Abstract
This essay examines five ideal–typical conceptions of politics in science and technology studies. Rather than evaluating these conceptions with reference to a single standard, the essay shows how different conceptions of politics serve distinct purposes: normative critique, two approaches to empirical description, and two views of democracy. I discuss each conception of politics with respect to how well it fulfills its apparent primary purpose, as well as its implications for the purpose of studying a key issue in contemporary democratic societies: the politicization of science. In this respect, the essay goes beyond classifying different conceptions of politics and also recommends the fifth conception as especially conducive to understanding and shaping the processes whereby science becomes a site or object of political activity. The essay also employs several analytical distinctions to help clarify the differences among conceptions of politics: between science as ‘political’ (adjective) and science as a site of ‘politics’ (noun), between spatial-conceptions and activity-conceptions of politics, between latent conflicts and actual conflicts, and between politics and power. The essay also makes the methodological argument that the politics of science and technology is best studied with concepts and methods that facilitate dialogue between actors and analysts. The main goal, however, is not to defend a particular view of politics, but to promote conversation on the conceptions of politics that animate research in social studies of science and technology.
| Arendt, H (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
| Asdal, K, Borch, C, Moser, I (2008) Editorial: The technologies of politics. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 9(1): 5–10. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Barnes, B (1988) The Nature of Power. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar | |
| Barry, A (2001) Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. London and New York: Athlone Press. Google Scholar | |
| Barry, A (2013) Material Politics: Disputes along the Pipeline. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Beck, U (1997) The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar | |
| Bennett, J (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Bijker, WE (2006) Why and how technology matters. In: Goodin, RE, Tilly, C (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 681–706. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Blume, SS (1974) Toward a Political Sociology of Science. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar | |
| Bogner, A, Menz, W (2010) How politics deals with expert dissent: The case of ethics councils. Science, Technology & Human Values 35(6): 888–914. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Bonneuil, C, Levidow, L (2012) How does the World Trade Organization know? The mobilization and staging of scientific expertise in the GMO trade dispute. Social Studies of Science 42(1): 75–100. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Braun, B, Whatmore, SJ (2010) The stuff of politics: An introduction. In: Braun, B, Whatmore, SJ (eds) Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. ix–xl. Google Scholar | |
| Brown, MB (2009) Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Brown, W (2006) Power after Foucault. In: Dryzek, J, Honig, B, Phillips, A (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 65–84. Google Scholar | |
| Callon, M, Latour, B (1992) Don’t throw the baby out with the bath school! A reply to Collins and Yearley. In: Pickering, A (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 343–368. Google Scholar | |
| Callon, M, Law, J (1982) On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment. Social Studies of Science 12(4): 615–625. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Callon, M, Lascoumes, P, Barthe, Y (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
| Clegg, SR (1989) Frameworks of Power. London: SAGE. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Collins, H (2008) Actors’ and analysts’ categories in the social analysis of science. In: Meusburger, P, Welker, M, Wunder, E (eds) Clashes of Knowledge: Orthodoxies and Heterodoxies in Science and Religion. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 101–110. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Collins, H, Evans, R (2002) The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science 32(2): 235–296. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Collins, H, Evans, R (2007) Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Collins, H, Weinel, M, Evans, R (2010) The politics and policy of the Third Wave: New technologies and society. Critical Policy Studies 4(2): 185–201. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Collins, H, Weinel, M, Evans, R (2011) Object and shadow: Responses to the CPS critiques of Collins, Weinel and Evans’, ‘Politics and policy of the Third Wave’. Critical Policy Studies 5(3): 340–348. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Connolly, WE (1993) The Terms of Political Discourse, 3rd edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Connolly, WE (2013) The Fragility of Things: Self-Organizing Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies, and Democratic Activism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Dean, J (2006) Political theory and cultural studies. In: Dryzek, JS, Honig, B, Phillips, A (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 751–772. Google Scholar | |
| De Vries, G (2007) What is political in sub-politics? How Aristotle might help STS. Social Studies of Science 37(5): 781–809. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Dewey, J (1916/1980) Democracy and education. In: Boydston, JA (ed.) The Middle Works of John Dewey, Volume 9, 1899-1924: Democracy and Education, 1916. Carbondale, IL and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Dewey, J (1927/1954) The Public and Its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press. Google Scholar | |
| Durant, D (2010) Public participation in the making of science policy. Perspectives on Science 18(2): 189–225. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Durant, D (2011) Models of democracy in social studies of science. Social Studies of Science 41(5): 691–714. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Ezrahi, Y (1990) The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Forsyth, T (2011) Expertise needs transparency not blind trust: A deliberative approach to integrating science and social participation. Critical Policy Studies 5(3): 317–322. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Foucault, M (1978) The History of Sexuality: An Introduction, vol. 1. New York: Pantheon Books. Google Scholar | |
| Foucault, M (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (ed Gordon, C). New York: Pantheon Books. Google Scholar | |
| Foucault, M (1991) Governmentality. In: Burchell, G, Gordon, C, Miller, P (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87–104. Google Scholar | |
| Freeden, M, Vincent, A (eds) (2013) Comparative Political Thought: Theorizing Practices. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Frickel, S, Moore, K (2006) Prospects and challenges for a new political sociology of science. In: Frickel, S, Moore, K (eds) The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 3–31. Google Scholar | |
| Friedan, B (1963) The Feminine Mystique. New York: W.W. Norton. Google Scholar | |
| Fuller, S (2002) Social Epistemology, 2nd edn. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Fuller, S (2006) The Philosophy of Science and Technology Studies. New York and London: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Funtowicz, SO, Ravetz, JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7): 739–775. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Gad, C, Jensen, CB (2010) On the consequences of post-ANT. Science, Technology & Human Values 35(1): 55–80. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Gallie, WB (1956) Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Gieryn, TF (1995) Boundaries of science. In: Jasanoff, S, Markle, GE, Petersen, JC, Pinch, T (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 393–443. Google Scholar | |
| Gieryn, TF (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
| Gieryn, TF (2008) Cultural boundaries: Settled and unsettled. In: Meusburger, P, Welker, M, Wunder, E (eds) Clashes of Knowledge: Orthodoxies and Heterodoxies in Science and Religion. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 91–99. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Gomart, E, Hajer, M (2003) Is that politics? For an inquiry into forms in contemporary politics. In: Joerges, B, Nowotny, H (eds) Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 33–61. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Guston, DH (2000) Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Guston, DH (2004) Forget politicizing science. Let’s democratize science! Issues in Science and Technology 25(1): 25–28. Google Scholar | |
| Habermas, J (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (trans. Rehg, W). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
| Harbers, H (2005) Epilogue: Political materials – Material politics. In: Harbers, H (ed.) Inside the Politics of Technology: Agency and Normativity in the Co-Production of Technology and Society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 257–272. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Harding, S (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Harman, G (2009) Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: re.press. Google Scholar | |
| Harman, G (2014) Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political. London: Pluto Press. Google Scholar | |
| Hay, C (2007) Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar | |
| Hess, D, Breyman, S, Campbell, N, Martin, B (2008) Science, technology, and social movements. In: Hackett, EJ, Amsterdamska, O, Lynch, M, Wajcman, J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 473–498. Google Scholar | |
| Irwin, A (2008) STS perspectives on scientific governance. In: Hackett, EJ, Amsterdamska, O, Lynch, M, Wajcman, J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 583–607. Google Scholar | |
| James, W (1907/1981) Pragmatism. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. Google Scholar | |
| Jasanoff, S (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Jasanoff, S (1996) Beyond epistemology: Relativism and engagement in the politics of science. Social Studies of Science 26(2): 393–418. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Jasanoff, S (2003) Breaking the waves in science studies: Comment on H.M. Collins and Robert Evans, ‘The Third Wave of Science Studies’. Social Studies of Science 33(3): 389–400. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Jasanoff, S (2004) Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In: Jasanoff, S (ed.) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge, pp. 13–45. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Jasanoff, S (2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Jasanoff, S (2011a) Introduction: Rewriting life, reframing rights. In: Jasanoff, S (ed.) Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–27. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Jasanoff, S (2011b) Quality control and peer review in advisory science. In: Lentsch, J, Weingart, P (eds) The Politics of Scientific Advice: Institutional Design for Quality Assurance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–35. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Jensen, CB (2014) Continuous variations: The conceptual and the empirical in STS. Science, Technology & Human Values 39(2): 192–213. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Keller, EF (1985) Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Kitcher, P (2011) Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. Google Scholar | |
| Kleinman, DL (2005) Science and Technology in Society: From Biotechnology to the Internet. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar | |
| Krause, SR (2011) Bodies in action: Corporeal agency and democratic politics. Political Theory 39(3): 299–324. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Kusch, M (2007) Towards a political philosophy of risk: Experts and publics in deliberative democracy. In: Lewens, T (ed.) Risk: Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Routledge, pp. 131–155. Google Scholar | |
| Laclau, E, Mouffe, C (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London and New York: Verso. Google Scholar | |
| Latour, B (1983) Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In: Knorr-Cetina, KD, Mulkay, M (eds) Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: SAGE, pp. 141–170. Google Scholar | |
| Latour, B (1988) The Pasteurization of France (trans. Sheridan, A, Law, J). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Latour, B (1992) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Bijker, WE, Law, J (eds) Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 225–258. Google Scholar | |
| Latour, B (1993) We Have Never Been Modern (trans. Porter, C). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Latour, B (2003) What if we talked politics a little? Contemporary Political Theory 2(2): 143–164. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Latour, B (2004a) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy (trans. Porter, C). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Latour, B (2004b) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 30(2): 225–248. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Latour, B (2005a) From realpolitik to dingpolitik, or how to make things public. In: Latour, B, Weibel, P (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 14–31. Google Scholar | |
| Latour, B (2005b) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Latour, B (2007) Turning around politics: A note on Gerard de Vries’ paper. Social Studies of Science 37(5): 811–820. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Latour, B (2013) An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns (trans. Porter, C). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Latour, B, Woolgar, S (1979/1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Latour, B, Harman, G, Erdélyi, P (2011) The Prince and the Wolf: Latour and Harman at the LSE. Winchester and Washington, DC: Zero Books. Google Scholar | |
| Law, J (ed.) (1991a) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Law, J (1991b) Power, discretion and strategy. In: Law, J (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination. London: Routledge, pp. 165–191. Google Scholar | |
| Law, J, Singleton, V (2013) ANT and politics: Working in and on the world. Qualitative Sociology 36(4): 485–502. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Leftwich, A (2004) Thinking politically: On the politics of Politics. In: Leftwich, A (ed.) What is Politics? Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 1–22. Google Scholar | |
| Lloyd, M, Little, A (2009) Introduction. In: Little, A, Lloyd, M (eds) The Politics of Radical Democracy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1–11. Google Scholar | |
| Mansbridge, J (2012) On the importance of getting things done. PS: Political Science and Politics 45(1): 1–8. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Marres, N (2007) The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science 37(5): 759–780. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Marres, N (2012) Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Marres, N, Lezaun, J (2011) Materials and devices of the public: An introduction. Economy and Society 40(4): 489–509. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Miller, CA (2001) Challenges in the application of science to global affairs: Contingency, trust, and moral order. In: Miller, CA, Edwards, PN (eds) Changing the Atmosphere: Expertise Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 247–285. Google Scholar | |
| Mitchell, T (2011) Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. London and New York: Verso. Google Scholar | |
| Mol, A (1999) Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In: Law, J, Hassard, J (eds) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 74–89. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals | |
| Mouffe, C (2005) On the Political. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Nahuis, R, Van Lente, H (2008) Where are the politics? Perspectives on democracy and technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 33(5): 559–581. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Nisbet, MC, Lewenstein, BV (2002) Biotechnology and the American media: The policy process and the elite press, 1970 to 1999. Science Communication 23(4): 359–391. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Okin, SM (1989) Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar | |
| Palonen, K (2003) Four times of politics: Policy, polity, politicking, and politicization. Alternatives 28(2): 171–186. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Palonen, K (2006a) The Struggle with Time: A Conceptual History of ‘Politics’ as an Activity. Hamburg: LIT Verlag. Google Scholar | |
| Palonen, K (2006b) Two concepts of politics: Conceptual history and present controversies. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 7(1): 11–25. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Papadopoulos, D (2010) Alter-ontologies: Towards a constituent politics in technoscience. Social Studies of Science 41(2): 177–201. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Pels, D (1997) Mixing metaphors: Politics or economics of knowledge? Theory and Society 26(5): 685–717. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Pels, D (2003) Unhastening Science: Autonomy and Reflexivity in the Social Theory of Knowledge. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Pestre, D (2004) Thirty years of science studies: Knowledge, society and the political. History and Technology 20(4): 351–369. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Pestre, D (2008) Challenges for the democratic management of technoscience: Governance, participation, and the political today. Science as Culture 17(2): 101–119. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Pielke, RA (2007) The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Proctor, RN (1991) Value-Free Science? Purity and Power in Modern Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Radder, H (1996) In and About the World: Philosophical Studies of Science and Technology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar | |
| Radder, H (2006) The World Observed/The World Conceived. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Rancière, J (1999) Disagreement: Politics And Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar | |
| Richards, E, Ashmore, M (eds) (1996) More Sauce Please! The Politics of SSK: Neutrality, Commitment and beyond. Social Studies of Science 26(2): 219–228. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals | |
| Sayes, E (2014) Actor-Network Theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Social Studies of Science 44(1): 134–149. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Schmitt, C (1932/1996) The Concept of the Political (trans. Schwab, G). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
| Shapin, S, Schaffer, S (1985) Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Sismondo, S (2008) Science and technology studies and an engaged program. In: Hackett, EJ, Amsterdamska, O, Lynch, M, Wajcman, J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 13–31. Google Scholar | |
| Sluga, H (2011) Could you define the sense you give the word ‘political’? Michel Foucault as a political philosopher. History of the Human Sciences 24(4): 69–79. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Star, SL, Griesemer, JR (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387–420. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Stengers, I (2005) The cosmopolitical proposal. In: Latour, B, Weibel, P (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 994–1003. Google Scholar | |
| Stirling, A (2008) ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 33(2): 262–294. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Thorpe, C (2008) Political theory in science and technology studies. In: Hackett, EJ, Amsterdamska, O, Lynch, M, Wajcman, J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 63–82. Google Scholar | |
| Turner, S (1989) Depoliticizing power. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 533–560. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals | |
| Urbinati, N, Warren, ME (2008) The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387–412. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Waldron, J (1999) Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Warren, ME (1999) What is political? Journal of Theoretical Politics 11(2): 207–231. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Weber, M (1978) Economy and Society (ed Roth, G, Wittich, C). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar | |
| Weber, M (1994) Political Writings (ed Lassman, P, Speirs, R). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Winner, L (1986) The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
| Wittgenstein, L (1958) Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edn (trans. Anscombe, GEM). New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar | |
| Woodhouse, E, Hess, D, Breyman, S, Martin, B (2002) Science studies and activism: Possibilities and problems for reconstructivist agendas. Social Studies of Science 32(2): 297–319. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Woolgar, S, Lezaun, J (2013) The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies? Social Studies of Science 43(3): 321–340. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Wyatt, S, Balmer, B (2007) Home on the range: What and where is the middle in science and technology studies? Science, Technology & Human Values 32(6): 619–626. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Wynne, B (2003) Seasick on the third wave: Subverting the hegemony of propositionalism. Social Studies of Science 33(3): 401–417. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Wynne, B (2007) Public participation in science and technology: Performing and obscuring a political-conceptual category mistake. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 1(1): 99–110. Google Scholar, Crossref |

