Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online August 1, 2014

Managing Cost Salience and Procrastination in Projects: Compensation and Team Composition

Abstract

The rising trend of projects with high‐skilled and autonomous contributors increasingly exposes managers to the risk of idiosyncratic individual behaviors. In this article, we examine the effects of an important behavioral factor, an individual's cost salience. Cost salience leads individuals to perceive the cost of immediate effort to be larger than the cost of future effort. This leads to procrastination in early stages and back‐loaded effort over the course of the project. We model the problem confronting the manager of a project whose quality is adversely impacted by such distortion of individual effort over time. Complementary to prior works focused on the planning and scheduling tasks of project management in the absence of human behavior, we find that managers should reward contributions made in earlier stages of a project. Our analysis also yields interesting insights on the project team performance: teams with diverse levels of cost salience will perform better than homogeneous teams. We also address another important facet of team composition, namely, the choice between stable and fluid teams, and find that the practice of creating fluid teams might have previously unrecognized benefits when behavioral aspects of projects are considered. We conclude with insights and organizational implications for project managers.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Akerlof G. A. 1991. Procrastination and obedience. Am. Econ. Rev. 81(2): 1–19.
Ariely D., Wertenbroch K. 2002. Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self‐control by precommitment. Psychol. Sci. 13(3): 219–224.
Baker S. 2008. The Numerati. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York.
Bendoly E., Donohue K., Schulz K. 2006. Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. J. Oper. Manag. 24(6): 737–752.
Bhaskaran S., Krishnan V. 2009. Effort, revenue, and cost sharing mechanisms for collaborative new product development. Manage. Sci. 55(7): 1152–1169.
Brunnermeier M. K., Papakonstantinou F., Parker J. A. 2009. An economic model of the planning fallacy. NBER Working paper 14228, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Cadena X., Schoar A., Cristea A., Delgado‐Medrano H. M. 2011. Fighting procrastination in the workplace: An experiment. NBER Working paper 16944.
Croson R., Donohue K. 2006. Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Manage. Sci. 52(3): 323–336.
Dayanand N., Padman R. 2001. Project contracts and payment schedules: The client's problem. Manage. Sci. 47: 1654–1667.
Deci E., Ryan R. 2002. Handbook of Self‐Determination Research. University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY.
Edmondson A. C., Nembhard I. M. 2009. Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 26: 123–138.
Gino F., Pisano G. 2008. Towards a theory of behavioral operations. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 10(4): 676–691.
Goldratt E. M. 1997. Critical Chain. North River Press, Great Barrington, MA.
Harriott J., Ferrari J. R. 1996. Prevalence of procrastination among samples of adults. Psychol. Rep. 78(2): 611–616.
Herroelen W. 2005. Project scheduling—Theory and practice. Prod. Oper. Manag. 14(4): 413–432.
Herroelen W., Leus R. 2001. On the merits and pitfalls of critical chain scheduling. J. Oper. Manag. 19: 559–577.
Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. 1987. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55(2): 303–328.
Huckman R. S., Staats B. R. 2011. Fluid tasks and fluid teams: The impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 13(3): 310–328.
Huckman R. S., Staats B. R., Upton D. M. 2009. Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Manage. Sci. 55(1): 85–100.
Kavadias S., Sommer S. C. 2009. The effects of problem structure and team diversity on brainstorming effectiveness. Manage. Sci. 55(12): 1899–1913.
Krishnan V., Loch C. H. 2005. A retrospective look at production and operations management articles on new product development. Prod. Oper. Manag. 14(4): 433–441.
Loch C. H., Wu Y. 2007. Behavioral operations management. Found. Trends Technol. Inform. Oper. Manag. 1(3): 121–232.
Mihm J. 2010. Incentives in new product development projects and the role of target costing. Manage. Sci. 56(8): 1324–1344.
Needleman S. E. 2010. Managing at a distance. Wall Street J. June 21, R.5. Available at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703862704575100221456493514.html (accessed date July 14, 2010).
O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. 1999. Doing it now or later. Am. Econ. Rev. 89(1): 103–124.
Parkinson C. N. 1958. Parkinson's Law: The Pursuit of Progress. John Murray, London.
Peters T. 1999. The wow project. Fast Company 44.
Schonberger R. J. 1981. Why projects are “always” late: A rationale based on manual simulation of a PERT/CPM network. Interfaces 11(5): 66–70.
Shen Z.‐J. M., Su X. 2007. Customer behavior modeling in revenue management and auctions: A review and new research opportunities. Prod. Oper. Manag. 16(6): 713–728.
Siemsen E. 2008. The hidden perils of career concerns in R&D organizations. Manage. Sci. 54(5): 863–877.
Steel P. 2007. The nature of procrastination: A meta‐analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self‐regulatory failure. Psychol. Bull. 133(1): 65–94.
Terwiesch C., Ulrich K. T. 2009. Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Tirole J., 1988. The Theory of Industrial Organization. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Wu Y., Ramachandran K., Krishnan V. 2012. Managing projects with present‐biased agents. Available at SSRN.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: August 1, 2014
Issue published: August 2014

Keywords

  1. project management
  2. procrastination
  3. cost salience
  4. behavioral operations management

Rights and permissions

© 2014 The Authors.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yaozhong Wu
National University of Singapore, Business School, Singapore, 119245
Karthik Ramachandran
Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30308, USA
Vish Krishnan
Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, California 92093, USA

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Production and Operations Management.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 108

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 41 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 56

  1. Advising Entrepreneurs: Optimal Recommendation of Alternatives
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. To Communicate or Not? Interfirm Communication in Collaborative Projects
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. Optimal Contracts for Time-Inconsistent Consumers with Heterogeneous Beliefs
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. Managerial Mental Accounting and Downstream Project Decisions
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. The functional connectivity between right parahippocampal gyrus and precuneus underlying the association between reward sensitivity and procrastination
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Industry 4.0: The Power of Data
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  7. Scheduling with present bias
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. Agile contracting: Managing incentives under uncertain needs
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. Work More Tomorrow: Resolving Present Bias in Project Management
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. Should We All Work in Sprints? How Agile Project Management Improves Performance
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

POMS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

POMS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text