Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published March 2004

Facilitated Processing of Visual Stimuli Associated with the Body

Abstract

Recent work on tactile perception has revealed enhanced tactile acuity and speeded spatial-choice reaction times (RTs) when viewing the stimulated body site as opposed to viewing a neutral object. Here we examine whether this body-view enhancement effect extends to visual targets. Participants performed a speeded spatial discrimination between two lights attached either to their own left index finger or to a wooden finger-shaped object, making a simple distal–proximal decision. We filmed either the finger-mounted or the object-mounted lights in separate experimental blocks and the live scene was projected onto a screen in front of the participants. Thus, participants responded to identical visual targets varying only in their context: on the body or not. Results revealed a large performance advantage for the finger-mounted stimuli: reaction times were substantially reduced, while discrimination accuracy was unaffected. With this finding we address concerns associated with previous work on the processing of stimuli attributed to the self and extend the finding of a performance advantage for such stimuli to vision.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Bermúdez J L, 2001 “Nonconceptual self-consciousness and cognitive science” Synthese 129 129–149.
Berti A, Frassinetti F, 2000 “When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 415–420.
Brewer B, 1992 “Self-location and agency” Mind 101 17–34.
Driver J, Spence C, 2000 “Multisensory perception: Beyond modularity and convergence” Current Biology 10 R731–R735.
Duncan J, 1984 “Selective attention and the organization of visual information” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 501–517.
Farnè A, Làdavas E, 2000 “Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use” Neuroreport 11 1645–1649.
Graziano M S A, 1999 “Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96 10418–10421.
Graziano M S A, Gross C G, 1992 “Somatotopically organized maps of near visual space exist” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 750.
Hari R, Jousmäki V, 1996 “Preference of personal to extrapersonal space in a visuomotor task” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8 305–307.
Head H, Holmes G, 1911 “Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions” Brain 34 102–254.
Iriki A, Tanaka M, Iwamura Y, 1996 “Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones” Neuroreport 7 2325–2330.
Iriki A, Tanaka M, Obayashi S, Iwamura Y, 2001 “Self-images in the video monitor coded by monkey intraparietal neurons” Neuroscience Research 40 163–173.
Kennett S, Taylor-Clarke M, Haggard P, 2001 “Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans” Current Biology 11 1188–1191.
Làdavas E, 2002 “Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 17–22.
Maravita A, Spence C, Kennett S, Driver J, 2002 “Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans” Cognition 83 B25–B34.
Pavani F, Spence C, Driver J, 2000 “Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves” Psychological Science 11 353–359.
Reed C L, Farah M J, 1995 “The psychological reality of the body schema: A test with normal participants” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 334–343.
Tipper S P, Lloyd D, Shorland B, Dancer C, Howard L A, McGlone F, 1998 “Vision influences tactile perception without proprioceptive orienting” Neuroreport 9 1741–1744.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: March 2004
Issue published: March 2004

Rights and permissions

© 2004 SAGE Publications.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 15176615

Authors

Affiliations

Louise Whiteley
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK
Steffan Kennett
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, University College London, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK
Marisa Taylor-Clarke
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, University College London, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK
Patrick Haggard
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, University College London, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK

Notes

Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Perception.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 61

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 28 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 28

  1. Topographic mapping of the sensorimotor qualities of empathic reactivi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Valence moderates the effect of stimulus-hand proximity on conflict pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Measuring embodiment: A review of methods for prosthetic devices
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Relationship Between Body-Specific Attention to a Paretic Limb and Rea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Body-Specific Attention to the Hands and Feet in Healthy Adults
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Expertise in Tool Use Promotes Tool Embodiment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Beyond one’s body parts: Remote object movement with sense of agency i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Time-dependent decline of body-specific attention to the paretic limb ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Hand posture and cognitive control: The congruency sequence effect is ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. That’s not quite me: limb ownership encoding in the brain
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Individuals with pronounced schizotypal traits are particularly succes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Network activity underlying the illusory self‐attribution of a dummy a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. The multisensory body revealed through its cast shadows
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Multisensory Integration and Child Neurodevelopment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Reduced Temporal Fusion in Near-Hand Space
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  16. Preference for Orientations Commonly Viewed for One’s Own Hand in the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Bodily illusions in health and disease: Physiological and clinical per...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Agency and Control for the Integration of a Virtual Tool into the Peri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  19. Seeing the body modulates audiotactile integration
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Widening the body to rubber hands and tools: what’s the difference?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Enhanced detection of visual targets on the hand and familiar tools
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Sense of Agency Primes Manual Motor Responses
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  23. Bibliography
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Visual processing and the bodily self
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Self-attributed body-shadows modulate tactile attention
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Multisensory numerosity judgments for visual and tactile stimuli
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Can vision of the body ameliorate impaired somatosensory function?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub