Abstract
In the Arab media, it has been claimed that independent news channels put more pressure on officials and public figures, compared with the state-owned news channels. This article aims to compare empirically the strategies that Arab interviewers use to restrict or broaden the answers expected from interviewees in two different channels. Adopting contrastive methods, the findings show that the percentage of equivocations is remarkably low in the government-controlled channel. The study suggests that the findings could be understood within the well-studied theory of equivocation “avoidance-avoidance conflict,” which argues that people tend to equivocate when they are expected to reply to a question for which all potential replies have negative consequences. Arab interviewers in the government-controlled channels design their questions in a way that does not constrain their guests, but avoids conflict with them by allowing them to give a wide range of valid answers.
References
Section:
| Alfahad, A. (2013). A conversation analysis of aggressiveness and deference in Arabic news interviews (Doctoral thesis). Leeds University, Leeds, England. Google Scholar | |
| Amin, H. (2002). Freedom as a value in Arab media: Perceptions and attitudes among journalists. Political Communication, 19, 125-135. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Ayish, M. (2002). Political communication on Arab world television: Evolving patterns. Political Communication, 19, 137-154. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Bavelas, J., Black, A., Bryson, L., Mullett, J. (1988). Political equivocation: A situational explanation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 137-145. Google Scholar, Link | |
| Bavelas, J., Black, A., Chovil, N., Mullett, J. (1990). Equivocal communication. London, England: Sage. Google Scholar | |
| Brown, P., Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Bull, P. (1994). On identifying questions, replies, and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 115-131. Google Scholar, Link | |
| Bull, P. (1997). Queen of hearts or queen of the arts of implication? Implicit criticisms and their implications for equivocation theory in the interview between Martin Bashir and Diana, Princess of Wales. Social Psychological Review, 1, 27-36. Google Scholar | |
| Bull, P. (1998). Equivocation theory and news interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 36-51. Google Scholar, Link | |
| Bull, P. (2000). Equivocation and the rhetoric of modernization: An analysis of televised interviews with Tony Blair in the 1997 British General Election. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 222-247. Google Scholar, Link | |
| Bull, P. (2003a). The analysis of equivocation in political interviews. In Breakwell, G. (Ed.), Doing social psychology research (pp. 205-228). Oxford, England: Blackwell. Google Scholar | |
| Bull, P. (2003b). The microanalysis of political communication: Claptrap and ambiguity. London, England: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Bull, P. (2008). “Slipperiness, evasion, and ambiguity”: Equivocation and facework in noncommittal political discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 333-344. Google Scholar, Link | |
| Bull, P., Elliott, J. (1998). Level of threat a means of assessing interviewer toughness and neutrality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 220-244. Google Scholar, Link | |
| Bull, P., Elliott, J., Palmer, D., Walker, L. (1996). Why politicians are three-faced: The face model of political interviews. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 267-284. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Bull, P., Fetzer, A. (2010). Face, facework and political discourse. International Review of Social Psychology, 23, 155-185. Google Scholar | |
| Bull, P., Mayer, K. (1993). How not to answer questions in political interviews. Political Psychology, 14, 651-666. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Chilton, P. A. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London, England: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Clayman, S. (1993). Reformulating the question: A device for answering/not answering questions in news interviews and press conferences. Text, 13, 159-188. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Clayman, S. (2001). Answers and evasions. Language in Society, 30, 403-442. Google Scholar | |
| Clayman, S., Elliott, M., Heritage, J., McDonald, L. (2006). Historical trends in questioning presidents, 1953-2000. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36, 561-583. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Clayman, S., Elliott, M., Heritage, J., McDonald, L. (2007). When does the watchdog bark? Conditions of aggressive questioning in presidential news conferences. American Sociological Review, 72, 23-41. Google Scholar, Link | |
| Clayman, S., Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46. Google Scholar, Link | |
| Feldman, O. (2004). Talking politics in Japan today. Brighton, England: Sussex Academic Press. Google Scholar | |
| Gnisci, A., Bonaiuto, M. (2003). Grilling politicians: Politicians’ answers to questions in television interviews and courtroom examinations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22, 385-413. Google Scholar, Link | |
| Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18, 213-231. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline | |
| Greatbatch, D. (1986). Aspects of topical organization in news interviews: The use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviewees. Media, Culture & Society, 8, 441-455. Google Scholar, Link | |
| Harris, S. (1991). Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In Scannell, P. (Ed.), Broadcast talk (pp. 76-99). London, England: Sage. Google Scholar | |
| Harris, S. (2001). Being politically impolite: Extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse. Discourse & Society, 12, 451-472. Google Scholar, Link | |
| Lewin, K. (1938). The conceptual representation and measurement of psychological forces. Contributions to Psychological Theory, 1, 247. Google Scholar | |
| Lynch, M. (2006). Voices of the new Arab public: Iraq, al-Jazeera, and Middle East politics today. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Mellor, N. (2007). Modern Arab journalism: Problems and prospects. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J., Crystal, D. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York, NY: Longman. Google Scholar | |
| Rugh, W. (2004). Arab mass media: Newspapers, radio, and television in Arab politics. Westport, CT: Praeger. Google Scholar | |
| Sakr, N. (2007). Arab television today. London, England: I.B. Tauris. Google Scholar | |
| Seib, P. (2007). New media and prospects for democratization. In Seib, P. (Ed.), New media and the new Middle East (pp. 1-17). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Seib, P. (2008). The al-Jazeera effect: How the new global media are reshaping world politics. Washington, DC: Potomac Books. Google Scholar | |
| Wilson, J. (1990). Politically speaking: The pragmatic analysis of political change. Oxford, England: Blackwell. Google Scholar | |
| Zayani, M., Sahraoui, S. (2007). The culture of Al Jazeera: Inside an Arab media giant. Jefferson, NC: McFarland. Google Scholar |
