Why Do Corrupt Governments Maintain Public Support?

First Published August 1, 2007 Research Article

Authors

Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas
by this author
,
University of Texas at Dallas
by this author
First Published Online: June 30, 2016

This article addresses an issue often neglected by the current literature on political corruption: Why do citizens support corrupt governments? The authors argue that people in countries where government institutions are weak and patron-client relationships strong are more likely to support a corrupt leader from whom they expect to receive tangible benefits. Using a cross-national analysis of citizens in 14 countries, the authors find statistical evidence consistent with the hypothesis, which also complements some of the recent works on clientelism and institutional development. This has important implications for scholars and practitioners working on accountability and good governance issues because its shows that as long as corrupt leaders can satisfy their clientelistic networks by manipulating government resources, they are likely to retain political support. This, in turn, questions the assumption that a few administrative reforms can weed out corruption in countries where formal and informal institutions provide opportunities for this phenomenon to thrive.

Adserá, A. , Boix, C. , & Payne, M. (2003). Are you being served? Political accountability and quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization , 19, 445-490.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ames, B. (1995). Electoral strategy under open-list proportional representation. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 406-433.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Anderson, C. , & Tverdova, Y. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Political Science Review, 47(1), 91-109.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Beck, A. , & Lee, R. (2002). Attitudes to corruption amongst Russian police officers and trainees. Crime, Law and Social Change, 38, 357-372.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bratton, M. , & van de Walle, N. (1994, July). Neopatrimonial regimes and political transitions in Africa. World Politics , 46, 453-489.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Brom, L. (2004, October). Avances para un catálogo lego de situationcies corruptas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Las Vegas, Nevada .
Google Scholar
Brusco, V. , Nazareno, M. , & Stokes, S.C. (2004). Vote buying in Argentina. Latin American Research Review, 39(2), 66-88.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Burgess, R. , & Besley, T. (2002). The political economy of government responsiveness: Theory and evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics , 117, 1415-1451.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Cain, B. , Ferejohn, J. , & Fiorina, M. (1987). The personal vote: Constituency service and electoral independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Calvo, E. , & Murillo, M.V. (2004). Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 742-757.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Carey, J. , & Shugart, M. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering or electoral formulas. Electoral Studies, 14, 417-439.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Clapham, C. (1982). Clientelism and the state. In C. Clapham (Ed.), Private patronage and public power (pp. 1-35). London: Frances Pinter .
Google Scholar
Dhillon, A. , & Wantchekon, L. (2003). Policy commitment through intermediaries: A theory of electoral clientelism. Unpublished manuscript, New York University.
Google Scholar
Easterly, W. , & Levine, R. (1997). Africa's growth tragedy: Politics and ethnic divisions . Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1203-1250.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Eisenstadt, S. N. , & Lemarchand, R. (Eds.). (1981). Political clientelism, patronage and development. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Elliott, K. (Ed.). (1997). Corruption and the global economy: Introduction. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Google Scholar
Estévez, F. , Magaloni, B. , & Diaz-Cayeros, A. (2002, May). A portfolio diversification model of policy choice. Paper presented at the Clientelism in Latin America: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives conference , Stanford University.
Google Scholar
Fox, J. ( 1994). The difficult transition from clientelism to citizenship: Lessons from Mexico. World Politics, 46(2), 151-184.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Goldsmith, A. (1999). Slapping the grabbing hand: Correlates of political corruption in emerging markets. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58, 865-883.
Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, A. (Ed.). (1970). Political corruption: Readings in comparative analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Google Scholar
Huntington, S. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. , Bashkirova, E. , Basanez, M. , Chiu, H.-Y. , Diez-Nicolas, J. , Esmer, Y. , et al. (2000). World values surveys and European values surveys, 1981-1984, 1990-1993, and 1995-1997, ICPSR version [Computer file] . Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D. (1997). Corruption, the facts. Foreign Policy, 107, 11-31.
Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D. , Kraay, A. , & Mastruzzi, M. (2003). Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996-2003 (Working Paper 3106). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D. , Kraay, A. , & Zoido-Labaton, P. (1999). Governance matters (Working Paper 2196) Washington, DC: World Bank.
Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D. , & Wei, S.J. (1999). Does “grease money” speed up the wheels of commerce? (Working Paper 7093). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Keefer, P. (2005). Democratization & credibility: Why are young democracies badly governed? (Working Paper 3594) Washington, DC: World Bank.
Google Scholar | Crossref
King, G. , Tomz, M. , & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 347-361.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kitschelt, H. (2000). Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic polities. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 845-879.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Kitschelt, H. , Mansfeldova, Z. , & Markowski, R. (1999). Post-communist party systems competition, representation, and inter-party cooperation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Knack, S. , & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics, 7, 207-227.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Leff, N. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption . American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 8-14.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Leftwich, A. (1995). Bringing politics back in: Towards a model of the developmental state. Journal of Development Studies, 31, 400-435.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lemarchand, R. (1972). Political clientelism and ethnicity in tropical Africa: Competing solidarities in nation-building. American Political Science Review, 66(1), 68-90.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lizzeri, A. , & Persico, N. (2001). The provision of public goods under alternative electoral incentives. American Economic Review, 91(1), 225-239.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Luttmer, E. (2001). Group loyalty and taste for redistribution. Journal of Political Economy, 109, 500-528.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Malesky, E. (2001, March). Enduring clientelism in Vietnam. Paper presented at the Citizen-Politician Linkages in Democratic Politics conference, Duke University.
Google Scholar
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 681-712.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Medina, L. , & Stokes, S. (2002). Clientelism as political monopoly. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Google Scholar
Mishler, W. , & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30-62.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Mitchell, P. (2000). Voters and their representatives: Electoral institutions and delegation in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 38, 335-351.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Montinola, G. , & Jackman, R. (2002). Sources of corruption: A cross-country study. British Journal of Political Science, 40, 570-602.
Google Scholar
Morris, S. (1991). Corruption and politics in contemporary Mexico . Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Google Scholar
Norton, E.C. , Wang, H. , & Ai, C. (2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata Journal, 4(2), 103-116.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Nye, J. ( 1967). Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis. American Political Science Review, 61, 417-427.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Persson, T. , Tabellini, G. , & Trebbi, F. (2003). Electoral rules and corruption. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 958-989.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Roniger, L. , & Gunes-Ayata, A. (1994). Democracy, clientelism, and civil society. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
Google Scholar
Rose, R. , Mishler, W. , & Haerpfer, C. (1998). Democracy and its alternatives: Understanding post-communist societies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Samuels, D. (1999). Incentives to cultivate a party vote in candidate-centric electoral systems: Evidence from Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 32, 487-518.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Schmidt, S. W. , Guasti, L. , Land, C. , & Scott, J. C. (Eds.). (1997). Friends, followers and factions: A reader in political clientelism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Schulte Nordholt, N.G. (2000). Corruption and legitimacy in Indonesia: An exploration . In H. E. Bakker & N. G. Schulte Nordholt (Eds.), Corruption and legitimacy (pp. 65-95). Amsterdam: SISWO Publications.
Google Scholar
Scott, J.C. (1972). Patron-client politics and political change in southeast Asia. American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91-113.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Seligson, M. (2002). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American countries. Journal of Politics, 64, 408-433.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Shefter, M. (1977). Party and patronage: Germany, England, and Italy . Politics and Society, 7, 403-452.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Shleifer, A. , & Vishny, R. (2002). The grabbing hand: Government pathologies and their cures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Stokes, S. (2005). Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review, 99, 315-326.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Theobald, R. (1982). Patrimonialism. World Politics , 34, 549-558.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Tomz, M. , Wittenberg, J. , & King, G. (2003). CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results (Version 2.1). Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. Retrieved February 17, 2004, from http://gking.harvard.edu/
Google Scholar
Tulchin, J. , & Espach, R. (Eds.). (2000). Combating corruption: Anti-corruption policies in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Google Scholar
Wantchekon, L. (2003). Clientelism and voting behavior: A field experiment in Benin. World Politics, 55, 399-422.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Waterbury, J. (1976). Corruption, political stability, and development: Comparative evidence from Egypt and Morocco. Government and Opposition, 11, 426-445.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wertheim, W.F. (1970). Sociological aspects of corruption in Southeast Asia. In A. Heidenheimer (Ed.), Political corruption: Readings in comparative analysis (pp. 195-211). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Google Scholar

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

CPS-article-ppv for GBP29.00
CPS-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP152.43
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $195.42