyens, J., Paladino, M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Rodriguez-Perez, A., Dovidio, J. F. (2004). Dimensions of “uniquely” and “non-uniquely” human emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 18, 71-96. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Fisher, R., Ury, W., Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Penguin. Google Scholar
Fiske, S. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., Gardner, L. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 357-411). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Giner-Sorolla, R., Castano, E., Espinosa, P., Brown, R. (2008). Shame expressions reduce the recipient’s insult from outgroup reparations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 519-526. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Ginges, J., Atran, S. (2008). Humiliation and the inertia effect: Implications for understanding violence and compromise in intractable intergroup conflicts. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 281-294. Google Scholar, Crossref
Ginges, J., Atran, S., Medin, D., Shikaki, K. (2007). Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 7357-7360. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Ginges, J., Hansen, I., Norenzayan, A. (2009). Religion and support for suicide attacks. Psychological Science, 20, 224-230. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Gromet, D., Darley, J. (2006). Restoration and retribution: How including retributive components affects the acceptability of restorative justice procedures. Social Justice Research, 19, 395-432. Google Scholar, Crossref
Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252-264. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Kelman, H. C. (1973). Violence without moral restraint: Reflections on the dehumanization of victims and victimizers. Journal of Social Issues, 29(4), 25-61. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Leidner, B., Castano, E., Zaiser, E., Giner-Sorolla, R. (2010). Ingroup glorification, moral disengagement, and justice in the context of collective violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1115-1129. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Leyens, J.-P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186-197. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Unchino, B. N., Fabrigar, L. R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185-199. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Maoz, I., McCauley, C. (2008). Threat, dehumanization, and support for retaliatory aggressive policies in asymmetric conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 93-116. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Marcu, A., Lyons, E., Hegarty, P. (2007). Dilemmatic human-animal boundaries in Britain and Romania: Post-materialist and materialist dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 875-893. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Marsh, H., Balla, J., McDonald, R. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Mikula, G., Wenzel, M. (2000). Justice and social conflict. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 126-135. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Mummendey, A., Otten, S. (1989). Perspective-specific differences in the segmentation and evaluation of aggressive interaction sequences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 23-40. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Nadler, A., Liviatan, I. (2006). Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary’s expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients’ trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 459-470. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Nadler, A., Malloy, T., Fisher, J. (2008). Intergroup reconciliation: Dimensions and themes. In Nadler, A., Malloy, T., Fisher, J. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 3-12). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Nadler, A., Saguy, T. (2004). Reconciliation between nations: Overcoming emotional deterrents to ending conflicts between groups. In Langholtz, H., Stout, C. (Eds.), The psychology of diplomacy: Psychological dimensions to war and peace (pp. 29-46). Westport, CT: Praeger. Google Scholar
Noor, M., Brown, R., Gonzalez, R., Manzi, J., Lewis, C. (2008). On positive psychological outcomes: What helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 819-832. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Noor, M., Brown, R., Prentice, G. (2008). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 481-495. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Okimoto, T. G., Wenzel, M. (2009). Punishment as restoration of group and offender values following a transgression: Value consensus through symbolic labelling and offender reform. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 346-367. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Okimoto, T. G., Wenzel, M., Feather, N. T. (2009). Beyond retribution: Conceptualizing restorative justice and exploring its determinants. Social Justice Research, 22, 156-180. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Otten, S., Mummendey, A., Wenzel, M. (1995). Evaluation of aggressive interactions in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Aggressive Behavior, 21, 205-224. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Pruitt, D., Carnevale, P. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Buckingham, England: Open University Press. Google Scholar
Roche, D. (2003). Accountability in restorative justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Shnabel, N., Nadler, A. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116-132. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Shnabel, N., Nadler, A. (2010). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Perpetrators need acceptance and victims need empowerment to reconcile. In Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 409-429). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar, Crossref
Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J., Dovidio, J., Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021-1030. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Skitka, L. (2003). Of different minds: An accessible identity model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 286-297. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Slater, J. (2001). What went wrong? The collapse of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. Political Science Quarterly, 116, 171-199. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Steinbock, B. (1992). Life before birth: The moral and legal status of embryos and fetuses. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Strang, H. (2002). Repair or revenge: Victims and restorative justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 376-400. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Wenzel, M. (2009). Social identity and justice: Implications for intergroup relations. In Otten, S., Sassenberg, K., Kessler, T. (Eds.), Intergroup relations: The role of motivation and emotion (pp. 61-79). New York, NY: Psychology Press. Google Scholar
Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G. (2010). How acts of forgiveness restore a sense of justice: Addressing status/power and value concerns raised by transgressions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 401-417. Google Scholar, ISI
Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., Platow, M. J. (2008). Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 375-389. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Wenzel, M., Thielmann, I. (2006). Why we punish in the name of justice: Just desert versus value restoration and the role of social identity. Social Justice Research, 19, 450-470. Google Scholar, Crossref