Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2000

Grasping Visual Illusions: No Evidence for a Dissociation Between Perception and Action

Abstract

Neuropsychological studies prompted the theory that the primate visual system might be organized into two parallel pathways, one for conscious perception and one for guiding action. Supporting evidence in healthy subjects seemed to come from a dissociation in visual illusions: In previous studies, the Ebbinghaus (or Titchener) illusion deceived perceptual judgments of size, but only marginally influenced the size estimates used in grasping. Contrary to those results, the findings from the present study show that there is no difference in the sizes of the perceptual and grasp illusions if the perceptual and grasping tasks are appropriately matched. We show that the differences found previously can be accounted for by a hitherto unknown, nonadditive effect in the illusion. We conclude that the illusion does not provide evidence for the existence of two distinct pathways for perception and action in the visual system.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Aglioti S., DeSouza J.F.X., Goodale M.A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679–685.
Brenner E., Smeets J.B.J. (1996). Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 473–476.
Bridgeman B., Lewis S., Heit G., Nagle M. (1979). Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 692–700.
Coren S., Girgus J.S. (1972). A comparison of five methods of illusion measurement. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 4, 240–244.
Coren S., Girgus J.S. (1978). Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coren S., Miller J. (1974). Size contrast as a function of figural similarity. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 355–357.
Daprati E., Gentilucci M. (1997). Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1577–1582.
Goodale M.A., Meenan J.P., Bülthoff H.H., Nicolle D.A., Murphy K.J., Carolynn I.R. (1994). Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Current Biology, 4, 604–610.
Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 97–112.
Goodale M.A., Milner A.D., Jakobson L.S., Carey D.P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154–156.
Goodale M.A., Pélisson D., Prablanc C. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320, 748–750.
Haffenden A.M., Goodale M.A. (1998). The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 122–136.
Hansen R.M., Skavenski A.A. (1985). Accuracy of spatial localization near the time of a saccadic eye movement. Vision Research, 25, 1077–1082.
Jackson S.R., Husain M. (1997). Visual control of hand action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 310–317.
Jeannerod M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In Long J., Baddeley A. (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 9, pp. 153–168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jeannerod M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 235–254.
Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Oldfield R.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
Post R.B., Welch R.B. (1996). Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figural illusions? Perception, 25, 569–581.
Pressey A.W. (1977). Measuring the Titchener circles and Delboeuf illusions with the method of adjustment. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 118–120.
Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In Ingle D.J., Goodale M.A., Mansfield R.J.W. (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2000
Issue published: January 2000

Rights and permissions

© 2000 Association for Psychological Science.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 11228838

Authors

Affiliations

V.H. Franz
Max-Planck-Institut f$uUr Biologische Kybernetik, T$uUbingen, Germany
K.R. Gegenfurtner
Max-Planck-Institut f$uUr Biologische Kybernetik, T$uUbingen, Germany
H.H. Bülthoff
Max-Planck-Institut f$uUr Biologische Kybernetik, T$uUbingen, Germany
M. Fahle
Zentrum f$uUr Kognitionswissenschaften, Universit$aUt Bremen, Bremen, Germany

Notes

Address correspondence to Volker Franz, Max-Planck-Institut f$uUr Biologische Kybernetik, Spemannstr. 38, D-72076 T$uUbingen, Germany; e-mail: [email protected].

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Psychological Science.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1379

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 343 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 277

  1. Reduced perception-action dissociation in children with amblyopia
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Pictorial depth cues always influence reaching distance
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Perceptual Phenomena Cannot Be Approached from a Single Perspective
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Neural networks underlying visual illusions: An activation likelihood ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Looking at the Ebbinghaus illusion: differences in neurocomputational ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Vertical−horizontal illusory effects with gaze restrictions do not cha...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. How prism adaptation reveals the distinct use of size and positions in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Virtual Reality for Vision Science
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Spatial distances affect temporal prediction and interception
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a pro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Use of remote data collection methodology to test for an illusory effe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Tau and kappa in interception – how perceptual spatiotemporal interrel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Serial dependence for oculomotor control depends on early sensory sign...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Altered Regional Homogeneity in Patients With Congenital Blindness: A ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Unilateral resection of both cortical visual pathways in a pediatric p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Selective interference of hand posture with grasping capability estima...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Explicit and implicit depth-cue integration: Evidence of systematic bi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. A change in perspective: The interaction of saccadic and pursuit eye m...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. The two visual systems hypothesis and contrastive underdetermination
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Implicit biases in visually guided action
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Ebbinghaus visual illusion: no robust influence on novice golf-putting...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Temporal Availability of Ebbinghaus Illusions on Perceiving and Intera...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Gaze Direction Changes the Vertical-Horizontal Illusory Effects on Man...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Physics of Experiential Now: Effort of Atomic Action
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Double dissociation between perception and action in children
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. A double dissociation between action and perception in bimanual graspi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. The effect of the Müller–Lyer configuration on saccadic eye movements ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. SNARC-like compatibility effects for physical and phenomenal magnitude...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Attention updates the perceived position of moving objects
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Stretching the skin immediately enhances perceived stiffness and gradu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Why some size illusions affect grip aperture
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Asymmetric Effects of the Ebbinghaus Illusion on Depth Judgments
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Cognitive Science
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Words’ Origin of an Affective State, but not Valence, Shape the Reacti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Attenuation of size illusion effect in dual-task conditions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. A review of grasping as the movements of digits in space
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Adaptation to Laterally Asymmetrical Visuomotor Delay Has an Effect on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. The Uznadze illusion reveals similar effects of relative size on perce...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. The Sixth Sense Organs: The Eyes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Are large portions always bad? Using the Delboeuf illusion on food pac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. The Size Congruity Effect Vanishes in Grasping: Implications for the P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. The target as an obstacle: Grasping an object at different heights
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Motion Extrapolation for Eye Movements Predicts Perceived Motion-Induc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Can I reach that? Blind reaching as an accurate measure of estimated r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. The faster you decide, the more accurate localization is possible: Pos...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Visual illusions modify object size estimates for prospective action j...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Force feedback delay affects perception of stiffness but not action, a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Memory for retinotopic locations is more accurate than memory for spat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. The Ebbinghaus illusion in contrast-defined and orientation-defined st...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Is the Ebbinghaus illusion a size contrast illusion?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Does visuomotor adaptation contribute to illusion-resistant grasping?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. The role of knowledge on perception in Müller-Lyer illusion
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Perception and Action
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Effects of wrist tendon vibration and eye movements on manual aiming
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Dynamic representations of visual space for perception and action
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Dissociable effects of stimulus range on perception and action
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Errors in interception can be predicted from errors in perception
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Do we have distinct systems for immediate and delayed actions? A selec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. The Sander parallelogram illusion dissociates action and perception de...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Memory-guided saccades show effect of a perceptual illusion whereas vi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Ebbinghaus figures that deceive the eye do not necessarily deceive the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. People Are Unable to Recognize or Report on Their Own Eye Movements
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  63. When perception trips action! The increase in the perceived size of bo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Interaction of Perception and Action in Discrete and Continuous Rapid ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. The Perception‐Action Model: Counting Computational Mechanisms
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Spatial Alignment and Response Hand in Geometric and Motion Illusions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Adaptation effects in grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Real and illusory issues in the illusion debate (Why two things are so...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Do visual illusions affect grasping? Considerable progress in a scient...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Processing of probabilistic information in weight perception and motor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Handlungssteuerung
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Attention in action and perception: Unitary or separate mechanisms of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Perceptual Averaging in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Cognition incarnée : un point de vue sur les représentations spatiales
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. Visual motion serves but is not under the purview of the dorsal pathwa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Rapid decrement in the effects of the Ponzo display dissociates action...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Does sensitivity in binary choice tasks depend on response modality?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. The functional subdivision of the visual brain: Is there a real illusi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Combined visual illusion effects on the perceived index of difficulty ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Visual Consciousness
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. Interactions between dorsal and ventral streams for controlling skille...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Quantifying the Ebbinghaus figure effect: target size, context size, a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Visual Neuroscience: Dissociating Perceptual and Occulomotor Localizat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. Weighing the evidence for a dorsal processing bias under continuous fl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. Rapid eye movements to a virtual target are biased by illusory context...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  86. Garner-Interference in left-handed awkward grasping
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  87. The effect of force feedback delay on stiffness perception and grip fo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  88. Semantic grasping escapes Weber's law
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. Trompe l’oeil and the Dorsal/Ventral Account of Picture Perception
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. Future challenges for vection research: definitions, functional signif...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  91. When Misrepresentation is Successful
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. Visual illusions and direct perception: Elaborating on Gibson's insigh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. Goal-oriented gaze strategies afforded by object interaction
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  94. Monkey see, Monkey reach: Action selection of reaching movements in th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  95. Effect of visual and haptic feedback on grasping movements
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  96. The influence of target object shape on maximum grip aperture in human...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  97. Line-bisectioning and obstacle avoidance: Evidence for separate strate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  98. Statistical extraction affects visually guided action
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  99. Superadditivity of the Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer Illusions Depends on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  100. Unconscious vision and executive control: How unconscious processing a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  101. How (and why) the visual control of action differs from visual percept...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  102. A Common Representation of Spatial Features Drives Action and Percepti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  103. Failure to see money on a tree: inattentional blindness for objects th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  104. Lack of motor prediction, rather than perceptual conflict, evokes an o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  105. Does the Size-Illusion Effect on Prehensile Movements Depend on Previe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  106. Ebbinghaus illusion in the tactile modality
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  107. Naturalizing Action Theory
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  108. Using scissors to bisect a line: A perception–action dissociation in c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  109. Perceptuomotor rules as prediction tools in (joint) action: The case o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  110. Learning to detect but not to grasp suppressed visual stimuli
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  111. The Hand Sees Visual Periphery Better Than the Eye: Motor-Dependent Vi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  112. The influence of target context and early and late vision on goal-dire...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  113. Connecting the Dots...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  114. Success semantics: the sequel
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  115. Fooling the Eyes: The Influence of a Sound-Induced Visual Motion Illus...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  116. Schema-Driven Influences in Recovering 3-D Shape from Motion in Human ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  117. Does bimanual grasping of the Müller-Lyer illusion provide evidence fo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  118. Sind motorische Handlungen auf eine präzise Wahrnehmung angewiesen?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  119. Motor Control
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  120. Relative size of numerical magnitude induces a size-contrast effect on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  121. Functional dissociation between perception and action is evident early...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  122. Plate Size and Color Suggestibility: The Delboeuf Illusion’s Bias on S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  123. Object processing in visual perception and action in children and adul...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  124. Visual processing for action resists similarity of relevant and irrele...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  125. Assimilation and contrast: the two sides of specific interference betw...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  126. Efficient models for grasp planning with a multi-fingered hand
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  127. Commonsense psychology, dual visual streams, and the individuation of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  128. Getting a grip on illusions: replicating Stöttinger et al [Exp Brain R...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  129. Sex & vision I: Spatio-temporal resolution
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  130. Differential effects of a visual illusion on online visual guidance in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  131. No transfer of calibration between action and perception in learning a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  132. Visual information and rubber hand embodiment differentially affect re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  133. Neural markers of automatic and controlled attention during immediate ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  134. Conscious Vision for Action Versus Unconscious Vision for Action?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  135. Transforming vision into action
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  136. The relationship between allocentric and egocentric frames of referenc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  137. Viewing and feeling touch modulates hand position for reaching
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  138. Converging evidence for diverging pathways: Neuropsychology and psycho...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  139. Vision-for-perception and vision-for-action: Which model is compatible...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  140. How do illusions constrain goal-directed movement: perceptual and visu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  141. Improved change detection with nearby hands
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  142. Saccadic eye movements and perceptual judgments reveal a shared visual...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  143. A metanalysis of the effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccadic ey...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  144. What Is an Output?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  145. Enhancing Implicit Change Detection through Action
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  146. Grasping for parsimony: Do some motor actions escape dorsal processing...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  147. The Ebbinghaus illusion deceives adults but not young children
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  148. The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades is modulated by spa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  149. Division of labour within the visual system: fact or fiction? Which ki...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  150. Is simple reaction time affected by visual illusions?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  151. On interference effects in concurrent perception and action
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  152. Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  153. Pointing in Stereoscopic Space
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  154. The limits of visual mass perception
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  155. Egocentric Spatial Representation in Action and Perception*
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  156. Saccades reveal that allocentric coding of the moving object causes mi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  157. Grasping isoluminant stimuli
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  158. Opposite haptic and visual induction effects observed with Titchener’s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  159. Infants’ responsiveness to pictorial depth cues in preferential-reachi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  160. Consistency in exchange for inappropriately matched visual feedback? A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  161. Comparison of Perceptual and Motor Decisions Via Confidence Judgments ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  162. Memory mechanisms in grasping
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  163. Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: No shift from dorsal t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  164. When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  165. The involvement of cognitive processing in a perceptual-motor process ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  166. Grasping the diagonal: Controlling attention to illusory stimuli for a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  167. Does My Step Look Big In This? A Visual Illusion Leads To Safer Steppi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  168. Another look at the Müller-Lyer illusion: Different gaze patterns in v...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  169. Grasping Occam’s Razor
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  170. Visual Consciousness: An Updated Neurological Tour
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  171. The rubber hand illusion in action
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  172. Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  173. Action without perception in human vision
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  174. Grasping Weber's illusion: The effect of receptor density differences ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  175. Dissociations in rod bisection: The effect of viewing conditions on pe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  176. State-trace analysis of the effects of a visual illusion on saccade am...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  177. Processing Spatial Layout by Perception and Sensorimotor Interaction
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  178. The specificity of learned associations in visuomotor and perceptual p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  179. Visual prediction: Psychophysics and neurophysiology of compensation f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  180. Action Rules: Why the Visual Control of Reaching and Grasping is Not A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  181. The Scope and Limits of Enactive Approaches to Visual Experience
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  182. Pre-Emptive Perception
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  183. A Double Dissociation Between Action and Perception in the Context of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  184. Attention for perception and action: task interference for action plan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  185. Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on children’s perception and graspi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  186. Depth cues, rather than perceived depth, govern vergence
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  187. Practice makes perfect, but only with the right hand: Sensitivity to p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  188. Two visual systems re-viewed
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  189. Voluntary and reflexive eye movements to illusory lengths
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  190. Neurobiologia na tropie świadomości
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  191. Interactions between perception and action programming: Evidence from ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  192. When does action resist visual illusion? The effect of Müller–Lyer sti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  193. Top-down influences make saccades deviate away: The case of endogenous...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  194. Unconscious Vision and the Platitudes of Folk Psychology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  195. Perceived Slant: A Dissociation between Perception and Action
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  196. The processing of linear perspective and binocular information for act...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  197. Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: The contributions of vision for per...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  198. Do visual illusions probe the visual brain?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  199. Obstacle avoidance during walking in real and virtual environments
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  200. 2-D Tilt and 3-D Slant Illusions in Perception and Action Tasks
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  201. Motion by Nearby Players Biases Perception but Not Action in Judgments...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  202. The type of visual information mediates eye and hand movement bias whe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  203. Why are saccades influenced by the Brentano illusion?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  204. The effect of response uncertainty on illusory biases of perception an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  205. The spatio-temporal tuning of the mechanisms in the control of saccadi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  206. Dissociating size representation for action and for conscious judgment...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  207. Hemispheric Specialization for the Visual Control of Action Is Indepen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  208. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  209. Effect of structuring the workspace on cognitive and sensorimotor dist...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  210. Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Mülle...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  211. Does an auditory perceptual illusion affect on-line auditory action co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  212. The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on the planning and control of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  213. Toward a formal theory of flexible spatial behavior: Geometric categor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  214. MOTION BY NEARBY PLAYERS BIASES PERCEPTION BUT NOT ACTION IN JUDGMENTS...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  215. Embodiment and Cognitive Science
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  216. Dissociation between Visual Perception of Allocentric Distance and Vis...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  217. Visual illusions affect both movement planning and on-line control: A ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  218. Grasping and Perceiving Objects
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  219. The Medawar Lecture 2001 Knowledge for vision: vision for knowledge
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  220. Effects of the Ebbinghaus figure on grasping are not only due to misju...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  221. Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  222. Effect of Contrast on the Active Control of a Moving Line
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  223. How does action resist visual illusion? Uncorrected oculomotor informa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  224. Motion-induced illusory displacement reexamined: differences between p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  225. Perception-action and the M�ller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  226. Dual routes to action: contributions of the dorsal and ventral streams...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  227. Visual phenomenal consciousness: a neurological guided tour
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  228. Hemispheric asymmetry in a dissociation between the visuomotor and vis...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  229. The Function of Phenomenal States: Supramodular Interaction Theory.
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  230. Psychophysical Test for the Independence of Perception and Action.
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  231. Illusion Effects on Grasping Are Temporally Constant Not Dynamic.
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  232. Perception, Action, and Roelofs Effect: A Mere Illusion of Dissociatio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  233. Perceiving virtual geographical slant: Action influences perception.
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  234. An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting cortical p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  235. Age-related differences in the visual processes implied in perception ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  236. 2D But Not 3D: Pictorial-Depth Deficits in a Case of Visual Agnosia
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  237. Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  238. Visual, haptic and cross-modal recognition of objects and scenes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  239. Visual Context Integration is Not Fully Developed in 4-Year-Old Childr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  240. Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: evidence from pe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  241. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  242. When does the Titchener Circles illusion exert an effect on grasping?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  243. From Vision to Action and Action to Vision: A Convergent Route Approac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  244. La dynamique des intentions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  245. Dissociating perception and action in Kanizsa’s compression illusion
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  246. Insights into Seeing and Grasping: Distinguishing the Neural Correlate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  247. Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: Support for a ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  248. A dissociation of perception and action in normal human observers: the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  249. Converging evidence for the detection of change without awareness
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  250. Commentary: Smooth pursuit eye movements: from low-level to high-level...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  251. Selective reaching: Evidence for multiple frames of reference.
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  252. Feature-specific perceptual processing dissociates action from recogni...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  253. Eye–hand coordination in goal-directed aiming
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  254. Action does not resist visual illusions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  255. When does action resist visual illusions?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  256. A Simon effect induced by induced motion and location: Evidence for a ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  257. Separate visual representations for perception and action revealed by ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  258. Blindsight: the role of feedforward and feedback corticocortical conne...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  259. Defining the cortical visual systems: “What”, “Where”, and “How”
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  260. Vision: Getting to grips with the Ebbinghaus illusion
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  261. Perception and Action Are Inseparable
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  262. Do action systems resist visual illusions?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  263. The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illus...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  264. Chapter 20 Different spaces and different times for perception and act...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  265. Grasping objects by their handles: A necessary interaction between cog...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  266. Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: Evidence for separate vis...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  267. Phase correction, phase resetting, and phase shifts after subliminal t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  268. Effects of visual illusions on grasping.
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  269. Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide rea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  270. Seeing size and weight
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  271. Varying the response code in the blindness to response-compatible stim...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  272. Attentional Bias toward Low-Intensity Stimuli: An Explanation for the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  273. Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  274. The last grasp?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  275. Perception-Action Dissociations of a Walkable Müller-Lyer Configuratio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  276. Optic Ataxia: A Gateway to the Human Visual Action System
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  277. Influence of Visual Motion on Object Localisation in Perception and Ac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

APS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

APS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub