Abstract
Background
Although several studies have described magnetic resonance imaging findings in shoulders of asymptomatic volunteers, no such investigation has been performed on asymptomatic dominant and nondominant shoulders of elite overhead athletes.
Hypothesis
Asymptomatic dominant shoulders of elite overhead athletes may have a higher incidence of magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities than either their nondominant shoulder or shoulders of asymptomatic volunteers.
Methods
Detailed magnetic resonance imaging scans of asymptomatic dominant and nondominant shoulders of elite overhead athletes were obtained. Three experienced musculoskeletal radiologists interpreted each scan for multiple variables, including rotator cuff appearance. Images from a surgical control group were intermixed to assess accuracy and control for observer bias. A 5-year follow-up interview was performed to determine whether magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities found in the initial stage of the study represented truly clinical false-positive findings or symptomatic shoulders in evolution.
Results
Eight of 20 (40%) dominant shoulders had findings consistent with partial- or full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff as compared with none (0%) of the nondominant shoulders. Five of 20 (25%) dominant shoulders had magnetic resonance imaging evidence of Bennett's lesions compared with none (0%) of the nondominant shoulders. None of the athletes interviewed 5 years later had any subjective symptoms or had required any evaluation or treatment for shoulder-related problems during the study period.
References
| 1. | ChandnaniV., HoC., GerharterJ., : MR findings in asymptomatic shoulders: A blind analysis using symptomatic shoulders as controls. Clin Imaging16: 25–30, 1992 Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline |
| 2. | FerrariJD, FerrariDA, CoumasJ., : Posterior ossification of the shoulder: The Bennett lesion. Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Sports Med22: 171–176, 1994 Google Scholar Link |
| 3. | HawkinsRJ, KennedyJC: Impingement syndrome in athletes. Am J Sports Med8: 151–158, 1980 Google Scholar Link |
| 4. | IannottiJP, ZlatkinMB, EsterhaiJL, : Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. J Bone Joint Surg73A: 17–29, 1991 Google Scholar CrossRef |
| 5. | JobeFW, VanderWildeRS: Chronic shoulder problems in athletes, inGriffin LY (ed): Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Sports Medicine. Rosemont, IL, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1994, pp 153–163 Google Scholar |
| 6. | KaplanPA, BryansKC, DavickJP, : MR imaging of the normal shoulder: Variants and pitfalls. Radiology184: 519–524, 1992 Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline |
| 7. | LiouJTS, WilsonAJ, TottyWG, : The normal shoulder: Common variations that simulate pathologic conditions at MR imaging. Radiology186: 435–441, 1993 Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline |
| 8. | MeisterK., AndrewsJR, BattsJ., : Symptomatic thrower's exostosis. Arthroscopic evaluation and treatment. Am J Sports Med27: 133–136, 1999 Google Scholar Link |
| 9. | MiniaciA., DowdyPA, WillitsKR, : Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the rotator cuff tendons in the asymptomatic shoulder. Am J Sports Med23: 142–145, 1995 Google Scholar Link |
| 10. | RechtMP, ResnickD.: Magnetic resonance-imaging studies of the shoulder. Diagnosis of lesions of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg75A: 1244–1253, 1995 Google Scholar |
| 11. | SherJS, UribeJW, PosadaA., : Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg77A: 10–15, 1995 Google Scholar CrossRef |
