Abstract
A two-step process is commonly used to evaluate data–model fit of latent variable path models, the first step addressing the measurement portion of the model and the second addressing the structural portion of the model. Unfortunately, even if the fit of the measurement portion of the model is perfect, the ability to assess the fit within the structural portion is affected by the quality of the factor–variable relations within the measurement model. The result is that models with poorer quality measurement appear to have better data–model fit, whereas models with better quality measurement appear to have worse data–model fit. The current article illustrates this phenomenon across different classes of fit indices, discusses related structural assessment problems resulting from issues of measurement quality, and endorses a supplemental modeling step evaluating the structural portion of the model in isolation from the measurement model.
|
Anderson, J.C. , & Gerbing, D.W. ( 1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Bentler, P.M. ( 1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Bentler, P.M. ( 2006). EQS structural equation program. Los Angeles, CA: Multivariate Software. Google Scholar | |
|
Bollen, K.A. ( 1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Bollen, K.A. ( 1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 256-259. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Browne, M.W. , MacCallum, R.C. , Kim, C.-T. , Andersen, B.L. , & Glaser, R. ( 2002). When fit indices and residuals are incompatible. Psychological Methods, 7, 403-421. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Hancock, G.R. ( 1999). A sequential Scheffé-type respecification procedure for controlling Type I error in exploratory structural equation model modification . Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal , 6, 158-168. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hancock, G.R. , & Mueller, R.O. ( 2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck , S. du Toit , & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future-A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195-216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International. Google Scholar | |
|
Hertzog, C. , Lindenberger, U. , Ghisletta, P. , & von Oertzen, T. (2006). On the power of multivariate latent growth curve models to detect correlated change. Psychological Methods, 11, 244-252. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Hu, L. , & Bentler, P.M. ( 1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Jöreskog, K.G. , & Sörbom, D. (1986). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software. Google Scholar | |
|
MacCallum, R.C. , Widaman, K.F. , Zhang, S. , & Hong, S. ( 1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Marsh, H.W. , Balla, J.R. , & McDonald, R.P. (1988). Goodness of fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
McDonald, R.P. , & Ho, M.R. ( 2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Steiger, J.H. , & Lind, J.C. ( 1980, May). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometric Society annual meeting, Iowa City, IA. Google Scholar | |
|
Tomarken, A.J. , & Waller, N.G. ( 2003). Potential problems with ‘‘well-fitting’’ models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 578-598. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
