Abstract
A meta-analysis of the data from empirical investigations of diversity in work groups was used to examine the impact of two types of diversity attributes, highly job-related and less job-related, on work group cohesion and performance. This distinction was used to test the proposition that different types of diversity will differentially impact work group cohesion and performance. In addition, type of team was examined as a possible moderator of the relationship between diversity and performance. Results showed that neither type of diversity had a relationship with cohesion or performance. Explanations and directions for future research are offered.
| Aguinis, H., & Pierce, C. A. (1998). Testing moderator variable hypotheses meta-analytically. Journal of Management, 24 (5), 577–592. Google Scholar | |
| Allison, P. D. (1978). Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review, 43, 865–880. Google Scholar | |
| Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demography and design: predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3 (3), 321–341. Google Scholar | |
| Arrow, H., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Membership dynamics in groups at work: a theoretical framework. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 373–411). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar | |
| Bantel, K. A. (1993). Strategic clarity in banking: role of top management team demography. Psychological Reports, 73 (3), 1187–1201. Google Scholar | |
| Bantel, K. A. (1994). Strategic planning openness: the role of top team demography. Group & Organization Management, 19 (4), 406–424. Google Scholar | |
| Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar | |
| Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46 (4), 823–850. Google Scholar | |
| Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: a replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49 (2), 429–452. Google Scholar | |
| Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Oser, R., & Flanagan, D. L. (1992). Work teams in industry: a selected review and proposed framework. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: their training and performance (pp. 355–378). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing. Google Scholar | |
| Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23 (3), 239–290. Google Scholar | |
| Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (3), 504–529. Google Scholar | |
| Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22 (2), 175–186. Google Scholar | |
| Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar | |
| Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: information sharing and group judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (5), 959–974. Google Scholar | |
| Gully, S. M., Devine, D. J., & Whitney, D. J. (1995). A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: effects of levels of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 26 (4), 497–520. Google Scholar | |
| Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315–342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar | |
| Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9 (2), 193–206. Google Scholar | |
| Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (4), 659–684. Google Scholar | |
| Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (1), 96–107. Google Scholar | |
| Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Google Scholar | |
| Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 121–140. Google Scholar | |
| Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar | |
| Ilgen, D. R., Major, D. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Sego, D. J. (1993). Team research in the 1990s. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: perspectives and directions (pp. 245–270). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar | |
| Jackson, S. E., May, K. E., & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. In R. A. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 204–261). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Google Scholar | |
| Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (4), 741–763. Google Scholar | |
| Johnson, B. T., Mullen, B., & Salas, E. (1995). Comparison of three major meta-analytic approaches. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80 (1), 94–106. Google Scholar | |
| Klimoski, R. J., & Donahue, L. M. (2001). Person perception in organizations: an overview of the field. In M. London (Ed.), How people evaluate others in organizations: person perception and interpersonal judgement in I/O Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
| Kosnik, R. D. (1990). Effects of board demography and directors’ incentives on corporate greenmail decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (1), 129–150. Google Scholar | |
| Lant, T. K., Milliken, F. J., & Batra, B. (1992). The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: an empirical exploration. Strategic Management Journal, 13 (8), 585–608. Google Scholar | |
| Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 325–340. Google Scholar | |
| Lawrence, B. S. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8 (1), 1–22. Google Scholar | |
| Libby, R., Trotman, K. T., & Zimmer, I. (1987). Member variation, recognition of expertise, and group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72 (1), 81–87. Google Scholar | |
| Littlepage, G., Robinson, W., & Reddington, K. (1997). Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 133–147. Google Scholar | |
| Littlepage, G. E., Schmidt, G. W., Whisler, E. W., & Frost, A. G. (1995). An input-process-output model of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 877–889. Google Scholar | |
| Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171–194. Google Scholar | |
| Mayo, M., Pastor, J. C., & Meindl, J. R. (1996). The effects of group heterogeneity on the self-perceived efficacy of group leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 7(2), 265–284. Google Scholar | |
| Maznevski, M. L., & DiStefano, J. J. (1996). The mortar in the mosaic: a new look at composition, process, and performance in decision-making groups. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, OH.B | |
| McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). The study of groups: past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 95–105. Google Scholar | |
| McGrath, J. E., Berdahl, J. L., & Arrow, H. (1995). Traits, expectations, culture, and clout: the dynamics of diversity in work groups. In S. E. Jackson & M. N. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: research paradigms for a changing workplace (pp. 17–46). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar | |
| McLeod, P. L., & Lobel, S. A. (1992). The effects of ethnic diversity on idea generation in small groups. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 227–231. Google Scholar | |
| McLeod, P. L., Lobel, S. A., & Cox, T. H. Jr (1996). Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small Group Research, 27(2), 248–264. Google Scholar | |
| Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402–433. Google Scholar | |
| Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (1997). Correcting effect sizes computed from factorial analysis of variance for use in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 192–199. Google Scholar | |
| Mullen, B., & Cooper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: an integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 210–227. Google Scholar | |
| Murray, A. I. (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 125–141. Google Scholar | |
| Nelson, L. J., & Klutas, K. (2000). The distinctiveness effect in social interaction: creation of a self-fulfilling prophecy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(1), 126–135. Google Scholar | |
| Nickerson, R. S. (1999). How we know—and sometimes misjudge—what others know: imputing one’s own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 737–759. Google Scholar | |
| Nouri, H., & Greenberg, R. H. (1995). Meta-analytic procedures for estimation of effect sizes on experiments using complex analysis of variance. Journal of Management, 21(4), 801–812. Google Scholar | |
| O’Reilly III, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 21–37. Google Scholar | |
| Pearlman, K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(4), 373–406. Google Scholar | |
| Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: an intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7(6), 615–631. Google Scholar | |
| Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28. Google Scholar | |
| Sessa, V. I., & Jackson, S. E. (1995). Diversity in decision-making teams: all differences are not created equal. In M. M. Chemers, S. Oskamp, & M. A. Costanzo (Eds.), Diversity in organizations: new perspectives for a changing workplace (pp. 133–156). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
| Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics. McGraw-Hill Publisher. Google Scholar | |
| Simons, T. (1995). Top management team consensus, heterogeneity, and debate as contingent predictors of company performance: the complimentarity of group structure and process. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 62–67. | |
| Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 662–674. Google Scholar | |
| Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O’Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 412–438. Google Scholar | |
| Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unique information in group decision making: biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1467–1478. Google Scholar | |
| Stauffer, J. (1998). MetaQuick II: psychometric meta analysis software for windows. Google Scholar | |
| Sundstrom, E., DeMeuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45(2), 120–133. Google Scholar | |
| Sutcliffe, K. M. (1994). What executives notice: accurate perceptions in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1360–1378. Google Scholar | |
| Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup relations (pp.33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole Publishing. Google Scholar | |
| Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identify theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers. Google Scholar | |
| Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 590–602. Google Scholar | |
| Whitener, E. M. (1990). Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 315–321. Google Scholar | |
| Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91–121. Google Scholar | |
| Wiersema, M. F., & Bird, A. (1993). Organizational demography in Japanese firms: group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 996–1025. Google Scholar | |
| Williams, R. J., Hoffman, J. J., & Lamont, B. T. (1995). The influence of top management team characteristics of M-form implementation time. Journal of Managerial Issues, 7(4), 466–480. Google Scholar | |
| Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Organizational demography: the differential effects of age and tenure distribution on technical communications. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 353–376. Google Scholar |
