![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
For women, choosing a facially masculine man as a mate is thought to confer genetic benefits to offspring. Crucial assumptions of this hypothesis have not been adequately tested. It has been assumed that variation in facial masculinity is due to genetic variation and that genetic factors that increase male facial masculinity do not increase facial masculinity in female relatives. We objectively quantified the facial masculinity in photos of identical (n = 411) and nonidentical (n = 782) twins and their siblings (n = 106). Using biometrical modeling, we found that much of the variation in male and female facial masculinity is genetic. However, we also found that masculinity of male faces is unrelated to their attractiveness and that facially masculine men tend to have facially masculine, less-attractive sisters. These findings challenge the idea that facially masculine men provide net genetic benefits to offspring and call into question this popular theoretical framework.
References
Section:
| Bonduriansky, R., Chenoweth, S. F. (2009). Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 280–288. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Cornwell, R. E., Perrett, D. I. (2008). Sexy sons and sexy daughters: The influence of parents’ facial characteristics on offspring. Animal Behaviour, 76, 1843–1853. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L. M., Little, A. C. (2010). The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2405–2410. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Smith, F. G., Little, A. C. (2010). Are attractive men’s faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 751–758. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Edwards, C. B., Marshall, S. D., Qian, F., Southard, K. A., Franciscus, R. G., Southard, T. E. (2007). Longitudinal study of facial skeletal growth completion in 3 dimensions. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, 132, 762–768. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Fisher, R. A. (1915). The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics Review, 7, 184–192. Google Scholar, Medline | |
| Folstad, I., Karter, A. J. (1992). Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. American Naturalist, 139, 602–622. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Gangestad, S. W., Eaton, M. A. (2013). Toward an integrative perspective on sexual selection and men’s masculinity. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 594–595. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Gangestad, S. W., Scheyd, G. J. (2005). The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 523–548. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism [Target article plus commentaries]. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2010). Men’s facial masculinity predicts changes in their female partners’ sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle, whereas men’s intelligence does not. Evolution & Human Behavior, 31, 412–424. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Garver-Apgar, C. E., Eaton, M. A., Tybur, J. M., Thompson, M. E. (2011). Evidence of intralocus sexual conflict: Physically and hormonally masculine individuals have more attractive brothers relative to sisters. Evolution & Human Behavior, 32, 423–432. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Huk, T., Winkel, W. G. (2008). Testing the sexy son hypothesis—a research framework for empirical approaches. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 456–461. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Keller, M. C., Coventry, W. L. (2005). Quantifying and addressing parameter indeterminacy in the classical twin design. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8, 201–213. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Keller, M. C., Medland, S. E., Duncan, L. E. (2010). Are extended twin family designs worth the trouble? A comparison of the bias, precision, and accuracy of parameters estimated in four twin family models. Behavior Genetics, 40, 377–393. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Lee, A. J., Dubbs, S. L., Kelly, A. J., von Hippel, W., Brooks, R. C., Zietsch, B. P. (2013). Human facial attributes, but not perceived intelligence, are used as cues of health and resource provision potential. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 779–787. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Little, A. C. (2013). Multiple motives in women’s preferences for masculine male faces: Comment on Scott et al. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 590–591. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I. (2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268, 39–44. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C. (2011). Exposure to visual cues of pathogen contagion changes preferences for masculinity and symmetry in opposite-sex faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 2032–2039. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C. (2012). Environment contingent preferences: Exposure to visual cues of direct male–male competition and wealth increase women’s preferences for masculinity in male faces. Evolution & Human Behavior, 34, 193–200. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 1638–1659. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., Perrett, D. I. (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1095–1100. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Mitchem, D. G., Purkey, A. M., Grebe, N. M., Carey, G., Garver-Apgar, C. E., Bates, T. C., . . . Keller, M. C. (2013). Estimating the sex-specific effects of genes on facial attractiveness and sexual dimorphism. Behavior Genetics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10519-013-9627-5 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., Maes, H. H. (2006). Mx: Statistical modeling. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University. Google Scholar | |
| Neale, M. C., Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Boston, MA: Kluwer. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Penton-Voak, I. S., Chen, J. Y. (2004). High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution & Human Behavior, 25, 229–241. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., Minamisawa, R. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741–742. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., . . . Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Pfluger, L. S., Oberzaucher, E., Katina, S., Holzleitner, I. J., Grammer, K. (2012). Cues to fertility: Perceived attractiveness and facial shape predict reproductive success. Evolution & Human Behavior, 33, 708–714. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Posthuma, D., Beem, A. L., de Geus, E. J. C., van Baal, G. C. M., von Hjelmborg, J. B., Lachine, I., Boomsma, D. I. (2003). Theory and practice in quantitative genetics. Twin Research, 6, 361–376. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline | |
| Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution & Human Behavior, 31, 157–175. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Rantala, M. J., Moore, F. R., Skrinda, I., Krama, T., Kivleniece, I., Kecko, S., Krams, I. (2012). Evidence for the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in humans. Nature Communications, 3, Article 694. Retrieved from: http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v3/n2/full/ncomms1696.html Google Scholar | |
| Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Rhodes, G., Chan, J., Zebrowitz, L. A., Simmons, L. W. (2003). Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270, S93–S95. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C. (2008). Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences. Genetica, 132, 309–321. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Scott, I. M. L., Clark, A. P., Boothroyd, L. G., Penton-Voak, I. S. (2012). Do men’s faces really signal heritable immunocompetence? Behavioral Ecology, 24, 579–589. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Scott, I. M. L., Pound, N., Stephen, I. D., Clark, A. P., Penton-Voak, I. S. (2010). Does masculinity matter? The contribution of masculine face shape to male attractiveness in humans. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13585. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0013585 Google Scholar | |
| Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution & Human Behavior, 27, 131–144. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Tybur, J. M., Gangestad, S. W. (2011). Mate preferences and infectious disease: Theoretical considerations and evidence in humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 3375–3388. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Welling, L. L. M., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M. (2008). Sex drive is positively associated with women’s preferences for sexual dimorphism in men’s and women’s faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 161–170. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Wright, M. J., Martin, N. G. (2004). Brisbane adolescent twin study: Outline of study methods and research projects. Australian Journal of Psychology, 56, 65–78. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L., Sheets, H. D., Fink, W. L. (2004). Geometric morphometrics for biologists: A primer. New York, NY: Elsevier Academic Press. Google Scholar |
