School district–university research collaborations represent one strategy to increase educators’ ability to use current, research-based information in program decision making and efforts to improve student achievement. However, differences in organizational structures, goals, values, and prior collaborative experiences have made successful school–university research partnerships challenging. This project intentionally structured and examined a mutually beneficial research collaboration between one small urban university with a significant percentage of first-generation college-going students and two local school districts (P-12) to examine high school math achievement and subsequent college math success. One partnership successfully conducted the study and identified actions to increase student success. The other was successful only to the point of partial data collection. This article describes the structures, mechanisms, and conditions that led to the successful partnership and compares them with the unsuccessful one. It contributes to our understanding of developing effective, mutually beneficial school–university research collaborations to improve student outcomes.

Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Google Scholar
Adelman, C. (2004). Principal indicators of student academic histories in postsecondary education, 1972-2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Google Scholar
Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/print/rschstat/research/pubs/toolboxrevisit/index.html
Google Scholar
Adelman, C., Danie, B., Berkovits, I. (2003). Postsecondary attainment, attendance, curriculum and performance: Selected results from the NELS:88/2000 postsecondary education transcript study (PETS) 2000. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Google Scholar
Attewell, P., Lavin, D., Domina, T., Levey, T. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 886-924.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Barton, R., Nelsestuen, K., Mazzeo, C. (2014). Addressing the challenges of building and maintaining effective research partnerships. Lessons Learned, 4(1), 1-6.
Google Scholar
Calcagno, J. C., Long, B. T. (2008). The impact of postsecondary remediation using a regression discontinuity approach: Addressing endogenous sorting and noncompliance (No. w14194). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Chen, X. (2016). Remedial coursetaking at US public 2-and 4-year institutions: Scope, experiences, and outcomes (Statistical Analysis Report, NCES 2016-405). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Google Scholar
Coburn, C. E., Bae, S., Turner, E. O. (2008). Authority, status, and the dynamics of insider-outsider partnership at the district level. Peabody Journal of Education, 83, 364-399. doi:10.1080/01619560802222350
Google Scholar | Crossref
Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research-practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45, 48-54. doi:10.3102/0013189X16631750
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W. R., Geil, K. E. (2013). Research-practice partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts. New York, NY: William T. Grant Foundation.
Google Scholar
Dallmer, D. (2004). Collaborative relationships in teacher education: A personal narrative of conflicting roles. Curriculum Inquiry, 34, 29-45.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Easton, J. (2010). Director’s final proposed priorities for the Institute of Education Sciences. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/director/board/priorities.asp
Google Scholar
Easton, J. (2014). Commentary on the uses of research in policy and practice. Social Policy Report, 26(2), 19-20.
Google Scholar
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, N. (2001). One blueprint for bridging the gap: Project PROMISE: (Practitioners and Researchers Orchestrating Model Innovations to Strengthen Education). Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 304-314.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Gersten, R., Smith-Johnson, J. (2001). Reflections on the research to practice gap. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 356-361.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hamilton, L., Halverson, R., Jackson, S., Mandinach, E., Supovitz, J., Wayman, J. (2009). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making (NCEE 2009-4067). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practice_guides/dddm_pg_092909.pdf
Google Scholar
Honig, M. I., Coburn, C. E. (2008). Evidence-based decision making in school district central offices: Toward a policy and research agenda. Educational Policy, 22(4), 578-608.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Jorgensen, D. L. (2015). Participant observation. In Scott, R. A., Kosslyn, S. M. (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource (pp. 1-15). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781118900772
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lee, J. (2012). College for all: Gaps between desirable and actual P-12 math achievement trajectories for college readiness. Educational Researcher, 41, 43-55. doi:10.3102/0013189X11432746
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Lefever-Davis, S., Johnson, C., Pearman, C. (2007). Two sides of a partnership: Egalitarianism and empowerment in school-university partnerships. The Journal of Educational Research, 100, 204-210. doi:10.3200/JOER.100.4.204-210
Google Scholar | Crossref
Levin, B. (2013). To know is not enough: Research knowledge and its use. Review of Education, 1(1), 2-31. doi:10.1002/rev3.3001
Google Scholar | Crossref
Martorell, P., McFarlin, I. (2011). Help or hindrance? The effects of college remediation on academic and labor market outcomes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 436-454.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
McIntyre, D. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35, 357-382. doi:10.1080/03057640500319065
Google Scholar | Crossref
New Jersey Department of Education (2006). Your guide to the HSPA. Retrieved from http://www.nj.gov/education/assessment/hs/hspa_guide_english.pdf
Google Scholar
New Jersey Department of Education . (2014). UPDATED: Grauation requirements for the classes of 2016, 2017, and 2018. Retrieved from http://www.state.nj.us/education/intervention/memos/120214grad.pdf
Google Scholar
Norman, K., Medhanie, A., Harwell, M., Anderson, E., Post, T. (2011). High school mathematics curricula, university mathematics placement recommendations, and student university mathematics performance. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies (PRIMUS), 21, 434-455. doi:10.1080/10511970903261902
Google Scholar | Crossref
Osajima, K. (1989). Building school-university partnerships: Subjectivity, power, and the process of change. The Urban Review, 21, 111-125.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Penuel, W., Allen, A., Coburn, C., Farrell, C. (2015). Conceptualizing research–practice partnerships and joint work at boundaries. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 20, 182-197. doi:10.1080/10824669.2014.988334
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Roderick, M., Easton, J. Q., Sebring, P. B. (2009). Consortium on Chicago School Research: A new model for the role of research in supporting urban school reform. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research, University of Chicago.
Google Scholar
Rosenquist, B., Henrick, E., Smith, T. (2015). Research-practice partnerships to support the development of high quality mathematics instruction for all students. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 20, 42-57. doi:10.1080/10824669.2014.988335
Google Scholar | Crossref
Scott-Clayton, J. (2012). Do high-stakes placement exams predict college success? CCRC Working Paper No. 41, Community College Research Center, Columbia University.
Google Scholar
Scott-Clayton, J., Crosta, P. M., Belfield, C. R. (2014). Improving the targeting of treatment: Evidence from college remediation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(3), 371-393.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Scott-Clayton, J., Rodriguez, O. (2014). Development, discouragement, or diversion? New evidence on the effects of college remediation policy. Education Finance and Policy.
Google Scholar
Tseng, V. (2012). The uses of research in policy and practice. Social Policy Report, 26(2), 3-19.
Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education . (2009, November). Race to the top program executive summary. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf3/28/2016
Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education . (2016). News from the Regional Educational Laboratories. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/
Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education . (2002). No Child Left Behind: A desktop reference. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/nclbreference/reference.pdf
Google Scholar
Villavicencio, A., Bhattacharya, D., Guidry, B. (2013). Moving the needle: Exploring key levers to boost college readiness among Black and Latino males in New York City. New York: New York University, The Research Alliance for New York City Schools.
Google Scholar
Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13-22.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Wilkins, C., Hartman, J., Howland, N., Sharma, N. (2010). How prepared are students for college-level reading? Applying a Lexile®-based approach (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2010-No. 094). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
Google Scholar

Author Biography

Jenifer J. Hartman was a K-12 school and district leader/administrator for 15 years and an education researcher for 5 years prior to accepting a tenure-track faculty position. She has been an assistant professor for several years—first, at New Jersey City University and now at University of South Florida St. Petersburg.

View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

EUS-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in:

Related Articles

Citing articles: 0