Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Free access
Research article
First published online August 28, 2020

Reflections on Israeli hospital-based social work with COVID-19 patients and their families

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic created an unfamiliar and dynamic reality which posed many challenges for hospital social workers. This article presents the experience of the social work service at Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center in Israel in answering the needs of COVID-19-hospitalized patients and their families.

Introduction

COVID-19 was first identified in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Since then, it has spread around the world and was declared by the World Health Organization as a global pandemic. At the time of writing this article, nearly 9 million people worldwide have been diagnosed with the virus, and the death toll has exceeded 460,500 (World Health Organization, 2020). On February 2020, the first case of COVID-19 was diagnosed in Israel. To date, more than 21,000 cases of coronavirus have been confirmed in Israel, and the number of deaths has exceeded 300 (Israel Ministry of Health, 2020).
In Israel, the treatment of people diagnosed with COVID-19 is given either in hospitals or by the Israeli Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) in the community (in designated hotels or patients’ homes). Treatment location is determined based on the patient’s clinical, functional, and psychosocial characteristics.
While community care is chosen when the patient’s condition enables this, most of the hospitalized patients require close monitoring and medical care. Since the time to recovery is usually prolonged, hospital admissions may be lengthy and are under quarantine with no visits allowed. Communication with the hospital staff is done using digital means that enable remote voice or video chats. When there is a need for medical treatment that cannot be done remotely, designated staff may enter the quarantined areas under strict safety regulations, wearing full protective gear (personal protective equipment [PPE]) that covers their bodies and faces. Hospital social workers do not enter patients’ quarantined areas, and communication is remote and mediated by digital means.
The nature of the disease, isolated and lengthy hospitalization, and therapeutic setting all created a complex situation for patients, family members, and the hospital staff and posed new challenges to the social work team. Although the psychosocial effects of COVID-19 on hospitalized patients have not yet been systematically studied, we would like to reflect in this article on hospital social work practice with coronavirus patients and families during the first wave of the pandemic in Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center in Israel. We will describe patients’ and family members’ needs and the psychosocial interventions that were offered during admission by the hospital’s social work staff.

Social work practice with patients admitted to COVID-19 units

Patients with mild symptoms

When the pandemic first started in Israel, each person who tested positive for COVID-19 was sent for hospital admission. During the first 5 weeks of the outbreak, our hospital operated a Special Quarantine Unit (SQU) designated for the admission of patients with mild symptoms. Patients functioned independently and were required to attend to their own needs. Communication with the medical team was done using telemedicine technologies, and when needed medical treatment was provided by designated staff who entered the unit wearing PPE.
The main difficulties that arose in this stage were compatible with (1) the need to cope with a new, unfamiliar pandemic, which brings about fear and uncertainty (Maunder et al., 2003), and (2) being isolated and separated from home, which can be an extremely disturbing experience (Abad et al., 2010; Hawryluck et al., 2004; Purssell et al., 2020). Patients were dealing with guilt over the fact that they were infected and may have infected others, and with a feeling of ‘leprosy’ that they were the first to contact this unfamiliar disease.
The prolonged admission under quarantine, the inability to meet family members, and the distance from home were accompanied by a sense of longing, loneliness, and feeling guilty about leaving family members at home. Some patients who had young children at home required guidance on how to explain the situation to their children and felt helpless in face of this ‘distant’ parenting. This complex emotional experience was often accompanied by anxiety about their own medical condition and fear of deterioration.
A social worker was appointed to the unit and contacted every new admitted COVID-19 patient whose medical condition necessitated intake. The intake was done over phone and had three main purposes:
assessment of the needs of the patient and family;
orientation to hospital admission and to the COVID-19 unit;
confirmation of contact person details.
During intake, the social worker mapped out patients’ personal, familial, functional, and medical situation and the resources available to them, and provided as much information as possible on the SQU, including the daily schedule and means of contact with the hospital staff. Orientation to the unit intended to help patients gain a sense of control, thereby decreasing their anxiety of the unknown, and to assist in creating a sense of continuity which was often interrupted by diagnosis and admission. Finally, patients were asked to appoint a contact person, which would be of particular importance in cases where the patient’s health deteriorates.
Psychosocial interventions in the early days of admission focused on helping patients find their place and feel comfortable in the unit, and on decreasing anxiety by providing information and emotional support. In addition, psychosocial problems at the patients’ home were addressed by the hospital social workers as well. For instance, when children were left alone at home because of the parent’s admission, the social worker reached out to relevant community organizations, making sure their needs were attended to.
As admissions became longer, the emotional difficulties related to uncertainty about the time to recovery, as well as anxiety, arose as a response to seeing deterioration of other patients. In addition, loneliness, longing, and boredom increased and became part of many patients’ emotional experience.
At this stage of admissions, interventions mainly focused on creating a daily routine together with the patient. Having a routine provided a sense of control in the new reality of uncertainty and created anchors throughout the day that relieved the boredom. Addressing anxiety was done using distress management techniques such as sharing feelings and emotional support, as well as mindfulness exercises. Aid offered to patients who had witnessed deterioration in the health of other patients included identifying and reducing social comparisons that had negative effects, refocusing on the patient’s situation, and emphasizing signs of improved health.
All communication between the social workers and patients was over the phone. This was an unfamiliar therapeutic setting for the social work team which faced the need to assess patient’s needs, build a therapeutic rapport, and provide psychosocial support remotely and without the ability to express closeness and empathy face to face.

Patients with moderate/severe symptoms

As the disease spread, the location of medical treatment changed. Patients with mild symptoms were referred for treatment in the community and moderate/severe patients were admitted to either intensive care units or designated COVID-19 units. Since many patients admitted to the hospital were dealing with severe symptoms, some sedated and intubated, they were engaged less in emotional help-seeking.
Hospitalized patients who were in need of psychosocial support were mostly those who woke up disoriented and depressed after being sedated and intubated. Providing support to these patients was challenging since the social workers could not enter patients’ areas and they were usually too weak to use digital means for communication. This created a very frustrating reality to the social work team, who could not offer direct support to these patients. Hence, the focus turned to training and supporting the designated staff who enter the units on how to address these patients’ emotional needs. Training focused on regaining patients’ orientation by providing information regarding their whereabouts, ways to assist patients regain a sense of control, emphasizing their medical improvement, and positive reinforcement.

Social work practice with COVID-19 patients’ families

Hospitalization under quarantine with no visitors, the distance from home, and the uncertainty that characterized the disease affected patients’ family members as well. Families of patients who were not able to communicate were completely dependent on hospital staff for distant updates. This, together with not being able to be beside their loved ones and their concern about the medical condition, brought up anxiety, frustration, and a sense of loss of control.
Social work with family members was intended to address their emotional and instrumental needs. Psychosocial intervention, which was done over the phone, was tailored to address family’s needs and generally included containing frustration related to the hospital, finding ways to improve their sense of involvement in the remote care of the patient, and reflecting on their strengths and coping strategies. The social worker also delivered messages from the family member to the patient through staff members who entered the patient’s designated area and updated the healthcare team on the family’s needs and special psychosocial matters.

Death

COVID-19 units were closed to visitors, yet given the importance of saying goodbye to patients on their deathbed by their families, the Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center was the first hospital in Israel and one of the first worldwide that enabled first-degree family members to be beside patients in their last moments (Halbfinger, 2020). A special protocol was designed for this matter in order to keep all parties safe and to assist families throughout this difficult moment, and the social worker had an important role throughout this process. According to the protocol, the treating physician contacted the family when it was estimated that a patient had several hours left to live, updated them on the patient’s medical condition, and offered them the opportunity to come at the hospital and stay beside him or her. The social worker contacted the family before arrival, checked whether they had any additional questions, and provided information regarding arrival at the hospital and meeting her. At this point, she became the case manager and the family’s contact at the hospital, offering emotional support throughout their stay in the hospital. Family members met the social worker upon arrival at the hospital and she accompanied them to and through their meeting with the doctor when they were updated about the patient’s medical condition and were given information about entering and visiting the unit. Escorted by the social worker, families then continued to a special room where the nursing staff assisted them in wearing PPE. She did not enter the unit with them but met them as soon as they came out for initial bereavement work. Although these situations enabled face-to-face encounter, physical contact such as a hug or laying a hand on a family member’s shoulder for support was restricted and was a difficult experience for the social worker.

Summary

This article aimed to present the experience of our social work service in answering the needs of COVID-19-hospitalized patients and their families. While social work services in Israeli hospitals are experienced in complex crises, including traumas and terror attacks, the COVID-19 pandemic created an unfamiliar reality under restricting conditions. One central challenge was remote communication, as in most cases counseling was mediated by digital means. The social distancing regulations also restricted using human touch to express empathy and offer comfort at times of crisis, such as when accompanying families in their most difficult moments of saying goodbye to their loved ones.
This unfamiliar situation created a potential ‘therapeutic distancing’ which needed to be avoided. Patients and families were reached out to using voice and video calls, relying on active listening and verbal communication skills to evaluate their needs, build rapport, and provide ongoing support. This remote relationship was challenging for social workers, who are used to using face-to-face communication and physical gestures as means to offer support.
Hospital social workers should be trained to provide adequate psychosocial interventions under pandemics such as COVID-19. Training should be based on research exploring various aspects of hospital social work under COVID-19. For instance, future research should focus on understanding hospital social workers’ experiences of working with COVID-19 patients and special attention be given to the challenges of providing remote psychosocial support. In addition, in order to adequately address patients’ needs, research should also systematically explore the psychosocial aspects of admitted COVID-19 patients and their families. Findings will be an important basis for training social workers on these matters, providing appropriate tools they could comfortably use when they again encounter a therapeutic distancing setting.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Abad C., Fearday A., Safdar N. (2010) ‘Adverse Effects of Isolation in Hospitalised Patients: A Systematic Review’, Journal of Hospital Infection 76: 97–102.
Halbfinger D.M. (2020) “It’s Really a Gift”: Israeli Hospitals Let Relatives Say Goodbye Up Close’. Available online at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/20/world/middleeast/israel-hospitals-relatives-dying.html (accessed 28 June 2020).
Hawryluck L., Gold W.L., Robinson S., Pogorski S., Galea S., Styra R. (2004) ‘SARS Control and Psychological Effects of Quarantine, Toronto, Canada’, Emerging Infectious Diseases 10(7): 1206–12.
Israel Ministry of Health (2020) ‘Coronavirus Cases in Israel’. Available online at: https://datadashboard.health.gov.il/COVID-19/?utm_source=go.gov.il&utm_medium=referral (accessed 28 June 2020).
Maunder R., Hunter J., Vincent L., Bennett J., Peladeau N., Leszcz M., Sadavoy J., Verhaeghe L.M., Steinberg R., Mazzulli T. (2003) ‘The Immediate Psychological and Occupational Impact of the 2003 SARS Outbreak in a Teaching Hospital’, Canadian Medical Association Journal 168: 1245–51.
Purssell E., Gould D., Chudleigh J. (2020) ‘Impact of Isolation on Hospitalised Patients Who are Infectious: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis’, BMJ Open 10: e030371.
World Health Organization (2020) ‘Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak Situation’. Available online at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (accessed 28 June 2020).

Biographies

Naama Levin-Dagan, a social worker at Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, is specialized in psycho-oncology and is a PhD student at the Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University
Sivan Sternfeld-Hever is director of the social work service at Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, former head of social work services at Lis Maternity and Women’s Hospital, and a member of Violence Prevention and Sexual Harassment Committees.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: August 28, 2020
Issue published: November 2020

Keywords

  1. COVID-19
  2. family
  3. hospital social work
  4. isolation
  5. patients
  6. psychosocial needs

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2020.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Naama Levin-Dagan
Bar-Ilan University, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Israel
Sivan Strenfeld-Hever
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Israel

Notes

Naama Levin-Dagan, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in International Social Work.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1753

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 12 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 14

  1. Protecting vulnerability. An international comparison of social worker...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Family members’ restricted visitations in psychiatric hospitals during...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. “There Was a Big Disconnect”: Experiences of Medical Social Workers on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. ‘How shall we handle this situation?’ Social workers’ discussions abou...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. COVID-19 and client violence toward healthcare social workers in Chile
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  6. Para além do imaginável: experiências vividas por profissionais de saú...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Beyond the imaginable: experiences lived by ICU health professionals d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. “Without social there is no health”: Social work perspectives in multi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Australian and New Zealand social workers adjusting to the COVID-19 pa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Riding the wave: pandemic social work in hospitals
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Responses to COVID-19 in Major Social Work Journals: A Systematic Revi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. I FELT GUILTY [THAT] I DIDN’T DO ENOUGH. ORGANIZATIONAL AND POLICY RES...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. The lived experiences of family members of Covid-19 patients admitted ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Israeli Health Care Social Workers’ Personal and Professional Concerns...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

IFSW members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

IFSW members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.