Non-semantic contributions to “semantic” redundancy gain
Abstract
Recently, two groups of researchers have reported redundancy gains (enhanced performance with multiple, redundant targets) in tasks requiring semantic categorization. Here we report two experiments aimed at determining whether the gains found by one of these groups resulted from some form of semantic coactivation. We asked undergraduate psychology students to complete choice RT tasks requiring the semantic categorization of visually presented words, and compared performance with redundant targets from the same semantic category to performance with redundant targets from different semantic categories. If the redundancy gains resulted from the combination of information at a semantic level, they should have been greater in the former than the latter situation. However, our results showed no significant differences in redundancy gain (for latency and accuracy) between same-category and different-category conditions, despite gains appearing in both conditions. Thus, we suggest that redundancy gain in the semantic categorization task may result entirely from statistical facilitation or combination of information at non-semantic levels.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Baird L. M., & Burton A. M. (2008). The bilateral advantage for famous faces: Interhemispheric communication or competition? Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 1581–1587.
Battig W., & Montague W. (1969). Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80(3), 1–46.
Bauer L. (1994). Introducing the Wellington Corpus of Written New Zealand English. Te Reo, 37, 21–28.
Biederman I., & Checkosky S. F. (1970). Processing redundant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83(3), 486–490.
Cavina-Pratesi C., Bricolo E., Prior M., & Marzi C. (2001). Redundancy gain in the stop-signal paradigm: Implications for the locus of coactivation in simple reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 932–941.
Collignon O., Girard S., Gosselin F., Saint-Amour D., Lepore F., & Lassonde M. (2010). Women process multisensory emotion expressions more efficiently than men. Neuropsychologia, 48(1), 220–225.
Endrass T., Mohr B., & Pulvermüller F. (2004). Enhanced mismatch negativity brain response after binaural word presentation. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 19(6), 1653–1660.
Fiedler A., Schröter H., & Ulrich R. (2013). Redundancy gain for semantic features. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 474–480.
Fific M., Little D. R., & Nosofsky R. M. (2010). Logical-rule models of classification response times: A synthesis of mental-architecture, random-walk, and decision-bound approaches. Psychological Review, 117(2), 309–348.
Giray M., & Ulrich R. (1993). Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(6), 1278–1291.
Grice G. R., & Reed J. M. (1992). What makes targets redundant? Perception & Psychophysics, 51(5), 437–442.
Jiang Y. V., Kwon M., Shim W. M., & Won B.-Y. (2010). Redundancy effects in the perception and memory of visual objects. Visual Cognition, 18(9), 1233–1252.
Kiesel A., Miller J., & Ulrich R. (2007). Systematic biases and Type I error accumulation in tests of the race model inequality. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 539–551.
Krummenacher J., Müller H., & Heller D. (2002). Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: Redundancy gains in compound tasks. Visual Cognition, 9(7), 801–837.
Marks N. L., & Hellige J. B. (1999). Effects of bilateral stimulation and stimulus redundancy on interhemispheric interaction. Neuropsychology, 13(4), 475–487.
Miller J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 247–279.
Miller J. (1986). Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(5), 331–343.
Miller J. (1991). Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(1), 160–169.
Miller J., & Lopes A. (1988). Testing race models by estimating the smaller of two true mean or true median reaction times: An analysis of estimation bias. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(6), 513–524.
Miniussi C., Girelli M., & Marzi C. A. (1998). Neural site of the redundant target effect: Electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(2), 216–230.
Mohr B., Landgrebe A., & Schweinberger S. R. (2002). Interhemispheric cooperation for familiar but not unfamiliar face processing. Neuropsychologia, 40(11), 1841–1848.
Mohr B., Pulvermüller F., Mittelstädt K., & Rayman J. (1996). Multiple simultaneous stimulus presentation facilitates lexical processing. Neuropsychologia, 34(10), 1003–1013.
Mohr B., Pulvermüller F., Rayman J., & Zaidel E. (1994). Interhemispheric cooperation during lexical processing is mediated by the corpus callosum: Evidence from the split-brain. Neuroscience Letters, 181, 17–21.
Mohr B., Pulvermüller F., & Zaidel E. (1994). Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction. Neuropsychologia, 32(1), 105–124.
Mordkoff J. T., & Danek R. H. (2011). Dividing attention between color and shape revisited: Redundant targets coactivate only when parts of the same perceptual object. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73(1), 103–112.
Mordkoff J. T., & Miller J. (1993). Redundancy gains and coactivation with two different targets: The problem of target preferences and the effects of display frequency. Perception & psychophysics, 53(5), 527–535.
Mordkoff J. T., & Yantis S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(2), 520–538.
Mordkoff J. T., & Yantis S. (1993). Dividing attention between color and shape: Evidence of coactivation. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(4), 357–366.
Mullin P. A., & Egeth H. E. (1989). Capacity limitations in visual word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(1), 111–123.
Oldfield R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.
Pulvermüller F. (1999). Words in the brain's language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 253–279.
Pulvermüller F. (2005). Opinion: Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(7), 576–582.
Pulvermüller F., & Mohr B. (1996). The concept of transcortical cell assemblies: A key to the understanding of cortical lateralization and interhemispheric interaction. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 20(4), 557–566.
Raab D. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24, 574–590.
Rastle K., Harrington J., & Coltheart M. (2002). 358,534 nonwords: The ARC Nonword Database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 55(4), 1339–1362.
Ratcliff R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85(2), 59–108.
Schwarz W., & Ischebeck A. (1994). Coactivation and statistical facilitation in the detection of lines. Perception, 23, 157–168.
Schweinberger S. R., Baird L. M., Blümler M., Kaufmann J. M., & Mohr B. (2003). Interhemispheric cooperation for face recognition but not for affective facial expressions. Neuropsychologia, 41(4), 407–414.
Shepherdson P. (2015). Expanded and updated New Zealand category norms. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Shepherdson P., & Miller J. (2014). Redundancy gain in semantic categorisation. Acta Psychologica, 148, 96–106.
Smith E. E., Shoben E. J., & Rips L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review, 81(3), 214–241.
Tamietto M., Adenzato M., Geminiani G., & de Gelder B. (2007). Fast recognition of social emotions takes the whole brain: Interhemispheric cooperation in the absence of cerebral asymmetry. Neuropsychologia, 45(4), 836–843.
Todd J. W. (1912). Reaction to multiple stimuli. Archives of Psychology, 21(8), 1–65.
Townsend J. T., & Nozawa G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321–359.
Ulrich R., Miller J., & Schröter H. (2007). Testing the race model inequality: An algorithm and computer programs. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 291–302.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: August 1, 2016
Issue published: August 2016
Keywords
PubMed: 26339718
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 142
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 6 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 5
- Rhythm contour drives musical memory
- Improving Young Learners’ L2 Writing Accuracy with Written Corrective ...
- An Experimenter's Influence on Motor Enhancements: The Effects of Lett...
- Evidence of Serial Processing in Visual Word Recognition
- Multisensory enhancement elicited by unconscious visual stimuli
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
EPS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
EPS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
