Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online November 30, 2017

Normative Influences on Adolescents’ Self-Reported Pro-Environmental Behaviors: The Role of Parents and Friends

Abstract

Pro-environmental behavioral patterns are influenced by relevant others’ actions and expectations. Studies about the intergenerational transmission of environmentalism have demonstrated that parents play a major role in their children’s pro-environmental actions. However, little is known about how other social agents may shape youth’s environmentalism. This cross-sectional study concentrates on the role that parents and peers have in the regulation of 12- to 19-year-olds’ pro-environmental behaviors. We also consider the common response bias effect by examining the associations between parents, peers, and adolescents’ pro-environmentalism in two independent data sets. Data Set 1 (N = 330) includes adolescents’ perceptions of relevant others’ behaviors. Data Set 2 (N = 152) includes relevant others’ self-reported pro-environmental behavior. Our results show that parents’ and peers’ descriptive and injunctive norms have a direct effect on adolescents’ pro-environmental behavior and an indirect one, through personal norms. Adolescents seem to be accurate in the perception of their close ones’ environmental actions.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Aarts H., Dijksterhuis A. (2003). The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 18-28.
Ajzen I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
Ajzen I. (2017). The theory of planned behavior. Retrieved from http://people.umass.edu/aizen/faq.html
Ajzen I., Fishbein M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Arnett J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Baker C. W., Little T. D., Brownell K. D. (2003). Predicting adolescent eating and activity behaviors: The role of social norms and personal agency. Health Psychology, 22, 189-198.
Ball K., Jeffery R. W., Abbott G., McNaughton S. A., Crawford D. (2010). Is healthy behavior contagious: Associations of social norms with physical activity and healthy eating. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7, Article 86.
Bamberg S., Hunecke M., Blöbaum A. (2007). Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 190-203.
Bamberg S., Möser G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25.
Bandura A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura A. (1997). Self efficacy. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
Bollen K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Borsari M. S., Carey K. B. (2003). Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 64, 331-341.
Bratt C. (1999). The impact of norms and assumed consequences on recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, 31, 630-656.
Bronfenbrenner U., Evans G. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Social Development, 9, 115-135.
Casaló L. V., Escario J. J. (2016). Intergenerational association of environmental concern: Evidence of parents’ and children’s concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 65-74.
Chawla L. (2009). Growing up green: Becoming an agent of care for the natural world. The Journal of Developmental Processes, 4, 6-23.
Chawla L., Derr V. (2012). The development of conservation behaviors in childhood and youth. In Clayton S. D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 527-555). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cheng J. C., Monroe M. C. (2012). Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44, 31-49.
Cialdini R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Cialdini R. B., Goldstein N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621.
Cialdini R. B., Reno R. R., Kallgren C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and re-evaluation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234.
Cialdini R. B., Trost M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In Gilbert D., Fiske S., Lindzey G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151-192). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Cialdini R. B., Trost M. R., Newsom J. T. (1995). Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 318-328.
Corraliza J. A., Collado S., Bethelmy L. (2013). Spanish version of the New Ecological Paradigm Scale for children. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, 1-8.
De Mol J., Buysse A. (2008). The phenomenology of children’s influence on parents. Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 163-193.
Duarte R., Escario J. J., Sanagustín M. V. (2017). The influence of the family, the school, and the group on the environmental attitudes of European students. Environmental Education Research, 23, 23-42.
Dunlap R., Van Liere K. (1978). The new environmental paradigm. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
Dunlap R., Van Liere K., Mertig A., Jones R. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
Falk A., Zimmermann F. (2013). A taste of consistency and survey response behavior. CESifo Economic Studies, 59, 181-193.
Festinger L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Fishbein M., Ajzen I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Gardner M., Steinberg L. (2005). Peer influence on risk talking, risk preference, and risk decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41, 625-635.
Göckeritz S., Schultz P. W., Rendon T., Cialdini R., Goldstein N., Griskevicius V. (2010). Descriptive normative beliefs and conservation behavior: The moderating roles of personal involvement and injunctive normative beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 514-523.
Gotschi E., Vogel S., Lindenthal T., Larcher M. (2010). The role of knowledge, social norms, and attitudes toward organic products and shopping behavior: Survey results from high school students in Vienna. The Journal of Environmental Education, 41, 88-100.
Grodzinska-Jurczark M., Bartosiewicz A., Twardowska A. (2003). Evaluating the impact of school waste education programme upon students’, parents’ and teachers’ environmental knowledge, attitudes and behavior. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 12, 106-122.
Grønhøj A., Thøgersen J. (2009). Like father, like son? Intergenerational transmission of values, attitudes, and behaviours in the environmental domain. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 414-421.
Grønhøj A., Thøgersen J. (2012). Action speaks louder than words: The effect of personal attitudes and family norms on adolescents’ pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 292-302.
Harland P., Staats H., Wilke M. (1999). Explaining pro-environmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2505-2528.
Harland P., Staats H., Wilke M. (2007). Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior: Questions derived from norm-activation theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 323-334.
Hu L., Bentler P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
Hussar K., Horvath J. (2011). Do children play fair with nature? Understanding children’s judgments of environmentally harmful actions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 309-313.
Kahn P. H. (1997). Children’s moral and ecological reasoning about the Prince William Sound oil spill. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1091-1096.
Kahn P. H., Lourenco O. (2002). Water, air, fire, and earth: A developmental study in Portugal of environmental moral reasoning. Environment and Behavior, 34, 405-430.
Kaiser F., Hübner G., Bogner F. (2005). Contrasting the theory of planned behavior with the value-belief-norm model in explaining conservation behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2150-2170.
Kallgren C. A., Reno R. R., Cialdini R. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002-1012.
Kline R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York, NY: Guilford.
Kohlberg L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages (Essays on Moral Development, Vol. 2). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Lamb M. E. (2000). The history of research on father involvement. Marriage and Family Review, 29, 23-42.
Maccoby E. (1992). The role of parents in the socialization of children: An historical review. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1006-1017.
Maccoby E. E. (2007). Historical overview of socialization research and theory. In Grusec J. E., Hastings P. D. (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 13-41). New York, NY: Guilford.
Maganto J.-M., Bartau I., Etxeberría J. (2004). Family co-responsibility programme (COFAMI): How to promote children’s cooperation and responsibility. Infancia Y Aprendizaje, 27, 417-423.
Matthies E., Selge S., Klöckner C. (2012). The role of parental behavior for the development of behavior specific environmental norms: The example of recycling and re-use behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 277-284.
Meeusen C. (2014). The intergenerational transmission of environmental concern: The influence of parents and communication patterns within the family. Journal of Environmental Education, 45, 77-90.
Mullen B., Hu L. (1988). Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: Two meta-analytic integrations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 333-356.
Musick K., Seltzer J. A., Schwartz C. R. (2007). Neighborhood norms and substance use among teens. Social Science Research, 37, 138-155.
Park W. (1977). Students and housewives: Differences in susceptibility to reference group influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 102-111.
Perkins H. W., Linkenbach J. W., Lewis M. A., Neighbors C. (2010). Effectiveness of social norms media marketing in reducing drinking and driving: A statewide campaign. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 866-874.
Perkins W. (2002). Social norms and the prevention of alcohol misuse in collegiate contexts. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 14, 164-172.
Piaget J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Prentice D. A., Miller D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243-256.
Rickinson M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education. Environmental Research, 7, 207-320.
Rogoff B., Paradise R., Arauz R. M., Correa-Chavez M., Angelillo C. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 175-203.
Rubin K. H., Bukowski W. M., Laursen B. (2009). Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. New York, NY: Guilford.
Schultz P. W., Kaiser F. (2012). Promoting pro-environmental behavior. In Clayton S. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 556-580). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Schwartz S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Schwartz S. H., Howard J. A. (1984). Internalized values as motivators of altruism. In Staub E., Bar-Tal D., Karylowski J., Reykowski J. (Eds.), Development and maintenance of prosocial behavior (pp. 229-255). New York, NY: Plenum.
Smith-McLallen A., Fishbein M. (2008). Predictors of intentions to perform six cancer-related behaviors: Roles for injunctive and descriptive norms. Psychology, Health, & Medicine, 13, 389-401.
Sobel D. (2008). Childhood and nature. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
Staats H. (2003). Understanding proenvironmental attitudes and behavior: An analysis and review of research based on the theory of planned behavior. In Bonnes M., Lee T., Bonaiuto M. (Eds.), Psychological theories for environmental issues (pp. 171-201). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Staats H., Jansen L., Thøgersen J. (2011). Greening the greenhouse grower: A behavioral analysis of a sector-initiated system to reduce the environmental load of greenhouses. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2461-2469.
Stern P. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.
Tanaka J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In Bollen K. A. (Ed.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Thøgersen J. (1996). Recycling and morality: A critical review of the literature. Environment and Behavior, 28, 536-558.
Thøgersen J. (2004). A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 93-103.
Thøgersen J. (2006). Norms for environmentally responsible behavior: An extended taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 247-261.
Tucker L. R., Lewis C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
Ullman J. B. (1996). Structural equation modeling. In Tabachnick B., Fidell L. (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed., pp. 709-812). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Vesely S., Klöckner C. (2018). Global social norms and environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 50, 247-272.
Wells N., Lekies K. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16, 2-25.
Wenzel M. (2005). Misperceptions of social norms about tax compliance: From theory to intervention. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 862-883.
Zint M. (2012). Advancing environmental program evaluation: Insights from a review of behavioral outcome variables. In Dillon A. Walls, Brody M., Stevenson B. (Eds.), International handbook of research in environmental education (pp. 298-309). Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.

Biographies

Silvia Collado is an assistant professor at the Department of Psychology and Sociology of University of Zaragoza. She is interested in the study of the restorative effects of natural and built environments, environmental preferences, and the factors shaping the development and change of environmental behaviors.
Henk Staats teaches environmental and social psychology at the Department of Social and Organizational Psychology of Leiden University. His research interests include environmental preferences, psychological restoration, proxemics, and the analysis and change of pro-environmental behavior.
Patricia Sancho is an assistant professor at the Department of Psychology and Sociology of University of Zaragoza. She holds a PhD in psychology and an MA in health and social care in dependency and clinical psychology. Main lines of research are quality of life, structural equation models, and psychometrics.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: November 30, 2017
Issue published: April 2019

Keywords

  1. social norms
  2. personal norms
  3. misperception of norms
  4. primary and secondary socialization
  5. pro-environmental behavior

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2017.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Silvia Collado
Henk Staats
Leiden University, The Netherlands
Patricia Sancho
University of Zaragoza, Spain

Notes

Silvia Collado, Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Ciudad Escolar, 44003 Teruel, Spain. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Environment and Behavior.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 3825

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 61 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 61

  1. Pro-environmental behavior, personality and emotional intelligence in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. RESCUER: Combining Passive and Active Learning Techniques to Teach Foo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The effectiveness of social norms in promoting green consumption
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Using an extended model of the reasoned action approach to explore ind...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Intergenerational transmission of pro-environmental behaviors: do gran...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Waste separation behavior with a new plastic category for the plastic ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Are we on the same page? Exploring the relationships between environme...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. ‘Listen to me!’: Young people’s experiences of talking about emotional...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Family congruence in sustainability attitudes and behaviour; an analys...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Can adolescents' subjective wellbeing facilitate their pro-environment...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Conservation Officers’ Perceptions of Their Working Conditions and The...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Transforming consumption: The role of values, beliefs, and norms in pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Teaching and environmentalism: a deduction from values, beliefs and no...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. A Panel Study of the Relationships Between Social Media Interactions a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Social norms and tourists’ pro-environmental behaviors: Do ethical eva...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Expert Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Students’ Environmental Literacy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Green teens: Understanding and promoting adolescents’ sustainable enga...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Reducing Plastic Pollution Using Norms Perspective: Integration of Mor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. The intergenerational transmission of nature relatedness predicts gree...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. From concern to behavior: barriers and enablers of adolescents’ pro-en...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Exploring the pro-environmental behavioral intention of Generation Z i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. The Role of Social Norms and Personal Costs on Pro-Environmental Behav...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Dark Sides of Consumption: How Consumers Trick and Deceive
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Designing learning environments for promoting young people’s construct...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. A meta-analysis of antecedents of pro-environmental behavioral intenti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Interactive effects of two-way information and perceived convenience o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Education for sustainable development in physical education: Program d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Why do young people do things for the environment? The effect of perce...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Local Residents Becoming Local Tourists: Value Co-Creation in Chinese ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. The Food Waste Lab: Improving food waste reduction behavior through ed...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Key Aspects of Adolescents’ Environmental Attitudes with a View to Tra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Differential impact of prescriptive norms in the intergenerational tra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Will “Green” Parents Have “Green” Children? The Relationship Between P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Multilevel Evidence for the Parent-Adolescent Dyadic Effect of Familia...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Children sustainable behaviour: A review and research agenda
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Innovation for environmental sustainability: longitudinal effects of a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Determinants of Proactive Low-Carbon Consumption Behaviors: Insights f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Effects of social and personal norms, and connectedness to nature, on ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Science literacy promotes energy conservation behaviors in Filipino yo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Parental Participation in the Environment: Scale Validation Across Par...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Social Responsibility Facilitates the Intergenerational Transmission o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. My Parents Taught…Green Was My Growth! The Role of Intergenerational T...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Climate strike or not? Intersectionality of age and culture encountere...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Factors associated with nature connectedness in school-aged children
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. The developmental roots of environmental stewardship: Childhood and th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Understanding Change in Social‐Movement Participation: The Roles of So...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Collective Public Commitment: Young People on the Path to a More Susta...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Children and Youth Environmental Action: The Case of Children and Yout...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. The Role of Family in the Intergenerational Transmission of Collective...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Intergenerational influence on sustainable consumer attitudes and beha...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. What drives pro-environmental activism of young people? A survey study...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. What prevents us from taking low-carbon actions? A comprehensive revie...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Mass-participant sport events and sustainable development: gender, soc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Sustainability in Youth: Environmental Considerations in Adolescence a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Contingent effects of social norms on tourists’ pro-environmental beha...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Influence of Air Quality on Pro-environmental Behavior of Chinese Resi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. How does soil pollution risk perception affect farmers' pro-environmen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Dunkle Seiten des Konsums: Wie Verbraucher tricksen und täuschen
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Young People’s Coping Strategies Concerning Climate Change: Relations ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. A new perspective to promote low-carbon consumption: The influence of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Green teens: Investigating the role of emotional intelligence in adole...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text