Cross-Cultural Insight into the Association between Religiousness and Authoritarianism

First Published May 1, 2009 Research Article

Authors

University of Maribor, Slovenia
by this author
,
University of Maribor, Slovenia
by this author
First Published Online: May 1, 2009

The current study investigated the possible existence of a relationship between authoritarianism and religiousness and the possible strength of this potential relationship. The study involved samples from four cultural environments known to differ substantially in terms of religious salience and content: Slovenia (predominantly Catholic), Serbia (predominantly Eastern Orthodox), Bosnia and Herzegovina (predominantly Muslim), and the United States (predominantly Protestant). Religiousness was assessed by way of religious orientation (including intrinsic and extrinsic orientation) as proposed by Allport (1950), whereas authoritarianism was tapped by a modified Lane scale (1955). Results from zero-order correlations indicated a strong and positive association between authoritarianism and all types of religious orientation, regardless of the sample analyzed. Residualizing the main study constructs by demographic variables did not alter the results. The association changed only when each dimension of religious orientation was controlled for the effect of other dimensions. Results did not lend support to the hypothesis that authoritarianism is more strongly linked to those who are more extrinsically oriented.

Adorno, T. 1950: The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Google Scholar
Allport, G.W. 1966: Traits revisited. American Psychologist, 21, 110.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Allport, G.W. 1950: The individual and his religion. New York: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Allport, G.W. & Ross, J.M. 1967: Religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432443.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Allport, G.W. 1954: The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison Wesley.
Google Scholar
Altemeyer, B. & Hunsberger, B. 1992: Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2 (2), 113132.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Altemeyer, B. 1988: Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Altemeyer, B. 2004: The ‘other’ authoritarian personality. In Jost, J.T. & Sidanius, J. (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings. New York: Psychology.
Google Scholar
Batson, C.D. & Ventis, W.L. 1982: The religious experience: A social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Billings, S.W. Guastello, S.J. and Rieke, M.L. 1993: A comparison of the construct validity of three measures of authoritarianism. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 328348.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Brown, R. 2004: The authoritarian personality and the organization of attitudes. In Jost, J.T. & Sidanius, J. (Eds.), Political psychology. New York: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Christie, R. 1991: Authoritarianism and related constructs. In Robinson, J.P. Shaver, P.R. & Wrightsman, L.S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. San Diego: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Donahue, M.J. 1985: Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: a review and meta-analysis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (4), 400419.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Durkheim, E. 1914/1961: The elementary forms of religious life. New York: MacMillan.
Google Scholar
Eckhardt, W. 1999: Authoritarianism. Political Psychology 12, 97-124.
Google Scholar
Feldman, S. 2003: Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 4174.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Flere, S. Edwards, K. & Klanjsek, R. 2008: Dimensionality of religious orientation in three Central European surroundings: Among Muslims, Roman Catholics and the Serbian Orthodox. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 18, 121.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Fromm, E. 1950: Psychonalysis and religion. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Fulton, A.S. Gorsuch, R.L. & Maynard, E. 1999: Religious orientation, antihomosexual sentiment and fundamentalism among Christians. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 1422.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Funke, F. 2005: The dimensionality of right wing authoritarianism: lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26 (2), 195218.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gorsuch, R.L. & McPherson, S.E. 1989: Intrinsic/Extrinsic measurement: I/E revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28 (3), 348354.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Haddock, G. Zanna, M.P. & Essess, V.M. 1993: Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 11051118.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hill, P.C. & Hood, R.W. (Eds.). 1999: Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.
Google Scholar
Hunsberger, B. 1995: Religion and prejudice: The role of religious fundamentalism, quest and right wing authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 51 (1), 11329.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hunsberger, B. 1996: Religious fundamentalism, right wing authoritarianism, and hostility toward homosexuals in non-Christian religious groups. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 6 (1), 3949.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kirkpatrick, L.A. 1993: Fundamentalism, Christian orthodoxy, and intrinsic religious orientation as predictors of discriminatory attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32 (3), 256268.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kirkpatrick, L.A. 1989: A psychometric analysis of the Allport-Ross and Feagin measures of intrinsic/extrinsic religious orientation. In Moberg, D.O. & Lynn, M.L. (eds.) Reserach in the Social Scientific Study of Religion (vol. I), Greenwhich, CT: JAI Press.
Google Scholar
Krauss, S.W. Streib, H. Keller, B. & Silver, C. 2006: Fundamentalism in three cultures. Factor analysis and personality correlates. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 28, 341348.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Lane, R.E. 1955: Political personality and electoral choice. American Political Science Review 49 (2), 173190.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Laythe, B. Finkel, D. & Kirkpatrick, L. 2001: Predicting prejudice from religious fundamentalism and right-wing authoritarianism: A multiple-regression approach. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40 (1), 110.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Leak, G.K. & Randall, B.A. 1995: Clarification of the link between right-wing authoritarianism and religiousness: the role of religious maturity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34, 245252.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Leong, T.L. & Zachar, P. 1990: An Evaluation of Allport's Religious Orientation Scale Across One Australian and Two United States Samples, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50(2), 359368.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Maltby, J. 1999:. The internal structure of a derived, revise and amended measure of religious orientation scales ‘Age-universal’ I-E scale 12, Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 407412.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Marx, K. [1844]1966: The critique of Hegel's philosophy of right, translated by A. Jolin and J. Malley. Cambridge: University Press.
Google Scholar
McFarland, S.G. & Adelson, S. 1996: An omnibus study of personality, values, and prejudice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Google Scholar
Norris, P. and Inglehart, R. 2004: Sacred and secular. Religion and politics worldwide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Oesterreich, D. 2005: Flight into security: A new approach and measure of the authoritarian personality. Political Psychology, 26, 275297.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sanford, N. 1973: Authoritarian personality in contemporary perspective. In Knutson, J. (Ed.), Handbook of political psychology. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Google Scholar
Trimble, D.E. (1997). The religious orientation scale: review and meta-analysis of social desirability effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 970986.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Access

    does not have access to this content.

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

PRJ-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $142.22

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top