![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Body weight plays a significant role in attraction and relationship formation, but does it continue to shape more established relationships? The current 4-year longitudinal study of 169 newlywed couples addressed this question by examining the implications of own and partner body mass index (BMI) for the trajectory of marital satisfaction. In contrast to findings from studies of attraction and mate selection, own and partner BMI demonstrated inconsistent effects on the trajectory of satisfaction. However, consistent with predictions derived from interdependence theory, normative resource theories, and evolutionary perspectives, husbands were more satisfied initially and wives were more satisfied over time to the extent that wives had lower BMIs than their husbands, controlling for depression, income, education, and whether the relationship ended in divorce. These findings suggest that a dyadic perspective may be more appropriate than an individual one for understanding how partners' qualities shape established relationships such as marriage.
References
Section:
| Banse, R. (2004). Adult attachment and marital satisfaction: Evidence for dyadic configuration effects. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 21, 273–282. doi:10.1177/0265407504041388. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Beck, A. T, Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline | |
| Billmann, S. J., Ware, J. C. (2002). Marital satisfaction of wives of untreated sleep apneic men. Sleep Medicine, 3, 55–59. doi:10.1016/S1389-9457(01)00118-6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Bjerkeset, O., Romundstad, P., Evans, J., Gunnell, D. (2008). Association of adult body mass index and height with anxiety, depression, and suicide in the general population: The HUNT study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167, 193–202. doi:10.1093/aje/kwm280. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Botwin, M. D., Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65, 107–136. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00531.x. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Boyes, A. D., Latner, J. D. (2009). Weight stigma in existing romantic relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 35, 282–293. doi:10.1080/00926230902851280. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 147–158. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.147. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S. W., Congdon, R. T. (2004). HLM: Hierarchical linear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs. Chicago: Scientific Software International. Google Scholar | |
| Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00023992. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Carmalt, J. H., Cawley, J., Joyner, K., Sobal, J. (2008). Body weight and matching with a physically attractive romantic partner. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1287–1296. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00566.x. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Carr, D., Friedman, M. A. (2006). Body weight and the quality of interpersonal relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 127–149. doi:10.1177/019027250606900202. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Chen, E. Y., Brown, M. (2005). Obesity stigma in sexual relationships. Obesity Research, 13, 1393–1397. doi:10.1038/oby.2005.168. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline | |
| Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245–264. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Edwards, J. E. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 51–100. doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1029. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Frye, N. E., McNulty, J. K., Karney, B. R. (2008). When are constraints on leaving a marriage related to negative behavior within the marriage? Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 153–161. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.153. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Gallo, L. C., Smith, T. W. (2001). Attachment style in marriage: Adjustment and responses to interaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 263–289. doi:10.1177/0265407501182006. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Griffin, D., Murray, S., Gonzalez, R. (1999). Difference score correlations in relationship research: A conceptual primer. Personal Relationships, 6, 505–518. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00206.x. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Gonzaga, G. C., Campos, B., Bradbury, T. (2007). Similarity, convergence, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 34–48. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.34. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Harrell, W. A. (1990). Husband’s masculinity, wife’s power, and marital conflict. Social Behavior and Personality, 18, 207–215. doi:10.2224/sbp.1990.18.2.207. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Harris, M. B., Harris, R. J., Bochner, S. (1982). Fat, four-eyed, and female: Stereotypes of obesity, glasses, and gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 503–516. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1982.tb00882.x. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Karney, B. R., Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Kurzban, R., Weeden, J. (2005). Do advertised preferences predict the behavior of speed daters? Personal Relationships, 14, 623–632. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Legenbauer, T., Vocks, S., Schäfer, C., Schütt-Strömel, S., Hiller, W., Wagner, C., Vögele, C. (2009). Preference for attractiveness and thinness in a partner: Influence of internalization of the thin ideal and shape/weight dissatisfaction in heterosexual women, heterosexual men, lesbians, and gay men. Body Image, 6, 228–234. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.04.002. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Markey, C. N., Markey, P. M. (2006). Romantic relationships and body satisfaction among young women. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 271–279. doi:10.1007/s10964-005-9013-6. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| McNulty, J. K, Neff, L. A., Karney, B. R. (2008). Beyond initial attraction: Physical attractiveness in newlywed marriages. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 135–143. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.135. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Meltzer, A. L., McNulty, J. K. (2010). Body image and marital satisfaction: Evidence for the mediating role of sexual frequency and sexual satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 156–164. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Neff, L. A., Karney, B. R. (2007). Stress crossover in early marriage: A longitudinal and dyadic perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 69, 594–607. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00394.x. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 141–151. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Osgood, C. E., Suci, G., Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Google Scholar | |
| Raudenbush, S. W., Brennan, R. T., Barnett, R. C. (1995). A multivariate hierarchical model for studying psychological change within married couples: Methodological advances in family psychology. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 161–174. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.9.2.161. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Rodman, H. (1967). Marital power in France, Greece, Yugoslavia, and the United States: A cross-national discussion. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29, 320–324. doi:10.2307/349693. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Rogers, S. L., DeBoer, D. D. (2001). Changes in wives' income: Effects on marital happiness, psychological well-being, and the risk of divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 458–472. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00458.x. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI | |
| Sanchez, D. T., Kwang, T. (2007). When the relationship becomes her: Revisiting women’s body concerns from a relationship contingency perspective. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 401–414. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00389.x. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI | |
| Sheets, V., Ajmere, K. (2005). Are romantic partners a source of college students' weight concern? Eating Behaviors, 6, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2004.08.008. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline | |
| Swami, V. (2006). The influence of body weight and shape in determining female and male physical attractiveness. In Kindes, M. V. (Ed.), Body image: New research (pp. 35–61). Hauppauge, NY: Nova. Google Scholar | |
| Thibaut, J., Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley. Google Scholar | |
| Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508–516. doi:10.1037/h0021188. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI | |
| Whisman, M. A. (2001). The association between depression and marital dissatisfaction. In Beach, S. R. H. (Ed.), Marital and family processes in depression: A scientific foundation for clinical practice (pp. 3–24). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar, Crossref |
