The many advantages of reading digitally also bring with them implications for how we learn differently when we read differently. The author suggests that new contemporary technologies are changing the very notion of what it means to read. Even millennials acknowledge that their attention is more focused when they read print rather than online. But they also perceive print as boring. If print is increasingly seen as more boring than digital text, will our ability to read print generally diminish? Since online technology is tailor-made for searching for information rather than analyzing complex ideas, might the meaning of “reading” become finding information rather than contemplating and understanding?

Ackerman, R., Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17 (1), 1832.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Baron, N.S. (2013). Redefining reading: The impact of digital communication media. PMLA, 128 (1), 193200.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Baron, N.S. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. New York, NY: Oxford.
Google Scholar
Baron, N.S., Calixte, R.M., Havewala, M. (2017). The persistence of print among university students: An exploratory study. Telematics & Informatics, 34, 590604.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Carrier, L.M., Rosen, L.D., Cheever, N.A., Lim, A.F. (2015). Causes, effects, and practicalities of everyday multitasking. Developmental Review, 35, 6478.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Dyson, M.C., Haselgrove, M. (2000). The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen. Journal of Research in Reading, 23 (2), 210223.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Farinosi, M., Lim, C., Roll, J. (2016). Book or screen, pen or keyboard? A cross-cultural sociological analysis of writing and reading habits basing on Germany, Italy, and the UK. Telematics and Informatics, 33 (2), 410421.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned? Science, 232 (5910), 6971.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hayles, K. (2012). How we think: Digital media and contemporary technogenesis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Jabr, F. (2013, 4 11). The reading brain in the digital age: The science of paper versus screens. Scientific American.
Google Scholar
Kaufman, G., Flanagan, M. (2016). High-low split: Divergent cognitive construal levels triggered by digital and nondigital platforms. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM, pp. 27732777.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B.R., Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 6168.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Barthel, M., Shearer, E. (2016, 7 7). The modern news consumer: News attitudes and practices in the digital age. New York, NY: Pew Research Center. www.journalism.org/2016/07/07/the-modern-news-consumer
Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. (2008, 5 6). How little do users read? Fremont, CA: Nielsen Norman Group. www.nngroup.com/articles/how-little-do-users-read/
Google Scholar
Paul, A.M. (2014, 4 10). Students reading e-books are losing out, study suggests.New York Times.
Google Scholar
Schugar, J.T., Schugar, H., Penny, C. (2011). A Nook or a book? Comparing college students’ reading comprehension levels, critical reading, and study skills. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7 (2), 174192.
Google Scholar
Schugar, H.R., Smith, C.A., Schugar, J.T. (2013). Teaching with interactive e-books in grades K-6. The Reading Teacher, 66 (8), 615624.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tenopir, C., King, D.W., Edwards, S., Wu, L. (2009). Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspective, 61 (1), 532.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

PDK-article-ppv for $5.00