![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Administrative capacity depends on the nature of the state of which the administrative system is an integral part. In recent years, there has been a revival of debates on the role of public administration under developmental states in Southeast Asia and Latin America. A major analytical component of developmental states has been their administrative capacity and how to build it. There are significant variations in administrative capacity among developmental states caused by divergences in their historical, economic, political, and cultural contexts. This article compares two cross-continental cases (Singapore and Chile) with regard to the formations of developmental states shaping their administrative systems and capacity-building initiatives. It examines the divergences in their state formations and the contextual factors affecting their administrative capacity. The article concludes by making some generalizations, offering an analytical framework for further research, and suggesting policies needed for building effective administrative capacity.
Points for practitioners
This article highlights the significance of administrative capacity-building for development. It explores how this capacity is shaped by the formation of the state under which public administration functions. In explaining this relationship between state formation and public administration, the article specifically focuses on the “developmental” state, compares two cross-continental cases (Singapore and Chile) as regards how these two developmental states differ and cause variations in their administrative systems, and explains the major contextual factors leading to such variations. This understanding is crucial to designing effective policies for building administrative capacity in any country depending on its state formation and context.
References
| Ahrens, J and, Stark, M (2014) Emulating developmental states? The institutional foundations of economic transition in Kazakhstan. Critique Internationale 2(63): 95–110. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Amsden, A (1989) Asia’s Next Giant. South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Bellows, TJ ( 1985) Bureaucracy and development in Singapore. Asian Journal of Public Administration 7(1): 55–69. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Bishop, L, Payne, A (2018) Introduction: Why revisit the developmental state? In: Bishop ML, Payne A, Sen K, et al. (eds) Revisiting the Developmental State. SPERI Paper No. 43. Sheffield: Sheffield Political Economy Institute, pp. 2–4. Google Scholar | |
| Block, F and, Negoita, M (2016) Beyond embedded autonomy: Conceptualizing the work of developmental states. In: Chu, Y-w (ed.) The Asian Developmental State: Reexaminations and New Departures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 57–72. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Cardenas, M. (2010) State Capacity in Latin America. Working paper, April. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Google Scholar | |
| Cardoso, FH, Faletto, E (1979) Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Castells, M (1992) Four Asian tigers with a dragon head. In: Appelbaum, RP, Henderson, J (eds) States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim. London: Sage, pp. 33–70. Google Scholar | |
| Centeno, MA, Kohli, A, Yashar, DJ, et al. (eds) (2017) States in the Developing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Chan, HC (1975) Politics in an administrative state: Where has the politics gone? In: Meow, SC (ed.) Trends in Singapore. Singapore: Singapore University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Cheung, ABL ( 2005) The politics of administrative reforms in Asia: Paradigms and legacies, paths and diversities. Governance 18(2): 257–282. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Cornell University, INSEAD (INStitut Européen d'ADministration des affaires), and WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) (2019) The Global Innovation Index 2019.
Geneva:
World Intellectual Property Organization. Google Scholar | |
| De Gregorio, J (2004) Economic Growth in Chile: Evidence, Sources and Prospects. Working Paper No. 298. Santiago, Chile: Central Bank of Chile. Google Scholar | |
| Edwards, S, Lederman, D (1998) The Political Economy of Unilateral Trade Liberalization: The Case of Chile. No. w6510. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| El-Taliawi, OG, Van Der Wal, Z (2019) Developing administrative capacity: An agenda for research and practice. Policy Design and Practice 2(3): 243–257. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| EROPA (Eastern Regional Organization for Public Administration) (2004) Civil Service Systems in the AEAN Region: A Comparative Perspective.
Quezon City, Philippines:
Eastern Regional Organization for Public Administration. Google Scholar | |
| Evans, P (1995) Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Farazmand, A ( 2002) Privatization and globalization: A critical analysis with implications for public management education and training. International Review of Administrative Sciences 68(3): 355–371. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Fritzen, SA ( 2007) Discipline and democratize: Patterns of bureaucratic accountability in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Public Administration 30(12–14): 1435–1457. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Gonzalez, ET, Mendoza, ML (2009) Governance in Southeast Asia: Issues and Options. Minal: Philippine Institute for Development Studies. Google Scholar | |
| Haggard, S ( 2018) Developmental States (Elements in the Politics of Development). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Hamilton-Hart, N (2000) The Singapore state revisited. Pacific Review 13(2): 195–216. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Huff, WG (1999) Turing the corner in Singapore’s developmental state? Asian Survey 39(2): 214–242. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Johnson, C (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Johnson, CA (1995) Japan, Who Governs? The Rise of the Developmental State. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company. Google Scholar | |
| Jones, DM ( 2007) The Southeast Asian development model: Neo-liberal democracy with market accountability. Southeast Asian Affairs No. SEAA07h: 59–76. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Kasahara, S (2013) The Asian Developmental State and the Flying Geese Paradigm. Discussion Papers No. 213. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Google Scholar | |
| Kim, CK ( 2008) Public administration in the age of globalization. International Public Management Review 9(1): 39–54. Google Scholar | |
| Kingstone, P ( 2011) The Political Economy of Latin America. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Koh, G (1997) Bureaucratic rationality in an evolving developmental state: Challenges to governance in Singapore. Asian Journal of Political Science 5(2): 114–141. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| KPMG (2017) 2017 Change Readiness Index: Assessing Countries’ Ability to Manage Change and Cultivate Opportunity.
Amstelveen, Netherlands:
KPMG International. Google Scholar | |
| KPMG (2019) 2019 Change Readiness Index: Assessing Countries’ Ability to Manage Change and Build a Climate-Ready Future.
Amstelveen, Netherlands:
KPMG International. Google Scholar | |
| Lee E, WY (2001) Public sector reform and the changing state form: Comparing Hong Kong and Singapore. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association’s 97th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, August 30–September 2. Google Scholar | |
| Lim, SG (2005) Leadership in the public service: Changing role of senior public officials in governance. Paper presented at the 6th Global Forum on Reinventing Government, Seoul, Republic of Korea, May 26. Google Scholar | |
| Liow, ED (2012) The neoliberal-developmental state: Singapore as case-study. Critical Sociology 38(2): 241--264. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Low, L, Haggard, S (2000) State, politics and business in Singapore. Working Paper Series, No. 2000-037, Department of Business Policy, National University of Singapore. Google Scholar | |
| Negoita, M, Block, F (2012) Networks and public policies in the Global South: The Chilean case and the future of the developmental network state. Studies in Comparative International Development 47(1): 1–22. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Nitsch, M, Schwarzer, H (1996) Recent Developments in Financing Social Security in Latin America. Discussion Paper No. 1. Geneva: Social Security Department, ILO. Google Scholar | |
| Olavarría-Gambi, M, Dockendorff, A (2015) Policy diffusion: Analysis of Chile’s administrative reform. Paper presented at the International Conference on Public Policy, Milan, Italy, July 1–4. Google Scholar | |
| Peeters, R, Trujillo Jimenez, H, O’Connor, E et al. (2018) Low-trust bureaucracy: Understanding the Mexican bureaucratic experience. Public Administration and Development 38(2): 65–74. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Prebisch, R ( 1950) The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. Economic Bulletin for Latin America 1: 1–12. Google Scholar | |
| Ramesh, M ( 1995) Economic globalization and policy choices: Singapore. Governance 8(2): 243–260. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Reid, GJ and, Scott, G (1994) Public sector human resource management in Latin America and the Caribbean. In: Chaudhry, SA, Reid, GJ, Malik, WH (eds) Civil Service Reform in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Bank Technical Paper No. 259. Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 39–81. Google Scholar | |
| Ricz, J (2015) Redefining developmental states: Experiences and lessons from East Asian and Latin American development models. Paper presented at the First World Congress of Comparative Economics, Rome, June 25–27. Google Scholar | |
| Roberts, A (2018) Strategies for governing: An approach to public management research for West and East. Korean Journal of Policy Studies 33(1): 1–24. Google Scholar | |
| Roberts, KM ( 2014) The politics of inequality and redistribution in Latin America’s post-adjustment era. In: Cornia, GA (ed.) Falling Inequality in Latin America. Policy Changes and Lessons. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Schneider, BR (1999) The Desarrollista state in Brazil and Mexico. In: Woo-Cumings, M (ed.) The Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 276–305. Google Scholar | |
| Silva, P (2000) State Capacity, Technocratic Insulation, and Government–Business Relations in South Korea and Chile. Santiago, Chile: FLACSO-Chile. Google Scholar | |
| Singh, JN, Ovadia, JS (2018) The theory and practice of building developmental states in the Global South. Third World Quarterly 39(6): 1033–1055. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Skocpol, T, Evans, P, Rueschemeyer, D (1985) Bringing the State Back In. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Soifer, H (2008) State infrastructural power: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development 43: 231–251. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Solimano, A (2009) Three Decades of Neoliberal Economics in Chile: Achievements, Failures and Dilemmas. Research Paper No. 2009/37. Helsinki, Finland: UN University World Institute for Development Economics Research. Google Scholar | |
| Tay, J (1999) Public service reforms in Singapore. New York: Management Development and Governance Division, UN Development Programme. Google Scholar | |
| Tendler, J (1997) Good Government in the Tropics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Turner, M ( 2002) Choosing items from the menu: New Public Management in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Public Administration 25(12): 1493–1512. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| UNDP (United Nations Development Programme ) (2019) Human Development Report 2019.
New York, NY:
United Nations Development Programme. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| United Nations (1999) Privatization in Latin America in the Early 1990s.
New York, NY:
Division for Public Economics and Public Administration, United Nations. Google Scholar | |
| Vom Hau, M (2012) State Capacity and Inclusive Development: New Challenges and Directions. Effective States and Inclusive Development Research Centre (ESID) Working Paper No. 02. Manchester: University of Manchester. Google Scholar | |
| Wade, RH ( 2018) The developmental state: Dead or alive? Development and Change 49(2): 518–546. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Whittle, SCA, Rafferty, M (2012) Capacity Building: What the Literature Tells Us. Dublin, Ireland: The Centre for Effective Services. Google Scholar | |
| Woo-Cumings, M (ed.) (1999) The Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| World Bank (2018) World Bank data: GDP per capita, PPP (current international $). Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD Google Scholar | |
| World Bank (2019) The Worldwide Governance Indicators, 2019 update. Available at: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/ Google Scholar | |
| World Economic Forum (2018) The Global Competitiveness Report 2018.
Geneva:
World Economic Forum. Google Scholar |
