![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Teachers may be confused or put off by buzzwords like “design thinking,” but the concept is a useful one: To solve stubborn, everyday problems of practice in schools, they should approach those problems strategically and systematically. Specifically, explain the authors, teachers gain new insights into challenges they face when they take steps to empathize with students, come to terms with the uncertainties of school change, and learn to think of themselves as designers.
References
Section:
|
Lahey, J. (2017, 1 4). How design thinking became a buzzword at school. The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/01/how-design-thinking-became-a-buzzword-at-school/512150/ Google Scholar | |
|
Norton, P., Hathaway, D. (2015). In search of a teacher education curriculum: Appropriating a design lens to solve problems of practice. Educational Technology, 55 (6), 3–14. Google Scholar | |
|
Plattner, H. (2015). Bootcamp bootleg. Institute of Design at Stanford. https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/the-bootcamp-bootleg Google Scholar | |
|
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., Leifer, L. (2010). Design thinking: Understand-improve-apply. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media. Google Scholar | |
|
Simon, H.A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Smith, S., Henriksen, D. (2016). Fail again, fail better: Embracing failure as a paradigm for creative learning in the arts. Art Education 69 (2), 6–11. Google Scholar | |
|
Watson, A.D. (2015). Design thinking for life. Art Education, 68 (3), 12. Google Scholar |
