Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content

Abstract

Citizen distrust towards the rival country is a defining feature of protracted international rivalries, undermining meaningful cooperation that can lead to mutual benefits. How might governments establish a public opinion base that is more supportive of cooperation with the rival country? We argue that information about ongoing environmental cooperation with the rival country makes citizens more supportive of non-environmental cooperation by changing their beliefs about the rival’s trustworthiness and facilitating extrinsic reciprocity. We investigate this potential micro-level cooperation spillover in the context of the longstanding rivalry between Japan and South Korea. Our survey-based experiment finds that information about cooperation on marine plastic pollution shapes the public’s willingness to cooperate in terms of the economy and security. Importantly, however, we find asymmetric results in Japan and Korea. While Koreans are more receptive to our positive cooperation treatment, which increases their willingness to cooperate in other domains, Japanese respondents react more strongly to the negative non-cooperation treatment, which reduces their willingness to cooperate in other domains. We offer explanations for these divergent reactions based on prior interactions between the two countries. Our findings have important policy implications for conflict-ridden areas of the world beyond East Asia that increasingly face common environmental challenges.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Akcinaroglu Seden, DiCicco Jonathan M, Radziszewski Elizabeth (2011) Avalanches and olive branches: A multimethod analysis of disasters and peacemaking in interstate rivalries. Political Research Quarterly 64(2): 260–275.
Aronow Peter M, Baron Jonathon, Pinson Lauren (2019) A note on dropping experimental subjects who fail a manipulation check. Political Analysis 27(14): 572–589.
Asaba Yuki, Hahn Kyu S, Jang Seulgi, Kobayashi Tetsuro, Tago Atsushi (2020) 38 seconds above the 38th parallel: How short video clips produced by the US military can promote alignment despite antagonism between Japan and Korea. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 20(2): 253–273.
Balliet Daniel, Lange Paul AM Van (2013) Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 139(5): 1090–1112.
Baum Matthew A, Potter Philip BK (2008) The relationships between mass media, public opinion, and foreign policy: Toward a theoretical synthesis. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 39–65.
Brown Robin (2013) The politics of relational public diplomacy. In: Zaharna RS, Arsenault Amelia, Fisher Ali (eds) Relational, Network and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy. Milton Park: Routledge, 44–55.
Chapman Hannah S, Gerber Theodore P (2019) Opinion-formation and issue-framing effects of Russian news in Kyrgyzstan. International Studies Quarterly 63(3): 756–769.
Chilton Adam S, Milner Helen V, Tingley Dustin (2020) Reciprocity and public opposition to foreign direct investment. British Journal of Political Science 50(1): 129–153.
Colaresi Michael (2004) When doves cry: International rivalry, unreciprocated cooperation, and leadership turnover. American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 555–570.
Cowan Geoffrey, Arsenault Amelia (2008) Moving from monologue to dialogue to collaboration: The three layers of public diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 10–30.
Diehl Paul F, Goertz Gary, Gallegos Yahve (2021) Peace data: Concept, measurement, patterns, and research agenda. Conflict Management and Peace Science 38(5): 605–624.
Engl Florian, Riedl Arno, Weber Roberto A (2021) Spillover effects of institutions on cooperative behavior, preferences, and beliefs. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 13(4): 261–299.
Entman Robert M (1989) How the media affect what people think: An information processing approach. Journal of Politics 51(2): 347–370.
Fearon James D (1994) Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review 88(3): 577–592.
Fischbacher Urs, Gächter Simon, Fehr Ernst (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters 71(3): 397–404.
Fitzpatrick Kathy R (2011) US Public Diplomacy in a Post-9/11 World: From Messaging to Mutuality. Los Angeles, CA: Figueroa.
Ganapati N Emel, Kelman Ilan, Koukis Theodore (2010) Analysing Greek–Turkish disaster-related cooperation: A disaster diplomacy perspective. Cooperation and Conflict 45(2): 162–185.
Goldsmith Benjamin E, Horiuchi Yusaku (2009) Spinning the globe? US public diplomacy and foreign public opinion. Journal of Politics 71(3): 863–875.
Goldsmith Benjamin E, Horiuchi Yusaku, Matush Kelly (2021) Does public diplomacy sway foreign public opinion? Identifying the effect of high-level visits. American Political Science Review 115(4): 1342–1357.
Haas Ernst B (1961) International integration: The European and the universal process. International Organization 15(3): 366–392.
Hensel Paul R, Goertz Gary, Diehl Paul F (2000) The democratic peace and rivalries. Journal of Politics 62(4): 1173–1188.
Incerti Trevor, Changwook Ju, Mattingly Daniel, Moreshead Colin, Rosenbluth Frances, Tanaka Seiki, Yamagishi Hikaru (2021) The logic of soft power competition: Evidence from east Asia. Working paper.
Jägerskog Anders (2009) Functional water cooperation in the Jordan river basin: Spillover or spillback for political security? In: Brauch Hans Günter, Spring Ursula Oswald, Grin John, Mesjasz Czesław (eds) Facing Global Environmental Change. Berlin: Springer, 633–640.
Kelman Ilan (2006) Acting on disaster diplomacy. Journal of International Affairs 59(2): 215–240.
Koukis Theodore, Kelman Ilan, Emel Ganapati N (2016) Greece–Turkey disaster diplomacy from disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 17(August): 24–32.
Lim Sijeong, Tanaka Seiki (2022) Why costly rivalry disputes persist: A paired conjoint experiment in Japan and South Korea. International Studies Quarterly 66(4).
Melissen Jan (2005) The new public diplomacy: Between theory and practice. In: Jan Mellisen (ed.) The New Public Diplomacy. Berlin: Springer, 3–27.
Parks Craig D, Hulbert Lorne G (1995) High and low trusters’ responses to fear in a payoff matrix. Journal of Conflict Resolution 39(4): 718–730.
Poortinga Wouter, Pidgeon Nick F (2004) Trust, the asymmetry principle, and the role of prior beliefs. Risk Analysis 24(6): 1475–1486.
Schmitter Philippe C (2005) Ernst B. Haas and the legacy of neofunctionalism. Journal of European Public Policy 12(2): 255–272.
Sheafer Tamir, Shenhav Shaul R, Takens Janet, Atteveldt Wouter Van (2014) Relative political and value proximity in mediated public diplomacy: The effect of state-level homophily on international frame building. Political Communication 31(1): 149–167.
Slovic Paul (1993) Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis 13(6): 675–682.
Swärd Anna (2016) Trust, reciprocity, and actions: The development of trust in temporary inter-organizational relations. Organization Studies 37(12): 1841–1860.
Szostek Joanna (2017) The power and limits of Russia’s strategic narrative in Ukraine: The role of linkage. Perspectives on Politics 15(2): 379–395.
Thompson William R (2001) Identifying rivals and rivalries in world politics. International Studies Quarterly 45(4): 557–586.
Tingley Dustin, Tomz Michael (2014) Conditional cooperation and climate change. Comparative Political Studies 47(3): 344–368.
Zaharna Rhonda S, Arsenault Amelia, Fisher Ali (2014) Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift. Milton Park: Routledge.

Biographies

AZUSA UJI, b. 1989, PhD in Political Science (Kyoto University, 2018); Associate Professor, Kyoto University (2021– ); current main interests: environmental politics and institutions.
SIJEONG LIM, b. 1984, PhD in Political Science (University of Washington, 2013); Associate Professor, Korea University (2018– ); previous academic positions at Stockholm University and University of Amsterdam; current main interests: welfare state and environmental politics.
JAEHYUN SONG, b. 1986, PhD in Political Science (Kobe University, 2018); Associate Professor, Kansai University (2021– ); previous academic positions at Doshisha University and Waseda University; current main interests: voting behavior and political methodology.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 17, 2023
Issue published: March 2024

Keywords

  1. environmental cooperation
  2. international rivalry
  3. Japan
  4. Korea
  5. public diplomacy
  6. security

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2023.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Azusa Uji
Sijeong Lim
Jaehyun Song

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Peace Research.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 657

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

PSSI members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

PSSI members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text