Abstract
Houston’s experience with the Educational Value-Added Assessment System (R) (EVAAS) raises questions that other districts should consider before buying the software and using it for high-stakes decisions. Researchers found that teachers in Houston, all of whom were under the EVAAS gun, but who taught relatively more racial minority students, higher proportions of English language learners, higher proportions of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunches, and higher proportions of special education students, had significantly lower EVAAS scores than colleagues teaching elsewhere in the Houston district. Hence, results suggest that the EVAAS does not, at least in Houston and perhaps elsewhere, offer states, districts, and schools the precise, reliable, and unbiased results that go far beyond what other simplistic [value-added] models found in the market today can provide, as the software owner, SAS Institute Inc., claims. Rather, evidence shows that EVAAS estimates in Houston, and likely elsewhere, may be biased against teachers who teach disproportionate percentages of certain type of students in their classrooms.
|
American Educational Research Association (AERA) Council . (2015). AERA statement on use of value-added models (VAM) for the evaluation of educators and educator preparation programs. Educational Researcher, 44 (8), 1–5. http://bit.ly/AERAonVAMS Google Scholar | |
|
American Statistical Association (ASA) . (2014). ASA statement on using value-added models for educational assessment. www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/POL-ASAVAM-Statement.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Amrein-Beardsley, A., Collins, C., Holloway-Libell, J., Paufler, N.A. (2016). Everything is bigger (and badder) in Texas: Houston’s teacher value-added system. [Commentary]. Teachers College Record. www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?%20ContentId=18983 Google Scholar | |
|
Collins, C. (2014). Houston, we have a problem: Teachers find no value in the SAS Education Value-Added Assessment System (EVAAS®). Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, 2–139 Google Scholar | |
|
Collins, C., Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2014). Putting growth and value-added models on the map: A national overview. Teachers College Record, 16 (1). www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?%20ContentId=17291 Google Scholar | |
|
Holloway-Libell, J. (2015). Evidence of grade and subject-level bias in value-added measures. Teachers College Record, 117. Google Scholar | |
|
Houston Federation of Teachers (Plaintiff) v. Houston Independent School District (Defendant), Civil No. 4:14-CV-01189 . (2015). United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. Google Scholar | |
|
Houston Independent School District . (2015a). State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness performance, grades 3-8, spring 2015. Houston, TX: Author. http://bit.ly/HISD_STAAR Google Scholar | |
|
Houston Independent School District . (2015b). State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness end-of-course results, spring 2015. Houston, TX: Author. www.houstonisd.org/Page/69852 Google Scholar | |
|
Kane, M.T. (2017). Measurement error and bias in value-added models (ETS RR–17- 25). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services. doi:10.1002/ets2.12153. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ets2.12153/full Google Scholar | |
|
Kappler Hewitt, K. (2015). Educator evaluation policy that incorporates EVAAS value-added measures: Undermined intentions and exacerbated inequities. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23 (76), 1–49. Google Scholar | |
|
Koedel, C., Mihaly, K., Rockoff, J.E. (2015). Value-added modeling: A review. Economics of Education Review, 47, 180–195. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP) . (n.d.). Value-added measures in teacher evaluation: Position statement. Reston, VA: Author. www.nassp.org/who-we-are/board-of-directors/position-statements/value-added-measures-in-teacher-evaluation?%20SSO=true Google Scholar | |
|
Newton, X., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Thomas, E. (2010). Value-added modeling of teacher effectiveness: An exploration of stability across models and contexts. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 18 (23). doi: 10.14507/epaa.v18n23.2010 Google Scholar | Medline | |
|
SAS Institute Inc . (n.d.). SAS EVAAS for K-12: Assess and predict student performance with precision and reliability. Cary, NC: Author. www.sas.com/en_ph/industry/k-12-education/evaas.html Google Scholar | |
|
U.S. Department of Education . (2010). International education rankings suggest reform can lift U.S. https://blog.ed.gov/2010/12/international-education-rankings-suggest-reform-can-lift-u-s/ Google Scholar |

