Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online August 11, 2024

Implications of Blockchain-Powered Marketplace of Preowned Virtual Goods

Abstract

The first‐sale doctrine, which protects consumers’ rights to resell purchased products, has been recognized by the US Supreme Court since 1908. In recent years, consumers have begun to purchase an increasing amount of virtual goods, which renders the first‐sale doctrine unclear. There are two main challenges leading to the uncertainty of the first‐sale doctrine in the digital age: lack of proper technology, and economic implications for developers and consumers. The advent of the blockchain solves the technology challenge, as it can track provenance and establish the chain of custody. In this study, we construct an analytical model to investigate the economic impact of trading preowned virtual items. Specifically, our model captures the decentralized nature of blockchain technology by allowing consumer‐to‐consumer trading, and considers the possibility that consumers prefer preowned virtual items over new ones because preowned items may be upgraded between purchase and resale. Lawmakers seek to strike a balance between the interests of virtual item developers and individual consumers. We show that, surprisingly, the introduction of a blockchain‐based preowned virtual item transaction can actually benefit both developer and consumer. The main intuition is that the developer can adjust the price when forward‐looking consumers incorporate the expected future transaction into their purchase decision. Our analysis also reveals that developers are more willing to embrace the secondary market when they can take a cut during the transaction. Our results provide important policy implications to the burgeoning debate of the first‐sale doctrine in the new digital world.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Abhishek V, Jerath K, Zhang ZJ (2016) Agency selling or reselling? Channel structures in electronic retailing. Management Science, 62(8), 2259–2280. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2230
Arya A, Mittendorf B (2006) Benefits of channel discord in the sale of durable goods. Management Science, 25(1), 91–96.
Babich V, Hilary G (2020) Distributed ledgers and operations: What operations management researchers should know about blockchain technology. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 22(2), 223–240.
Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E (1999) Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Science, 45(12), 1613–1630. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.12.1613
Balasubramanian S, Bhattacharya S, Krishnan V (2015) Pricing information goods: A strategic analysis of the selling and pay‐per‐use mechanisms. Marketing Science, 34(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2014.0894
Banerjee M (2008) Estimating monotone, unimodal and U‐shaped failure rates using asymptotic pivots. Statistica Sinica, 18(2), 467–492.
Barber G (2019) New to blockchain: Turning in‐game virtual goods into assets. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/blockchain‐turning‐in‐app‐virtual‐goods‐assets/
Cheng H, Liu Y (2012) Optimal software free trial strategy: The impact of network externalities and consumer uncertainty. Information Systems Research, 23(2), 488–504. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0348
Choi T, Guo S, Liu N, Shi X (2020) Optimal pricing in on‐demand‐service‐platform‐operations with hired agents and risk‐sensitive customers in the blockchain era. European Journal of Operational Research, 284(3), 1031–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.049
Desai P, Koenigsberg O, Purohit D (2004) Strategic decentralization and channel coordination. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 2(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QMEC.0000017033.09155.12
Dotson K (2019) Horizon blockchain games raises $3.75M in seed funding for virtual trading cards. SiliconAngle. https://siliconangle.com/2019/07/17/horizon-blockchain-games-raises-3-75m-seed-funding-virtual-trading-cards/
Dou Y, Hu YJ, Wu DJ (2017) Selling or leasing?Pricing information goods with depreciation of consumer valuation. Information Systems Research, 28(3), 582–602. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0698
Dutta P, Choi T, Somani S, Butala R (2020) Blockchain technology in supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research opportunities. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 142, 102067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102067
Esenduran G, Lu X, Swaminathan JM (2020) Buyback pricing of durable goods in dual distribution channels. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 22(2), 412–428.
Feng Y, Tan Y, Duan Y, Bai Y (2020) Strategies analysis of luxury fashion rental platform in sharing economy. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 142, 102065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102065
Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991). Game theory. MIT Press.
Geng X, Tan Y, Wei L (2018) How add‐on pricing interacts with distribution contracts. Production and Operations Management, 27(4), 605–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12831
Ghose A, Telang R, Krishnan R (2005) Effect of electronic secondary markets on the supply chain. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 91–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2005.11045853
Guo H, Hao L, Mukhopadhyay T, Sun D (2019) Selling virtual currency in digital games: Implications for gameplay and social welfare. Information Systems Research, 30(2), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0812
Hao L, Fan M (2014) An analysis of pricing models in the electronic book market. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1017–1032. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.4.04
Hao L, Guo H, Easley RF (2017) A mobile platform's in‐app advertising contract under agency pricing for app sales. Production and Operations Management, 26(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12647
Hastig GM, Sodhi MS (2020) Blockchain for supply chain traceability: Business requirements and critical success factors. Production and Operations Management, 29(4), 935–954. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13147
He Y, Ray S, Yin S (2016) Group selling, product durability, and consumer behavior. Production and Operations Management, 25(11), 1942–1957. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12586
Hendel I, Lizzeri A (1999) Interfering with secondary markets. Rand Journal of Economics, 30(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2556043
Huang K, Sundararajan A (2011) Pricing digital goods: Discontinuous costs and shared infrastructure. Information Systems Research, 22(4), 721–738. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0283
Ishihara M, Ching AT (2019) Dynamic demand for new and used durable goods without physical depreciation: The case of japanese video games. Marketing Science, 38(3), 392–416.
Jiang B, Tian L (2018) Strategic and economic implications of product sharing. Management Science, 64(3), 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2647
Jütte BJ (2017). Reconstructing European copyright law for the digital single market between old paradigms and digital challenges. Nomos Publishing.
Khoury M (2014) Exhausted yet? The first‐sale doctrine and the pre‐owned market for software licenses in the European union. Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 37(3), 45–57.
Kwark Y, Chen J, Raghunathan S (2014) Platform or wholesale? A strategic tool for online retailers to benefit from third‐party information. MIS Quarterly, 41(3), 763–785. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.3.05
Li S, Luo Q, Qiu L, Bandyopadhyay S (2020) Optimal pricing model of digital music: Subscription, ownership or mixed? Production and Operations Management, 29(3), 688–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13131
Olsen T, Tomlin B (2020) Industry 4.0: Opportunities and challenges for operations management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 22(1), 113–122.
Palmer D (2019) Microsoft teams up With Enjin to offer crypto collectible rewards. CoinDesk. https://www.coindesk.com/microsoft‐teams‐up‐with‐enjin‐to‐offer‐crypto‐collectible‐rewards
Pun H, Swaminathan JM, Hou P (2021) Blockchain adoption for combating deceptive counterfeits. Production and Operations Management, 30(4), 864–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13348
Reis S (2015) Toward a digital transfer doctrine‐the first sale doctrine in the digital era. Northwestern University Law Review, 109(1), 173–208
Shen B, Dong C, Minner S (2021) Combating copycats in the supply chain with permissioned blockchain technology. Production and Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13456
Shiller BR (2013) Digital distribution and the prohibition of resale markets for information goods. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 11(4), 403–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-013-9139-x
Shulman J, Coughlan A (2007) Pre‐owned goods, not pre‐owned bads: Profitable secondary market sales for a durable goods channel. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 5(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-006-9017-x
Sundararajan A (2004) Nonlinear pricing of information goods. Management Science, 50(12), 1660–1673. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0291
Takahashi D (2020) Forte recruits 5 more high‐end game studios to make blockchain‐based games. VentureBeat. https://venturebeat.com/2020/03/24/forte‐recruits‐5‐more‐high‐end‐game‐studios‐to‐make‐blockchain‐based‐games/
Tan Y, Carrillo J (2017) Strategic analysis of the agency model for digital goods. Production and Operations Management, 26(4), 724–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12595
Tan Y, Carrillo J, Cheng H (2016) The agency model for digital goods. Decision Science, 47(4), 628–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12173
Tian L, Vakharia A, Tan Y, Xu Y (2018) Marketplace, reseller, or hybrid: Strategic analysis of an emerging e‐commerce model. Production and Operations Management, 27(4), 1595–1610. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12885
Wang Z, Zheng Z, Jiang W, Tang S (2021) Blockchain‐enabled data sharing in supply chains: Model, operationalization and tutorial. Production and Operations Management, 30(7), 1965–1985. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13356
Wood M (2019) Blockchain gaming firm Immutable raises $15m from Naspers, Galaxy. Ledger Insights. https://www.ledgerinsights.com/blockchain-gaming-immutable-naspers-galaxy/
Yin S, Ray S, Gurnani H, Animesh A (2010) Durable products with multiple pre‐owned goods markets: Product upgrade and retail pricing implications. Marketing Science, 29(3), 540–560. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1090.0545

How to cite this article

Tan Y (2024). Implications of Blockchain-Powered Marketplace of Preowned Virtual Goods. Production and Operations Management 33(6): 1393–1409.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: August 11, 2024
Issue published: June 2024

Keywords

  1. Agency model
  2. blockchain
  3. distributed ledgers
  4. preowned products trading
  5. virtual good

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2022.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yinliang (Ricky) Tan
C.T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA

Notes

Yinliang (Ricky) Tan, China Europe International Business School, Shanghai, China. Email: [email protected]
Handling Editor: Special Issue (Disruptive) Editors

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Production and Operations Management.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 355

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 24 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 23

  1. Opportunities and challenges of blockchain for multi-sided platforms
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. Quality management in supply chain: Strategic implications and the paradox of AI inspection
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. Investigating the potential of blockchain technology in enabling circular economy practices in Industry 5.0: an electronics industry case study
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. Flexible Revenue-Sharing Contract in a Digital-Content Supply Chain Under Heterogeneous Beliefs of the Parties
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dynamic pricing strategy for content products considering consumer fairness concerns and strategic behavior
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Decency or devilment: the impact of blockchain technology on product line design
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  7. SSE_CIB: Secure storage and exchange of copyrighted images using blockchain
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. The value of secondary markets when consumers are socially conscious
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. Optimizing the Nonfungible Token Ecosystem: Effects of Business Models, Secondary Markets, and Royalties
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blockchain-Empowered Market Entry Strategy for a Green Product
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

POMS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

POMS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text