Social Psychological and Personality Science

Moral perceptions of harm and fairness are instrumental in guiding how an individual navigates moral challenges. Classic research documents that the gender of a target can affect how people deploy these perceptions of harm and fairness. Across multiple studies, we explore the effect of an individual’s moral orientations (their considerations of harm and justice) and a target’s gender on altruistic behavior. Results reveal that a target’s gender can bias one’s readiness to engage in harmful actions and that a decider’s considerations of harm—but not fairness concerns—modulate costly altruism. Together, these data illustrate that moral choices are conditional on the social nature of the moral dyad: Even under the same moral constraints, a target’s gender and a decider’s gender can shift an individual’s choice to be more or less altruistic, suggesting that gender bias and harm considerations play a significant role in moral cognition.

Aiken L., West S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Asch S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258290. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Banaji M. R., Hardin C. D. (1996a). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136141. Google Scholar Link
Banaji M. R., Hardin C. (1996b). Gender in language and thought. International Journal of Psychology, 31, 56225622. Google Scholar
Becker J. C., Wright S. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 6277. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Benson P. L., Karabenick S. A., Lerner R. M. (1976). Pretty pleases—Effects of physical attractiveness, race, and sex on receiving help. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 409415. Google Scholar CrossRef
Blair I. V., Banaji M. R. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 11421163. Google Scholar CrossRef
Broverman I. K., Vogel S. R., Broverma D. M., Clarkson F. E., Rosenkra P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes—Current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 5978. Google Scholar CrossRef
Buhrmester M., Kwang T., Gosling S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 35. Google Scholar Link
Cejka M. A., Eagly A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413423. Google Scholar Link
Cikara M., Botvinick M. M., Fiske S. T. (2011). Us versus them: Social identity shapes neural responses to intergroup competition and harm. Psychophysiology, 48, S17S17. Google Scholar
Cikara M., Bruneau E. G., Saxe R. R. (2011). Us and them: Intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 149153. Google Scholar CrossRef
Crew K. B. (1991). Sex differences in criminal sentencing: Chivalry or patriarchy? Justice Quarterly, 8, 5983. Google Scholar CrossRef
Cushman F., Gray K., Gaffey A., Mendes W. B. (2012). Simulating murder: The aversion to harmful action. Emotion, 12, 27. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Eagly A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Eagly A. H. (1994). On comparing women and men. Feminism & Psychology, 4, 513522. Google Scholar Link
Eagly A. H. (1997). Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 52, 13801383. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Eagly A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64, 644658. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Eagly A. H., Crowley M. (1986). Gender and helping-behavior—A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283308. Google Scholar CrossRef
Eagly A. H., Mladinic A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543558. Google Scholar Link
Eagly A. H., Wood W. (1991). Explaining sex-differences in social-behavior—A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306315. Google Scholar Link
Eckel C. C., Grossman P. J. (2001). Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry, 39, 171188. Google Scholar CrossRef
Fazio R. H., Olson M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297327. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Fehr E., Schmidt K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817868. Google Scholar CrossRef
FeldmanHall O., Dalgleish T., Evans D., Mobbs D. (2015). Empathic concern drives costly altruism. Neuroimage, 105, 347356. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
FeldmanHall O., Mobbs D., Evans D., Hiscox L., Navrady L., Dalgleish T. (2012). What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices. Cognition, 123, 434441. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Foot P. (1978). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect in virtues and vices. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar
Foschi M. (2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 2142. Google Scholar CrossRef
Friesdorf R., Conway P., Gawronski B. (2015). Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: A process dissociation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 696713. Google Scholar Link
Gardner W. L., Gabriel S. (2004). Gender differences in relational and collective interdependence: Implications for self-views, social behavior, and subjective well-being. In Eagly A. H., Beall A., Sternberg R. J. (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 169191). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
Gilligan C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Gilligan C., Attanucci J. (1988). 2 moral orientations—Gender differences and similarities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly-Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34, 223237. Google Scholar
Goldin C., Rouse C. (2000). Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. American Economic Review, 90, 715741. Google Scholar CrossRef
Graham J., Haidt J. (Eds.). (2011). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. New York, NY: APA Books. Google Scholar
Gray K., Knobe J., Sheskin M., Bloom P., Barrett L. F. (2011). More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 12071220. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Gray K., Waytz A., Young L. (2012). The moral dyad: A fundamental template unifying moral judgment. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 206215. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Gray K., Wegner D. A. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505520. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Gray K., Young L., Waytz A. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 101124. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Greene J. D., Cushman F. A., Stewart L. E., Lowenberg K., Nystrom L. E., Cohen J. D. (2009). Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition, 111, 364371. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Greene J. D., Sommerville R. B., Nystrom L. E., Darley J. M., Cohen J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 21052108. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Haidt J., Graham J. (2007a). Planet of the Durkheimians, where community, authority, and sacredness are foundations of morality. In Jost J., Kay A., Thorisdottir H. (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 371401). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Haidt J., Graham J. (2007b). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98116. Google Scholar CrossRef
Hamilton D. L., Sherman S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336355. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Higgins E. T., Rholes W. S., Jones C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression-formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141154. Google Scholar CrossRef
Horton J. J., Rand D. G., Zeckhauser R. J. (2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14, 399425. Google Scholar CrossRef
Kipling R. (1907). Collected verse of Rudyard Kipling. New York, NY: Doubleday, Page. Google Scholar
Kohlberg L., Hersh R. (1977). Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory into Practice, 16, 5359. Google Scholar CrossRef
Mason W., Suri S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 123. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Miller R. M., Hannikainen I. A., Cushman F. A. (2014). Bad actions or bad outcomes? Differentiating affective contributions to the moral condemnation of harm. Emotion, 14, 573587. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Moffitt T. E., Caspi A. (2001). Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 355375. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Moss-Racusin C. A., Dovidio J. F., Brescoll V. L., Graham M. J., Handelsman J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 1647416479. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Nosek B. A., Banaji M. R., Greenwald A. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math not equal me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 4459. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Paolacci G., Chandler J., Ipeirotis P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411419. Google Scholar
Pizarro D. (2000). Nothing more than feelings? The role of emotions in moral judgment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30, 355375. Google Scholar CrossRef
Rudman L. A., Greenwald A. G., McGhee D. E. (2001). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 11641178. Google Scholar Link
Saad G., Gill T. (2001). The effects of a recipient’s gender in a modified dictator game. Applied Economics Letters, 8, 463466. Google Scholar CrossRef
Sheltzer J. M., Smith J. C. (2014). Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 1010710112. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Skulmowski A., Bunge A., Kaspar K., Pipa G. (2014). Forced-choice decision-making in modified trolley dilemma situations: A virtual reality and eye tracking study. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 426. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Tetlock P. E., Kristel O. V., Elson S. B., Green M. C., Lerner J. S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853870. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Thomson J. J. (1976). Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. Monist, 59, 204217. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453458. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Viki G. T., Abrams D., Hutchison P. (2003). The “true” romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49, 533537. Google Scholar CrossRef
Wood W., Eagly A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699727. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Wood W., Eagly A. H. (2009). Gender identity. In Leary M., Hoyle R. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 109128). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar

Author Biographies

Oriel FeldmanHall received her PhD in neuroscience from Cambridge University. She is currently a postdoctoral fellow at New York University.

Tim Dalgleish is a clinical psychologist and program leader at the Medical Research Council’s Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit at Cambridge University.

Davy Evans received his PhD in psychology from Cambridge University. He is currently pursuing is clinical PhD from University of Birmingham.

Lauren Navrady was research staff at the Medical Research Council’s Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit at Cambridge University. She is currently pursuing her PhD at the University of Edinburgh.

Ellen Tedeschi is pursuing her PhD at Columbia University.

Dean Mobbs received his PhD from University College London. He is currently an associate professor at Columbia University.

Handling Editor: Jesse Graham

Vol 7, Issue 6, 2016

Recommended Citation


Moral Chivalry

Oriel FeldmanHall1, Tim Dalgleish2, Davy Evans3, Lauren Navrady2, Ellen Tedeschi4, Dean Mobbs4Author Biographies

Oriel FeldmanHall received her PhD in neuroscience from Cambridge University. She is currently a postdoctoral fellow at New York University.

Tim Dalgleish is a clinical psychologist and program leader at the Medical Research Council’s Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit at Cambridge University.

Davy Evans received his PhD in psychology from Cambridge University. He is currently pursuing is clinical PhD from University of Birmingham.

Lauren Navrady was research staff at the Medical Research Council’s Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit at Cambridge University. She is currently pursuing her PhD at the University of Edinburgh.

Ellen Tedeschi is pursuing her PhD at Columbia University.

Dean Mobbs received his PhD from University College London. He is currently an associate professor at Columbia University.

Handling Editor: Jesse Graham

Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USAMedical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UKSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA


Social Psychological and Personality Science

Vol 7, Issue 6, pp. 542 - 551

First published date: May-25-2016


If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click on download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format

Download article citation data for:
Oriel FeldmanHall, Tim Dalgleish, Davy Evans, Lauren Navrady, Ellen Tedeschi, Dean Mobbs
Author Biographies

Oriel FeldmanHall received her PhD in neuroscience from Cambridge University. She is currently a postdoctoral fellow at New York University.

Tim Dalgleish is a clinical psychologist and program leader at the Medical Research Council’s Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit at Cambridge University.

Davy Evans received his PhD in psychology from Cambridge University. He is currently pursuing is clinical PhD from University of Birmingham.

Lauren Navrady was research staff at the Medical Research Council’s Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit at Cambridge University. She is currently pursuing her PhD at the University of Edinburgh.

Ellen Tedeschi is pursuing her PhD at Columbia University.

Dean Mobbs received his PhD from University College London. He is currently an associate professor at Columbia University.

Handling Editor: Jesse Graham

Social Psychological and Personality Science 2016 7:6, 542-551

Request Permissions

View permissions information for this article

Share

Email