Optimizing flexible routing in flexible manufacturing systems ameliorates the efficiency of flexible manufacturing systems. In the present competitive market, accuracy in the planning stage plays an important role. Therefore, in this article, a production simulator system based on genetic algorithms is utilized to find the near-optimal flexible routing for flexible manufacturing systems. A combination of production simulator system and genetic algorithms is introduced to find the appropriate order of a set of operations for jobs that need to be operated on available machine tools in flexible manufacturing systems. In order to augment genetic algorithms, a matrix encoding method is incorporated. The proposed simulation is applied to numerical case studies of flexible routing for flexible manufacturing systems problem. The purpose of case studies is to demonstrate the successful applicability of the proposed method for flexible routing for flexible manufacturing systems problem.

1. Groover, MP. Automation, production systems, and computer-aided manufacturing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980. Google Scholar
2. Mahdavi, I, Azar, AHFM, Bagherpour, M. Applying fuzzy rule based to flexible routing problem in a flexible manufacturing system. In: IEEE international conference on paper read at industrial engineering and engineering management, 2009 (IEEM 2009), Hong Kong, 8–11 December 2009, pp.23582364. New York: IEEE. Google Scholar
3. Bilkay, O, Anlagan, O, Kilic, SE. Job shop scheduling using fuzzy logic. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2004; 23(7–8): 606619. Google Scholar, Crossref
4. Rui, Z, Shilong, W, Zheqi, Z. An ant colony algorithm for job shop scheduling problem with tool flow. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2014; 228(8): 959968. Google Scholar, Link
5. Gershwin, SB. Manufacturing systems engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PTR Prentice Hall, 1994. Google Scholar
6. SabuncuoŸlu, I, Lahmar, M. An evaluative study of operation grouping policies in an FMS. Int J Flex Manuf Sys 2003; 15(3): 217239. Google Scholar, Crossref
7. Shuiabi, E, Thomson, V, Bhuiyan, N. Entropy as a measure of operational flexibility. Eur J Oper Res 2005; 165(3): 696707. Google Scholar, Crossref
8. Qudeiri, JA, Yamamoto, H, Ramli, R. Buffer size decision for Flexible Transfer Line with Rework Paths using Genetic Algorithm. Int J Intell Syst Tech Appl 2009; 7(2): 227240. Google Scholar
9. Ficko, M, Kovacic, M, Brezocnik, M. Genetic algorithms: a useful optimization method for manufacturing problems. Acad J Manuf Eng 2004; 2: 2126. Google Scholar
10. Chan, FTS, Chung, SH, Chan, LY. An introduction of dominant genes in genetic algorithm for FMS. Int J Prod Res 2008; 46(16): 43694389. Google Scholar, Crossref
11. Wong, CS, Chan, FTS, Chung, SH. A genetic algorithm approach for production scheduling with mold maintenance consideration. Int J Prod Res 2012; 50(20): 56835697. Google Scholar, Crossref
12. Wong, CS, Chan, FTS, Chung, SH. A joint production scheduling approach considering multiple resources and preventive maintenance tasks. Int J Prod Res 2013; 51(3): 883896. Google Scholar, Crossref
13. Chung, SH, Chan, FTS. A workload balancing genetic algorithm for the quay crane scheduling problem. Int J Prod Res. Epub ahead of print 8 May 2013. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2013.774489. Google Scholar, Crossref
14. Fang, H-L, Ross, P, Corne, D. A promising genetic algorithm approach to job-shop scheduling, rescheduling, and open-shop scheduling problems. In: Forrest, S (ed.) Proceedings of the fifth international conference on genetic algorithms. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1993, pp.375382. Google Scholar
15. Young-Ming, W, Nan-Feng, X, Hong-Li, Y. Optimal computing budget allocation based compound genetic algorithm for large scale job shop scheduling. In: Proceeding of the second international conference of fuzzy information and engineering (ICFIE), Guangzhou, China, 13–16 May 2007, pp.384396. Google Scholar
16. Heavey, C, Papadopoulos, HT, Browne, J. The throughput rate of multistation unreliable production lines. Eur J Oper Res 1993; 68(1): 6989. Google Scholar, Crossref
17. Seong, D, Chang, S, Hong, Y. Heuristic algorithms for buffer allocation in a production line with unreliable machines. Int J Prod Res 1995; 33(7): 19892005. Google Scholar, Crossref
18. Askin, RG, Standridge, CR. Modeling and analysis of manufacturing systems. New York: Wiley, 1993. Google Scholar
19. Papadopoulos, CT, Heavey, C, Browne, J. Queueing theory in manufacturing systems analysis and design. London; New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993. Google Scholar
20. Buzacott, JA, Shanthikumar, JG. Stochastic models of manufacturing systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1993. Google Scholar
21. Perros, HG. Queueing networks with blocking: exact and approximate solutions. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994. Google Scholar
22. Altiok, T. Performance analysis of manufacturing systems. New York: Springer, 1997. Google Scholar, Crossref
23. Helber, S. Performance analysis of flow lines with non-linear flow of material (Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems). London: Springer, 1999. Google Scholar, Crossref
24. Li, ZW, Zhou, MC. Deadlock resolution in automated manufacturing systems: a novel Petri net approach. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2009. Google Scholar
25. Dallery, Y, Gershwin, SB. Manufacturing flow line systems: a review of models and analytical results. Queueing Syst 1992; 12(1–2): 394. Google Scholar, Crossref
26. Papadopoulos, HT, Heavey, C. Queueing theory in manufacturing systems analysis and design: a classification of models for production and transfer lines. Eur J Oper Res 1996; 92(1): 127. Google Scholar, Crossref
27. Ozmutlu, SA, Harmonosky, CM. A real-time methodology for minimizing mean flowtime in FMSs with routing flexibility: threshold-based alternate routing. Eur J Oper Res 2005; 166: 369384. Google Scholar, Crossref
28. Cogill, BR, Hindi, H. Optimal routing and scheduling in flexible manufacturing systems using integer programming. In: Proceedings of the 46th IEEE conference on decision and control, New Orleans, LA, 12–14 December 2007, pp.40954102. New York: IEEE. Google Scholar
29. Bilge, ÜC, Fırat, M, Albey, E. A parametric fuzzy logic approach to dynamic part routing under full routing flexibility. Comput Ind Eng 2008; 55: 1533. Google Scholar, Crossref
30. Witkowski, TD, Antczak, P, Antczak, A. Simulation modeling of manufacturing system in relation to route flexibility degree, open rate of operations and production type. Int J Model Optim 2012; 2(4): 498503. Google Scholar, Crossref
31. Shalaby, EMA, Abdelmaguid, TF, Abdelrasol, ZY. New routing rules for dynamic flexible job shop scheduling with sequence-dependent setup times. In: Proceedings of the 2012 international conference on industrial engineering and operations management, Istanbul, Turkey, 3–6 July 2012. Google Scholar
32. Jerald, J, Asokan, P, Prabaharan, G. Scheduling optimisation of flexible manufacturing systems using particle swarm optimisation algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2005; 25(9–10): 964971. Google Scholar, Crossref
33. Yamamoto, H. One-by-one parts input method by off-line production simulator system with GA. Eur J Autom 2000: 11731186. Google Scholar
34. Abu Qudeiri, J, Yamamoto, H, Ramli, R. Genetic algorithm for buffer size and work station capacity in serial-parallel production lines. Artif Life Robot 2008; 12(1–2): 102106. Google Scholar, Crossref
35. Goldberg, DE. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1989. Google Scholar

Vol 231, Issue 7, 2017