![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Encoding the internal features of unfamiliar faces poses a perceptual challenge that occasionally results in face recognition errors. Extensive experience with faces framed by a headscarf may, however, enhance perceivers' ability to process internal facial information. To examine this claim empirically, participants in the United Arab Emirates and the United States of America completed a standard part–whole face recognition task. Accuracy on the task was examined using a 2 (perceiver culture: Emirati vs American) x 2 (face race: Arab vs white) x 2 (probe type: part vs whole) x 3 (probe feature: eyes vs nose vs mouth) mixed-measures analysis of variance. As predicted, Emiratis outperformed Americans on the administered task. Although their recognition advantage occurred regardless of probe type, it was most pronounced for Arab faces and for trials that captured the processing of nose or mouth information. The findings demonstrate that culture-based experiences hone perceivers' face processing skills.
References
| Alenezi, H. M., Bindemann, M. (2013). The effect of feedback on face-matching accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27 735–753. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Bate, S., Bennetts, R. J. (2014). The rehabilitation of face recognition impairments: A critical review and future directions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8:491, 1–17. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Blais, C., Jack, R. E., Scheepers, C., Fiset, D., Caldara, R. (2008). Culture shapes how we look at faces. PLoS ONE, 3(8): e3022. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Bindemann, M., Avetisyn, M., Rakow, T. (2012). Who can recognize unfamiliar faces? Individual differences and observer consistency in person identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18 277–291. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Bruce, V., Humphreys, G. (1994). Recognizing faces and objects. Visual Cognition, 1 141–180. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Bruce, V., Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77 305–327. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Burton, A. M., Jenkins, R. (2011). Unfamiliar face perception. In Calder, A. J., Rhodes, G., Johnson, M. H., Haxby, J. V. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of face perception (pp. 287–306). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Carey, S. (1981). The development of face perception. In Davies, G., Ellis, H., Shephard, J. (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces (pp. 9–38), New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar | |
| Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25 257–271. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Fletcher, K. I., Butavicius, M. A., Lee, M. D. (2008). Attention to internal face features in unfamiliar face matching. British Journal of Psychology, 99 379–394. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Frowd, C. D., Skelton, F., Atherton, C., Pitchford, M., Hepton, G., Holden, L., Peter, J. B. (2012). Recovering faces from memory: The distracting influence of external facial features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18 224–238. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., Gobbini, M. A. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 223–233. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33 61–83. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Islam, M. R., Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out–group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19 700–710. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Itier, R. J., Taylor, M. J. (2004). Face inversion and contrast reversal effects across development: In contrast to the expertise theory. Developmental Science, 7 246–260. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Langner, O., Dotsch, R., Bijlstra, G., Wigboldus, D. H. J., Hawk, S. T., van Knippenberg, A. (2010). Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition & Emotion, 24 1377–1388. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Lawrence, K., Bernstein, D., Pearson, R., Mandy, W., Campbell, R., Skuse, D. (2008). Changing abilities in recognition of unfamiliar face photographs through childhood and adolescence: Performance on a test of non-verbal immediate memory (Warrington RMF) from 6 to 16 years. Journal of Neurospychology, 2 27–45. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Megreya, A. M., Bindemann, M. (2009). Revisiting the processing of internal and external features of unfamiliar faces: The headscarf effect. Perception, 38 1831–1848. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Megreya, A. M., Burton, A. M. (2008). Matching faces to photographs: Poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14 364–372. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Megreya, A. H., Memon, A., Havard, C. (2012). The headscarf effect: Direct evidence from the eyewitness identification paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26 308–315. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Minear, M., Park, D. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36 630–233. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
| Nachson, I., Moscovitch, M., Umilta, C. (1995). The contribution of external and internal features to matching of unfamiliar faces. Psychological Research, 58 31–37. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI | |
| Norenzayan, A., Heine, S. J. (2005). Psychological universals: What are they and how can we know? Psychological Bulletin, 131 763–784. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Rossion, B., Michel, C. (2011). An experience-based holistic account of the other-race face effect. In Calder, A. J., Rhodes, G., Johnson, M. H., Haxby, J. V. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of face perception (pp. 215–243). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Tanaka, J. W., Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 46 225–245. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Tarr, M. J., Cheng, Y. D. (2003). Learning to see faces and objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7 23–30. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Temtamy, S., Aglan, M. (2012). Consanguinity and genetic disorders in Egypt. Middle East Journal of Medical Genetics, 1 12–17. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Thomas, J. (2013). Psychological well-being in the gulf states. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Toseeb, U., Bryant, E. J., Keeble, D. R. T. (2014). The Muslim headscarf and face perception: “They all look the same, don't they?”. PLoS ONE, 9(2): e84754. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Toseeb, U., Keeble, D. R. T., Bryant, E. J. (2012). The significance of hair for face recognition. PLoS ONE, 7(3): e34144. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| van der Schalk, J., Hawk, S. T., Fischer, A. H., Doosje, B. (2011). Moving faces, looking places: Validation of the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set (ADFES). Emotion, 11 907–920. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
