![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Despite impressive employment gains in many fields of science, women remain underrepresented in fields requiring intensive use of mathematics. Here we discuss three potential explanations for women’s underrepresentation: (a) male–female mathematical and spatial ability gaps, (b) sex discrimination, and (c) sex differences in career preferences and lifestyle choices. Synthesizing findings from psychology, endocrinology, sociology, economics, and education leads to the conclusion that, among a combination of interrelated factors, preferences and choices—both freely made and constrained—are the most significant cause of women’s underrepresentation.
References
Section:
| Baenninger, M.A., Newcombe, N. (1995). Environmental input to the development of sex-related differences in spatial and mathematical ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 363–379. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Benbow, C.P., Stanley, J.C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029–1031. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Blau, F., Currie, J., Croson, R., Ginther, D. (2010). Can mentoring help female assistant professors? Interim results from a randomized trial (NBER Working Paper No. 15707. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Ceci, S.J., Williams, W.M. (2010). The mathematics of sex: How biology and society conspire to limit talented women and girls. NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Ceci, S.J., Williams, W.M., Barnett, S.M. (2009). Women’s underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 218–261. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Committee on Gender Differences in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty; Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine; National Research Council. (2010). Gender differences at critical transitions in the careers of science, engineering, and mathematics faculty. Washington DC: National Academy Press. Google Scholar | |
| Gallagher, A.M., Kaufman, J.C. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Ginther, D.K., Kahn, S. (2006). Does science promote women? Evidence from academia 1973–2001. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w12691 Google Scholar | |
| Hill, C., Corbett, C., Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women. Google Scholar | |
| Hyde, J.S., Lindberg, S.M., Linn, M.C., Ellis, A.B., Williams, C.C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Lubinski, D., Benbow, C.P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for math science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 316–345. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Marsh, H.W., Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Daniel, H.-D., O’Mara, A. (2009). Gender effects in the peer reviews of grant proposals: A comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and multilevel approaches. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1290–1326. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals | |
| Nelson, D.J., Brammer, C.N. (2010). A national analysis of minorities in science and engineering faculties at research universities. Retrieved from http://chem.ou.edu/~djn/diversity/faculty_Tables_FY07/FinalReport07.html Google Scholar | |
| Park, G., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C.P. (2008). Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science, 19, 957–961. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Steinpreis, R.E., Anders, K.A., Ritzke, D. (1999). The impact of gender on the review of the CVs of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles, 41, 509–528. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Su, R., Rounds, J., Armstrong, P.I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859–884. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Terlecki, M.S., Newcombe, N.S., Little, M. (2007). Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 996–1013. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Trix, F., Psenka, C. (2003). Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Society, 14, 191–220. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Wai, J., Cacchio, M., Putallaz, M., Makel, M.C. (2010). Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 30-year examination. Intelligence, 38, 412–423. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C.P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Wainer, H., Steinberg, L.S. (1992). Sex differences in performance on the Mathematics section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test: A bidirectional validity study. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 323–336. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Wenneras, C., Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer review. Nature, 387, 341–343. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI |
