Abstract
This article presents the results of an analysis of the large-scale processed texts of Arabic newspapers in the King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) Arabic Corpus Project. I adopted methods modified from the Biber Connor Upton Approach to retrieve the expanded concordances of the lexical units almarᵓa (woman) and alnisāᵓ (women) from the corpus. The extracted text reveals the discursive patterns regarding a number of topics which are discussed in Arabic newspapers, namely, socio-culture (social practices) and eco-politics. The results of the study show how and why topics related to Arab women are discursively constructed, revealing negative patterns with regard to the topics discrimination, the veil, sports, male guardianship, driving, pro-divorce settlements and municipal elections, and positive patterns concerning the topics marital status, violence, education, travel, sexual harassment, the removal of male guardianship, employment, ministerial election and political participation. The specific case of the topic (un)veil is subsequently analysed in more detail and the results reveal that the topic is associated with negative patterns within a wider socio-cultural discourse.
References
Section:
| Al-Mujaiwel, S (2016) Free/Open KACSTAC and its processing tools: Lexical resources for Arabic lexicogrammatical microstructures based on collocational indicators. In: Alonso Almeida, F, Ortega, I, Quintana, E. (eds) Input a Word, Analyze the World: Selected Approaches to Corpus Linguistics. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 153–170. Google Scholar | |
| Almujaiwel, S, Al-Thubaity, A (2016) Arabic corpus processing tools for corpus linguistics and language teaching. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Globalization of Second Language Acquisition and Teacher Education (G-SLATE), Fukuoka, Japan, 4–6 August. Gifu City, Japan: INTESDA, pp. 103–108. Google Scholar | |
| Al-Thubaity, A (2015) A 700M + Arabic corpus: KACST Arabic corpus design and construction. Language Resources and Evaluation 49(3): 721–751. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Al-Thubaity, A, Khan, M, Al-Mazrua, M. (2014) KACST Arabic corpora processing tool ‘Khawas’ (computer software). Available at: https://sourceforge.net/projects/ghawwasv4/ (accessed 2 July 2016). Google Scholar | |
| Baker, P (2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum. Google Scholar | |
| Baker, P, McEnery, T (2005) A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. In: Ballington, J, Karam, A (eds) Journal of Language and Politics, pp. 197–226. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Baker, P, Gabrielatos, C, Khosravinik, M. (2008) A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19(3): 273–306. Google Scholar, Link, ISI | |
| Biber, D, Connor, U, Upton, T (2007) Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Bourdieu, P (1991) Language and Symbolic Power (trans. G Raymond and M Adamson). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd. Google Scholar | |
| Burr, V (1995) An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Charlebois, JM (2010) The discursive construction of hegemonic and pariah femininities in the spoken accounts of a group of Japanese women. PhD Thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster. Google Scholar | |
| Connell, RW (1987) Gender and Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Connell, RW (1995) Masculinities. Oxford: Polity. Google Scholar | |
| Edley, N (2001) Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In: Wetherell, M, Taylor, M, Yates, SJ (eds) Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 189–228. Google Scholar | |
| Fairclough, N (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman. Google Scholar | |
| Fairclough, N (1996) Technologisation of discourse. In: Caldas-Coulthard, CR, Coulthard, M (eds) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 71–83. Google Scholar | |
| Fairclough, N (2009) Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In: Wodak, R, Meyer, M (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 122–138. Google Scholar | |
| Fairclough, N, Wodak, R (1997) Critical discourse analysis. In: Van Dijk, TA (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction. London: SAGE, pp. 258–284. Google Scholar | |
| Flowerdew, L (1997) Interpersonal strategies: Investigating inlerlanguage corpora. RELC Journal 28(1): 72–88. Google Scholar, Link | |
| Hardt-Mautner, G (1995) Only connect: Critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics. UCREL technical paper no. 6. Lancaster: Lancaster University. Available at: http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/papers/techpaper/vol6.pdf (accessed 14 July 2016). Google Scholar | |
| Hoey, M (1997) From concordance to text structure: New uses for computer corpora. In: Lewandowska, B, Melia, P (eds) Proceedings of the Practical Applications of Language Corpora Conference. Łódź: Łódź University Press, pp. 2–23. Google Scholar | |
| Holmes, J, Marra, M (eds) (2010) Femininity, Feminism and Gendered Discourse: A Selected and Edited Collection of Papers From the Fifth International Gender and Language Association conference (IGALA5). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Google Scholar | |
| Livani, T (2007) Middle East and North Africa: Gender Overview. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, pp. 1–43. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTMENA/Resources/MENA_Gender_Overview_2007.pdf (accessed 14 July 2016). Google Scholar | |
| Lombardo, L (2009) Introduction: Establishing guidelines for the use of corpora as resources for learners (and their teachers). In: Lombardo, L (ed.) Using Corpora to Learn about Language and Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 7–38. Google Scholar | |
| Louw, WE (2010) Collocation as instrumentation for meaning: A scientific fact. In: Van Peer, W, Zyngier, S, Viana, V (eds) Literary Education and Digital Learning: Methods and Technologies. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 79–101. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| McEnery, T, Hardie, A (2012) Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
| McRobbie, A (2009) The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
| Magalhaes, CM (2006) A critical discourse analysis approach to news discourses and social practices on race in Brazil. DELTA 22(2): 275–301. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Mautner, G (2007) Mining large corpora for social information: The case of elderly. Language in Society 36(1): 51–72. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Offenhauer, P (2005) Women in Islamic societies: A selected review of social scientific literature. A report prepared by the Federal Research Division in the Library of Congress under an interagency agreement with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence/National Intelligence Council (ODNI/ADDNIA/NIC) and Central Intelligence Agency/Directorate of Science and Technology. Available at: https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/pdf-files/Women_Islamic_Societies.pdf (accessed 14 July 2016). Google Scholar | |
| O’Halloran, K, Coffin, C (2004) Checking overinterpretation and underinterpretation: Help from corpora in critical linguistics. In: Coffin, C, Hewings, A, O’Halloran, K (eds) Applying English Grammar: Corpus and Functional Approaches. London: Arnold, pp. 275–297. Google Scholar | |
| Orpin, D (2005) Corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis: Examining the ideology of sleaze. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10(1): 37–61. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Ottaway, M (2004) Women’s Rights and Democracy in the Arab World. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Google Scholar | |
| Read, J, Bartkowski, J (2000) To veil or not to veil? A case study of identity negotiation among Muslim women in Austin, Texas. Gender & Society 14(3): 395–417. Google Scholar, Link | |
| Sabbagh, A (2005) The Arab states: Enhancing women’s political participation. In: Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, rev. edn. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), pp. 52–71. Google Scholar | |
| Sinclair, J (2004) Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Skalli, LH (2011) Constructing Arab female leadership lessons from the Moroccan media. Gender & Society 26(3): 382–405. Google Scholar | |
| Stubbs, M (1983) Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
| Stubbs, M (1996) Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar | |
| Stubbs, M (1997) Review of T. McEnery and A. Wilson (1996) Corpus Linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2(2): 296–302. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Stubbs, M (2007) On texts, corpora and models of language. In: Hoey, M, Mahlberg, M, Stubbs, M. (eds) Text, Discourse and Corpora: Theory and Analysis. London: Continuum, pp. 127–162. Google Scholar | |
| Teubert, W (2004) Language and corpus linguistics. In: Halliday, M, Teubert, W, Yallop, C. (eds) Lexicology and Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. London: Continuum, pp. 73–112. Google Scholar | |
| Teubert, W (2005) My version of corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10(1): 1–13. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Teubert, W (2007) Parole-linguistics and the diachronic dimension of the discourse. In: Hoey, M, Mahlberg, M, Stubbs, M. (eds) Text, Discourse and Corpora: Theory and Analysis. London: Continuum, pp. 57–88. Google Scholar | |
| The World Bank (2009) The Status and Progress of Women in the Middle East and North Africa. Washington, DC: The Social and Economic Development Group and the Office of the Chief Economist of the Middle East and North Africa. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTMENA/Resources/MENA_Gender_Compendium-2009-1.pdf (accessed 14 July 2016). Google Scholar | |
| Titscher, S, Meyer, M, Wodak, R. (2000) Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
| Tohmé-Tabet, A (2001) Women, intangible heritage and development in the Arab world. In: International Editorial Meeting and Future Activities in the Domain Iran-National Commission for UNESCO, Tehran, Iran, June. Available at: http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/doc/src/00161-EN.pdf (accessed 14 July 2016). Google Scholar | |
| Upton, TA, Cohen, MA (2009) An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse Studies 11(5): 585–605. Google Scholar, Link | |
| Van Dijk, TA (1993) Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 4(2): 249–283. Google Scholar, Link | |
| Van Dijk, TA (1998) Ideology. London: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
| Van Dijk, TA (2008) Discourse Reader. London: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
| Van Leeuwen, T (1996) The representation of social actors. In: Caldas-Coulthard, CR, Coulthard, M (eds) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 32–70. Google Scholar | |
| Weiss, G, Wodak, R (eds) (2003) Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar | |
| Wodak, R (2006) Review article: Boundaries in discourse analysis. Language in Society 35(4): 595–611. Google Scholar, Crossref | |
| Wodak, R, De Cillia, R, Reisigl, M. (1999) The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar |
