Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online July 10, 2016

Rationalizing Conflict: The Polarizing Role of Accountability in Ideological Decision Making


How does accountability impact political decisions? Though previous research on accountability has demonstrated its potential effects in the realms of business, elections, and more, very little research has explored the effect of citizen accountability in highly ideological, intractable, and political conflicts. This article addresses this issue, looking at the unique interaction between accountability and ideology on Israeli citizens’ political attitudes regarding the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The results of two experimental studies in Israel reveal that accountable individuals behave in significantly more ideologically partisan ways than their nonaccountable counterparts. Moreover, this polarization is dependent on the specific conflict context, with leftists more affected by the issue of negotiations and rightists by security concerns. This signals that ideological polarization under accountability may depend on the “issue ownership” each ideological group feels toward the specific conflict context and its corresponding social goal of projecting ideological consistency on these issues.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.


Anderson Sally, Souva Mark. 2010. “The Accountability Effects of Political Institutions and Capitalism on Interstate Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 54 (4): 543–65.
Arian Asher, Shamir Michal. 2011. The Elections in Israel 2009. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Bar-Tal D. 2007. “Sociopsychological Foundations of Intractable Conflicts.” American Behavioral Scientist 50 (11): 1430–53.
Behn Robert D. 2001. Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Bennett Stephen Earl. 1988. “‘ Know-nothings’ Revisited: The Meaning of Political Ignorance Today.” Social Science Quarterly 69 (2): 476–90.
B’Tselem. 2013. “Statistics on the Israeli Palestinian Conflict.” Accessed September 5, 2013.
Buchman Thomas A., Tetlock Philip E., Reed Ronald O. 1996. “Accountability and Auditors’ Judgments about Contingent Events.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 23 (3): 379–98.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Siverson Randolph M. 1995. “War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability.” American Political Science Review 89 (4): 841–55.
Burke Joseph C. 2005. Achieving Accountability in Higher Education: Balancing Public, Academic, and Market Demands. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Carpini Michael X. Delli, Keeter Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Converse Philip E. 1962. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan.
Converse Philip E., Campbell Angus, Miller Warren E., Stokes Donald E. 1961. “Stability and Change in 1960: A Reinstating Election.” The American Political Science Review 55 (2): 269–80.
Denzau Arthur T., North Douglass C. 1994. “Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions.” Kyklos 47 (1): 3–31.
Druckman James N. 2004. “Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)Relevance of Framing Effects.” American Political Science Review 98 (4): 671–86.
Federico Christopher M., Hunt Corrie V. 2013. “Political Information, Political Involvement, and Reliance on Ideology in Political Evaluation.” Political Behavior 35 (1): 1–24.
Federico Christopher M., Schneider Monica C. 2007. “Political Expertise and the Use of Ideology: Moderating Effects of Evaluative Motivation.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71 (2): 221–52.
Felson R. B. 1982. “Impression Management and the Escalation of Aggression and Violence.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 45: 245–254.
Fox J. 2007. “The Uncertain Relationship between Transparency and Accountability.” Development in Practice 17 (4-5): 663–71.
Foyle Douglas C. 1999. Counting the Public in: Presidents, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Fuhrman Susan, Elmore Richard F. 2004. Redesigning Accountability Systems for Education. Vol. 38. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gerber Alan, Green Donald. 1999. “Misperceptions about Perceptual Bias.” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1): 189–210.
Grant Ruth W., Keohane Robert O. 2005. “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 99 (1): 29–43.
Han S., Lerner Jennifer S. 2009. “Accountability and Medical Decision Making.” In Encyclopedia of Medical Decision Making, edited by Kattan Michael, Cowen Mark, 1280. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Hardin C. D., Higgins E. T. 1996. “Shared Reality: How Social Verification Makes the Subjective Objective.” In Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: The Interpersonal Context, edited by Richard M. Sorrentino and Edward Tory Higgins, 28–77. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Hayes Andrew F. 2013. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Hazan Reuven Y. 2007. “Kadima and the Centre: Convergence in the Israeli Party System.” Israel Affairs 13 (2): 266–88.
Hinich Melvin J., Munger Michael C. 1996. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Jost John T. 2006. “The End of the End of Ideology.” American Psychologist 61 (7): 651.
Jost John T., Amodio David M. 2011. “Political Ideology as Motivated Social Cognition: Behavioral and Neuroscientific Evidence.” Motivation and Emotion 36 (1): 55–64. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9260-7.
Jost John T., Federico Christopher M., Napier Jaime L. 2009. “Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities.” Annual Review of Psychology 60 (January): 307–37. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600.
Koch Michael, Gartner Scott Sigmund. 2005. “Casualties and Constituencies Democratic Accountability, Electoral Institutions, and Costly Conflicts.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (6): 874–94.
Kunda Ziva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108 (3): 480.
Kühberger A. 1998. “The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75 (1): 23–55.
Lavine Howard. 2002. “On-line versus Memory-based Process Models of Political Evaluation.” In Political Psychology, edited by Monroe Kristen Renwick, 225–47. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lerner J. S., Goldberg J. H., Tetlock P. E. 1998. “Sober Second Thought: The Effects of Accountability, Anger, and Authoritarianism on Attributions of Responsibility.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24 (6): 563–74.
Lerner Jennifer S., Shonk K. 2006. “How Accountability Can Improve Negotiations.” Negotiation 9 (1): 1–4.
Lerner Jennifer S., Tetlock Philip E. 1999. “Accounting for the Effects of Accountability.” Psychological Bulletin 125 (2): 255–75.
Lerner Jennifer S., Tetlock Philip E. 2003. “Bridging Individual, Interpersonal, and Institutional Approaches to Judgment and Choice: The Impact of Accountability on Cognitive Bias.” In Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Making, edited by Schneider S., Shanteau J., 431–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Linn Marcia C. 2000. “Designing the Knowledge Integration Environment.” International Journal of Science Education 22 (8): 781–96.
Lodge Milton, Taber Charles S. 2005. “The Automaticity of Affect for Political Leaders, Groups, and Issues: An Experimental Test of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis.” Political Psychology 26 (3): 455–82.
Luskin Robert C. 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science 31:856–99.
March James G., Olsen Johan P. 1995. Democratic Governance. New York: Free Press.
Marcus George E. 1995. With Malice toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller Samuel D. 1995. “Teachers’ Responses to Test-driven Accountability Pressures: If I Change, Will My Scores Drop?” Literacy Research and Instruction 34 (4): 332–51.
Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T. 1986. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19:123–205.
Przeworski Adam, Stokes Susan C., Manin Bernard. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Redlawsk David P. 2002. “Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making.” The Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1021–44.
Reicher Stephen, Levine Mark. 1994. “On the Consequences of Deindividuation Manipulations for the Strategic Communication of Self: Identifiability and the Presentation of Social Identity.” European Journal of Social Psychology 24 (4): 511–24.
Schafer M., Crichlow S. 2002. “The Process-outcome Connection in Foreign Policy Decision Making: A Quantitative Study Building on Groupthink.” International Studies Quarterly 46 (1): 45–68.
Semin G. R., Manstead Antony S. R. 1983. The Accountability of Conduct: A Social Psychological Analysis. London: Academic Press.
Shamir Michal, Arian Asher. 1999. “Collective Identity and Electoral Competition in Israel.” American Political Science Review 93 (3): 265–77.
Simonson Itamar. 1989. “Choice based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects.” Journal of Consumer Research 16 (2): 158–74.
Simonson Itamar, Nowlis Stephen M. 2000. “The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer Decision Making: Unconventional Choices based on Reasons.” Journal of Consumer Research 27 (1): 49–68.
Sitkin S. B., Bies R. J. 1993. “Social Accounts in Conflict Situations: Using Explanations to Manage Conflict.” Human Relations 46 (3): 349–70.
Skitka Linda J., McMurray Pamela J., Burroughs Thomas E. 1991. “Willingness to Provide Post-war Aid to Iraq and Kuwait: An Application of the Contingency Model of Distributive Justice.” Contemporary Social Psychology 15:179–88.
Sniderman Paul M., Brody Richard A., Tetlock Phillip E. 1993. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stenning Philip C. 1995. Accountability for Criminal Justice: Selected Essays. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Sulitzeanu-Kenan Raanan, Halperin Eran. 2012. “Making a Difference: Political Efficacy and Policy Preference Construction.” British Journal of Political Science 43 (2): 295–322. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000324.
Tetlock Philip E. 1983a. “Accountability and Complexity of Thought.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (1): 74.
Tetlock Philip E. 1983b. “Cognitive Style and Political Ideology.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (1): 118.
Tetlock Philip E. 1985. “Accountability: The Neglected Social Context of Judgment and Choice.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 7, edited by Staw B., Cummings L., 297–332. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Tetlock Philip E. 1992. “The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward a Social Contingency Model.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25 (3): 331–76.
Tetlock Philip, Lerner Jennifer S., Ramachandran. 1994. “Accountability and Social Cognition.” Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 1-10. San Diego, CA: Academic Press: Academic Press.
Voeten Erik, Brewer Paul R. 2006. “Public Opinion, the War in Iraq, and Presidential Accountability.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (6): 809–30.
Zajonc Robert Boleslaw. 1965. Social Facilitation. Ann Arbor: Research Center for Group Dynamics, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
Zakaria Fareed. 2012. “Having Faith in Political Islam.” Global Public Square Blog CNN, October 12.
Zaller John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

In this Data Supplement:

File (
File (

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article


Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options


Share this article

Share with email

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions


Published In

Article first published online: July 10, 2016
Issue published: December 2016


  1. accountability
  2. ideology
  3. conflict
  4. political attitudes
  5. motivated reasoning

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2015.
Request permissions for this article.


Published online: January 6, 2015
Published OnlineFirst: July 10, 2016
Issue published: December 2016



Carly Wayne
Department of Political Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Roni Porat
Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Department of Psychology, IDC Herzliya, Herzliya, Israel
Maya Tamir
Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Eran Halperin
Department of Psychology, IDC Herzliya, Herzliya, Israel


Carly Wayne, Department of Political Science, University of Michigan, 505 South State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations


Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Conflict Resolution.


Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 957

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Articles citing this one

Web of Science: 6 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 5

  1. Turning the lens in the study of precarity: On experimental social psy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Citizens in Peace Processes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Shamed If You Do, Shamed If You Do Not: Group-Based Moral Emotions, Ac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Proximity and the principle-policy gap in white racial attitudes: Insi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. A Treasure Trove of Insights...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media


View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

PSSI members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

PSSI members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options


View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text