![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
For-profit educational management organizations (EMOs) are a growing phenomenon in public education, and they are an integral part of charter school reform in many states. Research suggests that charter schools operated by for-profit entities may take a more entrepreneurial approach when expanding their operations and thus may be more inclined to serve less disadvantaged and less costly students. In this article, we examine empirically whether charter schools are less likely to serve disadvantaged students by comparing the distribution of students across traditional public schools, nonprofit charter schools, and those managed by private companies. We base our analysis on data from the National Center of Education Statistics’ (NCES) Common Core Data (CCD), and we combine this data with information on the types of management organizations operating charter schools. Our results suggest that charter schools managed by EMOs draw students differently to their schools than those charter schools not managed by EMOs. They seem to seek out more Black students but are also focused on selecting fewer poor students than we see among regular public schools. When examining differences in the size of EMOs, we find that these effects appear most likely to occur among schools operated by large-sized EMOs.
Keywords charter schools, school choice, educational policy
References
Section:
|
Andre-Bechely, L. (2007). Finding space and managing distance: Public school choice in an urban California district. Urban Studies, 44, 1355-1376. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Bettinger, E. P. (2005). The effect of charter schools on charter students and public schools. Economics of Education Review, 24(2), 133-147. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Buckley, J., Schneider, M. (2005). Are charter school students harder to educate? Evidence from Washington, DC. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 365-380. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Bulkley, K. (2007). Case studies of the politics of privatization: Bringing the private into the public: Changing the rules of the game and new regime politics in Philadelphia public education. Educational Policy, 21, 155-184. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Carnoy, M., Jacobsen, R., Mishel, L., Rothstein, R. (2005). The charter school dust-up: Examining the evidence on enrollment and achievement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Center on Education Policy . (2010). How many schools and districts have not made adequate yearly progress? Four-year trends. Washington, DC: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Chubb, J. E. (2001, Spring). The private can be public. Education Next, 1(1). Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/the-private-can-be-public Google Scholar | |
|
Finnegan, K., Adelman, N., Anderson, L., Cotton, L., Donnelly, M. B., Price, T. (2004). Evaluation of charter schools program: 2004 Final Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Policy and Programs Study Service. Google Scholar | |
|
Fitz, J., Beers, B. (2002). Education management organisations and the privatisation of public education: A cross-national comparison of the USA and Britain. Comparative Education, 38, 137-154. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Frankenberg, E., Lee, C. (2003, September 5). Charter schools and race: A lost opportunity for integrated education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(32). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n32/ Google Scholar | |
|
Gill, B. P., Zimmer, R., Christman, J. B., Blanc, S. (2007). Student achievement in privately managed and district-managed schools in Philadelphia since the state takeover. Pittsburgh, PA: RAND Corporation. Google Scholar | |
|
Glomm, G., Harris, D., Lo, T. (2005). Charter school location. Economics of Education Review, 24, 451-457. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Henig, J. R., MacDonald, J. A. (2002). Locational decisions of charter schools: Probing the market metaphor. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 962-980. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Henig, J. R., Holyoke, T. T., Lacireno-Paquet, N., Moser, M. (2003). Privatization, politics, and urban services: The political behavior of charter schools. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(1), 37-54. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Holyoke, T., Henig, J., Brown, H., Lacireno-Paquet, N. (2007). Institution advocacy and the political behavior of charter schools. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 202-214. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Horn, J., Miron, G. (1998). First annual report of the evaluation of the charter schools and the charter school initiative in the state of Connecticut. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University. Google Scholar | |
|
Horn, J., Miron, G. (2000). An evaluation of the Michigan charter school initiative: Performance, accountability, and impact. Kalamazoo: The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University. Google Scholar | |
|
Hoxby, C. M. (2003). School choice and school productivity. In Hoxby, C. (Ed.), The economics of school choice (pp. 287-342). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Lacireno-Paquet, N. (2006). Charter school enrollments in context: An exploration of organization and policy influences. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(1), 79-102. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Lacireno-Paquet, N. , (2004, June 15). Do EMO-operated charter schools serve disadvantaged students? The influence of state policies. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(26). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n26/ Google Scholar | |
|
Lacireno-Paquet, N., Holyoke, T. T., Moser, M., Henig, J. R. (2002, Summer). Creaming versus cropping: Charter school enrollment practices in response to market incentives. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 145-158. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Lubienski, C., Gulosino, C. (2007). Choice, competition, and organizational orientation: A geo-spatial analysis of charter schools and the distribution of educational opportunities. New York, NY: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University. Google Scholar | |
|
Mast, B. (2010). Measuring neighborhood quality with survey data: A Bayesian approach. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 12(3), 123-143. Google Scholar | |
|
Mead, S. (2006). Maintenance required: Charter schooling in Michigan. Washington, DC: Education Sector Reports: Charter School Series. Google Scholar | |
|
Miron, G., Applegate, B. (2000). An evaluation of student achievement in Edison Schools opened in 1995 and 1996. Kalamazoo: The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University. Google Scholar | |
|
Miron, G., Nelson, C. (2000). Autonomy in exchange for accountability: An initial study of Pennsylvania charter schools. Kalamazoo, MI: The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University. Google Scholar | |
|
Miron, G., Nelson, C. (2002). What’s public about charter schools? Lessons learned about choice and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Miron, G., Urschel, J. L., Mathis, W. J., Tornquist, E. (2010). Schools without diversity: Education management organizations, charter schools and the demographic stratification of the American school system. Boulder, CO: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit. Retrieved from http://epicpolicy.org/publication/schools-without-diversity Google Scholar | |
|
Molnar, A., Garcia, D. R., Miron, G., Berry, S. (2007). Profiles of for-profit education management organizations: Ninth Annual Report 2006-2007. Tempe: Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University. Google Scholar | |
|
Molnar, A., Miron, G., Urschel, J. L. (2010). Profiles of for-profit education management organizations: Twelfth annual report—2009-2010. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/EMO-FP-09-10 Google Scholar | |
|
Molnar, A., Garcia, D., Bartlett, M., O’Neill, A. (2006). Profiles of For-Profit Education Management Companies, 2005-2006 (Eighth Annual Report No. EPSL-0605-104-CERU). Tempe: Arizona State University. Google Scholar | |
|
Molnar, A. (2001). Calculating the benefits and costs of for-profit public education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(15), 1-19. Google Scholar | |
|
Renzulli, L. A., Evans, L. (2005). School choice, charter schools, and white flight. Social Problems, 52, 398-418. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
U.S. Department of Education . (2010). Elementary and secondary education: A blueprint for reform, the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/blueprint/publication.html Google Scholar | |
|
U.S. Census Bureau . (2007, October). The Decennial Census, 1990 Summary Tape File 1 (STF 1 and STF3) and Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF 1, SF2, SF3 and SF4) (Michigan) [machine-readable data files] (Prepared by Senior Systems Analyst Marie Pees from the Population Division of the U.S. Census Bureau, October 2009). Washington, DC: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Wamba, N. G., Ascher, C. (2003). An examination of charter school equity. Education and Urban Society, 35, 462-476. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Wells, A. S. (2002). Where charter school policy fails: The problems of accountability and equity. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Wells, A., Scott, J. (2001). Privatization and charter school reform: Economic, political and social dimensions. In Levin, H. (Ed.) Privatizing education: Can the marketplace deliver choice, efficiency, equity, and social cohesion? (pp. 234-263). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Wohlstetter, P., Wenning, R., Briggs, K. L. (1995). Charter schools in the United States: The question of autonomy. Educational Policy, 9, 331-358. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
