This article critically examines the notion that wealth sharing in the aftermath of internal armed conflicts can bring about long-lasting peace. While wealth sharing is increasingly considered a crucial element of peacebuilding, the evidence concerning its success is inconclusive. Previous studies unfortunately suffer from weak theoretical and empirical definitions of wealth sharing and from examining only a subset of postconflict societies. This article improves the research by disaggregating the concept of wealth sharing to concrete policy relevant natural resource management tools and by introducing new and better data on wealth sharing and including more postconflict peace periods than previous studies. This article examines the relationships between armed conflict, wealth sharing and peace by studying two independent but interlinked research questions: In which postconflict societies is wealth sharing most likely to be adopted? And can wealth sharing bring stable peace in postconflict societies? The analyses show that wealth sharing is more likely to be implemented after natural resource conflicts. Nonetheless, the article does not find that wealth sharing is successful in bringing postconflict peace after these conflicts. Reasons for this can be that (1) other factors than wealth sharing explain the outcome better, and (2) the wealth sharing policies are poorly designed and implemented. The article concludes that wealth sharing can only be a suitable path for societies recovering from armed conflict if such policies are carefully designed to fit the specific context and take into account the challenges that will arrive.

Aceh Agreement . 2005. Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Free Aceh Movement. Uppsala Conflict Data Program, Uppsala University (http://www.ucdp.uu.se/gpdatabase/peace/Ind%20050815.pdf). Google Scholar
Collier, Paul . 2000. Economic causes of civil conflict and their implications for policy. World Bank. Google Scholar
Collier, Paul, Hoeffler, Anke, Rohner, Dominic. 2009. Beyond greed and grievance: Feasibility and civil war. Oxford Economic Papers 61(1): 127. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
de Bremond, Ariane . 2007. The politics of peace and resettlement through El Salvador’s land transfer programme: Caught between the state and the market. Third World Quarterly 28(8): 15371556. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Fortna, Virginia Page . 2004. Does peacekeeping keep peace? International intervention and the duration of peace after civil war. International Studies Quarterly 48(2): 269292. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Gauster, Susana, Isakson, S. Ryan. 2007. Eliminating market distortions, perpetuating rural inequality: An evaluation of market-assisted land reform in Guatemala. Third World Quarterly 28(8): 15191536. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Gleditsch, Kristian S. 2002. Expanded trade and GDP data. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(5): 712724. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Wallensteen, Peter, Eriksson, Mikael, Sollenberg, Margareta, Strand, Håvard. 2002. Armed conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research 39(5): 615637. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Harbom, Lotta . 2007. UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset Codebook, Version 4–2007 (http://www.prio.no/CSCW/Datasets/Armed-Conflict/UCDP-PRIO/). Google Scholar
Hartzell, Caroline, Hoddie, Matthew. 2007. Crafting Peace: Power-Sharing Institutions and the Negotiated Settlement of Civil Wars. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. Google Scholar
Haysom, Nicholas, Kane, Sean. 2009. Negotiating Natural Resources for Peace: Ownership, Control and Wealth-Sharing. Geneva: Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue. Google Scholar
Heston, Alan, Summers, Robert, Aten, Bettina. 2006. Penn World Table Version 6.2. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania. Google Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan . 2005. Natural resources, conflict, and conflict resolution: Uncovering the mechanisms. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 508537. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Jarstad, Anna K. 2008. Power sharing: Former enemies in joint government. In From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding, eds Jarstad, Anna K., Sisk, Timothy D. pp. 105133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Jarstad, Anna K., Nilsson, Desirée. 2008. From words to deeds: The implementation of power-sharing pacts in peace accords. Conflict Management and Peace Science 25(3): 206223. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Kreutz, Joakim . 2010. How and when armed conflicts end: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 47(2): 243250. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Lacina, Bethany, Gleditsch, Nils Petter. 2005. Monitoring trends in global combat: A new dataset of battle deaths. European Journal of Population 21: 145166. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Le Billon, Philippe, Nicholls, Eric. 2007. Ending “resource wars”: Revenue sharing, economic sanction or military intervention? International Peacekeeping 14(5): 613632. Google Scholar, Crossref
Lujala, Päivi . 2010. The spoils of nature: Armed civil conflict and rebel access to natural resources. Journal of Peace Research 47(1): 1528. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Lujala, Päivi, Rustad, Siri Aas (eds). 2012. High-Value Natural Resources and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding. London: Earthscan. Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Jaggers, Keith. 2009. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2008 (http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm, accessed 28 August 2010). Google Scholar
Mason, Simon J. A., Gröbli, Pilar Ramirez, Sguaitamatti, Damiano A. Forthcoming. Stepping stones to peace? Natural resource provisions in peace agreements. In Governance, Natural Resources, and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding, eds Bruch, Carl, Muffett, Carroll, Nichols, Sandra S. London: Earthscan. Google Scholar
Mattes, Michaela, Savun, Burcu. 2009. Fostering peace after civil war: Commitment problems and agreement design. International Studies Quarterly 53(3): 737759. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Mukherjee, Bumba . 2006. Does third-party enforcement or domestic institutions promote enduring peace after civil wars? Policy lessons from an empirical test. Foreign Policy Analysis 2(4): 405430. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Regan, Anthony J. 2003. The Bougainville conflict: Political and economic agendas. In The Political Economy of Armed Conflict: Beyond Greed and Grievance, eds Ballentine, Karen, Sherman, Jake pp. 133166. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Google Scholar
Rustad, Siri Aas, Binningsbø, Helga Malmin. 2012. A price worth fighting for? Natural resources and conflict recurrence. Journal of Peace Research 49(4): 531546. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Wennmann, Achim, Krause, Jana. 2009. Managing the economic dimensions of peace processes: Resource wealth, autonomy, and peace in Aceh. Working paper 3, Centre on Conflict, Development and Peacebuilding. Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Article

Your Access Options


Purchase

CMP-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in: