A two-step process is commonly used to evaluate data–model fit of latent variable path models, the first step addressing the measurement portion of the model and the second addressing the structural portion of the model. Unfortunately, even if the fit of the measurement portion of the model is perfect, the ability to assess the fit within the structural portion is affected by the quality of the factor–variable relations within the measurement model. The result is that models with poorer quality measurement appear to have better data–model fit, whereas models with better quality measurement appear to have worse data–model fit. The current article illustrates this phenomenon across different classes of fit indices, discusses related structural assessment problems resulting from issues of measurement quality, and endorses a supplemental modeling step evaluating the structural portion of the model in isolation from the measurement model.

Anderson, J.C. , & Gerbing, D.W. ( 1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bentler, P.M. ( 1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Bentler, P.M. ( 2006). EQS structural equation program. Los Angeles, CA: Multivariate Software.
Google Scholar
Bollen, K.A. ( 1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bollen, K.A. ( 1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 256-259.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Browne, M.W. , MacCallum, R.C. , Kim, C.-T. , Andersen, B.L. , & Glaser, R. ( 2002). When fit indices and residuals are incompatible. Psychological Methods, 7, 403-421.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Hancock, G.R. ( 1999). A sequential Scheffé-type respecification procedure for controlling Type I error in exploratory structural equation model modification . Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal , 6, 158-168.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hancock, G.R. , & Mueller, R.O. ( 2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck , S. du Toit , & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future-A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195-216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Google Scholar
Hertzog, C. , Lindenberger, U. , Ghisletta, P. , & von Oertzen, T. (2006). On the power of multivariate latent growth curve models to detect correlated change. Psychological Methods, 11, 244-252.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Hu, L. , & Bentler, P.M. ( 1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jöreskog, K.G. , & Sörbom, D. (1986). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
Google Scholar
MacCallum, R.C. , Widaman, K.F. , Zhang, S. , & Hong, S. ( 1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Marsh, H.W. , Balla, J.R. , & McDonald, R.P. (1988). Goodness of fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
McDonald, R.P. , & Ho, M.R. ( 2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Steiger, J.H. , & Lind, J.C. ( 1980, May). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometric Society annual meeting, Iowa City, IA.
Google Scholar
Tomarken, A.J. , & Waller, N.G. ( 2003). Potential problems with ‘‘well-fitting’’ models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 578-598.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

Your Access Options


Purchase

EPM-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $323.77

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top