![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
The disparities in achievement among income and racial-ethnic groups of students have long been a major concern of educational policies. Among several identified factors that help explain the student performance gap, this paper focuses on inequity in funding for education among school districts, which resulted from heavy reliance of school districts’ revenue on local wealth. In 2004, the State of Maryland witnessed a significant change in financing methods for educational services by providing more resources for school districts with larger share of disadvantaged students. This is the first study to examine the effects of Maryland education finance reform on school spending and student performance. The findings show that reform has improved spending equity by providing more aid to school districts with larger share of disadvantaged students, but found little evidence that reform closed the student performance gap. This study holds policy implications for the current debate on reducing gaps of spending and student performance across school districts by using education finance reforms.
Keywords education finance reform, state aid
Reference
Section:
|
Angrist, J. D., Lavy, V. (1999). Using maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 533-575. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Baker, B. D. (2001). Balancing equity for students and taxpayers: Evaluating school finance reform in Vermont. Journal of Education Finance, 26, 437-462. Google Scholar | |
|
Baker, B. D., Imber, M. (1999). Rational educational explanation or politics as usual? Evaluating the outcome of school finance litigation in Kansas. Journal of Education Finance, 25, 121-139. Google Scholar | |
|
Baker, B. D., Welner, K. (2011). School finance and courts: Does reform matter, and how can we tell? Teacher College Record, 113, 2374-2414. Google Scholar | |
|
Benabou, R. (1996). Equity and efficiency in human capital investment: The local connection. The Review of Economic Studies, 63, 237-264. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Card, D., Krueger, A. B. (1992). Does school quality matter? Returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States. The Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1-40. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Card, D., Payne, A. A. (2002). School finance reform, the distribution of school spending, and the distribution of student test scores. Journal of Public Economics, 83, 49-82. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Chung, I. H. (2012). Education finance reform, school choice, and residential sorting (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Syracuse University, NY. Google Scholar | |
|
Clark, M. A. (2003). Education reform, redistributions, and student achievement: Evidence from the Kentucky Education Reform Act. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. Google Scholar | |
|
Cohen-Vogel, L. A., Cohen-Vogel, D. R. (2001). School finance reform in Tennessee: Inching toward adequacy. Journal of Education Finance, 26, 297-318. Google Scholar | |
|
Courant, P. N., Loeb, S. (1997). Centralization of school finance in Michigan. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16, 114-136. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Cullen, J. B., Loeb, S. (2004). School finance reform in Michigan: Evaluating Proposal A. In Yinger, J. (Ed.), Helping children left behind: State aid and the pursuit of educational equity (pp. 215-250). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Dee, T. S., Levine, J. (2004). The fate of new funding: Evidence from Massachusetts’ education finance reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 199-215. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Deke, J. (2003). A study of the impact of public school spending on postsecondary educational attainment using statewide school district refinancing in Kansas. Economics of Education Review, 22, 275-284. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Downes, T. A. (1992). Evaluating the impact of school finance reform on the provision of public education: The California case. National Tax Journal, 45, 405-419. Google Scholar | |
|
Downes, T. (2004). School finance reform and school quality: Lessons from Vermont. In Yinger, J. (Ed.), Helping children left behind: State aid and the pursuit of educational equity (pp. 283-313). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Downes, T. A., Figlio, D. N. (1997). School finance reforms, tax limits and student performance: Do reforms level up or dumb down (Discussion Paper no. 1142-97). Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty. Google Scholar | |
|
Downes, T. A., Shah, M. P. (2006). The effect of school finance reforms on the level and growth of per-pupil expenditures. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(3), 1-38. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Duncombe, W., Yinger, J. (1997). Why is it so hard to help central city schools? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16, 85-113. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Duncombe, W., Yinger, J. (1998). School finance reform: Aid formulas and equity objectives. National Tax Journal, 51, 239-262. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Duncombe, W. D., Johnston, J. (1998). Balancing conflicting policy objectives: The case of school finance reform. Public Administration Review, 58, 145-158. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Duncombe, W. D., Johnston, J. (2004). The impacts of school finance reform in Kansas: Equity is in the eye of the beholder. In Yinger, J. (Ed.), Helping children left behind: State aid and the pursuit of educational equity (pp.147-187). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Evans, W. N., Murray, S. E., Schwab, R. M. (1997). Schoolhouses, courthouses, and statehouses after Serrano. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16, 10-31. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Evans, W. N., Murray, S. E., Schwab, R. M. (1999). The impact of court-mandated school finance reform. In Ladd, H. F., Chalk, R., Hansen, J. S. (Eds.), Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives (pp. 72-98). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Figlio, D. N. (2004). Funding and accountability: Some conceptual and technical issues in state aid reform. In Yinger, J. (Ed.), Helping children left behind: State aid and the pursuit of educational equity (pp. 87-110). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Flanagan, A., Murray, S. (2004). A decade of reform: The impact of school reform in Kentucky. In Yinger, J. (Ed.), Helping children left behind: State aid and the pursuit of educational equity (pp. 59-85). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Goertz, M. E., Edwards, M. (1999). In search of excellence for all: The courts and New Jersey school finance reform. Journal of Education Finance, 25, 5-32. Google Scholar | |
|
Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141-1177. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Hanushek, E. A. (1996). A more complete picture of school resource policies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 397-409. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Hoxby, C. M. (2001). All school finance equalizations are not created equal. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1189-1231. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Huang, Y. (2004). A guide to state operating aid programs for elementary and secondary education. In Yinger, J. (Ed.), Helping children left behind: State aid and the pursuit of educational equity (pp. 331-352). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Imazeki, J., Reschovsky, A. (2004). School finance reform in Texas: A never ending story? In Yinger, J. (Ed.), Helping children left behind: State aid and the pursuit of educational equity (pp. 251-281). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Krueger, A. B. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 497-532. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Maryland Department of Legislative Services . (2002). The bridge to excellence in Public Schools Act of 2002: Its origin, components, and future. Annapolis, MD: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Murray, S. E., Evans, W. N., Schwab, R. M. (1998). Education-finance reform and the distribution of education resources. American Economic Review, 88, 789-812. Google Scholar | |
|
Neymotin, F. (2010). The relationship between school funding and student achievement in Kansas public schools. Journal of Education Finance, 36, 88-108. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Papke, L. E. (2005). The effects of spending on test pass rates: Evidence from Michigan. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 821-839. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Papke, L. E. (2008). The effects of changes in Michigan’s school finance system. Public Finance Review, 36, 456-474. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Roy, J. (2011). Impact of school finance reform on resource equalization and academic performance: Evidence from Michigan. Education Finance and Policy, 6, 137-167. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Saunders, T. (2004). Settling without “settling”: School finance litigation and governance reform in Maryland. Yale Law & Policy Review, 22, 571-614. Google Scholar | |
|
Schmidt, S. J., Scott, K. (2006). Reforming reforms: Changing incentives in education finance in Vermont. Education Finance and Policy, 4, 441-464. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Yinger, J. (2004). Helping children left behind: State aid and the pursuit of educational equity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar |
Author Biography
Il Hwan Chung is an assistant professor at School of Public Affairs in Baruch College, CUNY. His research interests include education policy, and public budgeting and finance.
