Abstract
Taking a memory test not only assesses what one knows, but also enhances later retention, a phenomenon known as the testing effect. We studied this effect with educationally relevant materials and investigated whether testing facilitates learning only because tests offer an opportunity to restudy material. In two experiments, students studied prose passages and took one or three immediate free-recall tests, without feedback, or restudied the material the same number of times as the students who received tests. Students then took a final retention test 5 min, 2 days, or 1 week later. When the final test was given after 5 min, repeated studying improved recall relative to repeated testing. However, on the delayed tests, prior testing produced substantially greater retention than studying, even though repeated studying increased students' confidence in their ability to remember the material. Testing is a powerful means of improving learning, not just assessing it.
REFERENCES
|
Balota, D.A., Duchek, J.M., Paullin, R. (1989). Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag, and retention interval. Psychology and Aging, 4, 3–9. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Balota, D.A., Duchek, J.M., Sergent-Marshall, S., Roediger, H.L.. (in press). Does expanded retrieval produce benefits over equal interval spacing? Explorations in healthy aging and early stage Alzheimer's disease. Psychology and Aging. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C.L.C. (1991). Effects of frequent classroom testing. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 89–99. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Bjork, R.A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomena. In Solso, R.L. (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 123–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Bjork, R.A. (1988). Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. In Gruneberg, M.M., Morris, P.E., Sykes, R.N. (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 396–401). New York: Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Bjork, R.A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In Metcalfe, J., Shimamura, A. (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Bjork, R.A. (1999). Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. In Gopher, D., Koriat, A. (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 435–459). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Carrier, M., Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633–642. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Cull, W.L. (2000). Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 215–235. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Gates, A.I. (1917). Recitation as a factor in memorizing. Archives of Psychology, 6 (40). Google Scholar | |
|
Glover, J.A. (1989). The “testing” phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 392–399. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hogan, R.M., Kintsch, W. (1971). Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 562–567. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Izawa, C. (1967). Function of test trials in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 194–209. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Koriat, A., Bjork, R.A., Sheffer, L., Bar, S.K. (2004). Predicting one's own forgetting: The role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 643–656. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Landauer, T.K., Bjork, R.A. (1978). Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In Gruneberg, M.M., Morris, P.E., Sykes, R.N. (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 625–632). London: Academic Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Leeming, F.C. (2002). The exam-a-day procedure improves performance in psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 210–212. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Loftus, G. (1985). Evaluating forgetting curves. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 397–406. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Logan, J.M., Balota, D.A. (2005). Spaced and expanded retrieval effects in younger and older adults. Manuscript submitted for publication. Google Scholar | |
|
McDaniel, M.A., Fisher, R.P. (1991). Tests and test feedback as learning sources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 192–201. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
McDaniel, M.A., Kowitz, M.D., Dunay, P.K. (1989). Altering memory through recall: The effects of cue-guided retrieval processing. Memory & Cognition, 17, 423–434. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
McDaniel, M.A., Masson, M.E.J. (1985). Altering memory representations through retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 371–385. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
McDermott, K.B., Kang, S., Roediger, H.L.. (2005, January). Test format and its modulation of the testing effect. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Wellington, New Zealand. Google Scholar | |
|
Morris, C.D., Bransford, J.D., Franks, J.J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer-appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Pashler, H., Cepeda, N.J., Wixted, J.T., Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 3–8. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Pashler, H., Zarow, G., Triplett, B. (2003). Is temporal spacing of tests helpful even when it inflates error rates? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1051–1057. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Peterson, L.R., Wampler, R., Kirkpatrick, M., Saltzman, D. (1963). Effect of spacing of presentations on retention of paired-associates over short intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 206–209. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Rawson, K.A., Kintsch, W. (2005). Rereading effects depend on time of test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 70–80. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Roediger, H.L. . (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043–1056. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Roediger, H.L., Gallo, D.A., Geraci, L. (2002). Processing approaches to cognition: The impetus from the levels-of-processing framework. Memory, 10, 319–332. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Roediger, H.L., Karpicke, J.D. (2006). The power of testing memory: Implications for educational practice. Unpublished manuscript, Washington University in St. Louis. Google Scholar | |
|
Roediger, H.L., Thorpe, L.A. (1978). The role of recall time in producing hypermnesia. Memory & Cognition, 6, 296–305. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Rogers, B. (2001). TOEFL CBT Success. Princeton, NJ: Peterson's. Google Scholar | |
|
Spitzer, H.F. (1939). Studies in retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 641–656. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Thompson, C.P., Wenger, S.K., Bartling, C.A. (1978). How recall facilitates subsequent recall: A reappraisal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 210–221. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Tulving, E. (1967). The effects of presentation and recall of material in free-recall learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 175–184. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Wheeler, M.A., Ewers, M., Buonanno, J. (2003). Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials. Memory, 11, 571–580. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Wheeler, M.A., Roediger, H.L.. (1992). Disparate effects of repeated testing: Reconciling Ballard's (1913) and Bartlett's (1932) results. Psychological Science, 3, 240–245. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
