In response to increased research being performed in developing countries, many research ethics committees (RECs) have been established, but the quality of their ethics review systems remains unknown. Evaluating the performance of an REC remains a challenging task. Absent an accreditation process, a self-assessment mechanism would provide RECs a way to review their policies and processes against recognized international standards. We describe a self-assessment tool that was developed and reviewed by REC members and researchers from the Middle East. This tool reflects pragmatic aspects of human subjects protection, is based on international standards, is straightforward in its completion, and its items are relevant to the administrative processes that exist in many RECs in the developing world.

Rab, Abdur M., Abou-Zeid, A., Afzal, M., & Silverman, H. J. (2008). Ethical practices for health research in the Eastern Mediterranean Region of the World Health Organization: A retrospective data analysis. PLoS ONE, 3, e2094. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Abou-Zeid, A., Afzal, M., & Silverman, H. J. (2006). Informed consent as an ethical requirement for health research in the Eastern Mediterranean Region of the World Health Organization. Paper presented at the National Conference on Alternative IRB Models, Washington, DC, November 20–21. Google Scholar
Abou-Zeid, A., Afzal, M., & Silverman, H. J. (2009). Capacity mapping of national ethics committees in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. BMC Medical Ethics, 4(10), 8. Google Scholar, Crossref
Al-Khateeb, W. (2008). Ethical conduct of clinical studies in Jordan: A case study providing a map for regulatory oversight. Paper presented at the First Meeting for the Eastern Mediterranean and Arab Forum on Bioethics in Research, Cairo, Egypt, August 12–14. Google Scholar
Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs. (2001). The Current Accreditation Standards. Retrieved January 10, 2010 from http://www.aahrpp.org/www.aspx?PageID?2024. Google Scholar
Bhutta, A. Z. (2002). Ethics in international health research: A perspective from the developing world. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80, 114120. Google Scholar, Medline
Burke, G. S. (2005). Looking into the Institutional Review Board: Observations from both sides of the table. Journal of Nutrition, 135, 921924. Google Scholar, Medline
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). (2002). International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva, Switzerland: CIOMS. Google Scholar
Fauriel, I., Moutel, G., Duchange, N., Callies, I., Francois, I., Huriet, C. (2004). Improving protection for research subjects in France: Analysis of regional ethics committees. Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology, 40, 312318. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Feldman, J. A. & Rebholz, C. M. (2009). Anonymous self-evaluation of performance by ethics board members: A pilot study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4(1), 6369. Google Scholar, Link
Fitzgerald, M. H., Phillips, P. A., & Yule, E. (2006). The research ethics review process and ethics review narratives. Ethics & Behavior, 16(4), 377395. Google Scholar, Crossref
Food and Drug Administration. (2010). Retrieved May 15, 2010 from http://www.fda.gov. Google Scholar
Fost, N. & Levine, R. J. (2007). The dysregulation of human subjects research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(18), 21962198. Google Scholar, Crossref
Gray, B. H., Cooke, R. A., & Tannenbaum, A. S. (1978). Research involving human subjects: The performance of institutional review boards is assessed in this empirical study. Science, 201(4361), 10941101. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Hyder, A. A., Wali, S. A., Khan, A. N., Teoh, N. B., Kass, N. E., & Dawson, L. (2004). Ethical review of health research: A perspective from developing country researchers. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 6872. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). (1997). International Digest of Health Legislation, 48(2), 231234. Google Scholar, Medline
Jordan Food and Drug Administration. (2001). Clinical Research Law. Retrieved July 1, 2010 from http://www.jfda.jo/EN/Laws/details.aspx?id?2070. Google Scholar
Kirigia, J. M., Wambebe, C., & Baba-Moussa, A. (2005). Status of national research bioethics committees in the WHO African region. BMC Medical Ethics, 6, 10. Google Scholar, Crossref
Krishnakumar, R. (2010). Ethics on trial. Frontline, 27(1). Retrieved January 9, 2010 from http://www.flonnet.com/fl2701/stories/20100115270109000.htm. Google Scholar
Middle East Research Ethics Training Initiative (MERETI). (2004). Retrieved June 15, 2009 from http://www.mereti.net. Google Scholar
Milford, C., Wassenaar, D., & Slack, C. (2006). Resources and needs of research ethics committees in Africa: Preparations for HIV vaccine trials. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 28, 19. Google Scholar, Medline
Moodley, K. & Myer, L. (2007). Health research ethics committees in South Africa 12 years into democracy. BMC Medical Ethics, 8, 18. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
National Health Research Ethics Committee. (2008). Nigeria. Retrieved July 1, 2010 from http://www.nhrec.net/nhrec/. Google Scholar
National Health Research Ethics Council. (2003). Call for the Registration of All Research Ethics Committees. Retrieved July 1, 2010 from http://www.doh.gov.za/nhrec/ethics/call.pdf. Google Scholar
National Research Ethics Service. (2007). REC Accreditation Scheme. Retrieved July 1, 2010 from http://www.nres.npsa.nhs.uk/rec-community/quality-assurance/accreditation/. Google Scholar
Normile, D. (2008). The promise and pitfalls of clinical trials overseas. Science, 322, 214216. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2002). The Ethics of Research Related to Healthcare in Developing Countries. London, England: Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Google Scholar
Nyika, A., Kilama, W., Chilengi, R., Tangwa, G., Tindana, P., Ndebele, P., & Ikingura, J. (2009a). Composition, training needs and independence of ethics review committees across Africa: Are the gate-keepers rising to the emerging challenges? Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(3), 189193. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Nyika, A., Kilama, W., Tangwa, G. B., Chilengi, R., & Tindana, P. (2009b). Capacity building of ethics review committees across Africa based on the results of a comprehensive needs assessment survey. Developing World Bioethics, 9(3), 149156. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Office for Human Research Protections. (2005). Registration of an Institutional Review Board (IRB). Retrieved May 15, 2010 from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/assurances/. Google Scholar
Rothstein, W. G. & Phuong, L. H. (2007). Ethical attitudes of nurse, physician, and unaffiliated members of Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(1), 7581. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Sleem, H., El-Kamary, S., & Silverman, H. J. (2010). Identifying structures, processes, resources and needs of research ethics committees in Egypt. BMC Medical Ethics, 11(12), 18. Google Scholar, Medline
Strategic Initiative for Developing Capacity in Ethical Review (SIDCER). (2002). SIDCER Recognition Programme. Retrieved January 10, 2010 from http://www.fercap-sidcer.org/recog.asp. Google Scholar
WHO/TDR. (2000). Operational Guidelines for Ethics Committees that Review Biomedical Research. Retrieved July 1, 2010 from http://www.who.int/tdrold/publications/publications/ethics.htm. Google Scholar
WHO/TDR. (2002). Surveying and Evaluating Ethical Review Practices. Retrieved July 1, 2010 from http://www.who.int/tdrold/publications/publications/ethics2012.htm. Google Scholar
Willyard, C. (2007). Pfizer lawsuit spotlights ethics of developing world clinical trials. Nature Medicine, 13, 763. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
Wolf, L. E., Croughan, M., & Lo, B. (2002). The challenges of IRB review and human subjects protections in practice-based research. Medical Care, 40(6), 521529. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline
World Health Organization (WHO). (2000). Operational Guidelines for Ethics Committees That Review Biomedical Research. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. Google Scholar
World Medical Association. (2008). Declaration of Helsinki. Retrieved July 1, 2010 from http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm. Google Scholar

Vol 5, Issue 3, 2010