This essay examines five ideal–typical conceptions of politics in science and technology studies. Rather than evaluating these conceptions with reference to a single standard, the essay shows how different conceptions of politics serve distinct purposes: normative critique, two approaches to empirical description, and two views of democracy. I discuss each conception of politics with respect to how well it fulfills its apparent primary purpose, as well as its implications for the purpose of studying a key issue in contemporary democratic societies: the politicization of science. In this respect, the essay goes beyond classifying different conceptions of politics and also recommends the fifth conception as especially conducive to understanding and shaping the processes whereby science becomes a site or object of political activity. The essay also employs several analytical distinctions to help clarify the differences among conceptions of politics: between science as ‘political’ (adjective) and science as a site of ‘politics’ (noun), between spatial-conceptions and activity-conceptions of politics, between latent conflicts and actual conflicts, and between politics and power. The essay also makes the methodological argument that the politics of science and technology is best studied with concepts and methods that facilitate dialogue between actors and analysts. The main goal, however, is not to defend a particular view of politics, but to promote conversation on the conceptions of politics that animate research in social studies of science and technology.

Arendt, H (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Asdal, K, Borch, C, Moser, I (2008) Editorial: The technologies of politics. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 9(1): 510. Google Scholar, Crossref
Barnes, B (1988) The Nature of Power. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar
Barry, A (2001) Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. London and New York: Athlone Press. Google Scholar
Barry, A (2013) Material Politics: Disputes along the Pipeline. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar, Crossref
Beck, U (1997) The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar
Bennett, J (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar
Bijker, WE (2006) Why and how technology matters. In: Goodin, RE, Tilly, C (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 681706. Google Scholar, Crossref
Blume, SS (1974) Toward a Political Sociology of Science. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
Bogner, A, Menz, W (2010) How politics deals with expert dissent: The case of ethics councils. Science, Technology & Human Values 35(6): 888914. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Bonneuil, C, Levidow, L (2012) How does the World Trade Organization know? The mobilization and staging of scientific expertise in the GMO trade dispute. Social Studies of Science 42(1): 75100. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Braun, B, Whatmore, SJ (2010) The stuff of politics: An introduction. In: Braun, B, Whatmore, SJ (eds) Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. ixxl. Google Scholar
Brown, MB (2009) Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Brown, W (2006) Power after Foucault. In: Dryzek, J, Honig, B, Phillips, A (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 6584. Google Scholar
Callon, M, Latour, B (1992) Don’t throw the baby out with the bath school! A reply to Collins and Yearley. In: Pickering, A (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 343368. Google Scholar
Callon, M, Law, J (1982) On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment. Social Studies of Science 12(4): 615625. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Callon, M, Lascoumes, P, Barthe, Y (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Clegg, SR (1989) Frameworks of Power. London: SAGE. Google Scholar, Crossref
Collins, H (2008) Actors’ and analysts’ categories in the social analysis of science. In: Meusburger, P, Welker, M, Wunder, E (eds) Clashes of Knowledge: Orthodoxies and Heterodoxies in Science and Religion. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 101110. Google Scholar, Crossref
Collins, H, Evans, R (2002) The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science 32(2): 235296. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Collins, H, Evans, R (2007) Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Collins, H, Weinel, M, Evans, R (2010) The politics and policy of the Third Wave: New technologies and society. Critical Policy Studies 4(2): 185201. Google Scholar, Crossref
Collins, H, Weinel, M, Evans, R (2011) Object and shadow: Responses to the CPS critiques of Collins, Weinel and Evans’, ‘Politics and policy of the Third Wave’. Critical Policy Studies 5(3): 340348. Google Scholar, Crossref
Connolly, WE (1993) The Terms of Political Discourse, 3rd edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Connolly, WE (2013) The Fragility of Things: Self-Organizing Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies, and Democratic Activism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Dean, J (2006) Political theory and cultural studies. In: Dryzek, JS, Honig, B, Phillips, A (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 751772. Google Scholar
De Vries, G (2007) What is political in sub-politics? How Aristotle might help STS. Social Studies of Science 37(5): 781809. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Dewey, J (1916/1980) Democracy and education. In: Boydston, JA (ed.) The Middle Works of John Dewey, Volume 9, 1899-1924: Democracy and Education, 1916. Carbondale, IL and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Google Scholar
Dewey, J (1927/1954) The Public and Its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press. Google Scholar
Durant, D (2010) Public participation in the making of science policy. Perspectives on Science 18(2): 189225. Google Scholar, Crossref
Durant, D (2011) Models of democracy in social studies of science. Social Studies of Science 41(5): 691714. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Ezrahi, Y (1990) The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Forsyth, T (2011) Expertise needs transparency not blind trust: A deliberative approach to integrating science and social participation. Critical Policy Studies 5(3): 317322. Google Scholar, Crossref
Foucault, M (1978) The History of Sexuality: An Introduction, vol. 1. New York: Pantheon Books. Google Scholar
Foucault, M (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (ed Gordon, C). New York: Pantheon Books. Google Scholar
Foucault, M (1991) Governmentality. In: Burchell, G, Gordon, C, Miller, P (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87104. Google Scholar
Freeden, M, Vincent, A (eds) (2013) Comparative Political Thought: Theorizing Practices. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
Frickel, S, Moore, K (2006) Prospects and challenges for a new political sociology of science. In: Frickel, S, Moore, K (eds) The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 331. Google Scholar
Friedan, B (1963) The Feminine Mystique. New York: W.W. Norton. Google Scholar
Fuller, S (2002) Social Epistemology, 2nd edn. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar
Fuller, S (2006) The Philosophy of Science and Technology Studies. New York and London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Funtowicz, SO, Ravetz, JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7): 739775. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Gad, C, Jensen, CB (2010) On the consequences of post-ANT. Science, Technology & Human Values 35(1): 5580. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Gallie, WB (1956) Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167198. Google Scholar, Crossref
Gieryn, TF (1995) Boundaries of science. In: Jasanoff, S, Markle, GE, Petersen, JC, Pinch, T (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 393443. Google Scholar
Gieryn, TF (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Gieryn, TF (2008) Cultural boundaries: Settled and unsettled. In: Meusburger, P, Welker, M, Wunder, E (eds) Clashes of Knowledge: Orthodoxies and Heterodoxies in Science and Religion. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 9199. Google Scholar, Crossref
Gomart, E, Hajer, M (2003) Is that politics? For an inquiry into forms in contemporary politics. In: Joerges, B, Nowotny, H (eds) Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3361. Google Scholar, Crossref
Guston, DH (2000) Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Guston, DH (2004) Forget politicizing science. Let’s democratize science! Issues in Science and Technology 25(1): 2528. Google Scholar
Habermas, J (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (trans. Rehg, W). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Harbers, H (2005) Epilogue: Political materials – Material politics. In: Harbers, H (ed.) Inside the Politics of Technology: Agency and Normativity in the Co-Production of Technology and Society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 257272. Google Scholar, Crossref
Harding, S (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
Harman, G (2009) Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: re.press. Google Scholar
Harman, G (2014) Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political. London: Pluto Press. Google Scholar
Hay, C (2007) Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar
Hess, D, Breyman, S, Campbell, N, Martin, B (2008) Science, technology, and social movements. In: Hackett, EJ, Amsterdamska, O, Lynch, M, Wajcman, J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 473498. Google Scholar
Irwin, A (2008) STS perspectives on scientific governance. In: Hackett, EJ, Amsterdamska, O, Lynch, M, Wajcman, J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 583607. Google Scholar
James, W (1907/1981) Pragmatism. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S (1996) Beyond epistemology: Relativism and engagement in the politics of science. Social Studies of Science 26(2): 393418. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Jasanoff, S (2003) Breaking the waves in science studies: Comment on H.M. Collins and Robert Evans, ‘The Third Wave of Science Studies’. Social Studies of Science 33(3): 389400. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Jasanoff, S (2004) Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In: Jasanoff, S (ed.) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge, pp. 1345. Google Scholar, Crossref
Jasanoff, S (2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Jasanoff, S (2011a) Introduction: Rewriting life, reframing rights. In: Jasanoff, S (ed.) Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 127. Google Scholar, Crossref
Jasanoff, S (2011b) Quality control and peer review in advisory science. In: Lentsch, J, Weingart, P (eds) The Politics of Scientific Advice: Institutional Design for Quality Assurance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1935. Google Scholar, Crossref
Jensen, CB (2014) Continuous variations: The conceptual and the empirical in STS. Science, Technology & Human Values 39(2): 192213. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Keller, EF (1985) Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
Kitcher, P (2011) Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. Google Scholar
Kleinman, DL (2005) Science and Technology in Society: From Biotechnology to the Internet. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
Krause, SR (2011) Bodies in action: Corporeal agency and democratic politics. Political Theory 39(3): 299324. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Kusch, M (2007) Towards a political philosophy of risk: Experts and publics in deliberative democracy. In: Lewens, T (ed.) Risk: Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Routledge, pp. 131155. Google Scholar
Laclau, E, Mouffe, C (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London and New York: Verso. Google Scholar
Latour, B (1983) Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In: Knorr-Cetina, KD, Mulkay, M (eds) Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: SAGE, pp. 141170. Google Scholar
Latour, B (1988) The Pasteurization of France (trans. Sheridan, A, Law, J). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Latour, B (1992) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Bijker, WE, Law, J (eds) Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 225258. Google Scholar
Latour, B (1993) We Have Never Been Modern (trans. Porter, C). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Latour, B (2003) What if we talked politics a little? Contemporary Political Theory 2(2): 143164. Google Scholar, Crossref
Latour, B (2004a) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy (trans. Porter, C). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Latour, B (2004b) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 30(2): 225248. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Latour, B (2005a) From realpolitik to dingpolitik, or how to make things public. In: Latour, B, Weibel, P (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1431. Google Scholar
Latour, B (2005b) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Latour, B (2007) Turning around politics: A note on Gerard de Vries’ paper. Social Studies of Science 37(5): 811820. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Latour, B (2013) An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns (trans. Porter, C). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Latour, B, Woolgar, S (1979/1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Latour, B, Harman, G, Erdélyi, P (2011) The Prince and the Wolf: Latour and Harman at the LSE. Winchester and Washington, DC: Zero Books. Google Scholar
Law, J (ed.) (1991a) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Law, J (1991b) Power, discretion and strategy. In: Law, J (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination. London: Routledge, pp. 165191. Google Scholar
Law, J, Singleton, V (2013) ANT and politics: Working in and on the world. Qualitative Sociology 36(4): 485502. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Leftwich, A (2004) Thinking politically: On the politics of Politics. In: Leftwich, A (ed.) What is Politics? Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 122. Google Scholar
Lloyd, M, Little, A (2009) Introduction. In: Little, A, Lloyd, M (eds) The Politics of Radical Democracy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 111. Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J (2012) On the importance of getting things done. PS: Political Science and Politics 45(1): 18. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Marres, N (2007) The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science 37(5): 759780. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Marres, N (2012) Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar, Crossref
Marres, N, Lezaun, J (2011) Materials and devices of the public: An introduction. Economy and Society 40(4): 489509. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Miller, CA (2001) Challenges in the application of science to global affairs: Contingency, trust, and moral order. In: Miller, CA, Edwards, PN (eds) Changing the Atmosphere: Expertise Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 247285. Google Scholar
Mitchell, T (2011) Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. London and New York: Verso. Google Scholar
Mol, A (1999) Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In: Law, J, Hassard, J (eds) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 7489. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Mouffe, C (2005) On the Political. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
Nahuis, R, Van Lente, H (2008) Where are the politics? Perspectives on democracy and technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 33(5): 559581. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Nisbet, MC, Lewenstein, BV (2002) Biotechnology and the American media: The policy process and the elite press, 1970 to 1999. Science Communication 23(4): 359391. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Okin, SM (1989) Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
Palonen, K (2003) Four times of politics: Policy, polity, politicking, and politicization. Alternatives 28(2): 171186. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Palonen, K (2006a) The Struggle with Time: A Conceptual History of ‘Politics’ as an Activity. Hamburg: LIT Verlag. Google Scholar
Palonen, K (2006b) Two concepts of politics: Conceptual history and present controversies. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 7(1): 1125. Google Scholar, Crossref
Papadopoulos, D (2010) Alter-ontologies: Towards a constituent politics in technoscience. Social Studies of Science 41(2): 177201. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Pels, D (1997) Mixing metaphors: Politics or economics of knowledge? Theory and Society 26(5): 685717. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Pels, D (2003) Unhastening Science: Autonomy and Reflexivity in the Social Theory of Knowledge. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Pestre, D (2004) Thirty years of science studies: Knowledge, society and the political. History and Technology 20(4): 351369. Google Scholar, Crossref
Pestre, D (2008) Challenges for the democratic management of technoscience: Governance, participation, and the political today. Science as Culture 17(2): 101119. Google Scholar, Crossref
Pielke, RA (2007) The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Proctor, RN (1991) Value-Free Science? Purity and Power in Modern Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Radder, H (1996) In and About the World: Philosophical Studies of Science and Technology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar
Radder, H (2006) The World Observed/The World Conceived. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Rancière, J (1999) Disagreement: Politics And Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar
Richards, E, Ashmore, M (eds) (1996) More Sauce Please! The Politics of SSK: Neutrality, Commitment and beyond. Social Studies of Science 26(2): 219228. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Sayes, E (2014) Actor-Network Theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Social Studies of Science 44(1): 134149. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Schmitt, C (1932/1996) The Concept of the Political (trans. Schwab, G). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Shapin, S, Schaffer, S (1985) Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Sismondo, S (2008) Science and technology studies and an engaged program. In: Hackett, EJ, Amsterdamska, O, Lynch, M, Wajcman, J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1331. Google Scholar
Sluga, H (2011) Could you define the sense you give the word ‘political’? Michel Foucault as a political philosopher. History of the Human Sciences 24(4): 6979. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Star, SL, Griesemer, JR (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387420. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Stengers, I (2005) The cosmopolitical proposal. In: Latour, B, Weibel, P (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 9941003. Google Scholar
Stirling, A (2008) ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 33(2): 262294. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Thorpe, C (2008) Political theory in science and technology studies. In: Hackett, EJ, Amsterdamska, O, Lynch, M, Wajcman, J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 6382. Google Scholar
Turner, S (1989) Depoliticizing power. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 533560. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Urbinati, N, Warren, ME (2008) The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387412. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Waldron, J (1999) Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Warren, ME (1999) What is political? Journal of Theoretical Politics 11(2): 207231. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Weber, M (1978) Economy and Society (ed Roth, G, Wittich, C). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
Weber, M (1994) Political Writings (ed Lassman, P, Speirs, R). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Winner, L (1986) The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L (1958) Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edn (trans. Anscombe, GEM). New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar
Woodhouse, E, Hess, D, Breyman, S, Martin, B (2002) Science studies and activism: Possibilities and problems for reconstructivist agendas. Social Studies of Science 32(2): 297319. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Woolgar, S, Lezaun, J (2013) The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies? Social Studies of Science 43(3): 321340. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Wyatt, S, Balmer, B (2007) Home on the range: What and where is the middle in science and technology studies? Science, Technology & Human Values 32(6): 619626. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Wynne, B (2003) Seasick on the third wave: Subverting the hegemony of propositionalism. Social Studies of Science 33(3): 401417. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Wynne, B (2007) Public participation in science and technology: Performing and obscuring a political-conceptual category mistake. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 1(1): 99110. Google Scholar, Crossref
View access options

My Account

You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Article

Your Access Options

This essay examines five ideal–typical conceptions of politics in science and technology studies. Rather than evaluating these conceptions with reference to a single standard, the essay shows how different conceptions of politics serve distinct purposes: normative critique, two approaches to empirical description, and two views of democracy. I discuss each conception of politics with respect to how well it fulfills its apparent primary purpose, as well as its implications for the purpose of studying a key issue in contemporary democratic societies: the politicization of science. In this respect, the essay goes beyond classifying different conceptions of politics and also recommends the fifth conception as especially conducive to understanding and shaping the processes whereby science becomes a site or object of political activity. The essay also employs several analytical distinctions to help clarify the differences among conceptions of politics: between science as ‘political’ (adjective) and science as a site of ‘politics’ (noun), between spatial-conceptions and activity-conceptions of politics, between latent conflicts and actual conflicts, and between politics and power. The essay also makes the methodological argument that the politics of science and technology is best studied with concepts and methods that facilitate dialogue between actors and analysts. The main goal, however, is not to defend a particular view of politics, but to promote conversation on the conceptions of politics that animate research in social studies of science and technology.

Arendt, H (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Asdal, K, Borch, C, Moser, I (2008) Editorial: The technologies of politics. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 9(1): 510. Google Scholar, Crossref
Barnes, B (1988) The Nature of Power. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar
Barry, A (2001) Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. London and New York: Athlone Press. Google Scholar
Barry, A (2013) Material Politics: Disputes along the Pipeline. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar, Crossref
Beck, U (1997) The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar
Bennett, J (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar
Bijker, WE (2006) Why and how technology matters. In: Goodin, RE, Tilly, C (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 681706. Google Scholar, Crossref
Blume, SS (1974) Toward a Political Sociology of Science. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
Bogner, A, Menz, W (2010) How politics deals with expert dissent: The case of ethics councils. Science, Technology & Human Values 35(6): 888914. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Bonneuil, C, Levidow, L (2012) How does the World Trade Organization know? The mobilization and staging of scientific expertise in the GMO trade dispute. Social Studies of Science 42(1): 75100. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Braun, B, Whatmore, SJ (2010) The stuff of politics: An introduction. In: Braun, B, Whatmore, SJ (eds) Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. ixxl. Google Scholar
Brown, MB (2009) Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Brown, W (2006) Power after Foucault. In: Dryzek, J, Honig, B, Phillips, A (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 6584. Google Scholar
Callon, M, Latour, B (1992) Don’t throw the baby out with the bath school! A reply to Collins and Yearley. In: Pickering, A (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 343368. Google Scholar
Callon, M, Law, J (1982) On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment. Social Studies of Science 12(4): 615625. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Callon, M, Lascoumes, P, Barthe, Y (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Clegg, SR (1989) Frameworks of Power. London: SAGE. Google Scholar, Crossref
Collins, H (2008) Actors’ and analysts’ categories in the social analysis of science. In: Meusburger, P, Welker, M, Wunder, E (eds) Clashes of Knowledge: Orthodoxies and Heterodoxies in Science and Religion. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 101110. Google Scholar, Crossref
Collins, H, Evans, R (2002) The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science 32(2): 235296. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Collins, H, Evans, R (2007) Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Collins, H, Weinel, M, Evans, R (2010) The politics and policy of the Third Wave: New technologies and society. Critical Policy Studies 4(2): 185201. Google Scholar, Crossref
Collins, H, Weinel, M, Evans, R (2011) Object and shadow: Responses to the CPS critiques of Collins, Weinel and Evans’, ‘Politics and policy of the Third Wave’. Critical Policy Studies 5(3): 340348. Google Scholar, Crossref
Connolly, WE (1993) The Terms of Political Discourse, 3rd edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Connolly, WE (2013) The Fragility of Things: Self-Organizing Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies, and Democratic Activism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Dean, J (2006) Political theory and cultural studies. In: Dryzek, JS, Honig, B, Phillips, A (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 751772. Google Scholar
De Vries, G (2007) What is political in sub-politics? How Aristotle might help STS. Social Studies of Science 37(5): 781809. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Dewey, J (1916/1980) Democracy and education. In: Boydston, JA (ed.) The Middle Works of John Dewey, Volume 9, 1899-1924: Democracy and Education, 1916. Carbondale, IL and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Google Scholar
Dewey, J (1927/1954) The Public and Its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press. Google Scholar
Durant, D (2010) Public participation in the making of science policy. Perspectives on Science 18(2): 189225. Google Scholar, Crossref
Durant, D (2011) Models of democracy in social studies of science. Social Studies of Science 41(5): 691714. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Ezrahi, Y (1990) The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Forsyth, T (2011) Expertise needs transparency not blind trust: A deliberative approach to integrating science and social participation. Critical Policy Studies 5(3): 317322. Google Scholar, Crossref
Foucault, M (1978) The History of Sexuality: An Introduction, vol. 1. New York: Pantheon Books. Google Scholar
Foucault, M (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (ed Gordon, C). New York: Pantheon Books. Google Scholar
Foucault, M (1991) Governmentality. In: Burchell, G, Gordon, C, Miller, P (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87104. Google Scholar
Freeden, M, Vincent, A (eds) (2013) Comparative Political Thought: Theorizing Practices. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
Frickel, S, Moore, K (2006) Prospects and challenges for a new political sociology of science. In: Frickel, S, Moore, K (eds) The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 331. Google Scholar
Friedan, B (1963) The Feminine Mystique. New York: W.W. Norton. Google Scholar
Fuller, S (2002) Social Epistemology, 2nd edn. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar
Fuller, S (2006) The Philosophy of Science and Technology Studies. New York and London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Funtowicz, SO, Ravetz, JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7): 739775. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Gad, C, Jensen, CB (2010) On the consequences of post-ANT. Science, Technology & Human Values 35(1): 5580. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Gallie, WB (1956) Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167198. Google Scholar, Crossref
Gieryn, TF (1995) Boundaries of science. In: Jasanoff, S, Markle, GE, Petersen, JC, Pinch, T (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 393443. Google Scholar
Gieryn, TF (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Gieryn, TF (2008) Cultural boundaries: Settled and unsettled. In: Meusburger, P, Welker, M, Wunder, E (eds) Clashes of Knowledge: Orthodoxies and Heterodoxies in Science and Religion. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 9199. Google Scholar, Crossref
Gomart, E, Hajer, M (2003) Is that politics? For an inquiry into forms in contemporary politics. In: Joerges, B, Nowotny, H (eds) Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3361. Google Scholar, Crossref
Guston, DH (2000) Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Guston, DH (2004) Forget politicizing science. Let’s democratize science! Issues in Science and Technology 25(1): 2528. Google Scholar
Habermas, J (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (trans. Rehg, W). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Harbers, H (2005) Epilogue: Political materials – Material politics. In: Harbers, H (ed.) Inside the Politics of Technology: Agency and Normativity in the Co-Production of Technology and Society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 257272. Google Scholar, Crossref
Harding, S (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
Harman, G (2009) Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: re.press. Google Scholar
Harman, G (2014) Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political. London: Pluto Press. Google Scholar
Hay, C (2007) Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar
Hess, D, Breyman, S, Campbell, N, Martin, B (2008) Science, technology, and social movements. In: Hackett, EJ, Amsterdamska, O, Lynch, M, Wajcman, J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 473498. Google Scholar
Irwin, A (2008) STS perspectives on scientific governance. In: Hackett, EJ, Amsterdamska, O, Lynch, M, Wajcman, J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 583607. Google Scholar
James, W (1907/1981) Pragmatism. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S (1996) Beyond epistemology: Relativism and engagement in the politics of science. Social Studies of Science 26(2): 393418. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Jasanoff, S (2003) Breaking the waves in science studies: Comment on H.M. Collins and Robert Evans, ‘The Third Wave of Science Studies’. Social Studies of Science 33(3): 389400. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Jasanoff, S (2004) Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In: Jasanoff, S (ed.) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge, pp. 1345. Google Scholar, Crossref
Jasanoff, S (2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Jasanoff, S (2011a) Introduction: Rewriting life, reframing rights. In: Jasanoff, S (ed.) Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 127. Google Scholar, Crossref
Jasanoff, S (2011b) Quality control and peer review in advisory science. In: Lentsch, J, Weingart, P (eds) The Politics of Scientific Advice: Institutional Design for Quality Assurance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1935. Google Scholar, Crossref
Jensen, CB (2014) Continuous variations: The conceptual and the empirical in STS. Science, Technology & Human Values 39(2): 192213. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Keller, EF (1985) Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
Kitcher, P (2011) Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. Google Scholar
Kleinman, DL (2005) Science and Technology in Society: From Biotechnology to the Internet. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
Krause, SR (2011) Bodies in action: Corporeal agency and democratic politics. Political Theory 39(3): 299324. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Kusch, M (2007) Towards a political philosophy of risk: Experts and publics in deliberative democracy. In: Lewens, T (ed.) Risk: Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Routledge, pp. 131155. Google Scholar
Laclau, E, Mouffe, C (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London and New York: Verso. Google Scholar
Latour, B (1983) Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In: Knorr-Cetina, KD, Mulkay, M (eds) Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: SAGE, pp. 141170. Google Scholar
Latour, B (1988) The Pasteurization of France (trans. Sheridan, A, Law, J). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Latour, B (1992) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Bijker, WE, Law, J (eds) Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 225258. Google Scholar
Latour, B (1993) We Have Never Been Modern (trans. Porter, C). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Latour, B (2003) What if we talked politics a little? Contemporary Political Theory 2(2): 143164. Google Scholar, Crossref
Latour, B (2004a) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy (trans. Porter, C). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Latour, B (2004b) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 30(2): 225248. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Latour, B (2005a) From realpolitik to dingpolitik, or how to make things public. In: Latour, B, Weibel, P (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1431. Google Scholar
Latour, B (2005b) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Latour, B (2007) Turning around politics: A note on Gerard de Vries’ paper. Social Studies of Science 37(5): 811820. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Latour, B (2013) An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns (trans. Porter, C). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Latour, B, Woolgar, S (1979/1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Latour, B, Harman, G, Erdélyi, P (2011) The Prince and the Wolf: Latour and Harman at the LSE. Winchester and Washington, DC: Zero Books. Google Scholar
Law, J (ed.) (1991a) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Law, J (1991b) Power, discretion and strategy. In: Law, J (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination. London: Routledge, pp. 165191. Google Scholar
Law, J, Singleton, V (2013) ANT and politics: Working in and on the world. Qualitative Sociology 36(4): 485502. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Leftwich, A (2004) Thinking politically: On the politics of Politics. In: Leftwich, A (ed.) What is Politics? Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 122. Google Scholar
Lloyd, M, Little, A (2009) Introduction. In: Little, A, Lloyd, M (eds) The Politics of Radical Democracy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 111. Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J (2012) On the importance of getting things done. PS: Political Science and Politics 45(1): 18. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Marres, N (2007) The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science 37(5): 759780. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Marres, N (2012) Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar, Crossref
Marres, N, Lezaun, J (2011) Materials and devices of the public: An introduction. Economy and Society 40(4): 489509. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Miller, CA (2001) Challenges in the application of science to global affairs: Contingency, trust, and moral order. In: Miller, CA, Edwards, PN (eds) Changing the Atmosphere: Expertise Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 247285. Google Scholar
Mitchell, T (2011) Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. London and New York: Verso. Google Scholar
Mol, A (1999) Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In: Law, J, Hassard, J (eds) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 7489. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Mouffe, C (2005) On the Political. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
Nahuis, R, Van Lente, H (2008) Where are the politics? Perspectives on democracy and technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 33(5): 559581. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Nisbet, MC, Lewenstein, BV (2002) Biotechnology and the American media: The policy process and the elite press, 1970 to 1999. Science Communication 23(4): 359391. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Okin, SM (1989) Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
Palonen, K (2003) Four times of politics: Policy, polity, politicking, and politicization. Alternatives 28(2): 171186. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Palonen, K (2006a) The Struggle with Time: A Conceptual History of ‘Politics’ as an Activity. Hamburg: LIT Verlag. Google Scholar
Palonen, K (2006b) Two concepts of politics: Conceptual history and present controversies. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 7(1): 1125. Google Scholar, Crossref
Papadopoulos, D (2010) Alter-ontologies: Towards a constituent politics in technoscience. Social Studies of Science 41(2): 177201. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Pels, D (1997) Mixing metaphors: Politics or economics of knowledge? Theory and Society 26(5): 685717. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Pels, D (2003) Unhastening Science: Autonomy and Reflexivity in the Social Theory of Knowledge. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Pestre, D (2004) Thirty years of science studies: Knowledge, society and the political. History and Technology 20(4): 351369. Google Scholar, Crossref
Pestre, D (2008) Challenges for the democratic management of technoscience: Governance, participation, and the political today. Science as Culture 17(2): 101119. Google Scholar, Crossref
Pielke, RA (2007) The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Proctor, RN (1991) Value-Free Science? Purity and Power in Modern Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Radder, H (1996) In and About the World: Philosophical Studies of Science and Technology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar
Radder, H (2006) The World Observed/The World Conceived. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Rancière, J (1999) Disagreement: Politics And Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar
Richards, E, Ashmore, M (eds) (1996) More Sauce Please! The Politics of SSK: Neutrality, Commitment and beyond. Social Studies of Science 26(2): 219228. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Sayes, E (2014) Actor-Network Theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Social Studies of Science 44(1): 134149. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Schmitt, C (1932/1996) The Concept of the Political (trans. Schwab, G). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Shapin, S, Schaffer, S (1985) Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Sismondo, S (2008) Science and technology studies and an engaged program. In: Hackett, EJ, Amsterdamska, O, Lynch, M, Wajcman, J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1331. Google Scholar
Sluga, H (2011) Could you define the sense you give the word ‘political’? Michel Foucault as a political philosopher. History of the Human Sciences 24(4): 6979. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Star, SL, Griesemer, JR (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387420. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Stengers, I (2005) The cosmopolitical proposal. In: Latour, B, Weibel, P (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 9941003. Google Scholar
Stirling, A (2008) ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 33(2): 262294. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Thorpe, C (2008) Political theory in science and technology studies. In: Hackett, EJ, Amsterdamska, O, Lynch, M, Wajcman, J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 6382. Google Scholar
Turner, S (1989) Depoliticizing power. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 533560. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Urbinati, N, Warren, ME (2008) The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387412. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Waldron, J (1999) Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Warren, ME (1999) What is political? Journal of Theoretical Politics 11(2): 207231. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Weber, M (1978) Economy and Society (ed Roth, G, Wittich, C). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
Weber, M (1994) Political Writings (ed Lassman, P, Speirs, R). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Winner, L (1986) The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L (1958) Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edn (trans. Anscombe, GEM). New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar
Woodhouse, E, Hess, D, Breyman, S, Martin, B (2002) Science studies and activism: Possibilities and problems for reconstructivist agendas. Social Studies of Science 32(2): 297319. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Woolgar, S, Lezaun, J (2013) The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies? Social Studies of Science 43(3): 321340. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Wyatt, S, Balmer, B (2007) Home on the range: What and where is the middle in science and technology studies? Science, Technology & Human Values 32(6): 619626. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Wynne, B (2003) Seasick on the third wave: Subverting the hegemony of propositionalism. Social Studies of Science 33(3): 401417. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Wynne, B (2007) Public participation in science and technology: Performing and obscuring a political-conceptual category mistake. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 1(1): 99110. Google Scholar, Crossref