![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
The Every Student Succeeds Act grants states new flexibility to create more balanced assessment systems with a greater role for formative assessment. Drawing on lessons learned over three decades of research and reform, we argue that state and local leaders should take the lead in designing new assessments guided by two core principles: First, make assessments coherent with rich curriculum and instruction; second, ground this integration of curriculum, instruction, and embedded assessments in equity-focused research on learning.
References
Section:
|
Bang, M., Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94 (6), 1008–1026. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Black, P., Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5 (1), 7–74. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Clark-Ibañez, M. (2004). Framing the social world with photo-elicitation interviews. The Behavioral Scientist, 47 (12), 1507–1527. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Deming, W.E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
diSessa, A.A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In Forman, G., Pufall, P. (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (Vol. 49–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Elmore, R.F. (2003). Accountability and capacity. In Carnoy, M., Elmore, R.F., Siskin, L.S. (Eds.), The new accountability: High schools and high-stakes testing (pp. 195–209). New York, NY: Routledge Falmer. Google Scholar | |
|
Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Local instruction theories as means of support for teachers in reform mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6 (2), 105–128. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Pellegrino, J.W., Wilson, M.R., Koenig, J.A., Beatty, A.S., (Eds.) (2014). Developing assessments for the next generation science standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Penuel, W.R., DeBarger, A.H., Boscardin, C.K., Moorthy, S., Beauvineau, Y., Kennedy, C., Allison, K. (2017). Investigating science curriculum adaptation as a strategy to improve teaching and learning. Science Education, 101 (1), 66–98. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Penuel, W.R., Shepard, L.A. (2016). Assessment and teaching. In Gitomer, D.H., Bell, C.A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 787–850). Washington, DC: AERA. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday. Google Scholar | |
|
Shepard, L.A., Davidson, K.L., Bowman, R. (2011). How middle school mathematics teachers use interim and benchmark assessment data. CSE Technical Report 807. Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. Google Scholar | |
|
Simon, M.A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26 (2), 114–145. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Smith, C.L., Wiser, M., Anderson, C.W., Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic-molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 4 (1&2), 1–98. Google Scholar | Crossref |
