Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online November 9, 2015

Parsing the Practice of Teaching

Abstract

Teacher education programs typically teach novices about one part of teaching at a time. We might offer courses on different topics—cultural foundations, learning theory, or classroom management—or we may parse teaching practice itself into a set of discrete techniques, such as core teaching practices, that can be taught individually. Missing from our courses is attention to the ultimate purpose of these discrete parts—how specific concepts can help teachers achieve their goals, or how specific procedures can help them achieve their goals. Because we are now shifting from a focus on bodies of knowledge to a focus on depictions of practice, this article examines our efforts to parse teaching practice into lists of discrete procedures. It argues that we need to pay less attention to the visible behaviors of teaching and more attention to the purposes that are served by those behaviors. As a way to begin a conversation about parsing teachers’ purposes, I offer a proposal for conceptualizing teaching as a practice that entails five persistent problems, each of which presents a difficult challenge to teachers, and all of which compete for teachers’ attention. Viewed in this way, the role of teacher education is not to offer solutions to these problems, but instead to help novices learn to analyze these problems and to evaluate alternative courses of action for how well they address these problems.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Anderson L. M., Evertson C. M., Brophy J. E. (1979). An experimental study of effective teaching in first-grade reading groups. The Elementary School Journal, 79(4), 193-223.
Ball D. L., Forzani F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497-511.
Bransford J. D., Brophy S., Williams S. (2000). When computer technologies meet the learning sciences: Issues and opportunities. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 59-84.
Bransford J. D., Sherwood R. D., Hasselbring T. S., Kinzer C. K., Williams S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In Nix D., Spiro R. (Eds.), Cognition, education and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Charters W. W., Waples D. (1929). Commonwealth teacher training study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Clark C. M., Peterson P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In Wittrock M. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Cohen D. K. (1988). Teaching practice: Plus Que ça change. In Jackson P. W. (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 24-87). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Cohen D. K. (2011). Teaching and its predicaments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fogo B. (2012). Round 3: Summary and demographic data. In Core teaching practices Delphi panel. Retrieved from https://cset.stanford.edu/research/core-practices
Forzani F. M. (2014). Understanding “core practices” and “practice-based” teacher education: Learning from the past. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 357-368.
Ghousseini H. (2015). Core practices and problems of practice in learning to lead class discussions. Elementary School Journal, 115(3), 334-357.
Grossman P., Hammerness K., McDonald M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273-289.
Jackson P. W. (1986). The practice of teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Jackson P. W. (1990). Life in classrooms (Reissued with a new introduction). New York, NY: Teachers College Press. (Original work published 1968)
Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kennedy M. M. (1989). Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(6), 53-57.
Kennedy M. M. (2005). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kennedy M. M. (2006). Knowledge and vision in teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 1-7.
Kennedy M. M. (in press). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research.
Kloser M. (2012). Secondary science core teaching practices Delphi study round 3 summary. Retrieved from https://cset.stanford.edu/research/core-practices
Kounin J. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
McGill-Franzen A., Allington R. L., Yokoi L., Brooks G. (1999). Putting books in the classroom seems necessary but not sufficient. Journal of Educational Research, 93(2), 67-74.
Murray F. B. (Ed.). (1996). Teacher educators’ handbook. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Posner G. J., Strike K. A., Hewson P. W., Gertzog W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific concept: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
Reynolds M. C. (Ed.). (1990). The knowledge base for beginning teachers. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
Roth K. J., Garnier H. E., Chen C., Lemmens M., Schwille K., Wickler N. I. Z. (2011). Videobased lesson analysis: Effective science PD for teacher and student learning. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 117-148.
Roth K. J., Taylor J., Wilson C., Landes N. M. (2013, April). Scale-up study of a videocase-based lesson analysis PD program: Teacher and student science content learning. Paper presented at the National Association of Research on Science Teaching, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico.
Shavelson R. J. (1983). Review of research on teachers’ pedagogical judgments, plans, and decisions. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 392-413.
Shulman L. S. (1986a). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In Wittrock M. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Shulman L. S. (1986b). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Shulman L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
Simon A., Boyer E. G. (1967). Mirrors for behavior. In Simon A., Boyer E. G. (Eds.), Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of classroom observation instruments (pp. 1-24). Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.
Simon A., Boyer E. G. (1969). Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of classroom observation instruments. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.
Simon A., Boyer E. G. (1970). Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of classroom observation instruments. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.
Simon A., Boyer E. G. (1974). Mirrors for behavior III: An anthology of classroom observation instruments. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.
Smith C. (2007). Bootstrapping processes in the development of students’ commonsense matter theories: Using analogical mappings, thought experiments, and learning to measure to promote conceptual restructuring. Cognition and Instruction, 25(4), 337-398.
Smith D. C. (Ed.). (1983). Essential knowledge for beginning teachers. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for teacher education.
Willingham D. T. (2009). Why don’t students like school? A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind words and what it means for the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Windschitl M., Thompson J., Braaten M. (2011). Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers: Who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why? Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1311-1360.

Biographies

Mary Kennedy is professor emerita at Michigan State University. Her research focuses on teaching, teacher thinking and teacher learning. She has won 5 awards for her work and is a Fellow in the American Educational Research Association.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: November 9, 2015
Issue published: January/February 2016

Keywords

  1. practice-based teacher education
  2. teacher learning
  3. teacher education preparation

Rights and permissions

© 2015 American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mary Kennedy
Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA

Notes

Mary Kennedy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Teacher Education.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 4753

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 123 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 152

  1. Teachers’ (evolving) beliefs about critical thinking education during professional learning: A multi- case study
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. International virtual sport coaching exchange: A mechanism for exploring pre-professional coaches’ interests and issues
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. Teaching students to evaluate online information in social studies: A comparative case study of teachers’ goals and approaches
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. Analysis of a Multi-year Teacher Professional Development: Perspectives from the Final Year
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. Exploring rural middle school music teachers’ classroom interaction decision-making levels: A student’s perspective
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Exploring the significance of co‐analysis and forms of professional knowledge in initial teacher education
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  7. Differentiating Between Core Practices and Best Practices: Exploring Divergent Purposes for Developing a Professional Language for Teaching
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. Putting the Pieces Back Together: Challenges Recomposing Elementary Science Teaching
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. A framework for approximations of practice: Variations in purpose, approach, and opportunities for learning
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. Understanding Sociological Theory for Educational Practices
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

AACTE members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

AACTE members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text