Five studies tested the common assumption that women prefer nonconformist men as romantic partners, whereas men prefer conformist women. Studies 1 and 2 showed that both men and women preferred nonconformist romantic partners, but women overestimated the extent to which men prefer conformist partners. In Study 3, participants ostensibly in a small-group interaction showed preferences for nonconformist opposite-sex targets, a pattern that was particularly evident when men evaluated women. Dating success was greater the more nonconformist the sample was (Study 4), and perceptions of nonconformity in an ex-partner were associated with greater love and attraction toward that partner (Study 5). On the minority of occasions in which effects were moderated by gender, it was in the reverse direction to the traditional wisdom: Conformity was more associated with dating success among men. The studies contradict the notion that men disproportionately prefer conformist women.

Archer, J. (1996). Sex differences in social behavior: Are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible? American Psychologist, 51, 909-917. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Bassett, J. F., Moss, B. (2004). Men and women prefer risk takers as romantic and nonromantic partners. Current Research in Social Psychology, 9, 135-144. Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings of life. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Google Scholar
Boyd, R., Richerson, P. J., Henrich, J. (2011). The cultural niche: Why social learning is essential for human adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 108, 10918-10925. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Brauer, M., Bourhis, R. Y. (2006). Social power. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 601-616. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Buss, D. M. (2001). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books. Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Campbell, A. (2002). A mind of her own: The evolutionary psychology of women. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Chen, X.-P., Wasti, S. A., Triandis, H. C. (1997). When does group norm or group identity predict cooperation in a public goods dilemma? The moderating effects of idiocentrism and allocentrism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 259-276. Google Scholar, Crossref
Dush, C. M. K., Amato, P. R. (2005). Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 607-627. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behaviour: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Eastwick, P. W., Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J., Hunt, L. L. (2014). The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 3, 623-665. Google Scholar, Crossref
Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Cialdini, R. B., Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 281-294. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
Hornsey, M. J., Jetten, J. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 248-264. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Graziano, W. G., West, S. G. (1995). Dominance, prosocial orientation, and female preferences: Do nice guys really finish last? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 427-440. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Kenrick, D. T., Li, N. P., Butner, J. (2003). Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision-rules and emergent social norms. Psychological Review, 110, 3-28. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Li, N. P., Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468-489. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Li, N. P., Yong, J. C., Tov, W., Sng, O., Fletcher, G. J. O., Valentine, K. A., . . . Balliet, D. (2013). Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 757-776. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Minear, M., Park, D. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 630-633. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119-125. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Richerson, P., Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T., Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 730-738. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Schaller, M. (1997). Beyond “competing,” beyond “compatible.” American Psychologist, 52, 1379-1380. Google Scholar, Crossref
Segal-Caspi, L., Roccas, S., Sagiv, L. (2012). Don’t judge a book by its cover, revisited: Perceived and reported traits and values of attractive women. Psychological Science, 23, 1112-1116. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240-275. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Triandis, H. C., Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Urbaniak, G. C., Kilmann, P. R. (2003). Physical attractiveness and the “nice guy paradox”: Do nice guys really finish last? Sex Roles, 49, 413-426. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Urbaniak, G. C., Kilmann, P. R. (2006). Niceness and dating success: A further test of the nice guy stereotype. Sex Roles, 55, 209-224. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Van Vugt, M., Iredale, W. (2013). Men behaving nicely: Public goods as peacock’s tails. British Journal of Psychology, 104, 3-13. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Wallach, M. A., Wallach, L. (1983). Psychology’s sanction for selfishness: The error of egoism in theory and therapy. San Francisco, CA: Freeman. Google Scholar
Wood, D., Brumbaugh, C. C. (2009). Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1226-1244. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Wood, W., Eagly, A. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699-727. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
View access options

My Account

You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Article

Your Access Options

Five studies tested the common assumption that women prefer nonconformist men as romantic partners, whereas men prefer conformist women. Studies 1 and 2 showed that both men and women preferred nonconformist romantic partners, but women overestimated the extent to which men prefer conformist partners. In Study 3, participants ostensibly in a small-group interaction showed preferences for nonconformist opposite-sex targets, a pattern that was particularly evident when men evaluated women. Dating success was greater the more nonconformist the sample was (Study 4), and perceptions of nonconformity in an ex-partner were associated with greater love and attraction toward that partner (Study 5). On the minority of occasions in which effects were moderated by gender, it was in the reverse direction to the traditional wisdom: Conformity was more associated with dating success among men. The studies contradict the notion that men disproportionately prefer conformist women.

Archer, J. (1996). Sex differences in social behavior: Are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible? American Psychologist, 51, 909-917. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Bassett, J. F., Moss, B. (2004). Men and women prefer risk takers as romantic and nonromantic partners. Current Research in Social Psychology, 9, 135-144. Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings of life. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Google Scholar
Boyd, R., Richerson, P. J., Henrich, J. (2011). The cultural niche: Why social learning is essential for human adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 108, 10918-10925. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Brauer, M., Bourhis, R. Y. (2006). Social power. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 601-616. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Buss, D. M. (2001). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books. Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Campbell, A. (2002). A mind of her own: The evolutionary psychology of women. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Chen, X.-P., Wasti, S. A., Triandis, H. C. (1997). When does group norm or group identity predict cooperation in a public goods dilemma? The moderating effects of idiocentrism and allocentrism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 259-276. Google Scholar, Crossref
Dush, C. M. K., Amato, P. R. (2005). Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 607-627. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behaviour: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Eastwick, P. W., Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J., Hunt, L. L. (2014). The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 3, 623-665. Google Scholar, Crossref
Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Cialdini, R. B., Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 281-294. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
Hornsey, M. J., Jetten, J. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 248-264. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Graziano, W. G., West, S. G. (1995). Dominance, prosocial orientation, and female preferences: Do nice guys really finish last? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 427-440. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Kenrick, D. T., Li, N. P., Butner, J. (2003). Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision-rules and emergent social norms. Psychological Review, 110, 3-28. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Li, N. P., Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468-489. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Li, N. P., Yong, J. C., Tov, W., Sng, O., Fletcher, G. J. O., Valentine, K. A., . . . Balliet, D. (2013). Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 757-776. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Minear, M., Park, D. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 630-633. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119-125. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Richerson, P., Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T., Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 730-738. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Schaller, M. (1997). Beyond “competing,” beyond “compatible.” American Psychologist, 52, 1379-1380. Google Scholar, Crossref
Segal-Caspi, L., Roccas, S., Sagiv, L. (2012). Don’t judge a book by its cover, revisited: Perceived and reported traits and values of attractive women. Psychological Science, 23, 1112-1116. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240-275. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Triandis, H. C., Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Urbaniak, G. C., Kilmann, P. R. (2003). Physical attractiveness and the “nice guy paradox”: Do nice guys really finish last? Sex Roles, 49, 413-426. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Urbaniak, G. C., Kilmann, P. R. (2006). Niceness and dating success: A further test of the nice guy stereotype. Sex Roles, 55, 209-224. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Van Vugt, M., Iredale, W. (2013). Men behaving nicely: Public goods as peacock’s tails. British Journal of Psychology, 104, 3-13. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Wallach, M. A., Wallach, L. (1983). Psychology’s sanction for selfishness: The error of egoism in theory and therapy. San Francisco, CA: Freeman. Google Scholar
Wood, D., Brumbaugh, C. C. (2009). Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1226-1244. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Wood, W., Eagly, A. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699-727. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI

Article available in: