Abstract
Five experiments are reported in which the relative importance of internal and external features for unfamiliar face identification are examined by a matching task. In experiments 1–3, Egyptian adults showed a robust internal-feature advantage for matching photographs of Egyptian faces. In experiment 4, a cross-cultural comparison between the ability of Egyptian and British adults to match the internal and external features of unfamiliar Egyptian and British faces was made. Once again, Egyptians showed an internal-feature advantage, for all faces. In contrast, British observers—and also Egyptian children in experiment 5—showed external-feature advantages consistent with previous research. We attribute this contrast to the long-term experience of Egyptians in perceiving and recognising faces with headscarves, which might develop more expertise in processing the internal than the external features of unfamiliar faces.
References
| Bartlett, J C, Searcy, J, 1993 “Inversion and configuration of faces” Cognitive Psychology 25 281–316 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Bonner, L, Burton, A M, 2004 “7–11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognising the internal features of familiar faces: Evidence against a developmental shift” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 57 1019–1029 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
| Bonner, L, Burton, A M, Bruce, V, 2003 “Getting to know you: How we learn new faces” Visual Cognition 10 527–536 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Bruce, V, Campbell, R N, Doherty-Sneddon, G, Import, A, Langton, S R H, McAuley, S, Wright, R, 2000 “Testing face processing skills in children” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 8 319–333 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Bruce, V, Henderson, Z, Greenwood, K, Hancock, P J B, Burton, A M, Miller, P, 1999 “Verification of face identities from images captured on video” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 5 339–360 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Bruce, V, Henderson, Z, Newman, C, Burton, A M, 2001 “Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 7 207–218 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Bukach, C M, Gauthier, I, Tarr, M J, 2006 “Beyond faces and modulatory: The power of an expertise framework” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 159–166 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Burton, A M, Jenkins, R, Hancock, P J B, White, D, 2005 “Robust representations for face recognition: the power of averages” Cognitive Psychology 51 256–284 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Burton, A M, White, D, McNeill, A, in press “The Glasgow Face Matching Test” Behavior Research Methods Google Scholar | |
| Burton, A M, Wilson, S, Cowan, M, Bruce, V, 1999 “Face recognition in poor-quality video: Evidence from security surveillance” Psychological Science 10 243–248 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Campbell, R, Coleman, M, Walker, J, Benson, P J, Wallace, S, Michelotti, J, Baron-Cohen, S, 1999 “When does the inner-face advantage in familiar face recognition arise and why?” Visual Cognition 6 197–216 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Carey, S, Diamond, R, 1994 “Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than children?” Visual Cognition 1 253–274 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Carey, S, Diamond, R, Woods, B, 1980 “Development of face recognition: A maturation component?” Developmental Psychology 16 257–269 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Clutterbuck, R, Johnston, R A, 2002 “Exploring levels of face familiarity by using an indirect face-matching measure” Perception 312 985–994 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Clutterbuck, R, Johnston, R A, 2004 “Matching as an index of face familiarity” Visual Cognition 11 857–869 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Clutterbuck, R, Johnston, R A, 2005 “Demonstrating how unfamiliar faces become familiar using a face matching task” European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 17 97–116 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Costigan, R , 2007 “Identification from CCTV: The risk of injustice” Criminal Law Review August, 591–608 Google Scholar | |
| Davis, J P, Valentine, T, 2009 “CCTV on trial: Matching video images with the defendant in the dock” Applied Cognitive Psychology 23 482–505 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Diamond, R, Carey, S, 1977 “Developmental changes in the representation of faces” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 23 1–22 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Diamond, R, Carey, S, 1986 “Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 107–117 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Ellis, H D, Shepherd, J W, Davies, G M, 1979 “Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition” Perception 8 431–439 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Farah, M J, Tanaka, J W, Drain, H M, 1995 “What causes the face inversion effect?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 628–634 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Farah, M J, Wilson, K D, Drain, H M, Tanaka, J R, 1995 “The inverted faces inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms” Vision Research 35 2089–2093 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Freire, A, Lee, K, Symons, L A, 2000 “The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence” Perception 29 159–170 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Frowd, C, Bruce, V, McIntyre, A, Hancock, P, 2007 “The relative importance of external and internal features of facial composites” British Journal of Psychology 98 61–77 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Gauthier, I, Nelson, C A, 2001 “The development of face expertise” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11 219–224 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Gauthier, I, Skudlarski, P, Gore, J C, Anderson, A W, 2000 “Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition” Nature Neuroscience 3 191–197 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Gauthier, I, Tarr, M J, 1997 “Becoming a ‘Greeble’ expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition” Vision Research 37 1673–1682 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Ge, L, Anzures, G, Wang, Z, Kelly, D J, Pascalis, O, Quinn, P C, Slater, A M, Yang, Z, Lee, K, 2008 “An inner face advantage in children's recognition of familiar peers” Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 124–136 Google Scholar | |
| de Gelder, B, Rouw, R, 2000 “Paradoxical configuration effects for faces and objects in prosopagnosia” Neuropsychologia 38 1271–1279 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Hancock, P J B, Bruce, V, Burton, A M, 2000 “Recognition of unfamiliar faces” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 330–337 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Henderson, Z, Bruce, V, Burton, A M, 2001 “Matching the faces of robbers captured on video” Applied Cognitive Psychology 15 445–464 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Kemp, R, Towell, N, Pike, G, 1997 “When seeing should not be believing: Photographs, credit cards and fraud” Applied Cognitive Psychology 11 211–222 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Malpass, R S, Kravitz, J, 1969 “Recognition for faces of own and other race” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 13 330–334 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Megreya, A M, Burton, A M, 2006 “Unfamiliar faces aren't faces: Evidence from a matching task” Memory & Cognition 34 865–876 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Megreya, A M, Burton, A M, 2007 “Hits and false positives in face matching: A familiarity based dissociation” Perception & Psychophysics 69 1175–1184 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
| Megreya, A M, Burton, A M, 2008 “Matching faces to photographs: poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory)” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 14 364–372 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Meissner, C A, Brigham, J C, 2001 “Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review” Psychology, Public, Policy, & Law 7 3–35 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Mondloch, C J, Le Grand, R, Maurer, D, 2002 “Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing” Perception 31 553–566 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Moscovitch, M, Moscovitch, D A, 2000 “Super face-inversion effects for isolated internal or external features, and for fractured faces” Cognitive Neuropsychology 17 201–219 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Nachson, I, Shechory, M, 2002 “Effect of inversion on the recognition of external and internal facial features” Acta Psychologica 109 227–238 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Newcombe, N, Lie, F, 1995 “Overt and covert recognition of faces in children and adults” Psychological Science 6 241–245 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Osborne, C D, Stevenage, S V, 2008 “Internal feature salience as a marker of familiarity and configural processing” Visual Cognition 16 23–43 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Rhodes, G, McLean, I G, 1990 “Distinctiveness and expertise effects with homogeneous stimuli: Towards a model of configural coding” Perception 19 773–794 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Rhodes, G, Hayward, W G, Winkler, C, 2006 “Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13 499–505 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Sporer, S L , 2001 “Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories” Psychology, Public Policy, & Law 7 36–97 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Tanaka, J W, Farah, M J, 1993 “Parts and wholes in face recognition” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 46 225–245 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
| Tanaka, J W, Sengco, J A, 1997 “Features and their configuration in face recognition” Memory & Cognition 25 583–592 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Walker, P, Tanaka, J W, 2003 “An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces” Perception 32 1117–1125 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Want, S C, Pascalis, O, Coleman, M, Blades, M, 2003 “Recognising people from the inner or outer parts of their faces: Developmental data concerning ‘unfamiliar’ faces” British Journal of Psychology 21 125–135 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Wilson, R R, Blades, M, Pascalis, O, 2007 “What do children look at in an adult face with which they are personally familiar?” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 25 375–382 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Young, A W, Hay, D C, McWeeny, K H, Flude, B M, Ellis, A W, 1985 “Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features” Perception 14 737–746 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
