In choosing strategies of state capture (the extraction of private benefits by incumbent officeholders from the state), rulers choose whether to share rents with popular constituencies and whether to tolerate competition. These choices are conditioned by existing organizational endowments, the costs of buying support, and the trade-off between the cost and probability of exit from office. In turn, both rent distribution and competition result in distinct configurations of state capture: clientelism, predation, fusion, exploitation, and the formation of specific state institutions and capacities.

Acemoglu, D. , & Robinson, J. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Ades, A. , & Di Tella, R. (1999). Rents, competition, and corruption. American Economic Review, 89(4), 982-993.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Adsera, A. , Boix, C. , Payne, M. (2003). Are you being served? Political accountability and the quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 19(2), 445-490.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ágh, A. (Ed.). (1994). The first steps. Budapest: Hungarian Centre of Democracy Studies.
Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. (1995). Why parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Allina-Pisano, J. (2005). Informal politics and challenges to democracy: Administrative resource in Kuchma's Ukraine. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Google Scholar
Allina-Pisano, J. (2007). The post-Soviet Potemkin Village. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Andrews, E. , & Pear, R. (2007, August 5). With new rules, congress boasts of pet projects. New York Times, p. A1.
Google Scholar
Asher, M. (1989). Fiscal systems and practices in ASEAN. Singapore Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Google Scholar
Bhargava, V. , & Bolongaita, E. (2004). Challenging corruption in Asia: Case studies and a framework for action. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Google Scholar
Big men, big fraud, and big trouble. (2007, April 28). Economist. Retrieved January 8, 2008, from http://www.economist.com/world/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9070922
Google Scholar
Boix, C. (1999). Setting the rules of the game: The choice of electoral systems in advanced democracies. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 609-624.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bratton, M. , & van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic experiments in Africa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Calvo, E. , & Gibson, E. (2001). Federalism and low-maintenance constituencies: Territorial dimensions of economic reform in Argentina. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), 32-55.
Google Scholar | ISI
Calvo, E. , & Murillo, M.V. (2004). Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 742-757.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Carey, J. , & Shugart, M. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies, 14(4), 417-439.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Chandra, K. (2004). Why ethnic parties succeed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Coppedge, M. (2001). Political Darwinism in Latin America's Lost Decade . In Larry Diamond & Richard Gunther (Eds.), Political parties and democracy (pp. 173-205). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
Cox, G. , & McCubbins, M. (1986). Electoral politics as a redistributive game. Journal of Politics, 48, 370-389.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Crenson, M. , & Ginsberg, B. (2004). Downsizing democracy. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Dahlberg, M. , & Johanson, E. (2002). On the vote-purchasing behavior of incumbent governments . American Political Science Review, 96(1), 27-40.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Darden, K. (2001). Blackmail as a tool of state domination: Ukraine under Kuchma. East European Constitutional Review, 10(3), 67-71.
Google Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, A. , Estevez, F. , & Magaloni, B. (2006). Vote-buying, poverty, and democracy: The politics of social programs in Mexico, 1989-2006. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, CA.
Google Scholar
Dixit, A. (1996). The making of economic policy: A transaction cost politics perspective. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Dixit, A. , & Londregan, J. (1996). The determinants of success of special interests in redistributive politics. Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1132-1155.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Fainsod, M. (1958). Smolensk under Soviet rule. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Freedom House. (1970-2006). Freedom in the world: Country rankings. Washington, DC : Author.
Google Scholar
Gandhi, J. , & Przeworski, A. (2007). Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats. Comparative Political Studies , 40(11), 1279-1301.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Ganev, V. (2007). Preying on the state. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
Geddes, B. (1999, September). Authoritarian breakdown: Empirical test of a game theoretic argument. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Meeting, Atlanta, GA.
Google Scholar
Gimpelson, V. , & Treisman, D. (2002). Fiscal games and public employment. World Politics, 54(2), 145-183.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Goldsmith, A. (2004). Predatory versus developmental rule in Africa . Democratization, 11(3), 88-110.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2007). Rebuilding Leviathan. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hellman, J. , & Kauffman, D. (2001). Confronting the challenge of state capture in transition economies. Finance and Development, 38(3), 1-9.
Google Scholar
Hicken, A. (2006). Party fabrication: Constitutional reform and the rise of Thai Rak Thai. Journal of East Asian Studies, 6(3), 381-408.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hirszowicz, M. (1980). The bureaucratic leviathan. Oxford, UK: Martin Robertson.
Google Scholar
Hutchcroft, P. (1991). Oligarch and cronies in the Philippine state. World Politics, 43(3), 414-450.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hutchcroft, P. (1998). Booty capitalism. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
Ichino, N. (2006). Thugs and voters: Political tournaments in Nigeria . Doctoral dissertation, Department of Political Science, Stanford University, CA.
Google Scholar
Jackson, R. , & Rosberg, C. (1982). Personal rule in Black Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Kang, D. (2003). Crony capitalism. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Kaplan, K. (1987). The short march: The Communist takeover of power in Czechoslovakia, 1945-1948. New York: St. Martin's.
Google Scholar
Kaplan, K. (1993). Aparát ÚV KSC v letech 1948-1968 [Apparat of the Central Committee of the Czechoslovak Communist Party, 1948-1968]. Prague, Czech Republic: Sesity Ústavu pro soudobé Dejiny AV CR.
Google Scholar
Keefer, P. (2002). Clientelism, credibility, and democracy. Washington, DC: World Bank Development Research Group .
Google Scholar
Khan, M. (2005). Markets, states, and democracy: Patron-client networks and the case for democracy in developing countries. Democratization, 12(5), 704-724.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kitschelt, H. (2000). Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic polities. Comparative Political Studies, 33(6/7), 845-879.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. (Eds.). (2006). Patrons, clients, and linkages . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Knack, Stephen , & Keefer, Philip. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures . Economics and Politics, 7, 207-227.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Levi, M. (1988). Of rule and revenue. Berkeley : University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. (2003). Transforming labor-based parties in Latin America . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lewanski, R. (1997, April). Italian civil service: A pre-modern bureaucracy in transition? Paper presented at the Conference on "Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective," University of Indiana, Bloomington.
Google Scholar
Lewis, P. (2007). Growing apart. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lindberg, S. (2004). The power of elections: Democratic participation, competition, and legitimacy in Africa. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
Google Scholar
Luther, K. , & Müller, W. (1992). Politics in Austria: Still a case of consociationalism? London: Frank Cass.
Google Scholar
Magaloni, B. (2006). Voting for autocracy. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mann, M. (1988). States, war, and capitalism. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Manzetti, L. , & Wilson, C. (2007). Why do corrupt governments maintain public support ? Comparative Political Studies, 40(8), 949-970.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Medina, L. , & Stokes, S. (2007). Monopoly and monitoring: An approach to political clientelism. In H. Kitschelt & S. Wilkinson (Eds.), Patrons, clients, and policies (pp. 68-83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
North, D. , & Weingast, B. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutional governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 803-832.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Nunberg, B. (Ed.). (1999). The state after Communism. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Google Scholar | Crossref
O'Dwyer, C. (2004). Runaway state building: How political parties shape states in postcommunist Eastern Europe. World Politics , 56(4), 520-553.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Persson, T. , Tabellini, G. , & Trebbi, F. (2001). Electoral rules and corruption. In S. Piattoni (Ed.), Clientelism, interests, and democratic representation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the market. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Richardson, B. (2001). Japan's `1995 System' and beyond. In L. Diamond & R. Gunther (Eds.), Political parties and democracy (pp. 143-172). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
Robinson, J. , & Verdier, T. (2002). The political economy of clientelism (Discussion Paper Series No. 3205). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Google Scholar
Robison, R. , & Hadiz, V. (2005). Reorganising power in Indonesia. London Routledge Curzon.
Google Scholar
Sachsenröder, W. (1998). Party politics and democratic development in East and Southeast Asia: A comparative view. In W. Sachsenröder & U. Frings (Eds.), Political party systems and democratic development in East and Southeast Asia (pp. 1-35). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Google Scholar
Schady, N.R. (2000). The political economy of expenditures by the Peruvian Social Fund (FONCODES) 1991-1995. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 289-304.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Scheiner, E. (2006). Democracy without competition in Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
Google Scholar
Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Seng, O. (1998). Singapore. In W. Sachsenröder & U. Frings (Eds.), Political party systems and democratic development in East and Southeast Asia (pp. 342-402). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Google Scholar
Sherlock, S. (2002). Combating corruption in Indonesia? Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 38(3), 367-383.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sidel, J. (1999). Capital, coercion, and crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar
Slater, D. (2003). Iron cage in an iron fist: Authoritarian institutions and the personalization of power in Malaysia. Comparative Politics, 36(1), 81-101.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Slater, D. (2007, October). Can a Leviathan be a democrat? Competitive elections, robust mass politics, and state infrastructural power. Paper Presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
Google Scholar
Smyth, R. , Wilkening, B. , & Urasova, A. (2007). Engineering victory: Institutional reform, informal institutions, and the formation of a hegemonic party regime in the Russian Federation. Post-Soviet Affairs, 23(2), 1-21.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Stokes, S. (2005). Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 215-225.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tarrow, S. (1990). Maintaining hegemony in Italy: The softer they rise, the slower they fall! In T. J. Pempel (Ed.), Uncommon democracies: The one-party dominant regimes (pp. 306-332). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1992). Coercion, capital and European states, AD 990-1992 . Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Transparency International. (2006). Global corruption report. London: Author.
Google Scholar
van de Walle, N. (2003). Presidentialism and clientelism in Africa's emerging party systems. Journal of Modern African Studies, 41(2), 297-321.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Warner, C. (2001). Mass parties and clientelism: France and Italy . In S. Piattoni (Ed.), Clientelism, interests, and democratic representation (pp. 122-151). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
World Bank. (2000). Cross-national data set on government employment and wages. Washington, DC: Author.
Google Scholar
World Bank. (2002). World governance indicators. Washington, DC: Author .
Google Scholar
Wurfel, D. (1988). Filipino politics: Development and decay. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here.

Your Access Options


Purchase

CPS-article-ppv for $36.00
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $195.42