Abstract
The many advantages of reading digitally also bring with them implications for how we learn differently when we read differently. The author suggests that new contemporary technologies are changing the very notion of what it means to read. Even millennials acknowledge that their attention is more focused when they read print rather than online. But they also perceive print as boring. If print is increasingly seen as more boring than digital text, will our ability to read print generally diminish? Since online technology is tailor-made for searching for information rather than analyzing complex ideas, might the meaning of “reading” become finding information rather than contemplating and understanding?
|
Ackerman, R., Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17 (1), 18–32. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Baron, N.S. (2013). Redefining reading: The impact of digital communication media. PMLA, 128 (1), 193–200. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Baron, N.S. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. New York, NY: Oxford. Google Scholar | |
|
Baron, N.S., Calixte, R.M., Havewala, M. (2017). The persistence of print among university students: An exploratory study. Telematics & Informatics, 34, 590–604. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Carrier, L.M., Rosen, L.D., Cheever, N.A., Lim, A.F. (2015). Causes, effects, and practicalities of everyday multitasking. Developmental Review, 35, 64–78. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Dyson, M.C., Haselgrove, M. (2000). The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen. Journal of Research in Reading, 23 (2), 210–223. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Farinosi, M., Lim, C., Roll, J. (2016). Book or screen, pen or keyboard? A cross-cultural sociological analysis of writing and reading habits basing on Germany, Italy, and the UK. Telematics and Informatics, 33 (2), 410–421. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned? Science, 232 (5910), 69–71. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hayles, K. (2012). How we think: Digital media and contemporary technogenesis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Jabr, F. (2013, 4 11). The reading brain in the digital age: The science of paper versus screens. Scientific American. Google Scholar | |
|
Kaufman, G., Flanagan, M. (2016). High-low split: Divergent cognitive construal levels triggered by digital and nondigital platforms. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM, pp. 2773–2777. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B.R., Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Barthel, M., Shearer, E. (2016, 7 7). The modern news consumer: News attitudes and practices in the digital age. New York, NY: Pew Research Center. www.journalism.org/2016/07/07/the-modern-news-consumer Google Scholar | |
|
Nielsen, J. (2008, 5 6). How little do users read? Fremont, CA: Nielsen Norman Group. www.nngroup.com/articles/how-little-do-users-read/ Google Scholar | |
|
Paul, A.M. (2014, 4 10). Students reading e-books are losing out, study suggests.New York Times. Google Scholar | |
|
Schugar, J.T., Schugar, H., Penny, C. (2011). A Nook or a book? Comparing college students’ reading comprehension levels, critical reading, and study skills. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7 (2), 174–192. Google Scholar | |
|
Schugar, H.R., Smith, C.A., Schugar, J.T. (2013). Teaching with interactive e-books in grades K-6. The Reading Teacher, 66 (8), 615–624. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Tenopir, C., King, D.W., Edwards, S., Wu, L. (2009). Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspective, 61 (1), 5–32. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |

