![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
The need to revise scholars’ approach to the measurement of gender attitudes—long dominated by the separate-spheres paradigm—is growing increasingly timely as women’s share of the labor force approaches parity with men’s. Recent years have seen revived interest in marital name change as a gendered practice with the potential to aid in this task; however, scholars have yet to test its effectiveness as one possible indicator of gender attitudes. In this article we present views toward marital name change as a potential window into contemporary gender attitudes and most centrally as an illustration of the types of measures that hold great potential for attitudinal research. Using quantitative analyses from a national survey, we show that views on name change reflect expected sociodemographic cleavages and are more strongly linked to a wide array of other gender-related attitudes than are views regarding gendered separate spheres—even net of sociodemographic factors. We then turn to interlinked qualitative data to illustrate three reasons why name-change measures so effectively capture broader beliefs about gender. We conclude by looking at what attitudes about name change can tell us about future directions for the conceptualization and measurement of gender attitudes.
Keywords family, methods, social psychology, work—family
| Benard, S., and S.J. Correll. 2010. Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender & Society 24:616-46. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals | |
| Bielby, D.D., and W.T. Bielby. 1984. Work commitment, sex-role attitudes, and women’s employment. American Sociological Review 49:234-47. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Bolzendahl, C., and D.J. Myers. 2004. Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974-1998. Social Forces 83: 759-90. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Brooks, C., and C. Bolzendahl. 2004. The transformation of U.S. gender role attitudes: Cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning . Social Science Research 33:106-33. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Butler, J. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity . New York: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Carter, J.S., M. Corra, and S.K. Carter. 2009. The interaction of race and gender: Changing gender-role attitudes, 1974-2006. Social Science Quarterly 90: 196-211. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Ciabattari, T. 2001. Changes in men’s conservative gender ideologies: Cohort and period influences. Gender & Society 15:574-91. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals | |
| Coontz, S. 1992. The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar | |
| Correll, S.J., S. Benard, and I. Paik. 2007. Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology 112:1297-1338. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| England, P. 2010. The gender revolution: Uneven and unstalled. Gender & Society 24:149-66. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals | |
| Ferree, M.M. 1990. Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research . Journal of Marriage and Family 52:866-84. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Forbes, G.B., L.E. Adams-Curtis, K.B. While, and N.R. Hamm. 2002. Perceptions of married women and married men with hyphenated surnames. Sex Roles 46:167-75. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Foss, K.A., and B.A. Edson. 1989. What’s in a name? Accounts of married women’s name choices. Western Journal of Speech and Communication 53:356-73. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, UK: Polity . Google Scholar | |
| Goldin, C., and M. Shim. 2004. Making a name: Women’s names at marriage and beyond. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18:143-60. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Gooding, G.E., and R.M. Kreider. 2010. Women’s naming choices in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Family Issues 31:681-701. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals | |
| Hoffnung, M. 2006. What’s in a name? Marital name choice revisited . Sex Roles 55:817-25. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Huber, J. 1976. On the generic use of male pronouns. American Sociologist 11:89. Google Scholar | |
| Huber, J., and G. Spitze. 1981. Wives’ employment, household behaviors, and sex-role attitudes. Social Forces 60:150-69. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Johnson, D.R., and L.K. Scheuble. 1995. Women’s marital naming in two generations: A national study. Journal of Marriage and Family 57:724-32. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Klatch, R.A. 2001. The formation of feminist consciousness among left- and right-wing activists of the 1960s. Gender & Society 15:791-815. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals | |
| Lakoff, R.T. 1975. Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper & Row. Google Scholar | |
| Lieberson, S., and E.O. Bell. 1992. Children’s first names: An empirical study of social taste. American Journal of Sociology 98:511-54. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Lieberson, S., S. Dumais, and S. Baumann. 2000. The instability of androgynous names: The symbolic maintenance of gender boundaries. American Journal of Sociology 105:1249-87. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Lorber, Judith. 1994. Paradoxes of Gender. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Luker, K. 1984. Abortion and the politics of motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar | |
| Martyna, W. 1980. Beyond the he/man approach: The case for nonsexist language . Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 5:482-93. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Mason, K.O., and Y. Lu. 1988. Attitudes toward women’s familial roles: Changes in the United States, 1977-1985. Gender & Society 2:39-57. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals | |
| McCabe, J. 2005. What’s in a label? The relationship between feminist self-identification and "feminist" attitudes among U.S. women and men. Gender & Society 19:480-505. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals | |
| McHugh, M.C., and I.H. Frieze. 1997. The measurement of gender-role attitudes: A review and commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly 21:1-16. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Moore, L.M., and R. Vanneman. 2003. Context matters: Effects of the proportion of fundamentalists on gender attitudes. Social Forces 82:115-39. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Nugent, C. 2010. Children’s surnames, moral dilemmas: Accounting for the predominance of fathers’ surnames for children. Gender & Society 24:499-525. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals | |
| Padavic, I., and B. Reskin. 2002. Women and men at work. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. Google Scholar | |
| Penfield, J. 1987. Surnaming: The struggle for personal identity. In Women & language in transition, edited by J. Penfield. Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar | |
| Powell, B., C. Bolzendahl, C. Geist, and L.C. Steelman. 2010. Counted out: Same-sex relations and Americans’ definitions of family. New York: Russell Sage. Google Scholar | |
| Plutzer, E. 1988. Work life, family life, and women’s support of feminism . American Sociological Review 53:640-49. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Raftery, A. 1995. Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology 25:111-63. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Rice, T.W., and D.L. Coates. 1995. Gender role attitudes in the southern United States. Gender & Society 9:744-56. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Ridgeway, C.L., and S.J. Correll. 2004. Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society 18:510-31. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Risman, B.J. 2004. Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism . Gender & Society 18:429-50. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Scheuble, L.K., and D.R. Johnson. 1993. Marital name change: Plans and attitudes of college students. Journal of Marriage and Family 55:747-54. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Scheuble, L.K., and D.R. Johnson. 2005. Married women’s situational use of last names: An empirical study. Sex Roles 53:143-51. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Schnittker, J., J. Freese, and B. Powell. 2003. Who are feminists and what do they believe? The role of generations. American Sociological Review 68:607-22. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Solis, H., and K. Hall. 2009. Women in the labor force: A databook . Report 1018. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC. Google Scholar | |
| Suter, E.A. 2004. Tradition never goes out of style: The role of tradition in women’s naming practices. Communication Review 7:57-87. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Swim, J.K., and L.L. Cohen. 1997. Overt, covert, and subtle sexism: A comparison between the attitudes toward women and modern sexism scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly 21:103-18. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Thorne, B., and N. Henley. 1975. Language and sex: Difference and dominance . Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Google Scholar | |
| Thornton, A., and D. Camburn. 1979. Fertility, sex role attitudes, and labor force participation. Psychology of Women Quarterly 4:61-80. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals | |
| U.S. Census Bureau. 2009. Married couple family groups, by labor force status of both spouses. http://www.census.gov/population/www./socdemo/hh-fam/cps2009.html . Google Scholar | |
| Weitzman, L.J. 1981. The marriage contract: Spouses, lovers, and the law. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar | |
| West, C., and D.H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender & Society 1:125-51. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Whitley, B.E. 2001. Gender-role variables and attitudes toward homosexuality . Sex Roles 45:691-721. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI |
