Increasing Retention Without Increasing Study Time

First Published August 1, 2007 Research Article

Authors

1
 
University of South Florida
by this author
, 2
 
University of California, San Diego
by this author
First Published Online: June 24, 2016

Because people forget much of what they learn, students could benefit from learning strategies that yield long-lasting knowledge. Yet surprisingly little is known about how long-term retention is most efficiently achieved. Here we examine how retention is affected by two variables: the duration of a study session and the temporal distribution of study time across multiple sessions. Our results suggest that a single session devoted to the study of some material should continue long enough to ensure that mastery is achieved but that immediate further study of the same material is an inefficient use of time. Our data also show that the benefit of distributing a fixed amount of study time across two study sessions—the spacing effect—depends jointly on the interval between study sessions and the interval between study and test. We discuss the practical implications of both findings, especially in regard to mathematics learning.

Bjork, R.A. (1979). (See References)
Google Scholar
McDaniel, M.A., Roediger, H.L., McDermott, K.B. (2007). Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 200206.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Metcalfe, J., Kornell, N, Son, L.K. (in press). A cognitive-science based program to enhance study efficacy in a high- and low-risk setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
Google Scholar
Pashler, H., Rohrer, D., Cepeda, N.J., Carpenter, S.K. (2007). (See References)
Google Scholar
Bahrick, H.P. (1979). Maintenance of knowledge: Questions about memory we forgot to ask. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 296308.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bjork, R.A. (1979). Information-processing analysis of college teaching. Educational Psychologist, 14, 1523.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Cepeda, N.J., Mozer, M.C., Coburn, N., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J.T., Pashler, H. (2007). Optimizing distributed practice: Theoretical analysis and practical implications. Unpublished manuscript.
Google Scholar
Cepeda, N.J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J.T., Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354380.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Crowder, R.G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Dempster, F.N. (1989). Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 309330.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Driskell, J.E., Willis, R.P., Copper, C. (1992). Effect of overlearning on retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 615622.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
National Geographic . (2006). 2006 Geographic Literacy Study. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society.
Google Scholar
Pashler, H., Cepeda, N.J., Wixted, J.T., Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 38.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Pashler, H., Rohrer, D., Cepeda, N.J., Carpenter, S.K. (2007). Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 187193.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Reese, C.M., Miller, K.E., Mazzeo, J., Dossey, J.A. (1997). NAEP 1996 Mathematics Report Card for the Nation and the States. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Google Scholar
Roediger, H.L., Karpicke, J.D. (2006). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181210.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Rohrer, D., Taylor, K. (2006). The effects of overlearning and distributed practice on the retention of mathematics knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 12091224.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rohrer, D., Taylor, K. (in press)The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning. Instructional Science.
Google Scholar | ISI
Rohrer, D., Taylor, K., Pashler, H., Wixted, J.T, Cepeda, N.J. (2005). The effect of overlearning on long-term retention. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 361374.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

CDP-article-ppv for GBP27.00
CDP-article-ppv for $35.00