Although women are thought to possess sexual power, they risk social and economic penalties (i.e., backlash; Rudman, 1998) when they self-sexualize (i.e., assert their power; Cahoon & Edmonds, 1989; Glick, Larsen, Johnson, & Branstiter, 2005). Why? Drawing on the status incongruity hypothesis (SIH), which predicts backlash against powerful women because they challenge the gender hierarchy, we expected prejudice against self-sexualizing women to be explained by a dominance penalty rather than a communality deficit (Rudman, Moss-Racusin, Phelan, & Nauts, 2012). Two experiments supported this hypothesis, and Experiment 3 further showed that the dominance penalty was explained by ascribing power motives to self-sexualized women. These findings extend the SIH’s utility to the domain of self-sexualization and illuminate the scope of people’s discomfort with female power. Implications for the advancement of gender equality are discussed.

Abbey, A., Cozzarelli, C., McLaughlin, K., Harnish, R. J. (1987). The effects of clothing and dyad sex composition on perceptions of sexual intent: Do women and men evaluate these cues differently? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 108126. doi:10.1111/j.1559–1816.1987.tb00304.x Google Scholar, Crossref
Amanatullah, E. T., Tinsley, C. H. (2013). Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much…or not enough: When advocacy moderates backlash. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(1), 110122. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.006 Google Scholar, Crossref
Brescoll, V. L. (2011). Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 622641. doi:10.1177/0001839212439994 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Cahoon, D. D., Edmonds, E. M. (1989). Male–female estimates of opposite-sex first impressions concerning females’ clothing styles. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 280281. doi:10.3758/BF03334607 Google Scholar, Crossref
Crandall, C. S. (1991). Multiple stigma and AIDS: Illness stigma and attitudes toward homosexuals and IV drug users in AIDS-related stigmatization. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 165172. doi:10.1002/casp.2450010210 Google Scholar, Crossref
Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573598. doi:10.1037//0033–295X.109.3.573 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Erchull, M. J., Liss, M. (2013). Exploring the concept of perceived female sexual empowerment: Development and validation of the Sex is Power Scale. Gender Issues, 30, 3953. doi:10.1007/s12147–013–9114–6 Google Scholar, Crossref
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878902. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.82.6.878 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism and Psychology, 18, 3560. doi:10.1177/0959353507084950 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Gill, R. (2012). Media, empowerment and the “sexualization of culture” debates. Sex Roles, 66, 736745. doi:10.1007/s11199–011–0107–1 Google Scholar, Crossref
Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 13231334. doi:10.1177/01461672972312009 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in low- and high-status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 389395. doi:10.1111/j.1471–6402.2005.00238.x Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford. Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F., Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451470. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Heilman, M. E., Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 8192. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.92.1.81 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416427. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.89.3.416 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Kane, E. W., Schippers, M. (1996). Men’s and women’s beliefs about gender and sexuality. Gender and Society, 10, 650665. doi:10.1177/089124396010005009 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Kray, L. J., Locke, C. C. (2008). To flirt or not to flirt? Sexual power at the bargaining table. Negotiation Journal, 24, 483493. doi:10.1111/j.1571–9979.2008.00199.x Google Scholar, Crossref
Kray, L. J., Locke, C. C., van Zant, A. B. (2012). Feminine charm: An experimental analysis of its costs and benefits in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 13431357. doi:10.1177/0146167212453074 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Lamb, S., Graling, K., Wheeler, E. E. (2013). “Pole-arized” discourse: An analysis of responses to Miley Cyrus’s Teen Choice Awards pole dance. Feminism and Psychology, 23, 163183. doi:10.1177/0959353512472482 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Lamb, S., Peterson, Z. (2012). Adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment: Two feminists explore the concept. Sex Roles, 66, 703712. doi:10.1007/s11199–011–9995–3 Google Scholar, Crossref
Levin, D., Kilbourne, J. (2008). So sexy, so soon: The new sexualized childhood and what parents can do to protect their kids. New York, NY: Ballantine. Google Scholar
Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., Ramsey, L. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the Enjoyment of Sexualization Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 5568. doi:10.1177/0146167210386119 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Murnen, S. K., Wright, C., Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys will be boys,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359375. doi:10.1023/A:1020488928736 Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Okimoto, T. G., Brescoll, V. L. (2010). The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 923936. doi:10.1177/0146167210371949 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counter-stereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629645. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.74.3.629 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Rudman, L. A., Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157176. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.87.2.157 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Rudman, L. A., Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 10041010. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.77.5.1004 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Rudman, L. A., Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743762. doi:10.1111/0022–4537.00239 Google Scholar, Crossref
Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Glick, P., Phelan, J. E. (2012). Reactions to vanguards: Advances in backlash theory. In Devine, P. G., Plant, E. A. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 45, pp. 167227). New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165179. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008 Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Rudman, L. A., Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 6179. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003 Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51, 687696. doi:10.1007/s11199–004–0718-x Google Scholar, Crossref
Six, B., Eckes, T. (1991). A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 24, 5771. doi:10.1007/BF00288703 Google Scholar, Crossref
Smolak, L., Murnen, S. K. (2011). The sexualization of girls and women as primary antecedent of self-objectification. In Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., Thompson, J. K. (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 5375). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar, Crossref
Watkins, M. B., Smith, A. N., Aquino, K. (2013). The use and consequences of strategic sexual performances. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 173186. doi:10.5465/amp.2010.0109 Google Scholar, Crossref
Wookey, M. L., Graves, N. A., Butler, J. C. (2009). Effects of a sexy appearance on perceived competence of women. Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 116118. doi:10.3200/SOCP.149.1.116–118 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
View access options

My Account

You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Article

Your Access Options

Although women are thought to possess sexual power, they risk social and economic penalties (i.e., backlash; Rudman, 1998) when they self-sexualize (i.e., assert their power; Cahoon & Edmonds, 1989; Glick, Larsen, Johnson, & Branstiter, 2005). Why? Drawing on the status incongruity hypothesis (SIH), which predicts backlash against powerful women because they challenge the gender hierarchy, we expected prejudice against self-sexualizing women to be explained by a dominance penalty rather than a communality deficit (Rudman, Moss-Racusin, Phelan, & Nauts, 2012). Two experiments supported this hypothesis, and Experiment 3 further showed that the dominance penalty was explained by ascribing power motives to self-sexualized women. These findings extend the SIH’s utility to the domain of self-sexualization and illuminate the scope of people’s discomfort with female power. Implications for the advancement of gender equality are discussed.

Abbey, A., Cozzarelli, C., McLaughlin, K., Harnish, R. J. (1987). The effects of clothing and dyad sex composition on perceptions of sexual intent: Do women and men evaluate these cues differently? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 108126. doi:10.1111/j.1559–1816.1987.tb00304.x Google Scholar, Crossref
Amanatullah, E. T., Tinsley, C. H. (2013). Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much…or not enough: When advocacy moderates backlash. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(1), 110122. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.006 Google Scholar, Crossref
Brescoll, V. L. (2011). Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 622641. doi:10.1177/0001839212439994 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Cahoon, D. D., Edmonds, E. M. (1989). Male–female estimates of opposite-sex first impressions concerning females’ clothing styles. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 280281. doi:10.3758/BF03334607 Google Scholar, Crossref
Crandall, C. S. (1991). Multiple stigma and AIDS: Illness stigma and attitudes toward homosexuals and IV drug users in AIDS-related stigmatization. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 165172. doi:10.1002/casp.2450010210 Google Scholar, Crossref
Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573598. doi:10.1037//0033–295X.109.3.573 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Erchull, M. J., Liss, M. (2013). Exploring the concept of perceived female sexual empowerment: Development and validation of the Sex is Power Scale. Gender Issues, 30, 3953. doi:10.1007/s12147–013–9114–6 Google Scholar, Crossref
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878902. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.82.6.878 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism and Psychology, 18, 3560. doi:10.1177/0959353507084950 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Gill, R. (2012). Media, empowerment and the “sexualization of culture” debates. Sex Roles, 66, 736745. doi:10.1007/s11199–011–0107–1 Google Scholar, Crossref
Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 13231334. doi:10.1177/01461672972312009 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in low- and high-status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 389395. doi:10.1111/j.1471–6402.2005.00238.x Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford. Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F., Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451470. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Heilman, M. E., Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 8192. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.92.1.81 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416427. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.89.3.416 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Kane, E. W., Schippers, M. (1996). Men’s and women’s beliefs about gender and sexuality. Gender and Society, 10, 650665. doi:10.1177/089124396010005009 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Kray, L. J., Locke, C. C. (2008). To flirt or not to flirt? Sexual power at the bargaining table. Negotiation Journal, 24, 483493. doi:10.1111/j.1571–9979.2008.00199.x Google Scholar, Crossref
Kray, L. J., Locke, C. C., van Zant, A. B. (2012). Feminine charm: An experimental analysis of its costs and benefits in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 13431357. doi:10.1177/0146167212453074 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Lamb, S., Graling, K., Wheeler, E. E. (2013). “Pole-arized” discourse: An analysis of responses to Miley Cyrus’s Teen Choice Awards pole dance. Feminism and Psychology, 23, 163183. doi:10.1177/0959353512472482 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Lamb, S., Peterson, Z. (2012). Adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment: Two feminists explore the concept. Sex Roles, 66, 703712. doi:10.1007/s11199–011–9995–3 Google Scholar, Crossref
Levin, D., Kilbourne, J. (2008). So sexy, so soon: The new sexualized childhood and what parents can do to protect their kids. New York, NY: Ballantine. Google Scholar
Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., Ramsey, L. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the Enjoyment of Sexualization Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 5568. doi:10.1177/0146167210386119 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Murnen, S. K., Wright, C., Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys will be boys,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359375. doi:10.1023/A:1020488928736 Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Okimoto, T. G., Brescoll, V. L. (2010). The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 923936. doi:10.1177/0146167210371949 Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counter-stereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629645. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.74.3.629 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Rudman, L. A., Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157176. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.87.2.157 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Rudman, L. A., Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 10041010. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.77.5.1004 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Rudman, L. A., Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743762. doi:10.1111/0022–4537.00239 Google Scholar, Crossref
Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Glick, P., Phelan, J. E. (2012). Reactions to vanguards: Advances in backlash theory. In Devine, P. G., Plant, E. A. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 45, pp. 167227). New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar, Crossref
Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165179. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008 Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Rudman, L. A., Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 6179. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003 Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51, 687696. doi:10.1007/s11199–004–0718-x Google Scholar, Crossref
Six, B., Eckes, T. (1991). A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 24, 5771. doi:10.1007/BF00288703 Google Scholar, Crossref
Smolak, L., Murnen, S. K. (2011). The sexualization of girls and women as primary antecedent of self-objectification. In Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., Thompson, J. K. (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 5375). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar, Crossref
Watkins, M. B., Smith, A. N., Aquino, K. (2013). The use and consequences of strategic sexual performances. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 173186. doi:10.5465/amp.2010.0109 Google Scholar, Crossref
Wookey, M. L., Graves, N. A., Butler, J. C. (2009). Effects of a sexy appearance on perceived competence of women. Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 116118. doi:10.3200/SOCP.149.1.116–118 Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline