“Twice the Citizen”: How Military Attitudes of Superiority Undermine Civilian Control in the United States
Abstract
Civilian control of the military is central to the making of security policy, ensuring that civilian officials and the elected leaders that appoint them oversee and decide military affairs. This paper exposes a challenge to civilian control in the United States that originates in the disparaging attitudes military personnel hold toward civilian society. We argue that when military personnel view military culture as superior, they are more likely to view civilian political leaders as illegitimate and in turn to favor actions that undermine civilian control. We develop a typology of civilian control in which military officers can constrain, contest and limit civilian authority. Our empirical analysis provides strong and consistent evidence of the corrosive effects of military superiority on civilian control across three surveys of U.S. military personnel: the 1998-99 TISS survey of 2901 military officers, a 2014 YouGov of 275 veterans, and an original 2020 survey of 770 West Point cadets.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Avant Deborah. 1994. Political Institutions and Military Change: Lessons from Peripheral Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Avant D. D. 1996. “Are the reluctant warriors out of control? Why the U.S. military is averse to responding to post‐cold war low‐level threats.” Security Studies 6, 2: 51‐90.
Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. 1986. “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 6: 1173‐1182.
Barno Dave. 2011. “General Barno’s Top 10 Tasks for General Dempsey, the new Army chief of Staff.” Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/01/21/dave-barnos-top-10-tasks-for-general-dempsey-the-new-army-chief-of-staff/.
Beliakova P. 2021. “Erosion of Civilian Control in Democracies: A Comprehensive Framework for Comparative Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 54, 8: 1393‐1423.
Brooks Risa A. 2009. “Militaries and Political Activity in Democracies.” In American Civil-Military Relations: The Soldier and the State in a New Era, edited by Nielsen Suzanne C., Snider Don M., Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Brooks Risa A. 2019. “Integrating the Civil-Military Relations Sub-field.” Annual Review of Political Science 22, 20: 1‐20.
Brooks Risa A. 2020a. “Paradoxes of Professionalism: The Civil-Military Politics of Strategic Assessment.” International Security 44, 4: 7‐44.
Brooks Risa A. 2020b. “The Paradoxes of Huntingtonian Professionalism.” In Reconsidering American Civil-Military Relations, edited by Beehner Lionel, Brooks Risa, Maurer Daniel, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Chapter 1.
Brooks Risa. 2021. “Beyond Huntington: Military Professionalism Today.” Parameters 51, 1: 65‐77.
Brooks Risa, Robinson Michael, Urben Heidi. 2021a. “What Makes a Military Professional? Evaluating Norm Socialization in West Point Cadets” Armed Forces & Society. (published; online first 20 June).
Brooks Risa, Golby Jim, Urben Heidi. 2021b. “Crisis of Command: America’s Broken Civil- Military Relations Imperils National Security,” Foreign Affairs. print edition, 64‐75.
Bryant Susan, Swaney Brett, Urben Heidi. 2021. “From Citizen Soldier to Secular Saint: The Societal Implications of Military Exceptionalism.” Texas National Security Review 4:2(Spring), 10‐24.
Burk J. 2002. “Theories of Democratic Civil-Military Relations,” Armed Forces & Society 29:1, 7-29.
Cebul Matthew, Sharan Grewal. 2022. “Military Conscription and Nonviolent Resistance.” Comparative Political Studies. Forthcoming
Croissant A., Kuehn D., Chambers P., Wolf S. O. 2010. “Beyond the fallacy of coup-ism: conceptualizing civilian control of the military in emerging democracies.” Democratization 17, 5: 950‐975.
Dempsey Jason K. 2010. Our Army: Soldiers, Politics, and American Civil-Military Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dejonge Schulman Loren, Friend Alice. 2018. “The Pentagon’s Transparency Problem,” Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2018-05- 02/pentagons-transparency-problem.
Desch Michael C. 1999. Civilian Control of the Military: The Changing Security Environment. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Feaver Peter. 1992. Guarding the Guardians: Civilian Control of Nuclear Weapons in the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Feaver P. D. 1999. “Civil-military relations.” Annual Review of Political Science 2, 211‐241.
Feaver Peter D, Kohn Richard H (eds.). 2001. Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Feaver Peter D. 2003. Armed Servants: Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Garamone Jim. 2019. Shahanan Tells Naval Academy Grads to Learn from Failure. ” U.S. Dept. of Defense. https://www.defense.gov/Explore/News/Article/Article/1858451/shanahan-tells-naval- academy-grads-to-learn-from-failure/.
Gates Robert M. 2011. Secretary of Defense Speech. ” West Point, NY. February 25 https://archive.defense.gov/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=1539.
Gallup. 2020. “Confidence in Institutions.” https://news.gallup.com/poll/1597/confidence- institutions.aspx.
Golby J., Feaver P., Dropp K. 2018. “Elite Military Cues and Public Opinion About the Use of Military Force.” Armed Forces & Society 44, 1: 44‐71.
Golby Jim, Feaver Peter. 2019. “Thank you for your Lip Service? Social Pressure to Support the Troops.” War on the Rocks August 14.
Hooker Jr., Richard D. 2003. “Soldiers of the State: Reconsidering American Civil-Military Relations.” Parameters 33, 4: 4‐18.
Holsti Ole R. 2004. “Identity of the U.S. Military: Comments on “An N of 1.” Perspectives on Politics 2, 3: 557‐560.
Huntington Samuel 1957. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Imai K., Keele L., Tingley D., Yamamoto T. 2011. “Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies.” American Political Science Review 105, 4: 765‐789.
Janowitz Morris. 1960. The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait Glencoe. IL: The Free Press.
Jost Tyler, Kertzer Joshua D. 2020. Armies and Influence: Public Deference to Foreign Policy Elites, 1‐65. Working Paper.
Karlin Mara. 2020. “Civilian Oversight inside the Pentagon: Who does it and how?” In Reconsidering American Civil-Military Relations, edited by Beehner Lionel, Brooks Risa, Maurer Daniel, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Chapter 4.
Klay Phil. 2018. Warrior at the Mall. New York, NY: New York Times. April 14.
Kleykamp M., Hipes C., MacLean A. 2017. “Who Supports U.S. Veterans and Who Exaggerates Their Support?” Armed Forces & Society 44, 1: 92‐115.
King David C., Karabell Zachary. 2002. The Generation of Trust: Public Confidence in the U.S. Military Since Vietnam. Washington, DC: The AEI Press.
Koehler Kevin, Grewal Sharan, Albrecht Holger. 2022. Who Fakes Support for the Military? Experimental Evidence from Tunisia. forthcoming: ” Democratization.
Kohn Richard. 1970. The Inside History of the Newburgh Conspiracy: America and the Coup d'Etat, Vol. XXVII, I87‐220. William and Mary Quarterly, 3d Ser.
Kohn Richard. 1975. Eagle and the Sword: The Federalists and the Creation of the Military Establishment in America, 1783-1802. Free Press.
Kohn Richard. 1994. Out of Control: The Crisis in Civil-Military Relations. Washington, DC: The National Interest.
Kohn Richard. 2002. “The Erosion of Civilian Control of the Military in the United States Today.” Naval War College Review 55, 3: 2‐52.
Krebs Ronald, Ralston Robert. 2020. “Civilian Control of the Military Is a Partisan Issue.” Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-07-14/civilian-control-military-partisan-issue
Kuehn David. 2018. “Democratic Control of the Military.”In Handbook of the Sociology of the Military, edited by Caforio G., Nuciari M., Cham, Vietnam: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer.
Loveman Brian. 1994. Constitutions of Tyranny: Regimes of Exception Across Spanish America. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.
Lupton Danielle. 2017. “Out of the Service, Into the House: Military Service and Congressional War Oversight.” Political Research Quarterly 70: 2.
Mehta Aaron. 2020. “Esper Announces Leak Investigation at Pentagon.” Defense News. July 9.
Neto, Octavio Amorim and Pedro Accorsi. 2022. “Presidents and Generals: Systems of Government and the Selection of Defense Ministers. ” Armed Forces & Society 48, 1: 136-163.
Nordlinger Eric. 1977. Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Pion-Berlin David. 1997. Through Corridors of Power: Institutions and Civil-Military Relations in Argentina. University Park, PA: Penn State U. Press.
Phillips Dave, Schmidt Eric. 2021. How the U.S. Hid an Airstrike that Killed Dozens of Civilians in Syria. New York, NY: New York Times. Nov. 13.
Rayside David M. 1996. “The Perils of Congressional Politics.” In Gay Rights, Military Wrongs: Political Perspectives of Lesbians and Gays in the Military, edited by Rimmerman Craig A., New York, NY: Garland.
Recchia Stefano. 2015. Reassuring the Reluctant Warriors: U.S. Civil-Military Relations and Multilateral Intervention. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Ricks Thomas E. 1997. “The Widening Gap Between the Military and Society. New York, NY: The Atlantic Monthly. July.
Robinson Michael. 2018. Danger Close: Military Politicization and Elite Credibility.PhD dissertation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Schafer Amy. 2017. “Generations of War: The Rise of the Warrior Caste and the All- Volunteer Force” CNAS. May 8 https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/generations-of-war.
Schake Kori, Mattis Jim, eds 2016. Warriors & Citizens: American Views of our Military. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
Shankar Thom, Healy Patrick. 2007. A New Push to Roll Back ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. New York, NY: New York Time. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/30/us/30military.html.
Stepan Alfred. 1988. Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Thompson William. 1973. Grievances of Military Coup-Makers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Urben Heidi A. 2010. Civil-Military Relations in a Time of War: Party, Politics, and the Profession of Arms. PhD dissertation. Georgetown University.
Urben Heidi. 2020. “Generals Shouldn’t be Welcome at these Parties,” War on the Rocks. July. https://warontherocks.com/2020/07/generals-shouldnt-be-welcome-at-these-parties- stopping-retired-flag-officer-endorsements/.
Urben Heidi, Golby Jim. 2020 “A Matter of Trust: Five Pitfalls that could Squander the American Public's Confidence in the Military,” In Reconsidering American Civil-Military Relations, edited by Beehner Brooks, Maurer, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, Chapter 7.
Weigley Russell F. 1993. “The American Military and the Principle of Civilian Control from McClennan to Powell.” The Journal of Military History 57, October: 5.
Wingate Christopher W. 2009. “Military Professionalism and the Early American Officer Corps, 1789–1796,” master’s thesis. Leavenworth, WA: U.S. Army Command and General Staff College.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: March 1, 2022
Issue published: May 2022
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Journal of Conflict Resolution.
View All Journal MetricsArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 2123
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 5 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 9
- The Soldier in the State: Explaining Public Trust in the Armed Forces
- Polarization versus professionalism: military and civilian views on the domestic use of the military
- National Guard Command Authority and the Black Lives Matter Protests of 2020: Domestic Security Debates for a New Generation of Military Veterans
- In the Army We Trust: Public Confidence in Global South Militaries
- Returning Veterans’ Attitudes Toward Democracy: Evidence From a Survey of Ukraine’s ATO Veterans
- Understanding the Impact of Military Service on Support for Insurrection in the United States
- A Problem in the Huntingtonian Universe: The Military Side of the Gap
- Military service as part of Serbian ethos
- Veteran Contempt for Civilian Communication Scale: Development and Validation
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
PSSI members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
PSSI members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
